HAL Id: jpa-00231330
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00231330
Submitted on 1 Jan 1977
HAL
is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire
HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Néel temperature of a low-dimensional antiferromagnet in a magnetic field
J. Villain, J.M. Loveluck
To cite this version:
J. Villain, J.M. Loveluck. Néel temperature of a low-dimensional antiferromagnet in a magnetic field. Journal de Physique Lettres, Edp sciences, 1977, 38 (2), pp.77-80.
�10.1051/jphyslet:0197700380207700�. �jpa-00231330�
NÉEL TEMPERATURE OF A LOW-DIMENSIONAL ANTIFERROMAGNET
IN A MAGNETIC FIELD
J. VILLAIN
Laboratoire de Diffraction
Neutronique, Département
de RechercheFondamentale,
Centre d’Etudes Nucléaires de
Grenoble,
85X,
38041 GrenobleCedex,
FranceJ. M. LOVELUCK
Institut
Laue-Langevin,
156 X Centre deTri,
38042 GrenobleCedex,
France(Re.Vu
le 25 octobre1976,
revise le 16 decembre1976, accepte
le 21 decembre1976)
Résumé. 2014 Un
champ magnétique
approprié peut augmenter la longueur de corrélation des chainesantiferromagnétiques classiques
de typeHeisenberg
ou XY. Il en résulte que la températurede Néel des
antiferromagnétiques
presque unidimensionnels peut être augmentée par unchamp
magnétique, en accord avec desexpériences
récentes sur TMMC.Abstract. 2014 A magnetic field of appropriate magnitude can increase the correlation length of one- dimensional, classical
antiferromagnets
of theHeisenberg
or XY type. It follows that the Néel temperature of quasi-one-dimensionalantiferromagnets
can be increased by a magnetic field, in agreement with recent experiments on TMMC.Classification Physics Abstracts
8.510 - 8.514
1. Introduction. - Recent
experiments [1]
showthat the Neel temperature
TN
of thequasi-one-dimen-
sional
antiferromagnet (CH3)4NMnCI3,
also knownas TMMC, is increased
by
18%
under amagnetic
field of 10 000
0.
The reduction ofquantum
fluc- tuations[2]
fails[1]
toexplain
the effect.It will be shown in the present letter that the
applica-
tion of a
magnetic
field H to a classical antiferroma- gnet can increase the Neeltemperature
whether the system has asufficiently
marked one-dimensional or two-dimensional character. The system will be assum- ed to beisotropic
in thespin
space for H = 0. The present workapplies
tospins
ofdimensionality
n = 2 or 3, and
might
be extended tohigher
valuesof n. The
Ising
case n = 1 is excluded.It is of interest to recall that in
usual,
three-dimen- sionalantiferromagnets
the Necl temperature decreases under amagnetic
field. For instance, in the molecular fieldapproximation :
where
2 1 J I z
is the molecular field at T = 0, C is theLangevin
function and h =sH/2 KB
T.For the sake of
simplicity.
the present work will be restricted toquasi-one-dimensional
antiferroma- gnets ; the results forquasi-two-dimensional
antiferro-magnets can be obtained in a similar way and will be
given
withoutproof
in section 5.2. The model. - Consider a
3-dimensional, periodic
array of N’
parallel
chains. labelledby
i. with Nclassical,
n-dimensionalspins Sim
located on eachchain with a uniform intersite distance I. The Hamil- tonian is assumed to be :
with J
0. 1 Si. I
= s,J~~
= J’ if chains iand j
arenearest
neighbours,
otherwiseJ~~
= 0.If J’ = 0, there is no
long
rangeordering,
and thecorrelations between the
spin
componentsS m
ortho-gonal
to themagnetic
field direction z aregiven
atlong
distances m[3,
4.5] by :
For H = 0. this relation is exact for all values of m ; at low temperature
T, ~
isgiven [3] by
The calculation
of ç
in a field involves the calcula- tion of twoeigenvalues
of the transfer operator;only
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyslet:0197700380207700
L-78 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE - LETTRES the lowest
eigenvalue
has been calculatedanalytically
for n = 3
[4].
Numerical calculations have beenperformed [5],
but it is of interest togive
thesimple, qualitative
discussion which follows. In section3,
the effect of amagnetic
field on an isolated chain(J’
=0)
will beconsidered,
and the consequences for J’ ~ 0 will be studied in section 4.3. Isolated chain in a
magnetic
field at lowtempera-
ture. - In this
section,
we argue that asufficiently high magnetic
field Happlied along
z to an isolatedchain at low temperature
KB T ~ ! J ~ I S2.
suppressesspin
fluctuationsalong
z ; on the other hand. a veryhigh
field also suppresses fluctuationsalong
the otherdirections. Therefore we shall assume :
It is easy to eliminate the odd sites in
(1)
and toobtain the free energy as a function of the even
spins Si,2p :
this is the so-called decimationprocedure;
theessential result at low temperature is that the effective bilinear interaction between even
spins is I J 1/2
instead
of - J I.
and themagnetic
fieldgives
rise toan effective
anisotropy :
There is also a
negligible
effectivemagnetic
fieldand
negligible
effectivebiquadratic
interactions.Fluctuations
along
z aresuppressed
when theorder of
magnitude
of theanisotropy
energy for alength
oforder ~
islarger
thanKB
T. i.e. :or.
according
to(2a)
and(2b) :
Comparing
with(3).
it is seen that amagnetic
fieldwhich satisfies :
transforms an XY chain into an
Ising chain,
and aHeisenberg
chain into an XY chain. In fact, this result isindependent
of the spacedimensionality
d.3 .1 CASE OF THE HEISENBERG CHAIN
(n
=3).
-The correlation
length
isgiven by (2a)
in zerofield;
if
(5)
is satisfied, thesystem
should behave as an XY chain since thespin component along
H isalways
very small : therefore the correlation
length
isgiven by (2b)
and is twice aslarge
as in zero field. This value 2~(0)
isobviously
a maximum : if the field is too small thespins
recover theirdegree
of freedomalong
z. andif the field is too
large
thespins progressively
losetheir
degree
of freedomalong
the other directions. The maximum is reached when condition(5)
issatisfied;
inaddition, ~(H)
isexpected
to besymmetric
in Hand
analytic
at H =0 ;
thisgives
thegeneral shape
of the curve
~(~).
More
complete
information can be obtainedby
thetransfer matrix method
[5],
and we show infigure
1typical
results obtained for differenttemperatures.
For these calculations we have
adopted
the definitionof given
in reference[5],
in terms of anexpansion
of
the
wave-vectordependent susceptibility
about thezone-boundary.
since this allows the extension tohigher
temperatureswhen ~
is small. The calculated results, for low temperatures, corroborate thequalita-
tive argument outlined above. For
higher
tempera-tures there is no increase
of ~
with field because condition(5)
cannot be satisfied.FIG. 1. - Calculated values of the ratio ~)/~(0) for a Heisenberg
chain are shown as a function of HI2 I J I s for a number of values of reduced temperature T * =~~72!~! I S2).
3.2 CASE OF THE XY CHAIN
(n = 2).
- A similardiscussion shows that the correlation
length. given by (2b)
in zero field. isgiven by (2c)
when condition(5)
isfulfilled. In
principle,
the correlationlength
can bemultiplied by
anarbitrarily large
factor when amagnetic
field isapplied
at very low temperature.4. Neel
temperature
of aquasi-one-dimensional antiferromagnet
in amagnetic
field. - For H =0,
the Neel temperatureTN
isgiven by
thefollowing equation.
which is derived in theappendix :
where
~(T)
is definedby (2)
andCn
is a coefficient which. for agiven lattice, depends
on thespin
dimen-sionality
n. In the mean fieldapproximation [2], Cn
isindependent
of n.Insertion of
(2)
into(6) yields :
FIG. 2. - Typical behaviour of TN as a function of H for a quasi- one-dimensional, Heisenberg antiferromagnet. Dashed parts are
interpolated.
We shall now consider the effect of a field
satisfy- ing (5) :
for an XY chain(n
=2). TN
isgiven by (7a)
in the presence of this field. and.
if J I is sufficiently small,
this value isalways higher
than the zero-field Néel temperature.given by (7b).
The case of the
Heisenberg
chain(n
=3) requires
more discussion : the maximum value of
TN.
in a fieldHM
which satisfies(5),
isgiven by (7b),
whereas the zero-field N6el temperatureTN(O)
isgiven by (7c) ;
therefore :
According
to M.F.A.. the R.H.S. isequal
to~/2.
and a field increases the Néel temperature
by
a maxi-mum factor
~/2.
The exact value isexpected
to be evenlarger
becausespin
fluctuations. which decrease the M.F.A. value ofTN.
increase with n. so thatCn
isexpected
to increase when n increases.5.
Ideal,
two-dimensionalantiferromagnets.
-5 .1 IDEAL HEISENBERG ANTIFERROMAGNET
(n
=3).
-This system is believed to have no transition in 2 dimen- sions in zero field
[6].
If a field H isapplied.
the system behaves like an XY model if(5)
holds. The XY model has a transitionwithout long
range order[7]
atTo ~ ! I J I s2IKB;
therefore a transition withoutlong
range order is
expected
for the two-dimensional,Heisenberg
model in a field. Wespeculate
the transi- tion temperature to be of order :5.2 IDEAL XY ANTIFERROMAGNET
(n
=2).
- Itcan be shown that the field is
equivalent
to anIsing anisotropy.
and mustproduce long
range order in theperpendicular
direction below some temperature oforder I J s2/KB.
These results are
spectacular.
but theirapplicability
to real systems is
problematic.
as will be seen in thenext section.
6. Real
systems.
- Real systems are not pureHeisenberg
or XY butalways
have a smallanisotropy;
if this
anisotropy
is of theIsing
type. as is the case formost
quasi-two-dimensional antiferromagnets [8],
theanisotropy
will dominate and the field will have asmall effect. except above the
spin-flop
value which isusually
veryhigh.
Inprinciple. experiments
abovethe
spin-flop
field would be veryinteresting
becausethe two-dimensional character is much better in
antiferromagnets
than inferromagnets.
so that onemight
come rather close to the ideal two-dimensional, XY magnet. However. fieldheterogeneities
can havea dramatic effect and such
experiments
areextremely
difficult.
We now come back to TMMC. an
easy-plane, quasi-one-dimensional antiferromagnet.
We havesome
hope
that our mechanism can account for theincrease of
TN
for a field within theplane.
but a quan- titative calculationrequires
the consideration of the easyplane anisotropy
and of thetetragonal
aniso-tropy within the
plane.
Theimportance
of the easy-plane anisotropy
results from thespectacular
diffe-rence between
(2b)
and(2c).
Thetetragonal anisotropy
is
expected
to be of someimportance
when it islarger
than the field.
Appendix :
Derivation ofequation (6).
- It ispossible. by
a decimationprocedure.
tochange
the(intrachain)
inter-site distance from I to Lby
elimina-tion of a fraction
(L - 1)IL
of thespin
variables in the Hamiltonian( 1 ).
H will be assumed to be zero. since its effect is
essentially
to reduce nby
1. as shown in section 3. In this case. J can be assumed to bepositive.
If H = 0, thechange
of scale does notmodify
the formof (1)
if Lis not too
large.
and the new. effectivecoupling
constants
JL
andJL
aregiven by :
where ~
is a well-defined functionof #J.
definedby (2).
Equations (A .1 )
and(A. 2)
hold if :and : o o
Consider all systems which can be scaled in such
a way that
~(~YJ = ~o
has agiven
value whichcorresponds
to agiven
value~o Jo
of~J.
Theproba- bility
distributiononly depends
on~JL s2. which, according
to(A.
1.2).
isequal
to :Since all
long wavelength properties
are describedby
thisunique parameter,
three-dimensional order appears for a well-defined value of thisquantity,
andequation (6)
follows. Since~o
isarbitrary,
this result isgeneral.
L-80 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE - LETTRES
References
[1] DUPAS, C., RENARD, J. P., Solid State Commun. 20 (1976) 581.
[2] IMRY, Y., PINCUS, P., SCALAPINO, D., Phys. Rev. B 12 (1975)
1978.
[3] See, for instance, STEINER, M., VILLAIN, J., WINDSOR, C. G., Adv. Phys. 25 (1976) 87 and references therein.
[4] MORITA, T., HORIGUCHI, T., Physica 83A (1975) 519.
[5] LOVESEY, S. W., LOVELUCK, J. M., J. Phys. C 9 (1976) 3639.
[6] BREZIN, E., ZINN-JUSTIN, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 691.
[7] KOSTERLITZ, J. M., THOULESS, D. J., J. Phys. C 6 (1973) 1181.
[8] DE JONGH, L. J., MIEDEMA, A. R., Adv. Phys. 23 (1974) 1.