A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
H ENRYK G ZYL
An unified presentation of equilibrium distributions in classical and quantum statistical mechanics
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 32, n
o2 (1980), p. 175-183
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1980__32_2_175_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1980, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
175
An unified presentation
of equilibrium distributions in classical and quantum statistical mechanics
Henryk GZYL
Escuela de fisica y matematicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad central de Venezuela, Caracas
Vol. XXXII, n° 2, 1980, Physique ’ théorique. ’
ABSTRACT. 2014 We show that in the usual
description
ofequilibrium
statesin classical and
quantum
statistical mechanics it suffices topostulate
thegrandcanonical
distributions and that the other two, the canonical and themicrocanonical,
can be obtainedby taking
conditionalexpectations
withrespect to the number of
particles
or withrespect
to the number ofparticles
and the other
macroscopical
observables.RESUME. 2014 Nous
demontrons,
que dans ladescription
ordinaire pour les etatsd’equilibre
dans Ie cadre de lamecanique statistique (classique
etquantique)
il suffit depostuler
les distributionsgrand canoniques.
Lesdistributions
canoniques
etmicrocanoniques, pouvant
etre obtenues sinous prenons des
expectations
conditionnels par rapport au nombre departicles,
ou parrapport
au nombre desparticules
et les observablesmacroscopiques
restants.1. INTRODUCTION
In the usual
description
of statistical systems(see [7 ],
forexample)
oneassumes
postulates
which tantamount topostulate
three different types of «equilibrium
distributions ». These are knownrespectively
as micro-canonical,
canonical andgrand-canonical distributions,
both in the caseof classical and quantum statistical mechanics.
They
describeequilibrium
states of systems with : fixed energy and number of
particles,
fixed numberAnnales de l’Institut Henri-Poincaré-Section A-Vol. XXXII, 0020-2339/1980/175/jt5,00/
(Ç) Gauthier-Villars
176 H. GZYL
of
particles
andvarying
energy andvarying
energy and number ofparticles.
We are
going
to showthat,
both in the classical and quantum cases, it suffices topostulate
thegrand-canonical
distribution and the other twocan be obtained when we
compute
conditionalexpectations given
thenumber of
particles
orgiven
both the number ofparticles
and the energy,obtaining respectively
the canonical and the microcanonical distributions.In section 2 we treat the case of classical statistical mechanics and in section 3 we treat the quantum case. Our
approach
will begeneral enough
to allow for
equilibrium
distributions todepend
on severalmacroscopical
observables.
2. THE CLASSICAL CASE
In this section we shall
postulate
theequilibrium
distribution for asystem with a variable number of
particles
and obtain the canonical and microcanonical distributionsby appropriate conditioning.
As state space for a system with variable number of
particles
we takea set of the type
where
Eo == /J
stands for the state space of a system with noparticles
and1,
will be a finite dimensional manifold(usually En
=R6n)
descri-bing
the states of a system of nparticles.
The observables will be functions
f :
E ~ [R obtained from collections{ fn
Animportant
observable is the « number of par- ticles »N,
which is such thatN |En
= n.If {
=f
is anobservable,
we shall putfN
for the functionfN :
such that = if
N(x)
= n.The states of our system will be
probability
measures(whose
structurewill be
specified
morebelow)
on(E, 8l(E)). 8l(E)
denotes the Borel sets of E.If
is a state, we shall denoteby n
the restriction of ,u toEn.
If is an
observable,
we define theexpected
valueof f
in the stateby
For the observableN we have =
nP" P" = ,un(En) _ ,u(En)
n=o .
is the
probability
ofhaving
nparticles
in the state /1.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section A
Before
continuing,
let us mention that thistype
ofdescriptions
of classi-cal mechanics can be found in
[6] or [2 ].
Let us now make the nature ofthe n
moreprecise.
In eachEn
wepick
up a differential from ofdegree equal
to the dimEn (a
volumeelement)
which we denoteby dVn,
and weassume that there exists a finite
independent family F~,
...,F~
of obser-vables such that
00
where
the an
are constantsand
= 1. andcertainly
the aren=0
positive
measurable functions. Now we aregoing
to compute some condi- tionalexpectations.
The reader should check[4] ]
for all necessary defi- nitions.Computation of E~ N ] :
i. e. of the conditional distribution off given
Nin state ~c. For any bounded
measurable g
it must hold thatwhere we
put N ] = h(N).
Let us compute both sides of(2 . 2).
Since 2 . 2 holds for any g, it follows that
Certainly,
when ...,Fn)
= exp(
- we have thatwhich
corresponds
to the canonical distribution. We also see thatN ]
does not
depend
on the choice of the a,~.Computation of N, F~,
...,F~] :
i. e. of the conditionalexpectation
of
f
in the stategiven
N andF1N,
..., k. This will result in a Vol. XXXII, nO 2-1980.178 H. GZYL
distribution that lies « between » the canonical and the microcanonical distributions. The later is obtained
when j
= k.Let us put
h(N, FN,
...,F~)
=N, FN,
...,F~] ;
then for any function of thetype
..., and bounded and measu-rable)
it is true thatLet us now compute each side of
(2.4). Obviously
and since is
arbitrary
which, being
valid for any g2,implies
thatWe shall now make use of the
independence
of the functionsF;, (in
thesense that their differentials
~F~
areindependent
cotangentvectors)
inorder to compute the left hand side of
(2.6).
We
begin by forming
thej-form dFn
A ... A~
and thed(n)-j-form
*
(dFn
A ... A Here is the dimension ofEn
and * is theHodge
star operator
(see [3 ]).
We then havestands for the norm of the form
given by
the obvious scalarproduct).
If we define
(with
an obvious abuse ofnotation)
then
and * we see " that
plays
the role of the surface element on eachhyper-surface {F1n =
ab ...,Fjn = an}.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare-Section A
Let us now
compute
both sides of(2. 5).
where
is the area of the
hypersurface {F1n = a1,
...,Fjn = aj}.
Since
(2.5)
is valid for anyg2 it
follows thatThis is a distribution which is « between » the canonical and the micro- canonical.
When j
== ~ we obtainwith
and
again
the result does notdepend
on ...,F:)
and that we obtainthe usual result see
[7] for j
= k = 1 andFn - Hn
is obvious.3.
QUANTUM
CASEAs in the
previous section,
we shall see that it isenough
topostulate
the
equilibrium
distribution for a system with variable number ofparticles,
Vol. XXXII, n° 2-1980.
180 H. GZYL
and that in order to obtain the other two distributions it is
enough
tospecify (or rather,
tomeasure)
the number ofparticles
and the othermacroscopic
observables.
Let us
briefly
review thedescription
ofequilibrium
states inquantum
statistical mechanics. The reader can check in[2] ]
for more details. We start with a Hilbert spacewhere
Hm
M ~ 1 describes the « pure » statesof an n-particle system
andHo
isessentially
thecomplex
numbers. Let us recall that the elements in Hare of thefrom 1/1
=1/10
(B1/1’
(B ... (B (B ... with inHm
andonly finitely
many of them different from zero, or suchthat
x.The observables of the system are described
by
operators of the formwhere
An
is a hermitian operator onHn representing
an observable ofa
system
ofn-particles.
The usual statistical
description
makes use of ageneralization
of thenotion of state via the introduction of «
density
matrices ». We shall considerdensity
matrices of the typewhere the /)~ are
positive
hermitian matrices.The
expected
value of an observables A in the state p isgiven by
where
Tr( )n
indicates trace relative toHn.
In the
quantum
case the number ofparticles
operator will be of the fromwhere "
In
is theidentity
onHn.
Note " that N commutes with any observable AAnnales de Henri Poincaré-Section A
and that its
eigenstates
are of the form.n arbitrary
inHn.
Also
Pn,
theprojector
on then-particle
states is of the formIn this section we shall assume that the ?~ are of the form where
We shall assume that the
Fn,
...,Fn
are acommuting
setof
hermitian opo- rators and that their spectra are discrete and that theireigenvectors form
a
complete
set. In order not to have domainproblems
we shall assume thembounded.
Now we suppose we are
given
a p asabove, and an
observableA,
andwe assume we measure N
(or
N andF 1,
...,Fk)
and we want tocompute N], N,
...,F~] ]
the conditionalexpected
values of A inthe state p
given
N(or given N, FB
...,Computation of By
definition(see [7] ]
or[2 ])
isthe operator in the Von Neumann
algebra generated by
Nsatisfying
for any
?. Certainly
oc.
where we wrote
N ] as 03A3 Ep[A IN
=n]Pn
which from tlmn=o
commutativity
of N with any other observable.Therefore,
it follows from(3 1)
thatwhich in the
particular
case in whichFn - Hn
and = exp(
-we obtain
and we see that after
measuring
N in the state p, theexpected
value of Acoincides with the
expected
value ofAn according
to the canonical distri- bution.Vol. XXXII, n° 2-1980.
182 H. GZYL
Computation of Ep [A N,
...,Fk] :
If ...,fik
are theeigenvalues
of
F~,
...,F~
and is theprojector
on thesubspace generated by
the
corresponding eigenvectors
we havePnP fm,. , , ,.~. k
= 0 unless m = n.The conditional
expectation N, F~,
...,F~]
is the element in the Von Neumannalgebra generated by N, F~,
...,F~,
such thatNow,
theright
hand side of(3 . 4) equals
From the
assumptions
on the setF~,
...,Fn,
it follows thatand
taking
this in to account it follows that the left hand side of(3.4)
can be
computed
as followsComparing
both sides of(3.4)
we obtainthe
meaning
of which is clear : is theexpected
valueof An
over the set of states
corresponding
toeigenvalues f n, ... ,
andTr
(P f~t , , . , ,,~. k~n
is thedegeneracy
of that set ofstates.
With this we prove our
contention, namely :
that it isenough
topostulate
the
grandcanonical
distribution and that the other two can be obtained from itby specifying enough macroscopical
observables.REFERENCES
[1] E. B. DAVIES and J. T. LEWIS, An Operational Apprach to Quantum Probability,
Comm. Math. Phys., t. 7, 1970, p. 239-260.
[2] J. M. COOK, Banach Algebras and Asymptotic Mechanics, Cargese, Lect. Theor.
Phys., Gordon Breach, 1967.
[3] H. FLANDERS, Differential Forms, Acad. Press, N. Y., 1963.
[4] I. I. GIHMAN and A. V. SKOROHOD, The Theory of Stochastic Processes I, Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1974.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare-Section A
[5] S. GUDDER and I. P. MARCHAND, Non-communative Probability on Von Neumann
Algebras. Jour. Math. Phys., t. 13, no. 5, 1972, p. 199-306.
[6] D. RUELLE, States of Classical Mechanics. Jour. Math. Phys., t. 8, 1968, p. 1657- 1668.
[7] D. N. ZUBAREV, Non-equilibrium Statistical Thermodynamics. Consultants Bureau, N. Y., 1974.
( M anuscrit reçu le 12 1978)
Vol. XXXII, n° 2-1980.