• Aucun résultat trouvé

An unified presentation of equilibrium distributions in classical and quantum statistical mechanics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "An unified presentation of equilibrium distributions in classical and quantum statistical mechanics"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A

H ENRYK G ZYL

An unified presentation of equilibrium distributions in classical and quantum statistical mechanics

Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 32, n

o

2 (1980), p. 175-183

<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1980__32_2_175_0>

© Gauthier-Villars, 1980, tous droits réservés.

L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.

org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.

Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques

http://www.numdam.org/

(2)

175

An unified presentation

of equilibrium distributions in classical and quantum statistical mechanics

Henryk GZYL

Escuela de fisica y matematicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad central de Venezuela, Caracas

Vol. XXXII, 2, 1980, Physique théorique.

ABSTRACT. 2014 We show that in the usual

description

of

equilibrium

states

in classical and

quantum

statistical mechanics it suffices to

postulate

the

grandcanonical

distributions and that the other two, the canonical and the

microcanonical,

can be obtained

by taking

conditional

expectations

with

respect to the number of

particles

or with

respect

to the number of

particles

and the other

macroscopical

observables.

RESUME. 2014 Nous

demontrons,

que dans la

description

ordinaire pour les etats

d’equilibre

dans Ie cadre de la

mecanique statistique (classique

et

quantique)

il suffit de

postuler

les distributions

grand canoniques.

Les

distributions

canoniques

et

microcanoniques, pouvant

etre obtenues si

nous prenons des

expectations

conditionnels par rapport au nombre de

particles,

ou par

rapport

au nombre des

particules

et les observables

macroscopiques

restants.

1. INTRODUCTION

In the usual

description

of statistical systems

(see [7 ],

for

example)

one

assumes

postulates

which tantamount to

postulate

three different types of «

equilibrium

distributions ». These are known

respectively

as micro-

canonical,

canonical and

grand-canonical distributions,

both in the case

of classical and quantum statistical mechanics.

They

describe

equilibrium

states of systems with : fixed energy and number of

particles,

fixed number

Annales de l’Institut Henri-Poincaré-Section A-Vol. XXXII, 0020-2339/1980/175/jt5,00/

(Ç) Gauthier-Villars

(3)

176 H. GZYL

of

particles

and

varying

energy and

varying

energy and number of

particles.

We are

going

to show

that,

both in the classical and quantum cases, it suffices to

postulate

the

grand-canonical

distribution and the other two

can be obtained when we

compute

conditional

expectations given

the

number of

particles

or

given

both the number of

particles

and the energy,

obtaining respectively

the canonical and the microcanonical distributions.

In section 2 we treat the case of classical statistical mechanics and in section 3 we treat the quantum case. Our

approach

will be

general enough

to allow for

equilibrium

distributions to

depend

on several

macroscopical

observables.

2. THE CLASSICAL CASE

In this section we shall

postulate

the

equilibrium

distribution for a

system with a variable number of

particles

and obtain the canonical and microcanonical distributions

by appropriate conditioning.

As state space for a system with variable number of

particles

we take

a set of the type

where

Eo == /J

stands for the state space of a system with no

particles

and

1,

will be a finite dimensional manifold

(usually En

=

R6n)

descri-

bing

the states of a system of n

particles.

The observables will be functions

f :

E ~ [R obtained from collections

{ fn

An

important

observable is the « number of par- ticles »

N,

which is such that

N |En

= n.

If {

=

f

is an

observable,

we shall put

fN

for the function

fN :

such that = if

N(x)

= n.

The states of our system will be

probability

measures

(whose

structure

will be

specified

more

below)

on

(E, 8l(E)). 8l(E)

denotes the Borel sets of E.

If

is a state, we shall denote

by n

the restriction of ,u to

En.

If is an

observable,

we define the

expected

value

of f

in the state

by

For the observableN we have =

nP" P" = ,un(En) _ ,u(En)

n=o .

is the

probability

of

having

n

particles

in the state /1.

Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section A

(4)

Before

continuing,

let us mention that this

type

of

descriptions

of classi-

cal mechanics can be found in

[6] or [2 ].

Let us now make the nature of

the n

more

precise.

In each

En

we

pick

up a differential from of

degree equal

to the dim

En (a

volume

element)

which we denote

by dVn,

and we

assume that there exists a finite

independent family F~,

...,

F~

of obser-

vables such that

00

where

the an

are constants

and

= 1. and

certainly

the are

n=0

positive

measurable functions. Now we are

going

to compute some condi- tional

expectations.

The reader should check

[4] ]

for all necessary defi- nitions.

Computation of E~ N ] :

i. e. of the conditional distribution of

f given

N

in state ~c. For any bounded

measurable g

it must hold that

where we

put N ] = h(N).

Let us compute both sides of

(2 . 2).

Since 2 . 2 holds for any g, it follows that

Certainly,

when ...,

Fn)

= exp

(

- we have that

which

corresponds

to the canonical distribution. We also see that

N ]

does not

depend

on the choice of the a,~.

Computation of N, F~,

...,

F~] :

i. e. of the conditional

expectation

of

f

in the state

given

N and

F1N,

..., k. This will result in a Vol. XXXII, nO 2-1980.

(5)

178 H. GZYL

distribution that lies « between » the canonical and the microcanonical distributions. The later is obtained

when j

= k.

Let us put

h(N, FN,

...,

F~)

=

N, FN,

...,

F~] ;

then for any function of the

type

..., and bounded and measu-

rable)

it is true that

Let us now compute each side of

(2.4). Obviously

and since is

arbitrary

which, being

valid for any g2,

implies

that

We shall now make use of the

independence

of the functions

F;, (in

the

sense that their differentials

~F~

are

independent

cotangent

vectors)

in

order to compute the left hand side of

(2.6).

We

begin by forming

the

j-form dFn

A ... A

~

and the

d(n)-j-form

*

(dFn

A ... A Here is the dimension of

En

and * is the

Hodge

star operator

(see [3 ]).

We then have

stands for the norm of the form

given by

the obvious scalar

product).

If we define

(with

an obvious abuse of

notation)

then

and * we see " that

plays

the role of the surface element on each

hyper-surface {F1n =

ab ...,

Fjn = an}.

Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare-Section A

(6)

Let us now

compute

both sides of

(2. 5).

where

is the area of the

hypersurface {F1n = a1,

...,

Fjn = aj}.

Since

(2.5)

is valid for any

g2 it

follows that

This is a distribution which is « between » the canonical and the micro- canonical.

When j

== ~ we obtain

with

and

again

the result does not

depend

on ...,

F:)

and that we obtain

the usual result see

[7] for j

= k = 1 and

Fn - Hn

is obvious.

3.

QUANTUM

CASE

As in the

previous section,

we shall see that it is

enough

to

postulate

the

equilibrium

distribution for a system with variable number of

particles,

Vol. XXXII, n° 2-1980.

(7)

180 H. GZYL

and that in order to obtain the other two distributions it is

enough

to

specify (or rather,

to

measure)

the number of

particles

and the other

macroscopic

observables.

Let us

briefly

review the

description

of

equilibrium

states in

quantum

statistical mechanics. The reader can check in

[2] ]

for more details. We start with a Hilbert space

where

Hm

M ~ 1 describes the « pure » states

of an n-particle system

and

Ho

is

essentially

the

complex

numbers. Let us recall that the elements in Hare of the

from 1/1

=

1/10

(B

1/1’

(B ... (B (B ... with in

Hm

and

only finitely

many of them different from zero, or such

that

x.

The observables of the system are described

by

operators of the form

where

An

is a hermitian operator on

Hn representing

an observable of

a

system

of

n-particles.

The usual statistical

description

makes use of a

generalization

of the

notion of state via the introduction of «

density

matrices ». We shall consider

density

matrices of the type

where the /)~ are

positive

hermitian matrices.

The

expected

value of an observables A in the state p is

given by

where

Tr( )n

indicates trace relative to

Hn.

In the

quantum

case the number of

particles

operator will be of the from

where "

In

is the

identity

on

Hn.

Note " that N commutes with any observable A

Annales de Henri Poincaré-Section A

(8)

and that its

eigenstates

are of the form

.n arbitrary

in

Hn.

Also

Pn,

the

projector

on the

n-particle

states is of the form

In this section we shall assume that the ?~ are of the form where

We shall assume that the

Fn,

...,

Fn

are a

commuting

set

of

hermitian opo- rators and that their spectra are discrete and that their

eigenvectors form

a

complete

set. In order not to have domain

problems

we shall assume them

bounded.

Now we suppose we are

given

a p as

above, and an

observable

A,

and

we assume we measure N

(or

N and

F 1,

...,

Fk)

and we want to

compute N], N,

...,

F~] ]

the conditional

expected

values of A in

the state p

given

N

(or given N, FB

...,

Computation of By

definition

(see [7] ]

or

[2 ])

is

the operator in the Von Neumann

algebra generated by

N

satisfying

for any

?. Certainly

oc.

where we wrote

N ] as 03A3 Ep[A IN

=

n]Pn

which from tlm

n=o

commutativity

of N with any other observable.

Therefore,

it follows from

(3 1)

that

which in the

particular

case in which

Fn - Hn

and = exp

(

-

we obtain

and we see that after

measuring

N in the state p, the

expected

value of A

coincides with the

expected

value of

An according

to the canonical distri- bution.

Vol. XXXII, 2-1980.

(9)

182 H. GZYL

Computation of Ep [A N,

...,

Fk] :

If ...,

fik

are the

eigenvalues

of

F~,

...,

F~

and is the

projector

on the

subspace generated by

the

corresponding eigenvectors

we have

PnP fm,. , , ,.~. k

= 0 unless m = n.

The conditional

expectation N, F~,

...,

F~]

is the element in the Von Neumann

algebra generated by N, F~,

...,

F~,

such that

Now,

the

right

hand side of

(3 . 4) equals

From the

assumptions

on the set

F~,

...,

Fn,

it follows that

and

taking

this in to account it follows that the left hand side of

(3.4)

can be

computed

as follows

Comparing

both sides of

(3.4)

we obtain

the

meaning

of which is clear : is the

expected

value

of An

over the set of states

corresponding

to

eigenvalues f n, ... ,

and

Tr

(P f~t , , . , ,,~. k~n

is the

degeneracy

of that set of

states.

With this we prove our

contention, namely :

that it is

enough

to

postulate

the

grandcanonical

distribution and that the other two can be obtained from it

by specifying enough macroscopical

observables.

REFERENCES

[1] E. B. DAVIES and J. T. LEWIS, An Operational Apprach to Quantum Probability,

Comm. Math. Phys., t. 7, 1970, p. 239-260.

[2] J. M. COOK, Banach Algebras and Asymptotic Mechanics, Cargese, Lect. Theor.

Phys., Gordon Breach, 1967.

[3] H. FLANDERS, Differential Forms, Acad. Press, N. Y., 1963.

[4] I. I. GIHMAN and A. V. SKOROHOD, The Theory of Stochastic Processes I, Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1974.

Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare-Section A

(10)

[5] S. GUDDER and I. P. MARCHAND, Non-communative Probability on Von Neumann

Algebras. Jour. Math. Phys., t. 13, no. 5, 1972, p. 199-306.

[6] D. RUELLE, States of Classical Mechanics. Jour. Math. Phys., t. 8, 1968, p. 1657- 1668.

[7] D. N. ZUBAREV, Non-equilibrium Statistical Thermodynamics. Consultants Bureau, N. Y., 1974.

( M anuscrit reçu le 12 1978)

Vol. XXXII, 2-1980.

Références

Documents relatifs

In popular accounts of quantum mechanics, such great emphases is placed on the Heisenberg Un- certainty Principle that it often appears that the primary effect of quantum

ىمع ةرطيسلاك ةينكناقلا تابمطتملا ؽييبطت لدم ىمع ـاظنلا اذى زكريك راطخلأا , ؼمتخم ؿخاد يلاحلا ةرادلإا ـاظنل ةمماش ةعجارم ءارجإ بمطتت لا اينأ ذإ ؾارطانكس عمجم

Même chose pour la température du dialysat qui avait aussi un impact sur la tolérance hémodynamique, nous avions appliqué le même réglage à 37°pour tous les

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Many quantum field theory techniques, such as the renormalization group formalism, have been particularly use- ful in statistical mechanics [3] but, in spite of the fact that it is

In summary, we have shown how supersymmetric quantum mechanics could provide -in an easy and systematic fashion - an estimate of the time of approach to equilibrium of a

Another notable difficulty with this problem is that the mean field limit in clas- sical mechanics is obtained by proving the weak convergence of the N -particle empirical measure

field through the use of a non commutative algebra of operators generaliz- ing the algebra of classical observables on the corresponding classical phase space.. It