• Aucun résultat trouvé

Fire tests on insulated sheet steel walls

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Fire tests on insulated sheet steel walls"

Copied!
17
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la

première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à [email protected].

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

[email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

Building Research Note, 1984-08

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC : https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=28258818-acba-47a7-a40c-69ab43384f16 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=28258818-acba-47a7-a40c-69ab43384f16

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/40000498

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Fire tests on insulated sheet steel walls Bardell, K. H.

(2)

BUILDING

RESEA

NOTE

FlFtE TESTS ON INSULATED SHEET STEEL WALLS

by

K.B. Bardell

(3)

FIRE TESTS ON I N S U T E D SHEET STEEL WALLS

bY K.H. Bardell

The National Building Code of h a d a (NBCC) requires that insulated

sheet steel w a l l s commnly used on the exterior of cormaercial and industrial

buildings have a fire resistance rating of h or more, In certain

aftuatims t h i s requlremnt may be waived f o r exterior walls located 1.2 m or further froin adjacent structures @BcC 3.2,3,9) (1). For such walls, the temperatures,

s,

on the unexpoeed face during a s p e c i f i e d time under f i r e test cmdi'tiona governs the required s p a t i a l separation.

A

aeriea of ten emalle9cale f i r e t e s t s of insulated sheet-steel walls had previously been conducted (2) t o study t h e m 1 perfotmaace. The p r e a a t

report describes the results of two full-8cale f i r e resistance tests

designed t o verify small-scale t e s t results and detsrmfne f i r e resistance

values and spatial separation requiremmts for insulated sheet-steel walls.

The results of a cavlty wall test are a l s o reported,

DESCRIPTION OF SPECIMENS

Details of the test specimens are shown in Figures I and 2 , i t e m

numbers below correspmding t o the part nmbers.

1, Steel liner sheet; 0.46

nrm

thick, 610 ~ l r m wide pauels; l i p - t y p e caulked vertical seam; #12 eheet m e t a l screws through the l i p at 300 mm u.c.;

Test No. 1

-

lips h s i d e wall, T e s t No. 2

-

lips outside wall.

2. Sheet metal z-bars; 150 mm wide; screwed t o l l n e r at 300 m 0 . c ~ ; Test

No. 1

-

1.22 mm t h i c k , f i v e bars of 606 m m lengths and two bars of '303 mm length. There is a space of 4 arm between the bars (see Figure 1 item 2). T e s t No. 2

-

1.91 mm t h i c k , m e cmtfnuous bar of 3630 mm

length.

3. Ceramic paper; 3.2 maa thick, glued to both e-bar flanges; Test

No. 1

-

1 layer, T e s t No. 2

-

2 layers.

4. Rock wool insulation; 128 kg m3 density; t w o layers of 75- t h i c k batts; 610 by 1220 mm square; vertical joints staggered.

5 . Exterior steel sheet; 0.46 ntm thfck, 762 mm wide painted panels; lap-

type vertical-j oint sheet metal screwed at 410 mm O.C. through the lap;

screwed t o z-bar a t 410 dmt 0.c.; Test No. 1

-

"V-beam" profile, %st

(4)

6 . Sheet a t e e l channels; 1.52 ma thick, 150 mm wide; ecrewed t o l i n e r and exterior sheet st 310 mm a-c. top and battoa and 410 mm o.c, on sides;

ramset t o cmcrete restraining frame a t 410 mm o.c,

(The following items were not part of the t e s t specimen.)

7.

Reinforced concrete ~ e s t ~ a i o i n g frame,

8. Red clay brtcks md mortar uaed as a filler between the frame (item

No. 7) and the t e a t specimen.

Wall caostructiwn was carried out by co-rcial sheet: steel erectors,

Figures 3 and 4 s h w the walls before t e s t .

TEST PILOCEDUllE

The specimens were subjected to fire test in accordance with UZC S101-

M1980 (3), following the prescribed t h e f u r n a c e temperature curve f a r s

period of 2 h. The furnace teraperature was masured by nine symmetrically distributed thermocouples enclosed in incanel tubee. The h o t junctim of each was placed 150 mm from the exposed surface of the specimen. Both

individual temperature at the nine p o i n t s in the furnace and the average of the nlne temperatures were recorded. The fuel input i n t o the furnace was automatically cmtrolled. A detailed description of the f i r e t e s t

f a c i l i t i e s of the National Besearch CMmcil is available (4).

The temperature of the ttnexposed surface of the specimens W a s measured

by nine f i x e d thermocouples and a roviPg one (Figure 5 ) . Numbers 3, 5, 6

and 8 plus the roving thermocouple =re placed in the valleys a£ the

corrugatims; the others were placed on the ridges. A l l w e r e covered w i t h

12- thick asbestos pads measuring 50 mm by 50 mm. The pads were smaller

than standard in order that they would fit in the corrugations.

In

Test No. 1 t h e roving thermocouple was fixed in a valley at z-bar l e v e l near

thermocouple 1 a t 1 h and remabed there f o r the duration af the test. h

Test No. 2 i t was in place from the begtming of the test, The lateral

deflectim of the specimen w a s measured at the wall centrepoint w l t h an LVDT (Ifnearly varying d l splacenmt trlmsducer).

OBSERVATIONS

Test No. 1

For the first 20 d n , smoke issued from the top of the corrugations on

the unexposed side, accompanied by flaming at t h e f h e a r seams on the

exposed side, indicating combustion of the organic l i n e r lip caulking. Steam continued t o issue from the top of t h e corrugations for the d u r a t i m of the test. The liner sheet underwent s f ~ i f i c a n t : defo-tim during the f i r s t 40 min, Including buckling and s e a m opening between screws (~igure 6 ) . A t I* h, 75- diam hot spots, Andicated by p a i n t charring on the unexposed face, appeared at a corrugation r i d g e near the t o p centreline and near the

(5)

z-bar screws. Ftom Figure 6 it is evident chat there was little or no

deterioraticm of the insulation near the unexposed surf ace nor of the

exterior sheet. The centreline of the wall deflected inward throughout t h e t e s t .

Test No, 2

Wall No. 2 behaved the same as wall No. 1 with the folloufng

exceptioas: the continuous z-bar bent in an s-shape at 1 h 10 min; a hot

spot developed at thermcwple Ho. 2, caused by opening of the l i n e r seam a t

t h i s locatia; the centreline of the w a l l deflected outward as t h e t e s t

began and returned toward the furnace near the end of the t e s t . Figure 7 shaws the w a l l after test.

The average furnace temperature, average-exposed surface temperature,

and temperatures of the nine fixed t h e m c o u p l e a and one rovtng one are given in Tables I and I1 and shown la Figures 8 a a d 9 f o r both testa. Deflections of the centrelhe are p l o t t e d in Figures 10 and 11.

Test No. 1

The f i r e resistance of the wall was 1 h, 40 min; failure was due to the fact that the termperature (measured by the roving thermocouple) on the

unexposed surface exceeded t h e allowable limit, 26

+

163 = 18g°C, according

to ULC-S101 (3). The t e s t was terminated after 2 h. Test No. 2

The f i r e resistqnce af the wall was 1 h and 30 min; failure was due t o the fact that the temperature (measured by the roving thermocouple) on the

unexposed surf ace exceeded the- d l w a b l e limit. The test was terminated

after 2 h. Immediately f a l h w i a g the t e s t s t h e furnace was opened and the

specimens were subjected t o a 180-8 Rose stream test l a which the water pressure was 205 kPa (Figure 12). The specimens s hawed n o further

deterioration as a reault of the hose stream test,

The N a t f u n a l M l l d i n g M e , s e c t i m 3 - 2 - 3 3 ( I ) , dictates the s p a t i a l

separatfam requiremts far walls that do not pass the insulation

requiremedlts of t h e fire resistance test but remain intact f o r a given fire

r e s i s e a ~ c e period. h equivalent opening factor,

so,

i s calculated for t h e w a l l at: the given period according to:

(T,

+

273)'

(6)

where TU = average temperature, in degrees Celslus, of the unexposed wall surface at the t i m e the required fireresistmce rating is

reached under t e s t c a d i t i o n s T

, = 8 9 2 ' ~ for a 314-h f ireresistmace rating, 927°C for a 1-h fireresiatrmce rattng,

10IO°C fare a 2-h Eire-resistance rating.

Equivalent unprotected openfngs are thus hcreased by this factor arld the required d i s t a n c e betwea the wall and the lot l i n e is increased

according t o the WBC, Sactim 3.2.3.1 (1). Table 111 stlgsriszes t h e

,

,

F

values for the test walls calculated for periods greater than their fire

resistmce. Also 11 sted are the correspmding s p a t i d aeperrarian values.

Figure 13 compares the average unexposed surface teperature determined

in the full-ecale and small t e s t s and that d e t e r d n e d by a calculatim

procedure described in Reference (2). The full-cala walls showed superibr

performance, probably due to s stack effect that developed i n the

corrugatfone and c o o l e d the unexposed surface. This effect was not present

in the smalFscale tests, nor wae I t taken into account i n the calculatim procedure.

1, National Building Code of h a p a , Associate Committee on the &tima1

Building Code, National Research Council of Canada, N W C 17303, 1980.

2. lardell, K., Thermal Performance of Sheet Steel Walls EKposed t o Fire,

To be published.

3. ULC-Sl01-Ml980, Standard Hethads of Flre adarance &sts of Building

Construction and Materials, Ih derwriters' La borataries of Canada,

Scarborough, Chtario.

4. Shorter, G.W. and T.Z. Hamthy, Fire &search Furnaces at the Maticma1 Research Council, Natimal Besearch Council of Canada, Divisim of

Building Research, NRC 5732, 1960.

This work was carried out tmder a program approved by a joint co&ttee

of the Canadian Steel Consttuctim Council and the Natioad Research CauuciT

(7)

TABLE I

TEST NO. 1, TEMPERATURES 'C

Temp. of Unexposed

Time Furnace Surface of

( m i d Qmperature Specilnen Thermocouple Readings

Prescr. Av. Av

.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8ov.

*

Failure

(8)

T m E

I

I

TEST NO. 2, TEMFBEBTIJRgS O C

Temp. of

Tln exposed Time Furnace Surface of

(dn) Temperature Specimen

. . -- . --

(9)

TABLE 111

SUMWRY OF TEST IlgSULTS

Average

Fire Unexposed

wall Itsiaemce ~emp:, 'C Time ,,F S p a t i a l Separation

2 h 0.0089 1.2 m f a r w a l l less than 500 sq m

2 1 h, 30 win 234 2 h 0.024 1 . 2 m f o r w a l l l e s s than 250 sq m

(10)

Figure 1

T e s t specimen

WALL NO. 1

610rnm,

Figure 2

(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)

I 1 I - 1 FURNACE TEMPERATURE7

-

-

UWPOSED SURFACE - MAXIMUM 'FEMPERATURE AVERAGE TEMPEATLIRE Figure 8

Average tqeratures, Test No. 1

TIME, min

Figure 9

(16)

TIME, min

Figure 10

Deflection of centreline, Test No. I

TIME. m i n

Figure 11

(17)

Figure 12 Hose Stream Test

Figure 1 3

Figure

Figure  13  compares  the average  unexposed surface  teperature determined  in the  full-ecale  and  small  t e s t s   and  that  d e t e r d n e d   by  a  calculatim
Figure  1  T e s t   specimen
Figure 12  Hose  Stream  Test

Références

Documents relatifs

(2013) Length-weight relationship and seasonal effects of the Summer Monsoon on condition factor of Terapon jarbua (Forsskål, 1775) from the wider Gulf of Aden including

Identification and detection of a novel point mutation in the Chitin Synthase gene of Culex pipiens associated with diflubenzuron resistance...

These depend on which actor controls the trait (the vector or the parasite) and, when there is manipulation, whether it is realised via infected hosts (to attract vectors) or

Brennan TP, Woods JO, Sedaghat AR, Siliciano JD, Siliciano RF, Wilke CO: Analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 viremia and provirus in resting CD4+ T cells reveals a

The newly employed reactive magnetron co-sputtering technique has allowed us to enhance the absorption coefficient from the MLs owing to the high density of Si-ncs achieved and/or the

Market and communication schemes have taken a noticeable place in temples and some of them can be regarded as types of “mega-temples.” 2 This article describes the

Altogether, these results indicate that expression of the endogenous DRP1 protein is important for maintaining normal mitochondrial morphology in NHEK and that loss of this

sour rot symptoms in the field and in the laboratory (n = 5 bunches), ‘Post-harvest mild rot’ indicates fruit that were collected without rot symptoms but showed mild rot in