Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
Building Research Note, 1968-02-01
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC : https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=f9a9a45e-0f66-4851-adee-d5a7c3c07c6f https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=f9a9a45e-0f66-4851-adee-d5a7c3c07c6f
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/40000646
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Factors affecting frost damage to clay bricks
I
T. R i t c h i e
Division of B u i l d i n g Research,
Ottawa, February 1968
FACTORS
AFFECTING FROST DAMAGET O
CLAY BRICKST , Ritchie
T o study the effect on clay bricks of f r e e z i n g and t h a w i n g them, a number of small samples w e r e tested under several different; f r e e z i n g conditions, Most of the samples had been used originally in other w o r k ,
such a s a study of t h e d i r e c t i o n a l effect on m o i s t u r e expansion of b r i c k s ,
and when t h e original work w a s completed, additional t e s t s w e r e m a d e
to investigate the influence of various factors on t h e damage d o n e t o the
bricks by freezing them,
The samples w e r e one i n c h square in cross section; the length
(corresponding to the l e a s t dimension of a brick) was t w o and a quarter inches. Some of the samples w e r e cut from m a n u f a c t u r e d b r i c k s made by the s t i f f -mud method, while o t h e r samples w e r e c u t from similar dry,
u n f i r e d bricks obtained from a brickworks. T h e latter w e r e cut to suitable s i z e and f i r e d in a laboratory furnace. The e n d surfaces of t h e samples w e r e g r o u n d flat, and measurements of length made w i t h a dial gauge accurate to one ten-thousandth of an inch,
The samples w e r e f r o z e n in a large c o l d chamber which operated
at a t e m p e r a t u r e varying f r o m
-15'F
to -20°F; after f r e e z i n g , theyw e r e usually thawed in air at "room1' temper atur e, approximately 7 2" F,
although in some t e s t s the samples w e r e thawed in w a t e r ,
EFFECT
OF
MOISTURE C O N T E N T O N FROST DAMAGEEight samples (designated
L)
w e r e cut from a brick a l o n g its length and eight samples (designatedU)
w e r e cut f r o m the same brickat right a n g l e s to its bedding s u r f a c e . T h e d r y samples w e r e soaked in water for various p e r i o d s of time (0 min.
,
30 min. , 2 h o u r s , a n d2 4 hours) prior to freezing, in o r d e r to study the effect of moisture content on frost damage.
The
results ofa
s i n g l e f r e e z i n g f o l l o w e d byt h a w i n g in air a r e s h o w n in Table I ,
In these t e s t s the four samples of highest m o i s t u r e content w e r e
cracked (along t h e length, for about half the length) a s a r csult of t h e fr eezing, while the remaining samples appeared t o be undamaged.
Although d i m e n s i o n a l changes d u r i n g f r e e z i n g and t h a w i n g w e r e n o t
measured, the net dimensional change of the samples d i d n o t appear t o b e related to f r o s t damage; sample
L1,
for e x a n ~ p l e , a p p a r e n t l y undamaged, hada
n e t expansion of 0.01 4 p e r c e n t , w h i l e that ofsample L 7 , which w a s cracked, w a s 0 , 0 0 5 per cent, Sample L8, a l s o c r a c k e d , had undergone no net dimensional change. In t h e s e
t e s t s the extent of f r o s t damage w a s apparently not affected b y t h e
d i r e c t i o n in w h i c h the samples w e r e cut f r o m t h e original brick.
ADDITIONAL TESTS
OF
THE I N F L U E N C E O F MOISTURE C O N T E N TON
FROST DAAdAGETwelve samples w e r e c u t f r o m an u n f i r e d brick, then f i r e d i n a laboratory furnace. F o u r of the samples ( d e s i g n a t e d L) w e r e cut
along the length of t h e brick, four athers
( C )
across the b r i c k , andt h e remainder (U] a t r i g h t angles to t h e bedding surface, Prior to
t h e f r e e z i n g t e s t the s a m p l e s had been autoclaved and then soaked i n
w a t e r . T w o samples f r o m each s e t of four w e r e d r i e d for s e v e r a l
hours before f r e e z i n g , w h i l e the other t w o w e r e a l m o s t c o m p l e t e l y saturated at t h e t i m e af freezing. The results a £ a single freezing
of the samples followed by thawing in w a t e r a r e shown in T a b l e 11.
T h e very considerable influence of m o i s t u r e content on frost r l a n ~ a g e i s c l e a r in t h e s e results. It is a l s o evident that a r e l a t i v e l y
slight c h a n g e in m o i s t u r e content d e t e r m i n e d t h e behaviour of the material. T h e samples that cracked from f r e e z i n g h a d r e l a t i v e l y
l a r g e net expansions. F o u r of the five damaged s a n ~ p l e s w e r e cracked a c r o s s the length w h i l e in the fifth the crack w a s l o n g i t u d i n a l . In
t h e s e t e s t s , as in t h e previous s e r i e s , f r o s t damage did not appear
t o b e influenced by t h e direction in which the s a m p l e s w e r e cut f r o m
the brick,
FURTHER
TESTS ON MOISTURE CONTENTF i v e samples w e r e cut in the same d i r e c t i o n f r o m each of three
stiff-mud b r i c k s (designated A , B ,
C),
taken from t h e s a m e lot, T h esamples w e r e soaked in water for G , 5, 30 and 6 0 m i n u t e s , a n d f o r
2 4 h o u r s , then w e r e f r o z e n and t h a w e d in air a t o t a l of eight times,
with the r e s u l t s shown in T a b l e
111.
E F F E C T O F R A T E
QF
F R E E Z I N G ON FROST DAMAGES i x samples w e r e cut: f r o m an u n f i r e d brick (at r i g h t angles t o
f o r 24 h o u r s , then frozen, T w o of the samples w e r e exposed d i r e c t l y
t o the c o l d air of the freezing chamber, w h i l e t h e other samples were
surrounded by plastic materials in such a w a y that t h e i r r a t e s a£
freezing w e r e l e s s than that of the uncovered samples. T h e r a t e of freezing w a s determined by e m b e d d i n g a t h e r r r ~ o c o u p l e in a sample
w h i c h w a s frozen; the time takkn for the t e m p e r a t u r e of the sample t o
fall f r o m 38°F to 2 6 - F (six degrees above and below the freezing
point of water) w a s noted and the rate of freezing w a s expressed in d e g r e e s F per minute, F o r the samples placed uncovered in the
cold chamber, t h e r a t e was about 6 d e g r e e s p e r n ~ i n u t e . A 1 samples w e r e left in the chamber until their temperatures equalled the air
temperature of the chamber, then thawed in air, T h e t e s t s , i n w h i c h
the samples w e r e f r o z e n five times, are shown in Table
IV
a n dV.
The results of these t e s t s clearly s h o w e d that the r a t e of f r e e z i n g
of the samples had an important influence on t h e damage caused to them,
The samples frozen at t h e highest rate w e r e cracked after one and two
fr'rezings; those frozen at t h e intermediate r a t e d i d not crack u n t i l the
fifth freezing, at which point the samples f r o z e n at the l o w e s t r a t e w e r e
apparently undamaged.
ADDITIONAL TESTS ON RATE O F F R E E Z L N G
F o u r samples w e r e cut f r o m each of two e x t r u d e d bricks
( A a n d B ) f r o m the same lot. T h e samples w e r e soaked in w a t e r for 7 2 hours before freezing, w h i c h w a s carried out at various r a t e s by the method d e s c r i b e d pr cviously. The samples w e r e f r o z e n four
times, with the r e s u l t s given in T a b l e
VI.
The results of these t e s t s also clearly i n d i c a t e the important
i n f l u e n c e of rate of f r e e z i n g on the damage s u s t a i n e d by the s a m p l e s .
I N F L U E N C E O F DIRECTION
O F
FREEZINGON
FROST DA,MAGE T e n samples w e r e cut from an extruded clay brick, soaked in water for 3 6 hours then p l a c e d in tho freezing chamber, some of thema r r a n g e d as usual so that t h e c o l d air s u r r o u n d e d t h e m on all s i d e s , w h i l e the others w e r e arranged t o have only one end e x p o s e d t o t h e
c o l d a i r , a l l other s u r f a c e s being c o v e r e d by an i n s u l a t i n g m a t e r i a l , The samples w e r e f r o z e n once, w i t h t h e results shown in Table VIT.
Although the results clearly indicate a d i r e c t i o n a l i n f l u e n c e of
d i f f e r e n c e in r a t e of freezing, which w a s not measured or controlled in t h e s e tests, also had an influence. A difference in the rates of
freezing would have r e s u l t e d from the different conditions of exposure, An interesting anornoly in the behaviaur of the four s u r v i v i n g
sarnpkes of the above test w a s noted in a second freezing test, in
w h i c h t w o of t h e samples w e r e frozen omnidirectienally and the other t w o w e r e frozen unidirectionally,
The
former samples w e r e unaffected by this second freezing, while the latter cracked.EFFECT
OF
FREEZINGCRACKED
SAMPLESSome samples which h a d cracked in freezing w e r e thawed then f r o z e n again, sometimes several times, with measurements made
of length changes, Usually cracks appeared in t h e samples without their complete breakage and t h e sample could be h a n d l e d and measured.
The crack sometimes extended partly across the sample near the mid- point or ~ a r t l y along its length f r o m one end, but in many cases
cracking o c c u r r e d in both directions near the centre of t h e sample,
giving it the appearance of having burst from within. T w o d i f f e r e n t
behaviour s of c r a ~ k e d samples subsequently r e -frozen a r e shown in
Table VIII,
T h e first sample cracked d u r i n g its second freezing with a net
expansion equal t o that of the other sample, which cracked during its fir st f r eeaing. The behaviour on subsequent fr e e z i n g s d i f f e r e d ; the
fir st sample expanded greatly on the t h i r d freezing and b r o k e after
the fourth, whereas subsequent freezings of the other sample produced
no additional net expansion,
SUMMARY
Several important influences on the damage t o clay bricks from
f r e e z i n g have been demonstrated, in confirmation of similar r e s u l t s d e s c r i b e d in papers f r o m other laboratories which have investigated t h e effects of freezing on masonry materials.
The m o i s t u r e content of a clay brick at the time of f r e e z i n g w a s clearly a major factor in its resistance to damage. A s l i g h t change of moisture content w a s frequently critical to t h e behaviour of the brick. T h e r a t e of t e m p e r a t u r e change of the b r i c k d u r i n g its
f r e e z i n g was also shown to be an important factor, and one in w h i c h
The d i r e c t i o n of f r e e z i n g of a brick, whether cooling w a s from all surfaces or from a single surface, w a s indicated to be important t o t h e p e r f o r m a n c e of the brick.
The net dimensional change of a brick from f r e e z i n g a n d
thawing w a s usually small even i f the brick cracked. Freezing
of a c r a c k e d brick in some c a s e s resulted in no additional expansion
of the material; in others there w a s gross expansion and breakage.
The direction of cutting samples from a brick did not appear to
T A B L E I
EFFECT
O F MOISTURE CONTENTON
FROST DAMAGEM o i s t u r e Content Condition Length C h a n g e ,
Sample ( P e r cent D r y Weight) After F r e e z i n g Per cent*
unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged cracked cracked unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged cracked cracked $0.01 4 0 -0. 005 - 0 , 0 0 5 -0.019 -0. 0 0 5 SO, 0 0 5 0
*
Expansion t; shrinkage-.
T h e length change is the the difference b e t w e e n the l e n g t h after t h a w i n g and the length before freezing, e x p r e s s e d as a percentage of the l e n g t h b e f o r e f r e e z i n g ; t e m p e r a t u r e and moisture cantent a s s u m e d to be constant.TABLE I1
EFFECT O F SEVERE MCXSTURE CONDITIONS ON FROST DAMAGE
M o i s t u r e Content
Percentage of Saturation Condition Length Change
Sample Content After Freezing Per c e n t
cracked* cracked* unchanged unchanged cracked* cracked** unchanged unchanged unchanged cracked* unchanged unchanged
*
C r a c k e d across t h e sample.**
Cracked along t h e length, about half the length.+
cxpansiunTABLE 111
EFFECT
O F MOISTURECONTENT ON
FROST DAMAGE AFTERREPEATED FREEZE -THAW CONDITIONS
M o i s t u r e Content Condition After
Sample (Per cent D r y Weight) Eight
F r
eezingsAZ
0 unchanged 131 0 unchanged C1 0 unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged cracked ( 8 ) " cracked ( 8 ) c r a c k e d ( 6 ) cracked ( I ) c r a c k e d ( 1 ) c r a c k e d ( 1 )*
N u m b e r s in parentheses a r e the number of freezingsTABLE
IV
E F F E C T
OF
RATE
OF
FREEZINGON
FROSTDAMAGE
Rate of Condition of Sample After
F r
e e z i n g Number F r e e z i n gSample ( " ~ / r n i n , ] 1 2 3 4 5
1
6
unchanged cracked-
-
Y2
6
cracked-
-
-
-
5 4 unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged c r a c k e d
6 4 unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged cracked
3 2 unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged
8 2 unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged
TABLE
V
E F F E C T
OF
RATEOF
F R E E Z I N G ON LENGTH CHANGE O F SAMPLER a t e of Length Change of Sample (per cent) After F r e e z i n g Number
Freezing
Sample a ~ / m i n . ) 1 2 3 4 5
+
expansionT A B L E VI
ADDITIONAL TESTS
ON
THE EFFECTOF
RATE
O F F R E E Z I N GO N
FROST DAMAGE
R a t e of Condition of Sample After Freezing Number
F r e e z i n g Sample ( * F/rnin. ) 1 2 3 4 A l 6 cracked I A2
6
cracked-
8 1 6 cracked-
-
I BZ6
cracked I-
I A 32.4
unchanged cracked c.-
B 4 2. 4 unchanged cracked-
3A5 0. 7 unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged
B5 0.7 unchanged unchanged unchanged unchanged
TABLE VIH
I N F L U E N C E
OF
D R E C T L O NOF
FREEZING OX FROST DAMAGESample F r e e z i n g Condition Condition of Sample
omnidir ectional omnidir ectional omnidir ectional omnidirectional omnidirectional omnidir ectional u n i d i r e c t i a n a l u n i d i r e c t i o n a l unidirectional unidirectional cracked cracked c r a c k e d cracked cracked cracked unchanged u n c h a n g e d unchanged u n c h a n g e d
TABLE VIII
EFFECT O F ADDITIONAL FREE ZhVG
ON
CRACKED SAMP LESExpansion After Each Freezing [Percentage of Original Length)
Sample Freezing 1 F r e e z i n g 2 Freezing 3 Freezing 4
A 4 0 , 0 0 5 0 , 0 1 9 0.137
(not cracked) (cracked) {cracked) ( d i s c a r d e d )
L5 0 . 0 1 9 0,014 0.014 0.014