• Aucun résultat trouvé

European Migrations Post WWII; Past, Present and Future?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "European Migrations Post WWII; Past, Present and Future?"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

UC BERKELEY SOCIAL SCIENCE MATRIX

Research Streams| Events |Initiatives |Services & Support |Affiliated Centers |About

EVENTS

Dear MATRIX participants and associated scholars,

We are excited to announce the next meeting of our MATRIX Research Group, “Continent Divided: Building Bridges, Finding Truth.” Our next meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 14, 2017, from 12-2 PM in 820 Barrows Hall (on the top floor of the building). We are pleased a two-part presentation for this meeting, with presentations by Dr. Maria Pichou, Senior Visiting Scholar at the Berkeley School of Law, and Dr. Spero Paravantes, Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of European Studies.

Spero’s presentation, “European Migrations post-WWII: Past, Present and Future,” will discuss the history of migrations and migration/refugee policy within the EU, from the beginning of the integration process and the formation of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) until the present. The talk will focus on earlier migrations within Western Europe, the rules established to regulate internal and external migration, and the steps which the various iterations of the European Union and its individual members took to deal with them. The overarching objective of this presentation is to place current events, and reactions to them, into the context of European integration and to examine misconceptions about migration policy and borders in the EU.

Building upon this historical trajectory, Maria’s presentation, entitled “Reception or Detention Centers? Informal Detention Practices for Migrants in Europe at the European Court of Human Rights” will focus on the legal obligations of European states concerning reception centers for migrants and refugees in the light of the European Convention on Human Rights. It analyses state obligations vis-à-vis migrants in view of recent interpretations by the Strasbourg Court. According to the Strasbourg Court’s established case law, states have the right to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens. The right to asylum is not provided in the Convention or its Protocols. However, the treatment of migrants by state authorities may give rise to a series of violations of the Convention. Her paper analyses these violations in the light of this recent case law.

As seating is limited, we would request that you RSVP no later than Friday, November 10, if you plan to participate in our discussion. Please send a confirmation of your attendance via email to Jon Cho-Polizzi at [email protected].

We look forward to continuing our ongoing conversations!

Best,

Jeroen Dewulf

Institute of European Studies Department of German

And

Références

Documents relatifs

In Strasbourg, journalist Rafig Nazir oglu Tagiyev and editor Samir Sadagat oglu Huseynov argued that their criminal conviction for incitement to religious hatred violated

As the information produced by the Russian Government, at the request of the ECtHR, showed that the Moscow courts indeed had not found against the Mayor of Moscow in any of

Beizaras and Levickas complained before the ECtHR that they had been discriminated against on account of their sexual orientation, which had been the reason underlying

Poland, the ECtHR found that holding the administrator of a local website liable for defamatory third-party comments, which upon notice had been immediately removed,

This state of affairs cast doubt on whether the interpretation given by the higher-level domestic courts in the present case – namely, that a statement

Therefore, the publishing of Mrs Rodina’s family photograph without taking any precautions could not be regarded as “contributing to any debate of general

Dirk Voorhoof Human Rights Centre, Ghent University and Legal Human Academy In a case concerning freedom of political expression and the right to protest, the European Court of

Croatia, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has held that the level of seriousness associated with the erroneous labelling of a photograph in a lifestyle