• Aucun résultat trouvé

Overview and rationale Indicator 25. Percentage of States Parties actively engaged in international networking and institutional cooperation Assessmen t factors

N/A
N/A
Info
Télécharger
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Overview and rationale Indicator 25. Percentage of States Parties actively engaged in international networking and institutional cooperation Assessmen t factors"

Copied!
2
0
0

Chargement.... (Voir le texte intégral maintenant)

Texte intégral

(1)

Overview and rationale

Indicator 25. Percentage of States Parties actively engaged in international networking and institutional cooperation

Assessmen t factors

This indicator is assessed on the basis of three country-level factors monitored and reported by each State Party:

25.1 State Party engages, as host or beneficiary, in the activities of

category 2 centres for ICH. OD 88

25.2 International networking is fostered among communities, groups and individuals, NGOs, experts, centres of expertise and

research institutes, active in the field of ICH. OD 86 25.3 State Party participates in the ICH-related activities of

international and regional bodies other than UNESCO.

Relation with SDGs and other indicators

Sustainable Development Goals: This indicator supports SDG Target 11.4, which concerns protecting and safeguarding the world’s cultural and natural heritage. It complements SDG Target 17.17, which aims to ‘encourage and promote effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships’.

Relation to other indicators: The present indicator complements Indicator 24, which concerns international cooperation for safeguarding. Here the focus turns to institutions and other actors who carry out such activities. These institutions may be among those mentioned in other indicators, such as in Indicator 1 (institutional capacities), Indicator 2 (capacity-building institutions) or Indicator 6 (post-secondary institutions).

Rationale for action

As noted with regard to Indicator 24, one of the Convention’s four purposes is ‘to provide for international cooperation and assistance’ (Article 1(d)), and the Convention further defines international cooperation as including joint initiatives, among other things (Article 19). Article 19 requires States ‘to cooperate at the bilateral, sub-regional, regional and international levels,’ and such cooperation can be formalized through networking and institutional cooperation, as described here. Category 2 centres are typically involved in strengthening international and regional networks and exchanging experiences in safeguarding, particularly in the context of support to the Convention’s capacity-building programme.

Increasingly, the actions of other United Nations agencies and regional bodies involve ICH and its safeguarding, and many States find them to be an important forum for international cooperation.

Key terms  Category 2 centres

 Communities, groups or, in some cases, individuals

 Non-governmental organizations

 Centres of expertise

 Research institutions

 Regional

Specific guidance on monitoring and periodic reporting

Benefits of

monitoring

Monitoring and reporting of international networking and institutional cooperation can help a State to take stock of the extent to which it is responding to the

1

(2)

Convention’s core purpose of fostering international cooperation. Such monitoring can also assist the State to recall effective examples of such cooperation that it might wish to reactivate or extend. Similarly, monitoring at the global level can help identify cases and instances of international cooperation that have demonstrated their effectiveness and can illustrate what measures and approaches ought to be continued.

Data sources and collection

As is the case for Indicator 24, those responsible for monitoring and reporting may wish to consult with the international cooperation office of the Ministry of Culture, which may maintain records of institutional cooperation with other States. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs may maintain an overview of the State’s involvement with international and regional bodies, many of which are increasingly active in the field of ICH and its safeguarding. If the State has a consultative body or coordination mechanism, its members should also be consulted concerning institutional cooperation in which they might be involved.

Possible data sources

 Reports and records of an international cooperation office of the Ministry of Culture and other line ministries, including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs

 Newsletters and websites of relevant category 2 centres

 Newsletters and websites of non-governmental organizations, centres of expertise and research institutes

 Official gazettes/journals or compendia of treaties and international agreements to which the State is party

Références

Télécharger maintenant ( DOCX - 2 Page - 33.37 KB )

Documents relatifs

Overview and rationale Indicator 9. Extent to which research and documentation, including scientific, technical and artistic studies, contribute to safeguarding Assessmen t factors

9.3 Practitioners and bearers of ICH participate in the management, implementation and dissemination of research findings and scientific, technical and artistic studies, all done

Overview and rationale Indicator 10. Extent to which research findings and documentation are accessible and are utilized to strengthen policy-making and improve safeguarding Assessmen t factors

Research and documentation, as well as scientific, technical and artistic studies, are important resources that can inform policy-making, particularly by tracing

Overview and rationale Indicator 16. Extent to which the importance of safeguarding ICH is recognized through inclusive plans and programmes that foster self-respect and mutual respect Assessmen t factors

Monitoring can help a State to determine the extent to which its safeguarding plans and programmes are as fully inclusive as possible, and whether there may exist unintended barriers

Overview and rationale Indicator 17. Extent to which communities, groups and individuals participate widely in raising awareness about the importance of ICH and its safeguarding Assessmen t factors

17.2 The free, prior, sustained and informed consent of communities, groups and individuals concerned is secured for conducting awareness-raising activities concerning

Overview and rationale Indicator 19. Extent to which public information measures raise awareness about the importance of ICH and its safeguarding and promote understanding and mutual respect Assessmen t factors

Relation to other indicators: The present indicator looks at the content and purposes of awareness-raising and public information measures and their impacts. It

Overview and rationale Indicator 20. Extent to which programmes raising awareness of ICH respect the relevant ethical principles Assessmen t factors

Those principles are complemented by relevant ethical codes or standards developed by professional organizations and associations whose members are involved in

Overview and rationale Indicator 21. Extent to which engagement for safeguarding ICH is enhanced among stakeholders Assessmen t factors

Its spirit of coordination among various actors involved in safeguarding – including communities, groups and individuals, non-governmental organizations and

Overview and rationale Indicator 22. Extent to which civil society contributes to monitoring of ICH safeguarding Assessmen t factors

Monitoring of this indicator turns the spotlight onto the monitoring process itself, and can help a State determine whether that process is benefitting from