• Aucun résultat trouvé

AND LINEAR FORMS OF e IN TERMS OF INTEGRALS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "AND LINEAR FORMS OF e IN TERMS OF INTEGRALS"

Copied!
20
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

AND LINEAR FORMS OF e IN TERMS OF INTEGRALS

TAKAO KOMATSU

Letpn/qn be thenth convergent ofα= [a0;a1, a2, . . .]. It is known thatpn/qn

approximatesαvery well. In other words,|pn/qnα|is small and tends to 0 as ntends to infinity. The purpose of this paper is to expresspnqnαin terms of integrals for a givenα. In special, some typical values of tanh, tan, and linear forms of e are considered. For example, if pn/qn is the nth convergent of the continued fraction expansion ofp

v/utanh(1/

uv),u, v >0, then p2n−1

rv

utanh 1

uvq2n−1=− 1 e2/uv+ 1

4 uv

nZ1

0

x2n−1(x1)2n−1 (2n1)! e2x/

uv

dx forn1. Ifpn/qn is thenth convergent of the continued fraction expansion of (e + 1)/3, then

p18n+2e + 1

3 q18n+2= 1 3

Z 1

0

(x+ 1)x6n+2(x1)6n+2

(6n+ 2)! exdx, n0.

AMS 2000 Subject Classification: 11A55, 11J70.

Key words: continued fraction expansion, diophantine approximation.

1. INTRODUCTION

Let α = [a0;a1, a2, . . .] denote the simple continued fraction expansion of a real α, where

α=a0+ 1/α1, a0 =bαc, αn=an+ 1/αn+1, an=bαnc, n≥1.

Thenth convergent of the continued fraction expansion is denoted bypn/qn= [a0;a1, . . . , an], andpnand qn satisfy the recurrence relations

pn=anpn−1+pn−2, n≥0, p−1 = 1, p−2= 0, qn=anqn−1+qn−2, n≥0, q−1= 0, q−2 = 1.

REV. ROUMAINE MATH. PURES APPL.,54(2009),3, 223–242

(2)

pn/qn,n= 0,1,2, . . ., are good approximates of α in the sense that |pn/qn− α| →0 as n→ ∞. More precisely, the equation

pn−qnα= (−1)n+1 αn+1qn+qn−1

does hold (see, e.g., [1, Lemma 5.4]).

Osler [10] investigated the case where α = e1/s, s≥ 2. When pn/qn is the nth convergent of the continued fraction of

e1/s= [1; (2k−1)s−1,1,1 ]k=1, he showed that

p3n−q3ne1/s=− 1 sn+1

Z 1 0

xn(x−1)n

n! ex/sdx, (1)

p3n+1−q3n+1e1/s= 1 sn+1

Z 1 0

xn+1(x−1)n

n! ex/sdx (2)

and

(3) p3n+2−q3n+2e1/s= 1 sn+1

Z 1 0

xn(x−1)n+1

n! ex/sdx

forn≥0. This was a direct extension of a result of Cohn [2] concerning e. In fact, a similar expression was given in [3].

In a similar manner, whenpn/qn is thenth convergent of the continued fraction of

e2/s =

1;(6k−5)s−1

2 ,(12k−6)s,(6k−1)s−1 2 ,1,1

k=1

, where s >1 is odd, for n≥0 we have

p5n−q5ne2/s =− 2

s

3n+1Z 1 0

x3n(x−1)3n

(3n)! e2x/sdx, (4)

p5n+1−q5n+1e2/s=−23n+1 s3n+2

Z 1 0

x3n+1(x−1)3n+1

(3n+ 1)! e2x/sdx, (5)

p5n+2−q5n+2e2/s =− 2

s

3n+3Z 1 0

x3n+2(x−1)3n+2

(3n+ 2)! e2x/sdx, (6)

p5n+3−q5n+3e2/s = 2

s

3n+3Z 1 0

x3n+3(x−1)3n+2

(3n+ 2)! e2x/sdx, (7)

and (see [7])

(8) p5n+4−q5n+4e2/s = 2

s

3n+3Z 1

0

x3n+2(x−1)3n+3

(3n+ 2)! e2x/sdx.

(3)

These results were extended to the cases of e1/s/3,se1/(ls), and e1/(ls)/s in [9]. In this paper, we establish a method to express pn−qnα in terms of integrals ifα is a function of e and its continued fraction expansion has some kind of regularity like quasi-periodicity. In particular, we shall consider the following values of α

rv

utanh 1

√uv, rv

utan 1

√uv, e1/s+ 1 3 for u, v >0 and s≥1.

2. MAIN LEMMA

Ifpn/qn denotes the nth convergent of the continued fraction of e1/s =

1; (2k−1)s−1,1,1

k=0, s≥1, then it can be proved by induction that

p3n=

n

X

k=0

(n+k)!

k!(n−k)!sk, q3n=

n

X

k=0

(−1)n−k (n+k)!

k!(n−k)!sk, p3n+1 =

n

X

k=0

(n+k+ 1)!

k!(n−k)! sk+1, q3n+1= (n+1)

n+1

X

k=0

(−1)n−k+1 (n+k)!

k!(n−k+1)!sk, p3n+2 = (n+ 1)

n+1

X

k=0

(n+k)!

k!(n−k+ 1)!sk, q3n+2=

n

X

k=0

(−1)n−k(n+k+ 1)!

k!(n−k)! sk+1 for n≥0 (see [6, Example 1]). By substituting these expressions into Osler’s identities (1), (2) and (3), we get the following lemma, which shall be used again and again to obtain the main results in this paper. An independent proof can be found in [9, Theorem 2].

Lemma 1. Forn≥0 we have

n

X

k=0

(n+k)!

k!(n−k)!sk−e1/s

n

X

k=0

(−1)n−k (n+k)!

k!(n−k)!sk (9)

=− 1 sn+1

Z 1 0

xn(x−1)n

n! ex/sdx,

n

X

k=0

(n+k+ 1)!

k!(n−k)! sk+1−e1/s(n+ 1)

n+1

X

k=0

(−1)n−k+1 (n+k)!

k!(n−k+ 1)!sk (10)

= 1

sn+1 Z 1

0

xn+1(x−1)n

n! ex/sdx,

(4)

(n+ 1)

n+1

X

k=0

(n+k)!

k!(n−k+ 1)!sk−e1/s

n

X

k=0

(−1)n−k(n+k+ 1)!

k!(n−k)! sk+1 (11)

= 1

sn+1 Z 1

0

xn(x−1)n+1

n! ex/sdx .

3. DIOPHANTINE APPROXIMATION OF tanh Letpn/qn be the nth convergent of the continued fraction

rv

utanh 1

√uv =

0; (4k−3)u,(4k−1)v

k=1, u, v >0.

Our main result can be stated as follows.

Theorem 1. For n= 1,2, . . . we have p2n−1

rv

utanh 1

√uvq2n−1

(12)

=− 1

e2/uv+ 1 4

uv nZ 1

0

x2n−1(x−1)2n−1 (2n−1)! e2x/

uvdx,

p2n− rv

utanh 1

√uvq2n

(13)

=− 2

(e2/uv+ 1)u 4

uv nZ 1

0

x2n(x−1)2n (2n)! e2x/

uvdx .

The proof is based upon a combinatorial expression of the leaping con- vergents together with Lemma 1.

Lemma 2[8, Corollary 1]. Forn= 1,2, . . . we have p2n−1 =

n−1

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i−1)!

(2i)!(2n−2i−1)!

u 2

iv 2

i

,

p2n=

n−1

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i+ 1)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i−1)!

u 2

iv 2

i+1

,

q2n−1 =

n−1

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i−2)!

u 2

i+1v 2

i

, q2n=

n

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i)!

(2i)!(2n−2i)!

u 2

iv 2

i

.

(5)

Theproof is by induction and we omit it.

Proof of Theorem1. First, notice that

2n−1

X

k=0

(2n+k−1)!

k!(2n−k−1)!

√ uv 2

k

=

n−1

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i−1)!

(2i)!(2n−2i−1)!

uv 4

i

+

n−1

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i−2)!

√ uv 4

i√ uv

2 =p2n−1+ rv

uq2n−1

and

2n−1

X

k=0

(−1)k+1 (2n+k−1)!

k!(2n−k−1)!

√ uv 2

k

=−p2n−1+ rv

uq2n−1. Replacing nby 2n−1 and sby√

uv/2 in (9), we have

p2n−1+ rv

uq2n−1

−e2/

uv

−p2n−1+ rv

uq2n−1

=− 4

uv nZ 1

0

x2n−1(x−1)2n−1 (2n−1)! e2x/

uvdx .

Dividing both sides by e2/

uv+ 1, we get (12).

Next, notice that

2n

X

k=0

(2n+k)!

k!(2n−k)!

√ uv 2

k

=

n

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i)!

(2i)!(2n−2i)!

uv 4

i

+

n−1

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i+ 1)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i−1)!

√ uv 4

i √ uv

2 =q2n+ ru

v p2n

and

2n

X

k=0

(−1)k (2n+k)!

k!(2n−k)!

√ uv 2

k

=q2n− ru

v p2n. Replacing nby 2n ands by√

uv/2 in (9), we have

q2n+ ru

v p2n

−e2/

uv

q2n

ru vp2n

=− 2

√uv 4

uv nZ 1

0

x2n(x−1)2n (2n)! e2x/

uvdx .

Dividing both sides by (e2/

uv+ 1)p

u/v, we get (13).

(6)

4. DIOPHANTINE APPROXIMATION OF tan Letpn/qn be the nth convergent of the continued fraction rv

utan 1

√uv =

0;u−1,1,(4k−1)v−2,1,(4k+ 1)u−2

k=1, u, v, >0.

Now, our main result can be stated as follows.

Theorem 2. For n= 1,2, . . . we have p4n−3

rv

utan 1

√uvq4n−3 = 1 2(e2

−1/ uv+ 1)

4 uv

n

(14) ×

× Z 1

0

(2x2−2x+ (2n−1)v)x2n−2(x−1)2n−2

(2n−1)! e2

−1x/ uvdx, p4n−2

rv

utan 1

√uvq4n−2= 1 e2

−1/ uv+ 1

4 uv

n

(15) ×

× Z 1

0

x2n−1(x−1)2n−1 (2n−1)! e2

−1x/ uvdx, p4n−1

rv

utan 1

√uvq4n−1 =− 2 (e2

−1/

uv+ 1)u 4

uv n

(16) ×

× Z 1

0

(x2−x+nu)x2n−1(x−1)2n−1

(2n)! e2

−1x/ uvdx, p4n

rv

utan 1

√uvq4n

(17)

=− 2

(e2

−1/

uv+ 1)u 4

uv nZ 1

0

x2n(x−1)2n (2n)! e2

−1x/ uvdx .

The proof is based upon a combinatorial expression of the leaping con- vergents together with Lemma 1 again.

Lemma 3[8, Corollary 2]. Forn= 1,2, . . . we have p4n−3 =

n−1

X

i=0

(−1)n−i−1 (2n+ 2i−1)!

(2i)!(2n−2i−1)!

u 2

iv 2

i

n−2

X

i=0

(−1)n−i (2n+ 2i−1)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i−3)!

u 2

iv 2

i+1

,

p4n−2 =

n−1

X

i=0

(−1)n−i−1 (2n+ 2i−1)!

(2i)!(2n−2i−1)!

u 2

iv 2

i

,

(7)

p4n−1 =

n−1

X

i=0

(−1)n−i−1 (2n+ 2i+ 1)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i−1)!

u 2

iv 2

i+1

n−1

X

i=0

(−1)n−i−1 (2n+ 2i−1)!

(2i)!(2n−2i−1)!

u 2

iv 2

i

,

p4n=

n−1

X

i=0

(−1)n−i−1 (2n+ 2i+ 1)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i−1)!

u 2

iv 2

i+1

,

q4n−3 =

n−1

X

i=0

(−1)n−i−1 (2n+ 2i)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i−2)!

u 2

i+1v 2

i

n−1

X

i=0

(−1)n−i−1 (2n+ 2i−2)!

(2i)!(2n−2i−2)!

u 2

iv 2

i

,

q4n−2 =

n−1

X

i=0

(−1)n−i−1 (2n+ 2i)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i−2)!

u 2

i+1v 2

i

, q4n−1 =

n

X

i=0

(−1)n−i (2n+ 2i)!

(2i)!(2n−2i)!

u 2

iv 2

i

n−1

X

i=0

(−1)n−i−1 (2n+ 2i)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i−2)!

u 2

i+1v 2

i

, q4n=

n

X

i=0

(−1)n−i (2n+ 2i)!

(2i)!(2n−2i)!

u 2

iv 2

i

.

Proof of Theorem2. Notice that

(−1)n−1

2n−1

X

k=0

(2n+k−1)!

k!(2n−k−1)!

√ uv 2√

−1 k

=

n−1

X

i=0

(−1)n−i−1 (2n+ 2i−1)!

(2i)!(2n−2i−1)!

u 2

iv 2

i

+

n−1

X

i=0

(−1)n−i−1 (2n+ 2i)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i−2)!

u 2

iv 2

i √ uv 2√

−1

=p4n−2+ rv

u

√1

−1q4n−2

(8)

and (−1)n−1

2n−1

X

k=0

(−1)k+1 (2n+k−1)!

k!(2n−k−1)!

√ uv 2√

−1 k

=−p4n−2+ rv

u

√1

−1q4n−2. Replacing nby 2n−1 and sby√

uv/(2√

−1) in (9), we obtain

p4n−2+ rv

u

√1

−1q4n−2

−e2

−1/ uv

−p4n−2+ rv

u

√1

−1q4n−2

=−(−1)n−1(−1)n 4

uv nZ 1

0

x2n−1(x−1)2n−1 (2n−1)! e2

−1/ uvdx . Dividing both sides by e2

−1/

uv+ 1, we get (15).

In order to get (17), notice that (−1)n

2n

X

k=0

(2n+k)!

k!(2n−k)!

√ uv 2√

−1 k

=

n

X

i=0

(−1)n−i (2n+ 2i)!

(2i)!(2n−2i)!

u 2

iv 2

i

+

n−1

X

i=0

(−1)n−i (2n+ 2i+ 1)!

(2i+1)!(2n−2i−1)!

u 2

iv 2

i √ uv 2√

−1 =q4n+ ru

v

√−1p4n

and

(−1)n

2n

X

k=0

(−1)k (2n+k)!

k!(2n−k)!

√ uv 2√

−1 k

=q4n− ru

v

√−1p4n.

Replacing nby 2n ands by√

uv/(2√

−1) in (9), we obtain

q4n+

ru v

√−1p4n

−e2

−1/ uv

q4n

ru v

√−1p4n

=−(−1)n(−1)n 4

uv n

2√

√−1 uv

Z 1 0

x2n(x−1)2n (2n)! e2

−1/ uvdx . Dividing both sides by (e2

−1/

uv+ 1)p u/v√

−1, we get (17).

The identity (16) follows from (15) and (17) because p4n−1

rv

utan 1

√uvq4n−1

=

p4n− rv

utan 1

√uvq4n

p4n−2− rv

utan 1

√uvq4n−2

.

(9)

The identity (14) also follows from (15) and (2) as p4n−3

rv

utan 1

√uvq4n−3

=

p4n−2− rv

utan 1

√uvq4n−2

p4n−4− rv

utan 1

√uv q4n−4

.

5. DIOPHANTINE APPROXIMATION OF (e1/s+ 1)/3 In this section we shall consider a linear form ofe. The method developed here can be applied to any linear form of e1/s, s ≥ 1, e2/2s+1, s ≥ 0, and any value of a function of e if the corresponding continued fraction can be expressed explicitly as a so-called Hurwitz continued fraction. For example, the continued fraction expansion

e + 1 3 =h

1; 4,5,4k−3,1,1,36k−16,1,1,4k−2,1,1,36k−4, 1,1,4k−1,1,5,4k,1

i k=1

does hold ([4, p. 294, (19)], [12]). In fact, this is a special case of e1/(3s+1)+ 1

3 =h

0; 1,2,(12k−11)s+ (4k−5),1,5,(12k−9)s+ (4k−4),1,5, (12k−7)s+ (4k−3),1,1,9(12k−5)s+ 4(9k−4),1,1, (12k−3)s+ (4k−2),1,1,9(12k−1)s+ 4(9k−1),1,1

i k=1, where s≥2. For s= 0, by the rule [. . . , a,−b, γ] = [. . . , a−1,1, b−1,−γ], we get the above expression because

e + 1 3 =h

0; 1,2,−1,1,5,0,1,5,4k−3,1,1,36k−16, 1,1,4k−2,1,1,36k−4,1,1,4k−1,1,5,4k,1i

k=1. Furthermore, for s= 1 we have

e1/4+ 1

3 =

h

0; 1,2,0,1,5,16k−13,1,5,16k−10,1,1,

144k−61,1,1,16k−5,1,1,144k−13,1,1,16k,1i k=1

=h

0; 1,3,5,16k−13,1,5,16k−10,1,1,

144k−61,1,1,16k−5,1,1,144k−13,1,1,16k,1i k=1.

(10)

There are two more different patterns having the same form. Lets≥2.

Then

e1/(3s)+ 1

3 =

h

0; 1,2,(4k−3)s−1,1,1,9(4k−1)s−1,1,1 i

k=1. For s= 1 by the rule [. . . , a,0, b, . . .] = [. . . , a+b, . . .], we have

e1/3+ 1

3 =h

0; 1,2,0,1,1,9(4k−1)−1,1,1,4k,1i k=1

=h

0; 1,3,1,36k−10,1,1,4k,1i k=1. Lets≥1. Then

e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 =

h

0; 1,2,(12k−11)s+ (8k−8),5,1,(12k−9)s+ (8k−7),5,1, (12k−7)s+ (8k−6),1,1,9(12k−5)s+ (72k−31),1,1, (12k−3)s+ (8k−3),1,1,9(12k−1)s+ (72k−7),1,1i

k=1. For s= 0 we have

e1/2+ 1

3 =h

0; 1,2,0,5,1,8k−7,5,1,8k−6,1,1,

72k−31,1,1,8k−3,1,1,72k−7,1,1,8k,5i k=1

= h

0; 1,7,1,8k−7,5,1,8k−6,1,1,

72k−31,1,1,8k−3,1,1,72k−7,1,1,8k,5i k=1. Now, our main results can be stated in the following three theorems.

Theorem 3. Let pn/qn be the nth convergent of the continued fraction expansion of (e1/(3s)+ 1)/3, s≥2. Then, forn≥0,

p6n+2−e1/(3s)+ 1

3 q6n+2 =− 1 (3s)2n+1

Z 1 0

x2n(x−1)2n

(2n)! ex/(3s)dx, (18)

p6n+3− e1/(3s)+ 1

3 q6n+3= 1 3(3s)2n+1

Z 1 0

(x+1)x2n(x−1)2n

(2n)! ex/(3s)dx, (19)

p6n+4− e1/(3s)+ 1

3 q6n+4= 1 3(3s)2n+1

Z 1 0

(x−2)x2n(x−1)2n

(2n)! ex/(3s)dx, (20)

p6n+5− e1/(3s)+ 1

3 q6n+5=− 1 3(3s)2n+2

Z 1 0

x2n+1(x−1)2n+1

(2n+ 1)! ex/(3s)dx, (21)

(11)

p6n+6−e1/(3s)+ 1

3 q6n+6 = 1 3(3s)2n+2

Z 1

0

(3x−1)x2n+1(x−1)2n+1

(2n+ 1)! ex/(3s)dx, (22)

p6n+7−e1/(3s)+ 1

3 q6n+7 = 1 3(3s)2n+2

Z 1

0

(3x−2)x2n+1(x−1)2n+1

(2n+ 1)! ex/(3s)dx . (23)

Remark 1. For s = 1, denote by pn/qn, the nth convergent of the continued fraction expansion of (e1/3+ 1)/3. Then every equation in Theo- rem 3 holds if pn+2 and qn+2 are replaced by pn and qn, respectively, for n= 0,1,2, . . ..

Theorem 4. Let pn/qn be the nth convergent of the continued fraction expansion of (e1/(3s+1)+1)/3, s≥2. Then, for n≥0,

p18n+2−e1/(3s+1)+1

3 q18n+2=− 1

(3s+1)6n+1 Z 1

0

x6n(x−1)6n

(6n)! ex/(3s+1)dx, (24)

p18n+3−e1/(3s+1)+1

3 q18n+3= 1

3(3s+1)6n+1 Z 1

0

(x+2)x6n(x−1)6n

(6n)! ex/(3s+1)dx, (25)

p18n+4−e1/(3s+1)+1

3 q18n+4= 1

3(3s+1)6n+1 Z 1

0

x6n(x−1)6n+1

(6n)! ex/(3s+1)dx, (26)

p18n+5−e1/(3s+1)+1

3 q18n+5 =− 1

(3s+1)6n+2 Z 1

0

x6n+1(x−1)6n+1

(6n+1)! ex/(3s+1)dx, (27)

p18n+6−e1/(3s+1)+1

3 q18n+6= (28)

= 1

3(3s+1)6n+2 Z 1

0

(x+2)x6n+1(x−1)6n+1

(6n+1)! ex/(3s+1)dx,

p18n+7−e1/(3s+1)+1

3 q18n+7= 1

3(3s+1)6n+2 Z 1

0

x6n+1(x−1)6n+2

(6n+1)! ex/(3s+1)dx, (29)

p18n+8−e1/(3s+1)+ 1

3 q18n+8= (30)

=− 1

(3s+ 1)6n+3 Z 1

0

x6n+2(x−1)6n+2

(6n+ 2)! ex/(3s+1)dx,

(12)

p18n+9−e1/(3s+1)+ 1

3 q18n+9= (31)

= 1

3(3s+ 1)6n+3 Z 1

0

(x+ 1)x6n+2(x−1)6n+2

(6n+ 2)! ex/(3s+1)dx, p18n+10−e1/(3s+1)+ 1

3 q18n+10= (32)

= 1

3(3s+ 1)6n+3 Z 1

0

(x−2)x6n+2(x−1)6n+2

(6n+ 2)! ex/(3s+1)dx, p18n+11−e1/(3s+1)+ 1

3 q18n+11= (33)

=− 1

3(3s+ 1)6n+4 Z 1

0

x6n+3(x−1)6n+3

(6n+ 3)! ex/(3s+1)dx, p18n+12−e1/(3s+1)+ 1

3 q18n+12= (34)

= 1

3(3s+ 1)6n+4 Z 1

0

(3x−1)x6n+3(x−1)6n+3

(6n+ 3)! ex/(3s+1)dx, p18n+13−e1/(3s+1)+ 1

3 q18n+13= (35)

= 1

3(3s+ 1)6n+4 Z 1

0

(3x−2)x6n+3(x−1)6n+3

(6n+ 3)! ex/(3s+1)dx, p18n+14−e1/(3s+1)+ 1

3 q18n+14= (36)

=− 1

(3s+ 1)6n+5 Z 1

0

x6n+4(x−1)6n+4

(6n+ 4)! ex/(3s+1)dx, p18n+15−e1/(3s+1)+ 1

3 q18n+15= (37)

= 1

3(3s+ 1)6n+5 Z 1

0

(x+ 1)x6n+4(x−1)6n+4

(6n+ 4)! ex/(3s+1)dx, p18n+16−e1/(3s+1)+ 1

3 q18n+16= (38)

= 1

3(3s+ 1)6n+5 Z 1

0

(x−2)x6n+4(x−1)6n+4

(6n+ 4)! ex/(3s+1)dx, p18n+17−e1/(3s+1)+ 1

3 q18n+17= (39)

=− 1

3(3s+ 1)6n+6 Z 1

0

x6n+5(x−1)6n+5

(6n+ 5)! ex/(3s+1)dx,

(13)

p18n+18−e1/(3s+1)+ 1

3 q18n+18= (40)

= 1

3(3s+ 1)6n+6 Z 1

0

(3x−1)x6n+5(x−1)6n+5

(6n+ 5)! ex/(3s+1)dx, p18n+19−e1/(3s+1)+ 1

3 q18n+19= (41)

= 1

3(3s+ 1)6n+6 Z 1

0

(3x−2)x6n+5(x−1)6n+5

(6n+ 5)! ex/(3s+1)dx .

Remark 2. Fors= 1, denote bypn/qn, thenth convergent of the contin- ued fraction expansion of (e1/4+1)/3. Then every equation in Theorem 4 holds ifpn+2 and qn+2 are replaced by pn and qn, respectively, for n= 0,1,2, . . ..

Fors= 0, denote byp∗∗n/q∗∗n , thenth convergent of the continued fraction expansion of (e1/3+ 1)/3. Then every equation in Theorem 4 holds ifpn+6 and qn+6 are replaced bypnand qn, respectively, for n= 0,1,2, . . .. For example, for n≥0 we have

p∗∗18n+3−e+ 1

3 q∗∗18n+3 =p18n+9−e1/(3s+1)+ 1 3 q18n+9

= 1 3

Z 1 0

(x+ 1)x6n+2(x−1)6n+2 (6n+ 2)! exdx .

Theorem 5. Let pn/qn be the nth convergent of the continued fraction expansion of (e1/(3s+2)+ 1)/3, s≥1. Then, forn≥0,

p18n+2−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+2=− 1

(3s+ 1)6n+1 Z 1

0

x6n(x−1)6n

(6n)! ex/(3s+2)dx, (42)

p18n+3−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+3 = 1

3(3s+ 2)6n+1 Z 1

0

x6n+1(x−1)6n

(6n)! ex/(3s+2)dx, (43)

p18n+4−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+4= (44)

= 1

3(3s+ 2)6n+1 Z 1

0

(5x−3)x6n(x−1)6n

(6n)! ex/(3s+2)dx, p18n+5−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+5= (45)

=− 1

(3s+ 2)6n+2 Z 1

0

x6n+1(x−1)6n+1

(6n+ 1)! ex/(3s+2)dx,

(14)

p18n+6−e1/(3s+2)+1

3 q18n+6 = (46)

= 1

3(3s+2)6n+2 Z 1

0

x6n+2(x−1)6n+1

(6n+ 1)! ex/(3s+2)dx, p18n+7−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+7= (47)

= 1

3(3s+ 2)6n+2 Z 1

0

(5x−3)x6n+1(x−1)6n+1

(6n+ 1)! ex/(3s+2)dx, p18n+8−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+8= (48)

=− 1

(3s+ 2)6n+3 Z 1

0

x6n+2(x−1)6n+2

(6n+ 2)! ex/(3s+2)dx, p18n+9−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+9= (49)

= 1

3(3s+ 2)6n+3 Z 1

0

(x+ 1)x6n+2(x−1)6n+2

(6n+ 2)! ex/(3s+2)dx, p18n+10−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+10= (50)

= 1

3(3s+ 2)6n+3 Z 1

0

(x−2)x6n+2(x−1)6n+2

(6n+ 2)! ex/(3s+2)dx, p18n+11−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+11= (51)

=− 1

3(3s+ 2)6n+4 Z 1

0

x6n+3(x−1)6n+3

(6n+ 3)! ex/(3s+2)dx, p18n+12−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+12= (52)

= 1

3(3s+ 2)6n+4 Z 1

0

(3x−1)x6n+3(x−1)6n+3

(6n+ 3)! ex/(3s+2)dx, p18n+13−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+13= (53)

= 1

3(3s+ 2)6n+4 Z 1

0

(3x−2)x6n+3(x−1)6n+3

(6n+ 3)! ex/(3s+2)dx, p18n+14−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+14= (54)

=− 1

(3s+ 2)6n+5 Z 1

0

x6n+4(x−1)6n+4

(6n+ 4)! ex/(3s+2)dx,

(15)

p18n+15−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+15= (55)

= 1

3(3s+ 2)6n+5 Z 1

0

(x+ 1)x6n+4(x−1)6n+4

(6n+ 4)! ex/(3s+2)dx, p18n+16−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+16= (56)

= 1

3(3s+ 2)6n+5 Z 1

0

(x−2)x6n+4(x−1)6n+4

(6n+ 4)! ex/(3s+2)dx, p18n+17−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+17= (57)

=− 1

3(3s+ 2)6n+6 Z 1

0

x6n+5(x−1)6n+5

(6n+ 5)! ex/(3s+2)dx, p18n+18−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+18= (58)

= 1

3(3s+ 2)6n+6 Z 1

0

(3x−1)x6n+5(x−1)6n+5

(6n+ 5)! ex/(3s+2)dx, p18n+19−e1/(3s+2)+ 1

3 q18n+19= (59)

= 1

3(3s+ 2)6n+6 Z 1

0

(3x−2)x6n+5(x−1)6n+5

(6n+ 5)! ex/(3s+2)dx .

Remark. Fors= 0, denote bypn/qn thenth convergent of the continued fraction expansion of (e1/2+ 1)/3. Then every equation in Theorem 5 holds if pn+2 and qn+2 are replaced by pn and qn, respectively, for n= 0,1,2, . . ..

Note that equations (43), (44), (46) and (47) in Theorem 5 are a little different from equations (25), (26), (28) and (29) in Theorem 4, respectively.

Other equations have the same forms which differ only by having 3s+2 instead of 3s+ 1.

6. PROOF OF THEOREMS 3–5

We shall only prove Theorem 3. The proofs of Theorems 4 and 5 are similar. Lemma 1 is used again and again combined with a combinatorial expression of leaping convergents of e1/(3s) as shown in the following lemma.

The proof of this lemma is by induction on nand we omit it.

(16)

Lemma 4. Let pn/qn be the nth convergent of the continued fraction expansion of (e1/(3s)+ 1)/3. Then, forn≥0,

p6n+2 = 2

n

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i)!

(2i)!(2n−2i)!(3s)2i, p6n+3 =

n

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i+ 2)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i)!

(3s)2i+1

3 −

n

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i)!

(2i)!(2n−2i)!(3s)2i, p6n+4 =

n

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i+ 2)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i)!

(3s)2i+1

3 +

n

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i)!

(2i)!(2n−2i)!(3s)2i, p6n+5 = 2

n

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i+ 2)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i)!

(3s)2i+1

3 ,

p6n+6 =−

n

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i+ 2)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i)!

(3s)2i+1

3 +

n+1

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i+ 2)!

(2i)!(2n−2i+ 2)!(3s)2i, p6n+7 =

n

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i+ 2)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i)!

(3s)2i+1

3 +

n+1

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i+ 2)!

(2i)!(2n−2i+ 2)!(3s)2i, and

q6n+2 = 3

2n

X

k=0

(−1)k (2n+k)!

k!(2n−k)!(3s)k, q6n+3 =

2n+1

X

k=0

(−1)k+1(4n−k+ 2)(2n+k)!

k!(2n−k+ 1)! (3s)k, q6n+4 =

2n+1

X

k=0

(−1)k(2n−2k+ 1)(2n+k)!

k!(2n−k+ 1)! (3s)k, q6n+5 =

2n+1

X

k=0

(−1)k+1 (2n+k+ 1)!

k!(2n−k+ 1)!(3s)k, q6n+6 =

2n+2

X

k=0

(−1)k(4n+k+ 4)(2n+k+ 1)!

k!(2n−k+ 2)! (3s)k, q6n+7 = 2

2n+2

X

k=0

(−1)k(n+k+ 1)(2n+k+ 1)!

k!(2n−k+ 2)! (3s)k.

(17)

Proof of Theorem3. Replacenby 2nandsby 3sin Lemma 1 (9). Then by the combinatorial expressions of p6n+2 and q6n+2 in Lemma 4 we have

− 1 (3s)2n+1

Z 1 0

x2n(x−1)2n

(2n)! e1/(3s)dx=

2n

X

k=0

(2n+k)!

k!(2n−k)!(3s)k+ +

2n

X

k=0

(−1)k (2n+k)!

k!(2n−k)!(3s)k−e1/(3s)+ 1

3 ·3

2n

X

k=0

(−1)k (2n+k)!

k!(2n−k)!(3s)k=

=p6n+2−e1/(3s)+ 1 3 q6n+2, which is (18).

Replacenby 2n+ 1 andsby 3sand divide both sides by 3 in Lemma 1 (9). Then, using the expressions of p6n+5 andq6n+5 in Lemma 4, we get (21).

Replacenby 2nand sby 3sin (10) and (11) in order to get (19). Then e1/(3s)+ 1

3 q6n+3+ 1 3(3s)2n+1

Z 1 0

(x+ 1)x2n(x−1)2n

(2n)! ex/(3s)dx=

= e1/(3s)+ 1

3 ·2(2n+ 1)

2n+1

X

k=0

(−1)k+1 (2n+k)!

k!(2n−k+ 1)!(3s)k+

+ 2

3(3s)2n+1 Z 1

0

x2n+1(x−1)2n

(2n)! ex/(3s)dx−

−e1/(3s)+ 1 3

2n

X

k=0

(−1)k(2n+k+ 1)!

k!(2n−k)! (3s)k+1

− 1 3(3s)2n+1

Z 1 0

x2n(x−1)2n+1

(2n)! ex/(3s)dx=

= 2 3

2n

X

k=0

(2n+k+ 1)!

k!(2n−k)! (3s)k+1+2

3(2n+ 1)

2n+1

X

k=0

(−1)k+1 (2n+k)!

k!(2n−k+ 1)!(3s)k

−2n+ 1 3

2n+1

X

k=0

(2n+k)!

k!(2n−k+ 1)!(3s)k−1 3

2n

X

k=0

(−1)k(2n+k+ 1)!

k!(2n−k)! (3s)k+1 =

= 1 3

n

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i+ 1)!

(2i)!(2n−2i)!(3s)2i+1+2n+ 1 3

n

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i+ 1)!

(2i+ 1)!(2n−2i)!(3s)2i+1+ +

n

X

i=0

(2i)(2n+ 2i)!

(2i)!(2n−2i+1)!(3s)2i−(2n+1)

n

X

i=0

(2n+ 2i)!

(2i)!(2n−2i+1)!(3s)2i=p6n+3.

(18)

In a similar manner, replacenby 2nandsby 3sin (9) and (11) in order to get (20), replace n by 2n+ 1 and s by 3sin (10) and (11) in order to get (22), and replacenby 2n+ 1 andsby 3sin (10) and (11) in order to get (23).

Theorems 4 and 5 can be similarly proved using the corresponding com- binatorial expressions from Lemma 4. If we let pn/qn be the nth convergent of the continued fraction expansion of (e1/(3s+1)+ 1)/3 then, for example,

p18n+2= 2

3n

X

i=0

(6n+ 2i)!

(2i)!(6n−2i)!(3s+ 1)2i, q18n+2= 3

6n

X

k=0

(−1)k(6n+k)!

k!(6n−k)! (3s+ 1)k, p18n+3=−5

3

3n

X

i=0

(6n+ 2i)!

(2i)!(6n−2i)!(3s+1)2i+1 3

3n

X

i=0

(6n+ 2i+ 2)!

(2i+1)!(6n−2i)!(3s+1)2i+1, q18n+3=

6n+1

X

k=0

(−1)k−1(18n−2k+ 3)(6n+k)!

k!(6n−k+ 1)! (3s+ 1)k, p18n+4= 1

3

3n

X

i=0

(6n+ 2i)!

(2i)!(6n−2i)!(3s+ 1)2i+1 3

3n

X

i=0

(6n+ 2i+ 2)!

(2i+1)!(6n−2i)!(3s+ 1)2i+1, q18n+4=

6n

X

k=0

(−1)k(6n+k+ 1)!

k!(6n−k)! (3s+ 1)k+1, p18n+5= 2

3n

X

i=0

(6n+ 2i+ 2)!

(2i+ 1)!(6n−2i)!(3s+ 1)2i+1, q18n+5= 3

6n+1

X

k=0

(−1)k−1(6n+k+ 1)!

k!(6n−k+ 1)! (3s+ 1)k.

If we letpn/qnbe thenth convergent of the continued fraction expansion of (e1/(3s+2)+ 1)/3 then, for example,

p18n+15=−

3n+2

X

i=0

(6n+ 2i+ 4)!

(2i)!(6n−2i+ 4)!(3s+ 2)2i+ +1

3

3n+2

X

i=0

(6n+ 2i+ 6)!

(2i+ 1)!(6n−2i+ 4)!(3s+ 2)2i+1, q18n+15=

6n+5

X

k=0

(−1)k−1(12n−k+ 10)(6n+k+ 4)!

k!(6n−k+ 5)! (3s+ 2)k,

(19)

p18n+16=

3n+2

X

i=0

(6n+ 2i+ 4)!

(2i)!(6n−2i+ 4)!(3s+ 2)2i+ +1

3

3n+2

X

i=0

(6n+ 2i+ 6)!

(2i+ 1)!(6n−2i+ 4)!(3s+ 2)2i+1, q18n+16=

6n+5

X

k=0

(−1)k(6n−2k+ 5)(6n+k+ 4)!

k!(6n−k+ 5)! (3s+ 2)k, p18n+17= 2

3

3n+2

X

i=0

(6n+ 2i+ 6)!

(2i+ 1)!(6n−2i+ 4)!(3s+ 2)2i+1, q18n+17=

6n+5

X

k=0

(−1)k−1(6n+k+ 5)!

k!(6n−k+ 5)! (3s+ 2)k, p18n+18=

3n+3

X

i=0

(6n+ 2i+ 6)!

(2i)!(6n−2i+ 6)!(3s+ 2)2i

−1 3

3n+2

X

i=0

(6n+ 2i+ 6)!

(2i+ 1)!(6n−2i+ 4)!(3s+ 2)2i+1, q18n+18=

6n+6

X

k=0

(−1)k(12n+k+ 12)(6n+k+ 5)!

k!(6n−k+ 6)! (3s+ 2)k, p18n+19=

3n+3

X

i=0

(6n+ 2i+ 6)!

(2i)!(6n−2i+ 6)!(3s+ 2)2i+ +1

3

3n+2

X

i=0

(6n+ 2i+ 6)!

(2i+ 1)!(6n−2i+ 4)!(3s+ 2)2i+1, q18n+19=

6n+6

X

k=0

(−1)k(6n+ 2k+ 6)(6n+k+ 5)!

k!(6n−k+ 6)! (3s+ 2)k.

Acknowledgements.This research was partially supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (No. 18540006), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

REFERENCES

[1] E.B. Burger,Exploring the Number Jungle: A Journey into Diophantine Analysis. Stu- dent Math. Library8. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence RI, 2000.

(20)

[2] H. Cohn, A short proof of the simple continued fraction expansion of e. Amer. Math.

Monthly113(2006), 57–62.

[3] C.S. Davis,On some simple continued fractions connected withe. J. London Math. Soc.

20(1945), 194–198.

[4] A. Hurwitz,Uber die Kettenbr¨¨ uche, deren Teilnenner arithmetische Reihen bilden, 1895.

In: Mathematische Werke, Band II, pp. 276–302. Birkh¨auser, Basel, 1963.

[5] A.Ya. Khinchin,Continued Fractions. Dover, Mineola, NY, 1997.

[6] T. Komatsu,Some combinatorial properties of the leaping convergents. In: B. Landman, M. Nathanson, J. Neˇsetˇril, R. Nowakowski and C. Pomerance (Eds.), Combinatorial Number Theory, Proceedings of the Integers Conference 2005 in Celebration of the 70th Birthday of Ronald Graham, held at the university of West Georgia, Carrollton, Georgia, USA, October 27–30, 2005, pp. 315–325. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2007.

[7] T. Komatsu,A proof of the continued fraction expansion ofe2/s. Integers7(1) (2007), A30, 8 pp. (electronic)

[8] T. Komatsu,Leaping convergents of Hurwitz continued fractions. In: Diophantine Anal- ysis and Related Fields(DARF2007/2008), AIP Conf. Proc.976, pp. 130–143. Amer.

Inst. Phys., Melville, NY, 2008.

[9] T. Komatsu, A diophantine approximation ofe1/s in terms of integrals. To appear in Tokyo J. Math.

[10] T. Osler, A proof of the continued fraction expansion ofe1/M. Amer. Math. Monthly 113(2006), 62–66.

[11] O. Perron, Die Lehre von den Kettenbr¨uchen, 2nd Ed. Chelsea Publishing Co., New York, 1950.

[12] D.S. Thakur,Patterns of continued fractions for the analogues ofeand related numbers in the function field case. J. Number Theory66(1997), 129–147.

Received 16 August 2008 Hirosaki University

Revised 13 January 2009 Graduate School of Science and Technology Hirosaki, 036-8561, Japan

komatsu@cc.hirosaki-u.ac.jp

Références

Documents relatifs

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

– Estimates of the rate of approximation in a de-Poissonization lemma of Beirlant and Mason [1] is obtained for the case where the distribution satisfy a quantitative condition

We present a lemma stipulating that when the variance of each element in a collection of random variables is maximal with respect to some larger class of random variables, then

Trapping holomorphic disks inside pseudoconvexdomains The aim of the section is to prove a priori estimates for the derivative of a disk with the trace in a graphical torus

4,5], Watson’s lemma is viewed as a rather particular case of more general results on Mellin transforms in the complex plane.. The point is that all versions of Watson’s lemma we

The first algorithmic proof of the asymmetric version, where the condition requires the existence of a number in (0, 1) for each event, such that the probability of each event to

In effect it says that if we randomly give values (0 or 1) to a large proportion of the variables which are also randomly selected (this procedure is called a random restriction),

In part 5, by taking the limit of “good” parametrizations, we reduce the main theorem to a proposition about the parametrization of semi-algebraic ”smooth” maps (thus avoiding