• Aucun résultat trouvé

arXiv:1107.4677v1 [math.DG] 23 Jul 2011

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "arXiv:1107.4677v1 [math.DG] 23 Jul 2011"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

arXiv:1107.4677v1 [math.DG] 23 Jul 2011

ON ORBIFOLDS

XIANZHE DAI, KEFENG LIU, AND XIAONAN MA

Abstract. In this note, we explain that Ross-Thomas’ result [4, Theorem 1.7] on the weighted Bergman kernels on orbifolds can be directly deduced from our previous result [1]. This result plays an important role in the companion paper [5] to prove an orbifold version of Donaldson Theorem.

In two very interesting papers [4, 5], Ross-Thomas describe a no- tion of ampleness for line bundles on K¨ahler orbifolds with cyclic quo- tient singularities which is related to embeddings in weighted projective spaces. They then apply the results in [4] to prove an orbifold version of Donaldson Theorem [5]. Namely, the existence of an orbifold K¨ahler metric with constant scalar curvature implies certain stability condi- tion for the orbifold. In these papers, the result [4, Theorem 1.7] on the asymptotic expansion of Bergman kernels plays a crucial role.

In this note, we explain how to directly derive Ross-Thomas’ result [4, Theorem 1.7] from Dai-Liu-Ma [1, (5.25)], provided Ross-Thomas condition [4, (1.8)] on ci holds. Since in [1, §5], we state our results for general symplectic orbifolds, in what follows, we will just use the version from [2, Theorem 5.4.11], where Ma-Marinescu wrote them in detail for K¨ahler orbifolds. We will use freely the notation in [2, §5.4].

We assume also the auxiliary vector bundle E therein is C.

Let (X, J, ω) be a compactn-dimensional K¨ahler orbifold with com- plex structureJ, and with singular setXsing. Let (L, hL) be a holomor- phic Hermitian proper orbifold line bundle on X. Let ∇L be the holo- morphic Hermitian connections on (L, hL) with curvatureRL= (∇L)2.

We assume that (L, hL,∇L) is a prequantum line bundle, i.e., RL=−2π√

−1ω.

(0.1)

Let gT X = ω(·, J·) be the Riemannian metric on X induced by ω.

Let ∇T X be the Levi-Civita connection on (X, gT X). We denote by RT X = (∇T X)2 the curvature, by rX the scalar curvature of ∇T X. For x∈X, set d(x, Xsing) := infyXsingd(x, y) the distance from xto Xsing.

1

(2)

For p ∈ N, the Bergman kernel Pp(x, x) (x, x ∈ X) is the smooth kernel of the orthogonal projection from C(X, Lp) onto H0(X, Lp), with respect to the Riemannian volume formdvX(x).

Theorem 0.1 ([1, Theorem 1.4], [2, Theorem 5.4.10]). There exist smooth coefficientsbbbr(x)∈C(X)which are polynomials inRT X, and its derivatives with order 6 2r−2 at x and C0 >0 such that for any k, l∈N, there exist Ck,l >0, M ∈N with

(0.2) 1

pnPp(x, x)− Xk

r=0

bbbr(x)prCl 6Ck,l

pk1+pl/2(1 +√pd(x, Xsing))MeC0p d(x,Xsing) , for any x∈X, p∈N. Moreover

bbb0 = 1, bbb1 = 1 8πrX. (0.3)

In local coordinates, there is a more precise form [1, (5.25)], see also [2, Theorem 5.4.11]. Let{xi}Ii=1⊂Xsing. For each pointxi we consider corresponding local charts (Gxi,Uexi) → Uxi with Uexi ⊂ Cn, such that 0 ∈ Uexi is the inverse image of xi ∈ Uxi, and 0 is a fixed point of the finite stabilizer group Gxi at xi, which acts C-linearly and effectively onCn (cf. [2, Lemma 5.4.3]). We assume moreover that

BUexi(0,2ε)⊂Uexi, and Xsing ⊂W :=∪Ii=1BUexi(0,1

4ε)/Gxi. Let Uexgi be the fixed point set of g ∈ Gxi in Uexi, and let Nexi,g be the normal bundle of Uexgi in Uexi. For each g ∈ Gxi, the exponential map Nexi,g,ex ∋ Y → expUxeexi(Y) identifies a neighborhood of Uexgi with Wfxi,g ={Y ∈ Nexi,g,|Y|6 ε}. We identify L|Wfxi,g with L|Uexig by using the parallel transport along the above exponential map. Then the g- action onL|Wfxi,g is the multiplication byeg, andθg is locally constant onUexgi.

Let ∇Nexi,g be the connection on Nexi,g induced by the Levi-Civita connection via projection. We trivialize Nexi,g ≃ Uexgi × Cng by the parallel transport along the curve [0,1] ∋ t → tZe1,g for Ze1,g ∈ Uexgi, which identifies also the metric on Nexi,g with the canonical metric on Cng. If Ze ∈ fWxi,g, we will write Ze = (Ze1,g,Ze2,g) with Ze1,g ∈ Uexgi, Ze2,g ∈ Cng. We will denote by Z the corresponding point on the orbifold.

(3)

Theorem 0.2([1, (5.25)], [2, Theorem 5.4.11]). On Uexi as above, there exist polynomialsK

r,Ze1,g(Ze2,g)inZe2,g of degree63r, of the same parity as r, whose coefficients are polynomials in RT X and its derivatives of order 6r−2, and a constant C0 >0 such that for any k, l∈N, there exist Ck,l >0, N ∈N such that

(0.4)

1

pnPp(Z,e Ze)− Xk

r=0

bbbr(Ze)pr

− X2k

r=0

pr2 X

16=gGx0

egpK

r,Ze1,g(√pZe2,g)e2πph(1g1)ez2,g,ez2,gi Cl 6Ck,l

pk1+pk+l−12 (1 +√pd(Z, Xsing))NeC0p d(Z,Xsing) , for any|Ze|6ε/2,p∈N, withbbbr(Z)e as in Theorem 0.1 andK

0,Ze1,g = 1.

Given a function f(p, x) in p∈N and x∈X, we write f =OCj(pl) if the Cj-norm of f is uniformly bounded by C pl.

Theorem 0.3. Let (X, ω) be a compact n-dimensional K¨ahler orb- ifold with cyclic quotient singularities (i.e., the stabilizer group Gx is a cyclic group for any x∈ X), and L be a proper orbifold line bundle on X equipped with a Hermitian metric hL whose curvature form is

−2π√

−1ω, such that for any x ∈ X, the stabilizer group Gx acts on Lex as Z|G

x|-order cyclic group. Fix N ≥ 0, and r ≥ 0 and suppose ci

are a finite number of positive constants chosen so that if X has an orbifold point of order m then

1 m

X

i

ikci = X

iu mod m

ikci for all u and all k= 0,· · ·, N +r.

(0.5)

Then the function

Bporb(x) := X

i

ciPp+i(x, x).

(0.6)

admits a global C2r-expansion of order N. That is, there exist smooth functions b0,· · · , bN on X such that

Bporb = XN

j=0

bjpnj +OC2r(pnN1).

(0.7)

(4)

Furthermore, bj are universal polynomials in the constants ci and the derivatives of ω; in particular

b0 =X

i

ci, b1 =X

i

ci

n i+ 1 8πrX

. (0.8)

Remark 0.4. Theorem 0.3 recovers [4, Theorem 1.7]of Ross-Thomas, where the remainder estimate is OCr(pnN1).

We improve here their remainder estimate to OC2r(pnN1) and we get Theorem 0.3 directly from Theorems 0.1, 0.2.

Remark 0.5. By Ma-Marinescu [3, (3.30), Remark 3.10], [2, Theo- rem 4.1.3, Remark 5.4.13], Theorem 0.3 generalizes to any J-invariant metric gT X on T X. Set Θ := gT X(J·,·). The only change is that the coefficients in the expansion become

b0 = ωn Θn

X

i

ci, b1 = ωn Θn

X

i

ci

n i+ rXω 8π − 1

4π∆ωlog ωn

Θn (0.9) ,

where rXω, ∆ω are the scalar curvature and the Bochner Laplacian as- sociated to gωT X =ω(·, J·). Moreover, (0.7) can be taken to be uniform as (hL, gT X) runs over a compact set.

Proof of Theorem 0.3. Recall that now Gis a cyclic group of order m.

Letζ be a generator ofG. From the local condition for orbi-ample line bundles, ζ acts on Lxi as a primitive m-th root of unity λ. Thus in (0.4), eζuu. For u∈ {1,· · · , m−1}, set

ηu =eh(1ζ−u)ez2,ζu,ez2,ζui, (0.10)

Su(Z) =e X

i

ci

2NX+2r+1 j=0

(p+i)nj2K

j,Ze1,ζu(p

p+iZe2,ζuu(p+i)ηup+i,

S2 =

m1

X

u=1

Su, S1 =X

i

ci

N+rX

j=0

bbbj(Ze)(p+i)nj.

HereZ =z+z, and z =P

izi

∂zi,z =P

izi

∂zi when we consider them as vector fields, and ∂zi

2 = ∂zi

2 = 1

2. Similarly for Ze (and those with subscripts).

(5)

Applying (0.4) for k =N +r+ 1 we obtain for |Ze| ≤ε/2, (0.11) Bporb(Z)e − S1− S2

Cl 6ClpnNr2

1 +pl+12 (1 +√pd(Z, Xsing))MeC0p d(Z,Xsing)

+X

i

ci(p+i)nNr1

mX1 u=1

K

2N+2r+2,Ze1,ζu(p

p+iZe2,ζuup+iCl+bbbN+r+1(Ze)Cl

! . In what follows, we write for simplicity Ze1,ζu as Z1,u and Ze2,ζu as

Z2,u. For a function f(p, Z) with p ∈ N and |Z| ≤ ε/2 we write f =OCj(g(p, Z)) if theCj-norm of f inZ can be uniformly controlled by C|g(p, Z)|.

Note thatKj,Z

1,u(Z2,u) is a polynomial in Z2,u with the same parity as j and degKj,Z

1,u ≤ 3j. Denote by Kj,Z

1,u,l the l-homogeneous part of Kj,Z

1,u. Then Kj,Z

1,u,l = 0 if l and j are not in the same parity or l >3j. By (0.10),

(0.12) Su(Z) =X

i

ci

2N+2r+1X

j=0

X

l

(p+i)nj2lKj,Z

1,u,l(Z2,uu(p+i)ηup+i

up

2N+2r+1X

j=0



 X

lj2n nXj−l2

q=0

+ X

l<j2n N+rX

q=0

Kj,Z

1,u,l(√pZ2,u)

× pn2jq

n− j2l

q

X

i

ciiqλuiηup+i )

+OC2r(pnN1).

Here we used (p+i)γ = PN+r q=0 pγq

γ q

iq +O(pγNr1) for γ < 0 and the following relations for r, r′′∈N, r′′ ≤l,

Kj,Z

1,u,l(√pZ2,upu =OCr′(pr2ηup/2), Kj,Z

1,u,l(√pZ2,u) =OCr′′(p2l|Z2,u|lr′′).

(0.13)

In order to prove (0.7) it is sufficient to show that for 0≤ l ≤ N +r, r ≤2r,

wl,p:=X

i

ciilλuiηup+i=OCr′(plNr1+r2ηp/2u ).

(0.14)

In fact, we will prove thatwl,p =OCr′(plNr1+r2η(34r

8r)p

u ) forr ≤2r.

(6)

Sincedwl,p = ηu

u(pwl,p+wl+1,p), and ηu

u has a termz2,u orz2,u which can be absorbed by ηu8r1p to get a factor p1/2, we see by induction that it is sufficient to prove wl,p =OC0(plNr1η

3 4p

u ). To this end, write wl,p =

P

iciilλuiηuiu−1)N+rl+1

u−1)N+rl+1ηup. (0.15)

Sinceλ is a primitive m-th root of unity, λu 6= 1 if u∈ {1,· · · , m−1}. From [4, Lemma 3.5], under the condition (0.5), the function η → P

iciilλuiηi has a root of orderN +r−l+ 1 atη = 1 and so the term in square brackets is bounded.

For|z2,u| ≤ε, we have by (0.10),

u−1| ≤C|z2,u|2. (0.16)

By using (0.10) and (0.16) and the fact that [0,∞) ∋ x 7→ xsex is bounded for any s≥0, we get

u−1)sηup/4 =O(ps) for s ≥1.

(0.17)

Thus, wl,p=OC0(plNr1η

3 4p

u ) and (0.14) follows.

Back in (0.12), for q > N +r, the corresponding contribution is certainly pnj2q· OC2r(prηup/2) =OC2r(pnN1ηup/2), by (0.13). On the other hand, if 0≤q ≤N+r, then, by (0.13) and (0.14), the correspond- ing contribution ispnj2q·OC2r(pqNr1+r(1+√p|Z2,u|)6N+6r+3ηup/2) = OC2r(pnN1ηup/4) again. ThusSu =OC2r(pnN1).

From (0.10) and the above argument, S2 =OC2r(pnN1). Combin- ing with (0.10), (0.11) and (0.13), we get (0.7) and (0.8).

References

[1] X. Dai, K. Liu, and X. Ma, On the asymptotic expansion of Bergman kernel, J. Differential Geom. 72(2006), 1– 41.

[2] X. Ma and G. Marinescu, Holomorphic Morse inequalities and Bergman ker- nels, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 254, Birkh¨auser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 2007, 422 pp.

[3] X. Ma and G. Marinescu, Generalized Bergman kernels on symplectic mani- folds, Adv. Math. 217 (2008), no. 4, 1756–1815.

[4] J. Ross and R. Thomas, Weighted Bergman kernels on orbifolds.

arXiv:0907.5215, J. Differential Geom. 88(2011), 87– 108.

[5] J. Ross and R. Thomas, Weighted projective embeddings, stability of orbifolds, and constant scalar curvature K¨ahler metrics, J. Differential Geom. 88(2011), 109– 160.

(7)

Department of Mathematics, UCSB, CA 93106 USA E-mail address: dai@math.ucsb.edu

Center of Mathematical Science, Zhejiang University and Depart- ment of Mathematics, UCLA, CA 90095-1555, USA

E-mail address: liu@math.ucla.edu

Universit´e Paris Diderot - Paris 7, UFR de Math´ematiques, Case 7012, Site Chevaleret, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France

E-mail address: ma@math.jussieu.fr

Références

Documents relatifs

We show that scalar as well as vector and tensor metric perturbations in the Randall Sundrum II braneworld allow normalizable tachyonic modes, i.e., instabilities.. These

• What issues and opportunities do we want to discuss in order to bring high-quality mental health services to all seniors living in long-term care facilities?. • What will we do

This can’t work perfectly, since the model predicts that individual birds have an element of randomness in their choice of direc- tion relative to their neighbors, but as shown in

Among these models, intestinal perfusion is the most common experiment used to study the in vivo drug permeability and intestinal metabolism in different regions of the

Under the table Behind the chairs Through the door And down the stairs What are we doing. We’re singing

Since the Federal Government has not yet decided whether to reimburse the vaccination, which costs around 700 CHF at present, until now only two cantons (Geneva and Valais) have

Differential Equations 259 (2015), no. Yun, Ellipsoidal BGK model near a global Maxwellian, SIAM J. Walender, On the temperature jump in a rarefied gas, Ark, Fys. Duan) Department

As applications, we present a con- struction of globally convergent power series of integrable Beltrami differentials on Calabi-Yau manifolds, and use an iteration method to