• Aucun résultat trouvé

The consultative process towards and International Mechanism of Scientific Expertise on Biodiversity (IMoSEB)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "The consultative process towards and International Mechanism of Scientific Expertise on Biodiversity (IMoSEB)"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

The consultative process towards

an

International Mechanism of

Scientific Expertise on

Biodiversity

Summary of development since February 2006

http://www.imoseb.net

executive-secretariat@imoseb.net

D. Babin

European Platform for Biodiversity Research Strategy meeting Helsinki, November 16-19, 2006

(2)

Background

A call for the launch of an international consultation to assess the need, scope and form of an international mechanism made by French President Jacques Chirac

The Conference of Paris “Biodiversity: Science and Governance” (Jan. 2005)

Warm-ups : 2005

- Constitution of an Interim Steering Committee (Jun. 2005)

- Inception of an Executive Secretariat (Nov. 2005)

- Presentation of the initiative at several events (SBSTTA 10 & 11, WGRI- CBD, DIVERSITAS OSC, …)

- Establishment of the International Steering Committee of the consultative process towards an IMoSEB (Feb. 2006)

Photo: Franz Dejon / IISD

(3)

ISC recommendations

(Feb 2006)

Current biodiversity management should be improved at

multiple levels: local, national, regional, and global.

The consultation should :

-

define the needs

-

assess accomplishments in terms of delivery of scientific expertise

to decision makers

-

evaluate the effectiveness of existing bodies of scientific knowledge

for decision-making.

Based on the consultation, the ISC will provide a set of

recommendations for action

(4)

The Executive Committee

Co-chairs: Alfred Oteng-Yeboah / Michel Loreau

Members: Ivar Baste, Martha Chouchena-Rojas, Christine Dawson,

Horst Korn, Keping Ma, Georgina Mace, Martha Mapangou, Charles

Perrings, Peter Raven, José Sarukhan, Robert Watson, Jacques

Weber.

Appointment of the Executive Committee (14 members)

(5)

Plan of Action Step 1, March- November 2006

A limited set of case studies

Objectives :

- to identify the gaps between science and decision in some various cases of expertise

- to retain some lessons and options for an eventual mechanism.

Map out the decision-making landscape affecting biodiversity

(D. Raffaelli), with indigenous and local knowledges incorporated by K. Bannister

Studies on the mobilisation and use of expertise

The Mexican Case (J. Sarukhan) The avian flu (P. Daszak)

Analyse existing models delivering scientific expertise

Lessons from the IPCC, GBA and MA (I. Noble / B. Watson)

Lessons from invasive alien species management (Ph. Goulletquer) Lessons from fisheries (M. Héral)

(6)

Plan of Action Step 1, March - December 2006

A consultative process more and more well-knowned

Presentation / discussion at different events

• CDB Cop 8, March 2006, Curitiba (Brazil)

• EU Green week, June 2006, Brussels (Belgium)

• Conservation International Africa / Team Seminar, June 2006, (Madagascar)

• Meeting of EU Environment Ministers, July 2006, (Finland)

• European Congress on Conservation Biology, Aug. 2006, Eger (Hungary)

• IUCN Conference “Biodiversity in European Development Cooperation”, Sept. 2006, Paris

• Design of science policy interfaces workshop, Oct. 2006 Leipzig (Germany)

• IGFA annual meeting, Nov. 2006, Montréal (Canada)

• Earth Science System Partnership, Nov. 2006, Peking (China)

• Workshop of senior experts on the Implementation of the CBD, Dec. 2006, Postdam (Germany)

A media coverage increasing

Nature Article “Diversity without representation” (July 2006)

A website with an open electronic forum

(7)

Plan of action Step 2, December 2006 - June 2007

Second Executive committee meeting, Paris, 5-6 Dec 2006

- Analyse of the results of the first step,

- First options for a possible IMoSEB

- Definition of a strategic plan for the worldwide consultation

Wider consultation with regional consultation, Jan-June

2007

North-America (Canada, end of January, Montréal)

Africa (Cameroon February-March, Yaoundé)

South-America ?

Europe ?

Asia ?

Pacific (New-Caledonia ?)

Meeting of the International Steering Committee, June 2007

Final recommendations and proposals by the ISC

(8)

Possible Agenda for plan of action Step 3,

July 2007 - Cop 9 May 2008

Presentation of the recommendations and proposal during

the CBD-SBSTTA July 2007 (at Unesco - Paris)

Regional / National initiatives for Scientific Expertise on

Biodiversity

(AfriSEB, FreMSEB, …)

Debate at the Trondheim conference on Biodiversity, Norway (Oct

- Nov 2007)

Recommendation / action / decision at CoP 9 ?

(9)

How to get involved in the consultation

Organise an event where scientific expertise on biodiversity and the

IMoSEB consultative process will be discussed

For example : Workshop “Design of science policy interfaces for global biodiversity governance” (Leipzig, October 2006)

Contribute to the discussions held on the forums

http://www.imoseb.net/forums

Present the consultative process at meetings you are attending

http://www.imoseb.net/information_center

Give any studies or articles related to the consultation

Références

Documents relatifs

But the disappointing overall performance of the LPA is perhaps due not so much per se to the LPA itself, as with the general inability of the African countries to translate

into account the sovere:l,gnty pf' all cQtmtries pver· their natural resoul;ces. Cil'lilarly ti',ese machineries should ensure necessary foll~w-up, action regarcline

in their Third Roport to ECOSOC, the ACAST proposod that the desire of the Unitod Nations to assist tho developing countries to apply scioncc and technology for tho promotion of

As ministries of education (or equivalent institutions) have the main responsibility for primary and secondary education, the implementation strategy proposed in the Plan

Welcoming the outcome document of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable De- velopment (Rio de Janeiro, 20–22 June 2012), entitled “The future we want”, 1

C. The adoption of the Lagos Plan of Action at such an important time for women as during the Unite~ Nations Decad~ for Women only strengthens convictions about the role that women

18. With the establishment and strengthening of these sub-regional groupings it can be expected that Africa will have a common market in a not two distant future pursuant to the

however, the vital role of an appropriate number of multinational institutions to the economic and social development of Africa cannot be gainsaid, steps must be taken to ensure