R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
J. I. B ERTOLO D. L. F ERNANDEZ
On the connection between the real and the complex interpolation method for several Banach spaces
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 66 (1982), p. 193-209
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1982__66__193_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1982, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
Complex Interpolation Method for Several Banach Spaces.
J. I. BERTOLO - D. L. FERNANDEZ
(*)
SUMMARY - The
objective
of this paper is to exhibit some connections bet-ween the real and the
complex interpolation
method for 2n Banach spaces.A version of the Lions-Peetre
interpolation
method for 2n Banach spaces and someproperties
of thecomplex
methodinvolving multiple
Poissonintegrals
arepresented. Applications
to spaces with a dominant mixed derivatives aregiven.
Introduction.
The
study
of theintepolation
spaces of several Banach spacesby
real methods has been made
by
Yoshikawa[15], Sparr [14]
and Fer-nandez [4],
andby complex
methodby Lions [7], Favini [3]
andFernandez
[5].
The aim of this paper is to exhibit some connections between the real and the
complex interpolation
methods for several Banach spaces and togive applications
to the spaces with a dominant mixed deri- vative.First we
give
a version of a realinterpolation
method among 2n(*)
Author’s address: J. I. BERTOLO:Departamento
de Matematica - UNESP 13500 - Rio Claro - San Paolo(Brasil)
and D. L. FERNANDEZ: Insti- tuto de Matematica - UNICAMP - Caixa Postal 6155 - 13100Campinas -
San Paolo
(Brasil).
The second author was
supported
inpart by
agrant
from theCNPq-
Brasil
(Proc. 111.1600/78).
Banach spaces
along
the lines of Lions-Peetre[8].
These spaces thus constructed are similar to some studiedby
one of the authors in[4]
and
[6].
We recall the definition of thecomplex
method for 2" Banach spaces and thengive
some newproperties
of these spacesalong
thelines of Calder6n
[2]
and Peetre[13]. Using
theHausdorff-Young
theorem for Ll spaces with mixed norms, as
given by
Benedek-Pan-zone in
[1],
andborrowing
some ideas from Peetre[13]
wegive
aconnection between the real and the
complex interpolation
space among 2n Banach spaces. As aby-product
we show that for Hilbert spaces the twointerpolation
spaces coincide. Ourdevelopment
iscarried out in the context of the LP spaces with mixed norms of Benedek-Panzone
[1].
As an
application
of thetheory
wegive
somerelationships
betweenthe
Lipschitz
spaces ofNikol’skii [1-l-]
and ofpotential
spaces of Lizorkin-Nikol’skii[10].
1. Generalities on
interpolation
for 2n Banach spaces.Let us denote
by
D the set of such thatkj
= 0 or 1. We have 0 ={O, 1}
when n =1,
and D ={(O, 0), (1, 0), (0,1 ), (1,1)}
when n = 2. The families ofobjects
we shall considerwill take indices in D.
We shall consider families of 2n Banach spaces E
D)
embed-ded in one and a same linear Hausdorff space V. Such a
family
willbe called an admissible
family (of
Banach spaces(in V)).
If lE = E
n)
is an admissiblefamily
of Banach spaces, the linearhull I
E and the intersectionn E
can be introduced in the usual way.They
are Banach spaces under the normsand
The
spaces Y
Eand n E
arecontinuously
embedded in V.A Banach space .E which
satisfy
will
be,
called an intermediacte space(with respect
toE).
(Hereafter
c will denote continuousembeddings).
A
pair
of Banach spaces(E, .F’),
intermediaterespect
to the admis-sible families l~ _
(Eklk
ED) (in V)
and F =(F, Ik
ED) (in W )
respec-tively,
has theinterpolation property
if for every linearmapping
fromI E into I F
such thatit follows that
(we
agree that -7 will denote bounded linearmappings).
REMARK. Observe that T :
implies
2. The real
interpolation
spaces(E; O ; P) .
Let E= E
D)
be an admissiblefamily
of Banach spaces.For t =
(tl,
... ,in)
> 0 and k = ... ,kn)
e D weset tk = tk,... tnn.
For y E n E
we defineObserve that
J(l,..., 1; y)
= and for each tfixed, J(t; y)
isa
functional
norm inn
E.Now,
let us denoteby Lr
the LP space, onRi =
with
respect
to the Haar measure d*t =dt1/tl
...dtn/tn .
If .~ is aBanach space,
L:(F)
is theZ~
space of thestrongly
measurable func- tions such thatL: .
For notations and resultson LP spaces, with mixed norms see
[1].
With the above notation we have the
following proposition.
PROPOSITION 2.1. Assume that
, then the
following
conditions areequivalent
and
PROOF.
Indeed,
thefollowing inequalities
hold:and
Now,
we introduce the spaces( E ; O ; P).
DEFINITION 2.2. We
de f ine (E; e; P)
to be the spaceof
all elementsx
E !
Efor
which there exists acf unction
~c : withII u(t) 111 E
E.L* ,
which
satisfy 2.1 ( 1 )
or2.1(2)
and 8uch thatPROPOSITION 2.3. The space
(E; 8; P)
is an intermediate Banach space under any oneof
thefollowing equivalent
normswhere the
in f imum
is taken on all u whichsatis f y 2.2 (1 ) .
It will be convenient to work also with an
interpolation
spaceslightly
moregeneral
than the spaces(E; e; P ) just
introduced.DEFINITION 2.4. Let E =
(Ek/k
ED)
be an admissibtefamily of
=(9iy...y~)l)
wedefine
the spaceo f
allf or
which there is af unction
U:Rj - n
E with U e suchthat
2.2(1)
holds and thefollowing
conditions aresatis f ied
We
equip ( E ; O ; P)
with the normWe see at once that the
following proposition
holds.PROPOSITION 2.5. it
follows
thatThe spaces
(E; O ; P )
and(E; O ; P)
have the so calledinterpolation property.
For theproof
and furtherproperties
of these spaces see Fernandez[4]
and[6].
3. The
complex interpolation
spaces[E; 0].
We shall recall
briefly
the notion of thecomplex
method of inter-polation
for 2n Banach spaces. For theproofs
see Fernandez[5].
Let E=
(Ek jk
ED)
be an admissiblefamily
of Banach spaces.3.1. The spaces of all
5~
E-valued functionsf (z) defined,
continuousand bounded on the
n-strip
Sn(product
of n unitstrips)
which are
holomorphic
on the interior of withrespect
to the normof I E,
and such thatf (k + it)
EEk
and areEk-continuous
and boun- ded for all k E 0 will be denotedby H(E).
The space endowed with the norm
becomes a Banach space.
This spaces is a intermediate Banach space under the norm
Also,
the spaces[E; 0]
have theinterpolation property.
EXEMPLE 1. Let
Po
=(Po,
...,Pl)
andPl
=(Pi,
...,Pi)
begiven
with Consider
(Pk)kED
the sequence of admissible powers associated withPo
andPi (Pk
=(Pki, ... , P~~, ... , Pkn)
wherek
= 0 or1),
and setwhere
be the space
If
(Sklk
ED)
is afamily
of admissibleparameters
associated with is afamily
of admissible powers associated withPo
andP1,
wherewhere
proof
and details see[5].
4. A characterization of
[E ; O] involving
the Poisson kernel.4.1. The Poisson kernels for the unit
strip S
will be denotedby Po(s, y)
andP,(s, y). They
can be obtained from the Poisson kernel for thehalf-plane by mapping conformally
the halfplane
onto thestrip. Explicitly
these kernels are4.2. For k =
(k,,
... , let us set the k-Poisson kernel for thepoly-strip Sn:
here
PROPOSITION 4.3..l~or all
f
EH(E)
and) >we have
PROOF.
Let gk
be a boundedinfinitely
differentiable function such thatLet F be an
analytic
function such thatSuch a function exists and Re
{F(k + it))
=gk(t). Furthermore,
thedifferentiability of gk implies
thatF(z)
is continuous in0 ~ ~’ ~ 1.
Consequently
and since
it follows that
Consequently
and Hence
Takink now a
decreasing
sequence of functionsgk,y converging
to+ respectively,
andpassing
to the limit we obtainthe result.
COROLLARY 4.4. For
f
EH(E)
and 0S
=(S1’ .., sn) 1,
we havewhere
PROOF. We observe that
From this and from Jensen’s
inequality
it follows thatfor all
Now,
from4.3(1)
and theseinequalities,
we obtainthis
gives 4.4(1).
It remains to prove
4.4(2).
Thefollowing inequality
holdsThis follows
by
induction from the well known case n = l :Let us set
in the above
inequality. Again, by 4.3 (1 ),
and the aboveinequality
we
get 4.4(2 ) :
PROPOSITION 4.5. Let a E
[E; O]
andf
EH(E)
be such thatf(09)
= a.Suppo-ge
thatwhere E
D)
is af amily of
admissibleparameters
associated toQo
and
QI
and such that 1Qk
00. ThenPROOF. Due to
corollary
4.4 we havePROPOSITION 4.6 Let
f
be a continuous and E-valuedfunction
on thepolystrip
Sn which isanalytic
on the interiorof
Sn andsuch that
where E
D)
are admissibleparameters,
with 1 00, and asso-ciated to
Qo
= ... , andQI = (q’,
... ,q’). Then, i f f (0) =
a ttfollows
that a E[ lE ; ÐJ.
PROOF. The assertion will be done if we show that there is a
Cauchy
sequence(aj)
in[lE, 0]
such that aj - ain ! E, as j
-7 00.Let
(q;j)
be a sequence ofnon-negative
continuous functions onsuch that
Now,
letf
begiven
as in thehypothesis,
y and let us setand
We shall show that
Ii
EH(E)
and ajErE; 0]. First,
we observe thatfix
is
1 lE-holomorphic
inAlso,
it is bounded:From Minkowski’s
inequality,
y we haveSince E the Hölder
inequality implies
thatf j(k + it)
isEa-bounded:
This
inequality
alsoimplies
that+ it)
isEk-continuous. Thus
it follows that
f ~
EH(E)
andconsequently
aj = E[E; e].
Now,
theinequality
implies
thatIt remains to show that
(aj)
is aCauchy
sequence in[E; e].
Weshall use the
inequality 4.5(2):
Now, given E
>0,
there is aninteger N
such thatif
Hence,
forn, m ~ N
it follows that~
The
proof
iscomplete.
. The
Hausdorff-Young theorem,
forL’
spaces with mixed norm, and spaces oftype
P.We recall the
Hausdorff-Young
theorem in the formgiven by
Benedek-Panzone
[1].
THEOREM 5.1. Let
Ff
be the Fouriertrans f orm of f
E andsuch that Then
where
11P
_-_ 1 andC(P)
=1.I f
1c P c 2
and thecomponents of
P are notmonotonically non-increasing
then~.1 (1 )
does not holdfor
anyC(P).
Now, following Peetre [13]
and the above theorem we set.DEFINITION 5.2. Let E be a
given
Banach space and P =(p,,
... ,pn)
an
n-tuple
with1 ~ pn ... ~ pl ~ 2. I f for
some constantC(P)
it holdsthat
for
allf
ELP(E),
the space .E will be calledof type
P.When p1= ... = p~ = p theorem
5.1,
reduces to the usual Haus-dorff-Young theorem,
and the definition5.2,
coincides with Peetre’s definition 2.1 in[13].
EXEMPLES 5.3.
5.3(1)
Banach spaces are oftype
1 =(1,
... ,1);
5.3(2)
Hilbert spaces are oftype
2 ={2, ... , 2);
5.3(3) (J. Peetre)
the space is oftype P
if1.P2;
5.3(4)
IfEk
is oftype Pk (k
ED),
where ED)
is afamily
ofpowers associated with
Po
andPi,
thenis of
type .P,
where =( 1- O/P2 . Indeed, by hypothesis
we haveThus But and
5.3(5)
If .E is reflexive then E and the dual spaces E’ are either oftype
P.6. A connection between the real and the
complex
method.As in the case n =
1,
we know thatwhere 1 =
(1,
... ,1 )
and oo =(00, ..., 00).
We shallgive
ageneraliz-
ation of this result.
THEOREM
(Eklk
ED)
be an admissiblefamily of
Banachspaces and
(P
=(Pklk E D))
af amily of
admissible powers associated with.Po
andPl. Now, if .Ek
iso f type Pk,
thenPROOF. We follow the ideas of
[13] (see
also[5]).
Let a E(E; O; P)
and u =
u(t)
EE)
such thatwith
Let us set
the n-dimensional Mellin transformation of u.
We see that
U(z)
isa ~
E-valuedholomorphic
function withBut, by
thechange
of variablestj
= exp(- s~ ),
weget
where
v(s)
=u (exp (-s)).
Butand since
Ek
is oftype Pk
is follows thatBy proposition
4.6 it follows that a E[E; 0].
CONVERSE. Let
a c [E; 19]. Then,
there isu c- H(E)
such thatac = =
u ( 81,
... ,6J.
Moreoveru(k + iy)
isE7,-bounded
and conti-nuous, for
any k E 0. But,
here we canreplace u(z) by u(z)
exp(z- e)2.
Thus we can suppose that
If we set
(the
inverse of the n-dimensional Mellintransformation)
we shall haveand
We see the
2.2(l)
and2.4(l)
are satisfied and thus a E(E; O ; P’ )
asdesired.
When the elements of an admissible
family
are Hilbert spaceswe have the
following
result.THEOREM 6.2. Let H = E
D)
be an admissiblefamily of
Hil-bert spacees. Then
PROOF. Since Hilbert spaces are of
type 2 = (2, ..., 2)
we have7.
Applications.
If
.M- _ (ml, ... , mn) E liTn
and1 P = (pl, ... , pn) oo,
let usconsider the Sobolev Nikols’kii spaces
(see [11]):
the
potential
space of Lizorkin-Nikols’kii i(see [l0a) :
Now, given
ltl =(ml,
... ,mn)
E let(Mk)kEp
be thefamily
of admissible
parameters
associated with .M =(m,,
...,m.)
and0 =
(0,
...,0) (that
is =(mkl’
...,mkn),
withMk,
= 0 orm;).
Letus set
where 1 C P =
(Pi, ... , p n ) C oo, 1 c Q
=( q, ... , q ) c oo, ~’
=(81 , ... , 8n)
and O -
( 8~, ... , On)
with6~
=Sj!mj,
0=1,
... , n.On the other hand we know that the spaces and are
isomorphic
via the Mihlin-Lizorkin theorem([9]
and[10]). Thus,
we have
where S, Mk
and P aregiven
as above.The Mihlin-Lizorkin theorem
implies
also thatWM,P
isisomorphic
to
Thus,
iflp~...pi2
and the spacesP
is oftype
P.Now, by
theorem 6.1 we haveMoreover,
y theorem 6.2implies
thatThe
embeddings 7.0(1)
and7.0(2)
hold for also P = 1 and P’ = oo, but notby
theorem 6.1.REFERENCES
[1]
A. BENEDEK - R. PANZONE, The spaces Lp, with mixed norm, Duke Math. J., 28 (1961), pp. 301-324.[2]
A. P. CALDERÓN, Intermediate spaces andinterpolation,
thecomplex
me- thod, Studia Math., 24(1964),
pp. 113-190.[3] A. FAVINI, Su una estensione del metodo
d’interpolazione complesso,
Rend.Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova, 47 (1972), pp. 244-298.
[4]
D. L. FERNANDEZ,Interpolation of 2n-tuples of
Banach spaces, StudiaMath.,
65(1979),
pp. 87-113.[5]
D. L. FERNANDEZ, An extensionof
thecomplex
methodof interpolation,
Boll. U.M.I., 18-B (1981), pp. 721-732.
[6]
D. L. FERNANDEZ, On theinterpolation of
2n Banach espaces - I: The Lions-Peetreinterpolation
method, Bull. Inst.Polytech.
Iasi(to appear).
[7]
J. L. LIONS, Une constructiond’espaces d’interpolation,
C. R. Acad. Sci.Paris, 251 (1960), pp. 1853-1855.
[8]
J. L. LIONS - J. PEETRE, Sur une classed’espaces d’interpolation,
Pub.Math. de l’IHES, 19
(1964).
[9]
P. I. LIZORKIN, Generalized Liouvilledifferentiation
and thefunctional
space
Lnp(En). Imbedding
theorems, Math. Sb., 60(102) (1963),
pp. 325-353.[10]
P. I. LIZORKIN - S. M. NIKOLS’KII, Aclassification of differentiable func-
tions in some
fundamental
space with mixed derivetives, Proc. Steklov Inst. Mat., 77 (1967), pp. 160-187.[11]
S. M. NIKOLS’KII, Functions with dominant mixed derivativessatisfying
a
multiple
Hölder condition, AMS transl., 2 (102)(1973),
pp. 27-51.[12]
J. PEETRE, Sur le nombre deparamètres
dans ladéfinition
de certains espacesd’interpolation,
Ric. Mat., 12(1963),
pp. 248-261.[13] J. PEETRE, Sur le
transformation de
Fourier desfonctions à
valeurs vecto- rielles, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova, 42 (1969), pp. 15-26.[14]
G. SPARR,Interpolation of
several Banach spaces, Ann. Mat. PuraAppl.,
99(1974),
pp. 247-316.[15] A. YOSHIKAWA, Sur la théorie
d’espaces d’interpolation :
les espaces de moyenne deplusieurs
espaces de Banach, J. Fac. Sc. Univ.Tokyo,
16(1970),
pp. 407-468.Manoscritto