• Aucun résultat trouvé

Quantifying the uncertainties introduced by dimension reduction in fluid dynamics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Quantifying the uncertainties introduced by dimension reduction in fluid dynamics"

Copied!
22
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02165809

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02165809

Submitted on 26 Jun 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Quantifying the uncertainties introduced by dimension reduction in fluid dynamics

Valentin Resseguier, Matheus Ladvig, Agustin Picard, Etienne Mémin, Reda Bouaida, Bertrand Chapron

To cite this version:

Valentin Resseguier, Matheus Ladvig, Agustin Picard, Etienne Mémin, Reda Bouaida, et al.. Quanti-fying the uncertainties introduced by dimension reduction in fluid dynamics. UNCECOMP 2019 - 3rd International Conference on Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Sciences and Engineering, Jun 2019, Hersonissos, Greece. pp.1-21. �hal-02165809�

(2)

Document Security: Restricted @Scalian 2019. All rights reserved.

D i g i t a l S y s t e m s

QUANTIFYING THE UNCERTAINTIES

INTRODUCED BY DIMENSION REDUCTION

IN FLUID DYNAMICS

Valentin Resseguier,

Matheus Ladvig, Agustin M Picard

(3)

1.

Context : observer for wind turbine application

2.

Physics, data & reduced order model (ROM)

3.

Simulation, measurements & data assimilation

4.

Reduced order model under location uncertainty

5.

Results

(4)

PART I

CONTEXT :

OBSERVER FOR WIND

TURBINE APPLICATIONS

26/ 06/ 2019 Pr és ent at ion ...

(5)

CEN « Simulation » (~ 70 people)

R&D and engineering

Expertise:

• Radar, optronics, sonar •Geophysical fluid dyn. • Mechanical and thermal Business: • Scientific softwares • Simulations, HPC • VR & AR Lab (~ 15 peoples)

Research, R&T, R&D

Expertise:

•Geophysical fluid dyn. •Signal, data

assimilation

•Machine Learning •Multi-agents systems •Drones

Other Business Units

(6)

Wind

Turbine

blade

Variable

blade lift

Controler

+

Desired

value

WIND TURBINE BLADE

LIFT CONTROL

Wind

Damages

fluctuations

Simple model

Observer

Simple model Estimation and prediction: • Flow • Lift • …

Incomplete & noisy measurements

(7)

PART II

PHYSICS, DATA

& REDUCED ORDER MODEL

26/ 06/ 2019 Pr és ent at ion ...

(8)

REDUCED ORDER MODEL (ROM)

Time Space

Parameters (if any)

Solution of an PDE with the form:

Full space

Reduced

space

Solution

coordinates

Dimension

!×# ~ 10

'

( ~ 10 − 100

Order of

magnitude

examples in CFD

(9)

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on a

dataset

to reduce the dimensionality:

Resolved modes

Snapshots Spatial modes

PCA

Off-line simulations

Approximation:

à ROM for very fast simulation of temporal modes

POD-GALERKIN

Projection of the “physics”

onto the spatial modes :

!" ( Physical equation (e.g. Navier-Stokes))

(10)

PART III

SIMULATION,

MEASUREMENTS

& DATA ASSIMILATION

26/ 06/ 2019 Pr és ent at ion ...

(11)

Numerical

Simulation

(ROM)

à erroneous

On-line

measurements

à incomplete à possibly noisy

COMBINING SIMULATIONS AND MEASUREMENTS

3 ". $%& 5 ". $%& Velocity More accurate estimation globally in space ( ) * ∝ ( * ) (()) (()) ((*|)) Data assimilation ( particle filtering with tempering &

mutation )

Need for uncertainty / errors quantification à Random dynamics

(12)

PART IV

REDUCED ORDER MODELS

UNDER LOCATION

UNCERTAINTY

26/ 06/ 2019 Pr és ent at ion ...

(13)

Randomized

Navier-Stokes model

__________________

Good closure

Good model error

quantification

for data assimilation

Residual

LOCATION UNCERTAINTY MODELS (LUM)

Assumed

time-uncorrelated

! = #

$%&

'

(

$

)

$

+

SALT LUM Memin, 2014 Resseguier et al. 2017 a, b, c, d Cai et al. 2017 Chapron et al. 2018 Yang & Memin 2019

Crisan et al., 2017

Gay-Balmaz & Holm 2017 Cotter and al. 2018 a, b Cotter and al. 2019 Holm, 2015 Holm and Tyranowski, 2016 Arnaudon et al. 2017 Mikulevicius & Rozovskii, 2004 Flandoli, 2011 References

:

Cotter and al. 2017 Resseguier et al. 2019 a, b

Resolved

modes

Randomized

ROM

(14)

̇-Advection Diffusion

MODEL UNDER LOCATION UNCERTAINTY,

THE TRACER ADVECTION EXAMPLE

Drift

correction

Multiplicative

random

forcing

Balanced

energy

exchanges

!#

= 0

Large scales: Small scales: Variance tensor:

(15)

!"

#

!$

= F

'

b + *

⋅#⋅

̇-

.

/

" + 0

#⋅

̇-

.

additive noise multiplicative noise n x M M x 1 n x 1 1 x M M x 1

(stochastic Navier-Stokes)

R E D U C E D M O D E L S U N D E R L O C AT I O N U N C E R TA I N T Y:

G A L E R K I N P R O J E C T I O N G I V E S S D E S F O R R E S O LV E D M O D E S

Large scales: Small scales: Variance tensor:

2

nd

order polynomial:

coefficients given by physics,

and

1 = 2 ̇- 2 ̇-

/

3

Correlations to estimate

(16)

SUMMARY

Off-line : Building ROM

On-line :

Simualtion & data assimialtion

Stochastic ROM Randomized Physics (LUM) Data DNS code Physics (Navier-Stokes) Stochastic ROM Flow ! = # $%& ' ($)$ Temporal modes ($ Data assimilation (particle filtering) Measurements

(17)

PART V

RESULTS :

UQ &

FAST OBSERVER

OF THE FLOW

26/ 06/ 2019 Pr és ent at ion ...

(18)

UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION

u 2D Wake at Re 100 u 3D Wake at Re 300 6/ 26/ 19 Pr és ent at ion ... DNS POD-Galerkin DNS POD-Galerkin with fitted eddy viscosity (benchmark) Red. LUM RMSE Red. LUM bias Red. LUM ensemble minimal Red. LUM std

(no data assimilation)

u Red. LUM blindly describe unresolved triades

§ Stabilize the unstable modes

§ Maintains the variability of stables modes

(19)

D ATA A S S I M I L AT I O N :

WA K E AT R E 1 0 0

Reference (DNS) 10#degrees of freedom Our method (Red-LUM-based data-assimilation) 6degrees of freedom Theoretical bound

(Optimal from 6-d.o.f. linear decomposition)

6degrees of freedom

Benchmark

(POD-ROM (with eddy viscosity) + init. by obs.)

6degrees of freedom Vo rtic ity Vo rtic ity Vo rtic ity Vo rtic ity

Reduced order models with % = 6

(20)

Reduced order models with ! = 6

and 2dB-SNR obs. assimilated every 5 sec

Reference (DNS) 10&degrees of freedom Our method (Red-LUM-based data-assimilation) 6degrees of freedom Theoretical bound (optimal from 6-d.o.f. linear decomposition) 6degrees of freedom Benchmark (POD-ROM (with eddy viscosity) + init. by obs.) 6degrees of freedom

D ATA A S S I M I L AT I O N :

WA K E AT R E 3 0 0

(21)

CONCLUSION

26/ 06/ 2019 Pr és ent at ion ... [email protected]

(22)

CONCLUSION

u

Reduced order model (ROM) : for very fast and robust CFD

(10# → 6 degrees of freedom.)

§ Combine data & physics (built off-line)

§ Closure problem handled by LUM

u

Data assimilation : to correct the fast simulation on-line by incomplete/noisy measurements

§ Model error quantification handled by LUM

u

First results

§ Optimal unsteady flow estimation/prediction in the whole spatial domain (large-scale structures)

§ Robust far outside the learning period

NEXT STEPS

u

Increasing Reynolds

(reduced DNS à reduced LES)

u

Real measurements (PIV, TrimControl, …)

u

Increasing the degrees of freedom (&)

Références

Documents relatifs

In case of soft impact, with a finite time duration of the shock, and no external excitation, the existence of periodic solutions, with an arbitrary value of the

This paper presents a kinematical model of the knee joint that will be employed to specify the future Device kinematics and a preliminary control

In this paper, we have discussed the regularized variational formulation for 3D solid element with the incompatible mode method to analyze geometrically nonlinear problems in

Namely, we show that for any given Lasso regularization parameter λ and any observed data y belonging to a set of full (Lebesgue) measure, the cardinality of the support of a

Moreover, even if it is not stated here explicitly, Theorem 4 can be extended to unbiasedly estimate other measures of the risk, including the projection risk, or the estimation

We show that under a suitable condition on the design matrix, the number of nonzero coefficients of the Lasso solution is an unbiased estimate for the degrees of freedom.. An

In the special case of standard Lasso with a linearly independent design, (Zou et al., 2007) show that the number of nonzero coefficients is an unbiased esti- mate for the degrees

Algorithm 1 Haptic rendering algorithm for a single par- ticle coupling: the different steps of the computation of haptic feedback from the interaction between fluid and