R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
A NNE -M ARIE S IMON
A corollary to the Evans-Griffith Syzygy theorem
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 94 (1995), p. 71-77
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1995__94__71_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1995, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
ANNE-MARIE
SIMON (*)
ABSTRACT -
Height
two ideals of finiteprojective
dimension in aCohen-Macaulay
or Gorenstein local
ring
areinvestigated, providing slight
extensions of re-sults of Serre and Evans-Griffith
concerning
theproblem
to know whenthey
are
two-generated,
when thequotient ring
isCohen-Macaulay
ifthey
arethree-generated.
Introduction.
This note is concerned with the
height
two ideals of a Cohen-Macaulay
noetherian localring:
when arethey two-generated,
what canwe say about them when
they
arethree-generated?
In the second direction we have an
important
theorem of Evans- Griffith.THEOREM 1.
([E.G.81]
Theorem2.1,
or[E.G.85]
Theorem4.4).
Let A be aregular
localring containing
afield. If
I is an unmixed threegenerated
idealof height two,
then thering
All isCohen-Macaulay.
In the first direction we have first a Serre’s
theorem,
one formula-tion of it is the
following.
(*) Indirizzo dell’A.: Service
d’Alg6bre,
Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bou- levard duTriomphe
CP.211, B-1050 Brussel,Belgium.
72
THEOREM 2.
([Se, Proposition 5] [B-E]).
Let I be aheight
two idealof
aregular
localring
AIf
thequotient ring
All isGorenstein,
thenthe ideal I is
two-generated.
However,
another formulation of Serre was a little bit different.THEOREM 2’.
[Se,
corollaire à laProposition 2].
Let A be a noethe- rian domain such that allprojectile
A -modules one or two arefree,
and let I be a non-zero idealof projective
dimension less orequal
to one. Then the ideal I is
two-generated if
andonly if
the A-moduleExt1 (I, A) is principal.
We note that in Theorem 2’
only
the case where I is an idealof proj ec-
tive dimension one and of
height
two is of someinterest,
at least to us.In Theorem
2,
thehypothesis
on Iimply
that theprojective
dimen-sion of I is one,
they imply
also that the A-moduleExt1 (I, A)
isprinci-
pal,
sinceIndeed,
the last moduleExt2A (A/I, A)
is the canonical module of thering A/I,
hence it isprinci- pal
sinceA/I
is Gorenstein(a
localring
is Gorenstein if andonly
if it isCohen-Macaulay
and if its canonical module isprincipal).
Then we have another Evans-Griffith’s theorem.
THEOREM 3.
([E.G.81],
Theorem2.2,
or[E.G.85],
Theorem4.7).
Let A be aregular
localring containing a field
and let I be aprime
idealof height
two such that the A-moduleExt2A (A/I, A)
isprincipal.
Then I istwo
generated.
There is an evident
analogy
between Theorem 3 and Theorem2’,
inthe
hypothesis,
the conclusions and even theproofs.
Bothproofs
use anextension 0 - A - M - 1 - 0 whose class
generates
theprincipal
A-module
Ext1 (I, A),
and one observes thatA)
= 0. From this observation the conclusion of Theorem 2’ follows ratherquickly,
whilefor theorem 3 one has to use the syzygy
theorem;
and thehypothesis
that I is a
prime
ideal of aregular ring
isstrongly
used.Concerning
that last Theorem 3 we have also to mention
[Br.E.G.].
The aim of this note is to
provide slight generalizations
of the above-mentioned theorems. The
generalizations
of Theorem 1 and 2 arestraightforward,
indeed theproofs
areessentially
the same. The gener- alization wegive
of Theorem 3requires
notonly
thepreceding
exten-sions but also a rather different
proof, using
thelinkage theory
as de-velopped
in[P.S]
or[Ul]
as well as the syzygy theorem.As a
general
reference forhomological background
wequote
[E.G.85], [St], [Ul].
1. Preliminaries.
To state the syzygy theorem we must recall the Serre k-condition.
DEFINITION. An A-moduLe M is said to
be Sk if, for
allprime
ide-als p of A
one hasdepth Mp -> min {k,
So,
if an A-module isSk
for some k >0,
then all the associatedprime
ideals of M are minimal in
Spec
A.A
key
result is the theorem ofAuslander-Bridger
which shows thata
finitely generated
A-module of finiteprojective
dimension isSk
if andonly
if it is ak th
syzygy(see [E .G.85]
Theorem3.8)
when thering
itselfis
Sk-
THE SYZYGY THEOREM.
([E.G.81],
Theorem1.1,
or[E.G.85],
Theo-rem
3.15,
see also[Br]
or[0g]).
Let A be a noetherian localring
con-taining afield
and let M be afinitely generated Sk-module
over Aoffi-
nite
projective
dimension. Thenif
M is notfree,
it has rank at least k.We note that the rank of a
finitely generated
A-module of finite pro-jective
dimension is a well-defined natural number: if 0 -A"8- is a free resolution ofM,
then ranks
;
and,
for all minimalprime ideals p
ofSpec
A onehas
Mp
=Ap .
In the syzygy
theorem,
thehypothesis
that the localring
contains afield is still essential.
Indeed,
theproof
uses aBig Cohen-Macaulay module, only
availableby
now inequal
characteristic.Here is the
straightforward generalization
of theorem 1.PROPOSITION 1. Let A be a
Cohen-MacauLacy
noetherian localring containing
a and let I be an unmixed threegenerated
idealof height
twoof finite projective
dimension. Then the ideal I isperfect,
i. e. the
quotient ring AII is Cohen-Macaulay. Moreover,
the moduleExtA (A/I, A)
is also aperfect module,
i.e. it is aCohen-Macaulay
module
of projective
dimension two.PROOF We resolve
A/I and
have an exact sequence0 -~ M -~ A 3 -~
-~ A ~ A/I --~ 0,
where M is a second syzygy ofA/I.
We need to show that M is free.
(If
M isfree, using
the Auslander- Buchsbaumequality
we obtaindepth A/I
= dim A -pd A/1
== dim A - 2 = dim
All).
We observe that M is a
finitely generated
A-module of finiteprojec-
tive dimension and of rank two.
74
On the other
hand,
the A-module M is~3. Indeed, let p
be aprime
ideal of A at which we localize.
If
I ,
thenAmp = Ap
anddepth Mp
=min {3,
If P D I and
ht p
=2,
the above exact sequence localizedat p
showsthat
depth Mp
= 2 ~min {3, 2}.
If P D
I and >2,
the above exact sequence localizedat p
showsthat
depth Mp ~ 3,
becausedepth being
unmixed.The freeness of the module M follows now from the syzygy theorem and
For the second
assertion,
weapply
the functorHomA (-, A) = ( ~ ) *
tothe exact sequence
0 ~ A 2 -~ A 3 ~ A -~ A/I -~ 0.
We obtain acomplex 0 --*A* --*A 3* --> A2* ___> 0whose homology
is concentrated indegree 2,
where it is
EXt2 (A/I , A).
So
pd A)
=2,
andagain
the conclusion follows from the Auslander-Buchsbaumequality:
dim A - 2 =depth EXt2 (A/I, A) 5
~ dim
E xtA (A/1, A ) ~
dim A - 2.We
give
now thestraightforward generalization
of Theorem2, though
this hasnothing
to do with the syzygy theorem.PROPOSITION. 2. Let I be a
height
two idealof
a Gorenstein localring. If
theprojective
dimensionof
I isfinite
andif
thequotient ring
A/I s
Gorenstein,
then the ideal I istwo-generated
PROOF. The
hypotheses imply
that the ideal I isperfect,
i.e. theprojective
dimension ofA/I
istwo,
theheight
of I.A minimal resolution of
A/I
has the format
and the sequence
~
Exti (A/I , A ) ~
0 is exact.As the resolution of
A/I
is minimal the entries of the matrix associ- ated to a and to itstransposed a
are in the maximal ideal of A. This shows that the minimal number ofgenerators
ofA)
ism- 1.
On the other
hand,
this number is one sinceA/I is
assumed to beGorenstein, 1, m = 2
and the ideal I is twogenerated.
2. An extension of Theorem 3.
PROPOSITION 3. Let A be a Gorenstein noetherian local
ring
con-taining
and let I be an unmixed idealof finite projective
dimen-sion and
o, f height
two.If the
A-moduleA)
isprincipal.,
thenthe ideal I can be
generated by
2 elements.PROOF. We choose in I a
regular
sequence XI’ X2 and use it to make analgebraic
link: if J =x2 ): I,
then I =(XI, x2 ):
J since Iis unmixed and since the
ring
A is Gorenstein[P.S.];
moreover, the ideal J is also unmixed. Theisomorphisms
=
HomA (A/I, A/(xl , x2 )) =
thehypothesis
on7 imply
thatthe linked ideal J is a
height
two ideal threegenerated:
J =(XI,
x2 ,y)
for some y in A.
As I =
(x1, X2): J,
we have an exact sequencewhich shows that
A/I
=J/(xl , a?2)’
So we have also an exact sequencethis shows that the A-module
A/J
is of finiteprojective
dimension.By proposition 1,
we conclude that thering A/J
isCohen-Macaulay;
but then
A/I
is alsoCohen-Macaulay by
thelinkage theory
in a Goren-stein
ring
A([P.S],
or[Ul]). Consequently
thering A/I
is Gorenstein since it isCohen-Macaulay
and since its canonical moduleA)
isprincipal,
and the conclusion follows fromproposition
2.NOTE. the above
proposition
is to becompared
with ageometric
result of Fiorentini and Lascu
([Fi.La.],
Theorem 2(iii)).
The
hypothesis
inProposition
3 areslightly
weaker then inProposi-
tion
2;
inProposition 3,
thering A/I
is not assumed to be Cohen-Macaulay
in advance.3. Some
Examples.
EXAMPLE 1. To the twisted cubic curve
(s 3 , s 2 t, st 2 , t 3 )
of theprojective
spaceP3K
is associated an ideal I of theregular
localring
A ==
Xl , X2 , X3 1.
This ideal is aheight
twoprime
ideal which is three-generated :
I =(Xo X3 -
Hence thering
A/I
isCohen-Macaulay,
not Gorenstein. In fact the ideal I is the ideal of the 2 x 2 minors of the matrix76
A minimal
projective
resolution of the A-moduleA/I
isgiven by
this shows that the canonical module
of A/I, ExtA (A/I, A)
=coker ’0’
t(where q5
t is thetransposed
ofØ)
isminimally generated by
2elements.
EXAMPLE 2. To the
quartic
curve(s , 83 t, 8t3,
of theprojec-
tive space
P3K
is associated aheight
twoprime
ideal I of thering A
=X, , X2 , X3 1,
this ideal I isfour-generated:
I =(Xo X3 - Xi - X2 - xl X3 ).
Thequotient ring A/I
isnot
Cohen-Macaulay,
however it is a Buchsbaum localring.
EXAMPLE 3. Bertini constructed an
example
of a non Cohen-Macaulay
factorialring
B which is animage
of aregular
localring
A : B =
A/I ,
theheight g
of I isgreater
than 3. Since B isfactorial,
themodule
Ext~ (B, A)
isprincipal.
This illustrates the fact that thehy- pothesis
inProposition
3 are weaker than those inProposition
2. On theother
hand,
Theorem 1 is concerned with unmixed ideals I ofheight g generated by
g + 1 element. When g =2,
when thering
A isregular,
the
quotient A/I
isCohen-Macaulay. When g
>2,
this conclusion is not valid anymore.Indeed,
in Bertin’sexample
we can choose in the ideal Ia
regular
sequence x1, ... ,x9
such thatIA1= (xl ,
... ,(I
is aprime
ideal of the
regular ring A).
Thisgives
us a link(even
ageometric link):
J =
(xl ,
... , I. The ideal J is an unmixed ideal ofheight g
of thering A,
thequotient ring A/J
is notCohen-Macaulay (since A/I
isnot),
but J can be
generated by
g + 1 elements: the moduleJI(xl,
... ,- HomA (All,
... , =ExtA (A/I, A)
isprincipal.
Schenzel gave other
examples
ofprime
ideal ofheight
g in aregular
local
ring, minimally generated by g
+ 1elements,
and such that thequotient ring
is notCohen-Macaulay.
This work was done while the author was
visiting
theUniversity
ofFerrara.
REFERENCES
[Be] M. J. BERTIN, Anneaux d’invariants d’anneaux de
polynômes,
en car-actéristique
p, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 264 (1967), 653-656.[Br] W. BRUNS, The
Evans-Griffith
syzygy theorem and Bass numbers, Proc. of the Amer. Math. Soc. 115 n° 4 (1992), pp. 939-946.[Br.E.G] W. BRUNS - E. EVANS - P. GRIFFITH,
Syzygies,
idealsof height
two andvector bundles, Jour.
Alg.
67 (1980), pp. 143-162.[B.E.] A. BUCHSBAUM - D. EISENBUD, Gorenstein ideals
of height
3, in Semi-nar Eisenbud
Singh Vogel,
Teubner texte zur Mathematik, band 48 (1982), 30-47.[Fi.La.] M. FIORENTINI - A. LASCU,
Projective embeddings
andlinkage,
inRendiconti del Seminario Matematico e Fisico di Milano, vol. LXII (1987).
[E.G.81] E. G. EVANS - P. GRIFFITH, The syzygy
problem,
Annals of Math., 114 (1981), pp. 323-333.[E.G.85] E. G. EVANS - P. GRIFFITH,
Syzygies,
London Math. Soc. Lect. Notes Ser. 106,Cambridge
Univ. Press,Cambridge
(1985).[Og]
T. OGOMA, A note on the syzygyproblem,
Comm.Algebra,
17 (1989),pp. 2061-2066.
[P.S.] C. PESKINE - L. SZPIRO, Liaison des variétés
algébriques
I, Invent.Math.,
26 (1974), pp. 271-302.[Sch] P.
SCHENZEL,
A note on almostcomplete
intersections, in Seminar D.Eisenbud, B.
Singh,
W.Vogel,
vol. 2, Teubner-Texte zur Mathematik, Band 48,Leipzig
(1982), pp. 49-54.[Se] J. P. SERRE, Sur les modules
projectifs,
dans Séminaire Dubreil-Pisot(Algèbre
et théorie des nombres) 1960/1961, n° 2.[St] J. STROOKER,
Homological questions in
localAlgebra,
London Math.Soc. Lect. Notes Ser., 145,
Cambridge
Univ. Press,Cambridge,
1990.
[Ul] B. ULRICH, Lectures on
Linkage
anddeformation, preprint, workshop
on commutative
algebra,
Trieste 1992.Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione il 15 dicembre 1993
e, in forma revisionata, il 31