HAL Id: jpa-00248049
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00248049
Submitted on 1 Jan 1994
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Hexagonal-cubic phase transitions in lipid containing systems : epitaxial relationships and cylinder growth
Paolo Mariani, Lia Amaral, Letizia Saturni, Hervé Delacroix
To cite this version:
Paolo Mariani, Lia Amaral, Letizia Saturni, Hervé Delacroix. Hexagonal-cubic phase transitions in
lipid containing systems : epitaxial relationships and cylinder growth. Journal de Physique II, EDP
Sciences, 1994, 4 (8), pp.1393-1416. �10.1051/jp2:1994206�. �jpa-00248049�
Classification Physic-s Abstracts
61.30 64.70 87.15
Hexagonal-cubic phase transitions in lipid containing systems
:epitaxial relationships and cylinder growth
Paolo Mariani
(I. *),
LiaQ.
Amaral(2),
Letizia Satumi(I)
and Hervd Delacroix(3)
('
Istituto di Scienze Fisiche, Facolth di Medicina eChirurgia,
Universith di Ancona, via Ranieri.60131 Ancona,
Italy.
(2) Instituto de Fisica, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Caixa Postal 20516, CEP 01498-970, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
I')
Centre de Gdndtique Moldculaire (**), Laboratoire Propre du CNRS, 91198 Gif-sun-Yvette France(Received 22 December 1993, revised 4 March 1994, accepted 26 April 1994)
Abstract. In order to approach the nature of the phase transitions, three lipid-water systems (namely PaLPC, OLPC and DTAC), which exhibit a sequence of phases of type I, including
hexagonal
(which exists in the central region of the three phasediagrams)
as well as cubic bicontinuous Q~"° (Ia3d) and/or cubic micellarQ~~'(Pm3n)
phases, have been considered. On the basis ofa recently proposed alternative description of the hexagonal
phase
in terms of finite micelles, the structural parameters as a function of the lipid concentration are analysed in terms of micellar growth inside the hexagonal domain. Moreover, considering theepitaxial relationships
occurring at the hexagonal to cubic phase transition, the growth of the hexagonal phase from the 3D networks of rods of the Q~~° cubicphase
and from theglobular
micelles packed in the Q223 cubic symmetry has been followed. As a result, a different behaviour has been observed in the three lipid systems. These differences are discussed in relation to the phase sequence: in particular, from asimple
geometrical approach, based on theanalysis
of theprojection
of the electrondensity
distribution on the cubicphase
in the direction of thecylinder growth,
amechanism for the process of transformation of the structure elements is proposed.
1. Introduction.
Lipids
present an extendedpolymorphism.
Inparticular,
among the widevariety
of structures that can be observed inlipid-containing
systems, non-lamellarhexagonal
and cubicorganiza-
tions show anincreasing
theoretical andbiological
interest(reviewed,
forexample,
inii
and[2]). Concerning
the cubicphases,
several papers tackledrecently
asystematic analysis
of their(*) Author to whom
correspondence
should be addressed.(**) Assoc16 h l'Universitd P. et M. Curie.
structures
[2-11]
as aresult,
the structure of the six cubicphases
so far identified has been determined. Inparticular,
in this work we will consider three differentlipid-water
systemswhich show two cubic
phases
of type I in our notationQ~~° (space
groupIa3d)
and Q~~~(space
groupPm3n)
whichbelong
to two different classes. The Q231~phase
isbicontinuous,
in the sense that both the water and the
hydrocarbon
media are continuousthroughout
thestructure
[1, 4, 12],
while the Q~~~ cubicphase
is micellar[2,
5, 8,9].
The other non-lamellar
organization
which will be considered is thehexagonal
Hphase.
Thestructure of this
phase
has been assumed since the initial works to consist of« infinite »
cylindrical micelles,
with a two-dimensionalhexagonal positional
order in theplane perpendicular
to thecylinder
axes[13, 14].
However, recent results relative to the sodiumdodecyl
sulfate(SLS)
water system leads to an alternativedescription [15]
: after a directisotropic (I)
tohexagonal phase
transition, thehexagonal
cell parameter a has been observed to vary with theamphiphile
volume concentration c~ as a oI c-j'°,
thisevidencing
the presence offinite hard rods in the
hexagonal
domain. Moreover, in the same system, a detailedanalysis
of micellargrowth
in thevicinity
of theisotropic
toliquid crystalline phase
transition evidencedthat the micelles grow little in the I
phase [16].
Other results relative to the columnarhexagonal phase
observed in adeoxyguanosine-water
system, which presents an intermediate cholesteric Chphase (the phase
sequencebeing I-Ch-H),
show a behaviour a oI c-j '~~,typical
of infinite orlong
flexiblecylinders
in the Hphase [17].
All these results are in agreement with recent theoreticalprevisions
for these transitions,taking
into account the self-associationproperties
of
lyotropic
systems[18-21]. Recently,
evidence for micellargrowth
within the H domain aftera direct
isotropic
tohexagonal phase
transition has been obtained in anotherlipid-water
system(oleoyl-lyso-phosphatidyl choline, OLPC) [22],
that presents aI-H-Q~~°-L phase
sequence.In this paper, we
analyse
thegrowth
of the micelles in thehexagonal phase focusing
OLPC[22]
and other twolipid-water
systems,namely palmitoyl-lyso-phosphatidyl
choline, PaLPC anddodecyl-trimethyl-ammonium
chloride,DTAC,
that present aI-Q~~~-H-L
anda1-Q223- H-Q23°-L phase
sequence,respectively.
Inparticular, X-ray
diffractionanalysis
demonstratethe existence of
epitaxial relationships occurring
at thehexagonal
to cubicphase
transitions :making
reference to the results ofRan~on
and Charvolin[23]
and of Clerc et a/.[24],
which show the direction ofgrowth
of thehexagonal cylinders
from the 3-dimensional networks of rods of theQ~~°
bicontinuous cubicphase,
we propose thathexagonal phase
formsalong
thesame direction also from the
globular
micellespacked
in the Q~~~ cubic symmetry. On the basis of ageometrical approach,
theserelationships give
us thepossibility
to follow the transformation of the structure elements and to suggest a mechanism for thecylinder growth.
2.
Experimental.
2, I NOTATIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS
DTAC
dodecyl-trimethyl
ammonium chloride OLPColeoyl-lyso-phosphatidyl
cholinePaLPC
palmitoyl-lyso-phosphatidyl
choline ;SDS sodium
dodecyl sulphate
2D,
3D2-dimensional,
3-dimensionalL, H, Q" ID lamellar, 2D
hexagonal
and 3D cubicphase
of space group of numbern,
according
to the International Tables[25]
isotropic liquid phase
;c
weight
concentration(lipid/(lipid+water))
c~ volume concentration of the
lipid,
calculated asreported by
Luzzati[13]
c~, ~~~
volume concentration of the
lipid paraffine moiety,
calculated asreported by
Luzzati[13]
a unit cell parameter
r, s vectors
specifying position
in real and inreciprocal
space r and s are theirmoduli s
=
(2
sin tl)/A(where
2 tl is thescattering angle
and is theX-ray wavelength)
s~ vector
specifying
thepositions
of thereciprocal
latticepoints,
h=
(h,
k,f)
F
(h)
structure factor atreciprocal
latticepoint
hp coefficient of the Gaussian
apodization eventually applied
to the(F (h)) [3]
:'~fl(h)(
=
I(F(h)( eXp(-
2/~~S~)j/[°ih'F(h)(~eXp(-
2/~~S~)j~~~
p)(0)
curvature of the autocorrelation function at thepoint
r=
0
[3,
4]p
(r)
3D electrondensity distribution,
I-e- Fourier transform of(F (h))
;IA)
average value of the function A(r) over the volume V of the unit cellIA )
= ( IV )
.
A (rdv~
Ap
(r) normalized,
dimensionlessexpression
of the function p(r),
also called the 3D map :Ap (r)
=
lp (r) jp (r)j ill jp 2(r)j jp (r)j 2)j~/2
Ap ?D section of the electron
density
distribution Ap(r) computed,
at onespecified
distance from the
crystallographic origin (0,
0,0)
andnormally
to thecrystallo- graphic
direction[nmf], using
structure factors(F (h))
Ap j,,~,tj
projection
of the electrondensity
distribution Ap(r) along
thecrystallographic
direction
[nmf], computed using
structure factors(F(h))
;plane (nmf) plane
orientedperpendicularly
to thecrystallographic
direction[nmf]
d~~~
length
of the 3-fold[I
II] (body-diagonal)
axis of the cube :djjj
=
a,,5.
2.2 THE PHASES. This work focuses on three different
phases
of type I, all characterizedby
disordered conformation of the
hydrocarbon
chains and alldisplaying
one-parameter structu- res,belonging
to the 2Dhexagonal
and to the 3D cubic systems. Thehexagonal phase
consists of ahexagonal
array ofcylinders,
coated with thepolar headgroups
of thelipid
molecules[13, 14].
As the structure is of type I, the rods are filledby
thehydrocarbon
chains oflipids
andare embedded in the water matrix.
The
two cubicphases
that will be considered are onebicontinuous (the
Q~~°
cubicphase)
and the other micellar(the Q"~).
TheQ~~°
can be described in terms of two 3D networks ofjoined
rods,mutually
intertwined and unconnected[2, 4, 12]
the rods(of
type I) haveequal length
and arecoplanarly joined
3by
3. Thisphase
isrelated to the Schoen's
Gyroid infinitely period
minimal surface without intersections[2, 4].
The structure of the
Q"~
consists ofdisjointed
micelles(of
type I) embedded in a continuouswater matrix. The micelles
belong
to two different classes : those of one class arequasi
spherical
inshape
while those of the other class aredisk-shaped [2, 8, 9].
The micelles of each class are centred at one of thespecial positions
of the space groupPm3n, namely
a and c[25].
A schematic
representation
of the structure of thehexagonal
and of theQ~~°
and Q~~~ cubicphases
isreported
infigure
I.In the
following,
we will discuss aboutshape
and dimensions of the structure elements : it must be observed thatthey
are bound to be definedby
the structural conformation of themolecules,
by
the lattice interactions and dimensions andby
the chemicalcomposition
of thephase. However,
fewhypotheses
have to be made inparticular,
thehydrocarbon
chains are assumed to cluster intoregions
from which water is excluded and the interface between water andparaffin
is assumed to be coveredby
thehydrophilic
groups of thelipid
molecules[4,
13, 22,29].
;
)o'~ l
( j..j-. .@-..(...g.... qf;
o . o'I _)...I[- .[~)j[[[I)[. -.§.
.-+-..""
O'°
."'"'~
Q~~~ cubic phase
Fig,
I. Schematicrepresentation
of the non-lamellar structures discussed in the text.Hexagonal
phase : the structure isrepresented
in terrns ofparallel
tubes packed in a 2Dhexagonal
array (space group p6 [25]). In the studied systems, the structure is type I thecylinders
are filled by theparaffin
chains and embedded in a polar matrix. CubicQ~'° Phase
the content of the box (defined by light lines) is shown inperspective
(left frame) and inprojection along
the axis [100](right
frame). The black heavy lines mark theprojection
of the unit cell. The structure isrepresented
in terms of two 3D networks of rods, mutually intertwined and unconnected. The rods arejoined
coplanarly 3~6y 3 and occupy positions g, of symmetry 2 ; the rod junctions occupy positions b of symmetry 32 [25]. In the studied systems, the structure istype I the rods are filled by the
hydrocarbon
chains and are embedded in a polar matrix. Cubic Q223 phase : perspective view (left frame) andprojection
along the axis [100] (right frame) of the structure.The limits of the unit cell are marked by thin lines. The structure consists of 2 types of disjointed
globules
representedby
circles. The unit cell contains 6 globules of symmetry 12m (open circles) centred atposition
c and 2globules
of symmetry m3 (filled circles) centred at position a [25]. The structure is type I the globules, filled by the hydrocarbon chains, are embedded in apolar
matrix.2.3 ELECTRON DENSITY MAPS. The structure of all the considered
phases
will bepresented
in the form of electron
density
maps,computed
from theamplitudes
of the observedreflections. As a consequence of the data
normalization,
wereally
computeby
Fouriertransform a function Ap
(r
) which is a normalized dimensionlessexpression
of the fluctuations Of the electrondensity
distribution p (r) (for more details on the normalizationprocedure,
seeRefs
[3, 4]).
A number of electrondensity
sections Ap and electrondensity projections
Ap j,,~,t will be shown in this paper :they
arerepresented using equally spaced density
levels ;negative
levels(which correspond
to the low-electrondensity regions
and then to theparaffinic moiety)
arereported
as dashed lines the level whichcorresponds
to zero is drawnby
a full line. Moreover, as the structuresinvestigated
are of type I(I.e.
the structural elements are made ofparaffines),
for the sake ofclarity
thepositive
levels of electrondensity
sections andprojections
are omitted in thedrawings
offigures
9 and I. Note that we will presentonly
electron
density
maps ofhexagonal,
cubic Q~~~ and cubicQ~~° Phases
relative to the DTAC system infact,
the information that could be extracted from thecorresponding
maps fromOLPC and PaLPC are
exactly
the same (see also[8]).
2.4 THE DATA. The
phase diagrams
of the DTAC water system and of OLPC andPaLPC water systems were determined
respectively by
Balmbra et a/.[26]
andby
Eriksson et a/.[27]
and arereported
infigure
2. Thesephase diagrams
have in common the presence of ahexagonal phase
in the centralregion.
However, in the case of DTAC andPaLPC,
a micellar Q~~~ cubicphase
extends between the normalhexagonal
and theisotropic
fluidphases,
while in the case of DTAC andOLPC,
aQ~~°
cubicphase
appears in the dried side of thephase
diagram,
between the normalhexagonal
and the lamellarphases.
DTAC
p
L1
I H
I
#
0 50 100
Weight
Concentration (ib)OLPC p
bd
~
i I H L
#
E0 50 100
Weight
Concenwation (ib)~°°
PaLPC
LJ fi e
I H L
50
u
o 50 loo
Weight
Concentration (ib)Fig.
2. Phasediagram
of the three systems considered in this work. The grey portions correspond tocrystalline or to biphasic regions. The phases are labelled as in the text. DTAC redrawn from Balmbra et a/. [26]. OLPC and PaLPC redrawn from Eriksson et a/. [27].
The
X-ray
diffractionanalysis
of the structure of cubic Q~~~ andhexagonal phases
observed in DTAC, PaLPC and OLPC werealready reported by
Mariani et al.[4], by Vargas
et al.[8]
and
by
Mariani and Amaral[22].
In table I, some relevant structural information are resumed.The structural
analysis
of the cubicQ~~° Phase
observed in OLPC and DTAC will bepresented
in thefollowing paragraphs. X-ray
diffractionexperiments
wereperformed by using
an Ital-Structures 1.5 kW
X-ray
generatorequipped
with aGuinier-type focusing
camera witha bent quartz monochromator.
Samples containing
differentquantity
of water wereprepared by
Table I. Structuia/ data
of
theher.agona/
and cubicphases.
DTAC
c 0.50 0.50* 0.58 0.60 0.65 0.72 0.76
0.895* 0.895
C-v, pa, 0.38 0.38 0.44 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.56 0.66 0.66
Phase Q22~ H H H H H H H
Q~~°
a
(A)
85.4 39.7 39.3 38.9 38.8 38.2 38,1 37.2 79.6V,~~
(10~ h')
13.8V~
(10~ A')
25. IV~
(10~ h~
28.6PaLPC
c 0.50 0.50* 0.51 0.52 0.54 0.55 0.57 0.60 0.65
c~_~~~ 0.27 0.27 0.28
0.285 0.295
0.30 0.31 0.33 0.36Phase Q~~3 H H H H H H H H
a(h)
136.7 62.7 62.6 62.4 62.0 61.9 61.8 61.2 59.5V~
(10~ l~)
55.3V~
(10~ l~
87.5OLPC
c 0.50 0.52 0.56 0.58 0.60 0.62 0.65 0.67 0.70
c~,~~,
0.285
0.30 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.36 0.37 0.390.405
Phase H H H H H H H H H
a
(1)
59.4 58.7 58,1 57.6 57.0 56.5 56.0 55.4 55.0v,~~
(io3 l~
iOLPC,
contd.c 0.71 0.77* 0.77
c~ ~~~ 0.41 0.45 0.45
Phase H H
Q~~°
a
(1)
54.8 53.4 113,IV,~~
(10"1')
26.9Data for DTAC and PaLPC relative to the H and Q22~ phases are taken from Mariani et al. [4] and from
Vargas
et al. [8]. Data for thehexagonal phase
of OLPC are taken from Mariani and Amaral [22]. The columns with an asterisk on I report the value of the parameters relative to virtual samples of phase H,extrapolated
at the concentration of the cubic phase. The volume of one hydrocarbon rods in the Q2'~' cubicphase
has been determined from the unit cell dimension and the paraffinic volume concentration byusing
V,,,~ = (a~c~ ~~,)/24. V~ and V~ are respectively the volumes of any micelle centred in theposition
aand c in the Q~~' cub)c phase (see text) as calculated by Luzzati et al. [2]. The absolute
error on the
lattice parameter is ± I I. Other notations and
symbols
as reported in the text.mixing
controlled amounts of theingredients.
The relativeuncertainity
of the concentrationswas estimated to be 5 fl. The
samples
were mounted invacuum-tight
cells with thin micawindows the cells were
continuously
rotatedduring
the exposure in order to reducespottiness
(which arises from thetendency
of cubicphases
to grow intomacroscopic
monodomains[4]).
The films were microdensitometered and the intensities measured and corrected as described
by
Tardieu[28].
2.5 CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE OLPC-WATER SYSTEMS. In order to determine
the structural data relative to the H
[22]
andQ~'° Phases, X-ray
diffractionexperiments
wereperformed
at room temperature as a function of water concentration. In eachexperiment,
anumber of
sharp low-angle
reflections are observed and theirspacing
and intensities measured.As
expected,
in the centralregion
of thephase diagram
(from aboutc. =
0.3 to c
=
0.7) the observed
peaks
showspacing
ratios in the order :,5
:
,j
:
,I ,~,
which indicate the 2Dhexagonal
symmetry[13,
22,25].
In theregion
between about c=
0.7 and c
=
0.8,
thespacing
ratios of the observed reflections are in theorder,~
:
,~
:
,~ ,/16 ,$: ,)...
clearly indicating
the Ia3d cubic symmetry[4, 12, 25].
Once the symmetry is obtained, the dimensions of the unit cell have been determined these data arereported
in table I. It can be noticed thatby using
the above describedexperimental
device, the weak additional diffusescattering
around and away from theBragg peaks, expected considering
manyprevious
observations
(see
forexample
Ref.[23]),
cannot beclearly
observed.2.6 CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE Q~~~ CUBIC PHASE OBSERVED IN THE DTAC-
wATER SYSTEMS. The
hexagonal
and the cubic Q223phases
observed in the DTAC systemTable II.
Cij,sta/%graphic.
dataoJ
the DTAC .<_vstem.Hexagonal phase
Cubic Q~~~Phase
c
0.89~*
c0.89~*
a
(h)
37.2a
(h)
79.6F(
lo) 404F(21
1) + 164F(21)
29F(220)
+ 158F(20) + 40
F(3211
+ 14F(3
19F(400)
+ 51F(30)
20F(420)
+ 17F(322)
18F(422)
19F(431)
172
pi (h2
0 2pi (h2
~
0
pj (0 (10~~
A~2)
13.7p)(0)
(10~ 2A~~
15.5( (Ap )~)
2.634( (Ap )~)
2.907~ ~
~~~
i19.5~
(j~[(~)jo-2 j-2)
~~.~
-~i~°~ ~'°~ ~~~'
~~The structure factor, are normalized to ~~
(F (h)(
~ 10~.The signs of the reflections are those of the maps in
figures
3, 8 and 9.(
(Apj~)
is the moment of order 4 of thehistogram
of the maps Ap (r calculated from raw data. Other notations and symbols as reported in the text.JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE ,, T 4 N'~ AUGUST 1994 52
~
~
~
~O
~,
Q
Q Q
O,(~~e,,
O',""""
"kl'l'(f,
~j Q'~i'Q"~t"
~~
Q ',',,j"'',',,""'
',',,"",
Q
,
Q
D ,,=,, '*qfi$/$' O ,=,,%~~
'~'t((,'
'~"'~
'j*']jll'
~"""' ~"""' Q
"fi"'$Kli' ~j
Q"h"'$fir'
'~"'$ff' O '~"J$f$' O
Q Q 1/2'$$$' '~J~'$$$$'
~~~j$#~' Q
)]j$~#'
,,"' ,,','
<' Q <' Q
~ ~
~
~~
© ~
~
F)g. 3. DTAC system. Upper frame : electron density map calculated from the raw data of the H
sample
extrapolated to the concentration of the cubic phase (see Tab. II). Lower frame sections Ap of the electron density map of the Q~~°Phase
calculated from the raw data and the « best »sign
combination as determined by using the pattern recognition approach (see Tab. III. in the left side,
section normal to the ~-fold axes and to the
plane
(211)containing
the point a/8,a/8,a/8; in the
right
side, section normal to the crystallographic axis [100]containing
the point a/8.0,0. The bar represents 50 h.were the
object
of recentcrystallographic
studies[4, 8].
Inparticular,
thesigns
of the reflections ofphase
H were determinedby
asystematic X-ray
diffractionanalysis
as a functionof the water content
[4],
while the structure of the cubic Q~~~Phase
was solvedby using
apattern
recognition approach [8]. By
contrast, the presence of a cubicQ~~° Phase
in the dried side of thephase diagram
was up to nowonly
documented[4, 26]. Therefore,
we report here thecrystallographic analysis
of thisphase.
As
expected,
in the concentration range between about c= 0.82 and c
=
0.90,
thespacing
ratios of the observed reflections are in the order
,I:,I:,/14:,@:,$fi...
indicating
the Ia3d cubic symmetry[25] (see
Tabs. I andII).
Asbefore,
due to the usedinstrumentation,
no additional diffusescattering
wasclearly
detected.To solve the
crystallographic phase problem,
and then to reconstruct the structure of thephase,
we use the patternrecognition approach
describedby
Luzzati et al.[3]. According
tothis
approach [3, 4, 8],
thesign
of the reflections could be assessedusing
the axiom that thehistograms
of the electrondensity
maps of two differentphases, extrapolated
to the same concentration andproperly
normalized in scale andshape,
are very similar to each other. Theprocedure
involves thecomparison
of twohistograms,
one relevant to thephase
underinvestigation
and the other to a referencesample
of known structure. In the present case, avirtual
hexagonal sample,
with the same chemicalcomposition
like the cubicsample,
has been used as reference.In order to determine the structure of this reference
sample,
we resorted to aswelling experiment [4, 8],
In thehexagonal phase,
it isexpected
that, at all concentrations, the observed reflectionssample
thecircularly averaged
structure factor of the cross section of the rods.By plotting
theintensity
of the reflections as a function of s, thesigns
of each lobe of thecircularly averaged
structure factor have been in fact determined[see Fig,
in Ref.8].
The electrondensity
map of the reference Hsample
is then obtainedby linearly extrapolating
to the concentration of the cubicphase
theconcentration-dependent
structure factors of each reflection observed in thehexagonal phase.
The so-obtained structure factors arereported
in table II thecorresponding
electrondensity
map isreported
infigure
3.According
to theprocedure,
before thecomparison,
the intensities observed in the cubicphase
and those of the referencehexagonal sample
wereapodised,
such that thepj(0)
takes the same value in the twophases [3,
4, 7,8] (see
Tab.II).
All thesign
combinations
compatible
with the diffraction data relative toQ~~° Phase
were thengenerated,
and each of the
corresponding histogram~
wascompared
with thehistogram
of the map of the reference Hphase. According
toVargas
et al.[8],
thesimilarity
between thehistograms
wasassessed
by searching
for the minimal value of the parameterSl~
s, I-e- their distance in the six- dimensional space of the moments,
((Ap )")
]'~~, for 3 m n m 8. In thefigure
4, thepoints
SIM g arereported
as a function of((Ap)~),
The bestsign
combination is the one whichcorresponds
to the minimum ofSl~
g (see Tab.
II).
Some sections of thecorresponding
map arereported
infigure
3. It is worthnoting
that the selected electrondensity
map is in excellent agreement with the well-known structure of theQ23° phase [see
also 3, 4, lo and I?],
It is alsointeresting
to note that the final result is invariant with respect to the choice of thep)(0)
value at which thecomparison
is made[P. Mariani, unpublished results].
iooo.o
~aa o oaa° ~°oaaoo° °
° ° o o
° a° on o
~ ~
~~ ~o o
loo,o
°° °°°
°& tjii~
~~~~IS
j
a
~ o
~~~8~
°@~o8
o °o ~~
~
~
° o
~
llf
1000
/~
DTAC 1.0
1.5 2 2.5 3
<(Ap)~>
Fig. 4. DTAC ~y~tem : plot of Mp
x ;ei iu~
(
l~p )~) in searching for the sign combination of theQ2'l'
phase who~e histogram be~t fits the hi,tograni oi the reference hexagonal phase. The apodized andextrapolated data of table II were u~ed. M~
x
and
(
(~p )~) are defined in the text. The arrow point~ at theminimal value of M~
x.
3.
Hexagonal phase.
3. ANALYSIS oF THE CYLINDER GROWTH. The structure of the
hexagonal phase
has beenusually
assumed to consist of « infinite »cylindrical
micellespacked
in aplanar hexagonal
cell with parameter a.Recently,
on the basis of results obtained in the SDS system[15]
and of statistical-mechanical calculations for the directisotropic
tohexagonal phase
transition[18- 2l],
an alternativedescription
has beenproposed
in terms of finite micelles. Inparticular,
the finitecylinders pack
as a fluid in the third dimension(normal
to the 2Dhexagonal cell),
withan average distance C between micellar centers.
Polydispersity
incylinder length
is a basic property of micellar systems and in thisdescription
is a necessary condition for the occurrence of a directisotropic-to-hexagonal phase
transitionII
5,18-21].
Note that the usual absence ofdiffraction in the direction
perpendicular
to thehexagonal plane
shall therefore be ascribed topolydispersity
ofcylinder length
and notnecessarily
to the presence ofinfinitely long cylinders.
Let us consider
initially
that the radius and the averagelength
of thecylindrical
micelle be R and L,respectively.
Theamphiphile-to-water
volume ratio has to be the same in the unit cellas in the whole
sample,
therefore(L/C
)=
(,5/2
ar c~
a~
R~ ~ lwhere c~ is the
amphiphile
volume fraction. However, since thelipid polar region
containswater, we shall consider R, L and the volume concentration of the
paraffin
core(C'v,pa<)-
Assuming
a constant R value, andestimating
it from thelength
of the extended chain[15],
it ispossible
to obtain from theexperimental
values (a and c, ~~,) the ratio L/C, thatgives
essentially
the fraction of water in C direction. It is evident that for « infinite»
cylinders,
wehave L/C
= I, so that
a oI cj
)j,.
(2)In order to describe the system as
containing
finitecylinders,
thehypotesis
of a uniformdecrease in
interparticle
distances in all three dimensions has been made[18-20]
:L/C = 2Rla.
(3)
From
equation
(I), we then get :~ ~ ~
(2 ,/jlar
)- '/3~.- )/3
~. M'
However, as discussed in a
previous
paperII
5], theapproach
of a «cylinder
» may lead to inconsistencies in the case of finiteobjects.
It is better in this case to consider asphero-cylinder
with radius R,
cylinder length f,
totallength
L=
(f
+ 2 R andanisometry
v=
(f/2
R).
The condition foramphiphile-to-water
volume ratio becomes then(instead
ofEq. (I))
:i~
~~'P~'~~
~3~/~v
~~~
Under the condition of uniform decrease in
interpartide
distances in all three dimensions(Eq. (3)),
it results[15]
a - 2 R
fi
~i«++~ii~
°
cv
pi, (6)
If
experimentally
it is observed a=
Acj j~,,
theanisometry
becomes[22]
«
~'~. l~l, ~i~ll (7)
where K=
(2,star)(A/2R)~.
It is evident that forcylinders
withconstant
radius,
K is a constant. If.i= 1/3, I-e- if the
cylinders
are finite and the condition of uniform decrease ininterparticle
distances in all three dimensions is fulfilled, the averageanisometry
isconstant
K 2/3
" ~
(8)
l K
By
contrast, if,i is smaller than 1/3,equation (7) gives
a law for thecylinder growth
withconcentration
[22].
Inparticular,
the(Kc(' j~l'')
value must respect the condition :' ~ (fi~l'~~
'~)
~ 2/3
(~)
PA'
as it
corresponds
to an averageanisometry
vranging
from o~ to 0 (I.e, fromcylinders
of infinite diameter tospherical particles
of diameterequal
to 2 R).Therefore,
theanalysis
of the function(Kc[~ j~/
'~ in the domain of existence of the Hphase,
andparticularly
at the transitionpoints
toneighbouring phases,
may throwlight
on the process ofcylinder growth
and on thenature of the
phase
transition. Moreover, we stress that the conditiongiven by equation (31
cannot be valid when
cylinders
become « infinite », and in this limit theequation (7)
is nolonger
valid,The
analysis
of the OLPC system[22] gives
a first clear evidence of micellargrowth
within thehexagonal
domain, with aphase
sequenceI-H-Q~~°
Since the SLS system evidencesabout constant
anisometry
in the Hregion,
with,i=
1/3 within
experimental
error[15],
and has aphase
sequence I-H-M(hexagonal distorted),
we focus in this paper on systems that showcubic
phases
before and/or after thehexagonal phase.
3.2 RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION. The curves a versus c~,
~~, are
reported
infigure
5 table IIIgives
the values obtained from thefittings
to theexperimental points
; results for70
~mw~n__~ ~
~q 50
m
-+- PaLPC
-- oLPc
~ DTAC
30
0.3 0.5
J0.7
C v,par
Fig. 5. Hexagonal parameter a as a function of the volume concentration of the
paraffinic
core c~ ~~,for the three considered systems. Data for DTAC and PaLPC are taken from references [4] and [8].
Data for OLPC are from reference [22]. The values obtained from the fittings to the
experimental points
are reported in table III.
OLPC have been taken from Mariani and Amaral
[22].
It could be observed that theequation (2)
does not fit the data in any case. As it has been showntheoretically [18-21]
that the exponents 1/2 and 1/3 are thefingerprint
of,respectively,
infinite (orflexible) objects
(with volume aroundchanging
in twodimensions)
and hard finiteobjects (with
volume around theparticles changing
in all the threedimensions),
we can conclude that, in all the threedifferent systems, the structure elements in the
hexagonal phase
behave like finitecylinders.
Figure
6 shows L/C values calculated in thehexagonal phase by using equation (I)
on theassumption
of a constant R value, as estimated from Tanford relation[30]
and molecular models from thelength
of thelipid
extended chain(see
Tab,III).
Note that due to theexpected polydispersity
in thecylinder length,
the calculated L/C ratios represent an average value.Even if the results are
critically dependent
on the valueadopted
for theradius,
a clear trend of increase of L/C withincreasing
concentration can be observed for all the threelipids.
It is clear that DTAC andPaLPC,
bothpresenting
the cubic Q223phase,
show similar behaviour.By
contrast, in the case of
OLPC,
where an I-Hphase
transition exists, lower values ofL/C are observed. Both PaLPC and DTAC reach the limit L/C
=
I (« infinite » micelles, and therefore
Eqs. (3)
and(7)
nolonger
valid). But PaLPC reaches this limit at the H-Lphase
Table III.
Analysis of cylinder grow>tli
in thehe,ragona/ phase.
PaLPC OLPC DTAC
A 49.66 = 0.62 44.70 = 0, I1 35,52 = o,14
,1 0.187 ± o-U 0.226 ± 0.002 0. I 18 ± 0.006
c-f. 96.0 fl 99.8 fl 99.0 fl
R
(1)
20.5 ±1.0 21.0± 1.5 15.4 ± 1-U
i~,
~~,(I
H ) 0,lsl ± 0.017Kc(' jl''
0.72± 0.15
v
~
0.2
c~ ~_,,(Q?~~ Hi 0.261 ± 0,012 0.402 ± 0.008
Kc-[
j/
'~ l.09 ± 0,16 0.94 ± 0,13v
~
4.5
c,
~~,(H
Q~~'~) 0.423 ± U-U15 0.606 ± U-U14Kc(
'j~/
'~ l.00 ± 0.21 .22 ± 0.24v o~
i~,
~,,,(H
L) 0.453 ± 0.008Ki[~ p/
' l .39 ± 0. 20V
c-f- is the correlation factor obtained
fitting
the experimental data bya=Acjj~,
(see text).R is the radius oi the
paraffinic cylinder
)n thehexagonal
phase, assumed constant, as estimated from the e~tended chain of the lipid~ [30]. In the case of OLPC, where the double bond bends the chain, the length has been correctedby using
molecular models. c, ~,,,lI HI, c,~~,(Q~~'-
HI. i~ ~~,(H Q~~~~) and~
~,jH L are
respectively
theparaffin)c
volume concentrations where the indicated phase transitionsocjur
[4~ 8, 26. ?7]. The anisotropy ~L ha~ been calculated
disregarding
the errors on theKi(' jl''
values.Other notations and
symbols
as reported in the text..o
q
~
0.6
--- PaLPC
--- OLPC
-~ DTAC
0.2
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
c
Fig.
6. L/C values (see text) calculated in the hexagonal phase on the assumption of a constant radius (see Tab. III) for the three considered systems as a function of the weight concentration I. Note that forinfinitely
long cylinders the L/C ratio must be equal to I. The reported lines are only guides to the eyes.transition, while DTAC passes
through
this condition still in the Hphase,
beforeentering
theQ~~°
cubicphase.
Thus OLPC andDTAC,
while bothpresenting
theH-Q~" Phase
transition, have different L/C values at this transition.
Let us now
analyze
resultsthrough equation (7).
The values of the function(Kc(' j~l'~)
and thecorresponding
anisometriesv, calculated at the
phase
transitions on theassumption
ofconstant radius, are
reported
in table III. The data for OLPC[22]
are consistent with thepresence of
nearly spherical
micelles at the I-H transition (v = 0.2),
which growalong
the Hphase. Infinitely long cylinders
exist at the H toQ~"
cubicphase
transition, The observedKc[) j~l''
values indicate agrowth
of micelles in thehexagonal
domain also for the DTAC. At theQ~~~-H phase
transition the finite micelles show alarge anisometry (about 4.5),
while at theH-Q23° phase
transition the micelles appearinfinitely long.
In the case ofPaLPC,
the values ofKc() j~l'~
observed at the twophase
transitions arelarger
than theunity,
so that their anisometries cannot be determined ; it should be stressed however that thelarge
errors inKc)'pl'~
leave open thepossibility
of finite micelles at theQ223-H
transition, which growalong
thehexagonal region
also for PaLPC.Results from table III show that, while micelles have small anisometries after the I-H
phase
transition inOLPC, they
arequite large
after a cubicQ~~~-H phase
transition in both PaLPC and DTAC.Moreover,
all the threelipid
systems showlong
micelles, near to the « infinite » limit, in thehigher
concentration side of thehexagonal
domain, both at theH-Q~" Phase
transition for OLPC and DTAC and at the H-L
phase
transition for PaLPC. What seems tocharacterize the
H-Q~~° Phase
transition is an « extra » micellargrowth
in the Hphase just
before the transition for OLPC such
growth
isexponential [22],
while for DTAC the valueL/C becomes
larger
than I. Such « extra »growth
seems not to occur for PaLPC, that haslarger
anisometries at theQ223-H phase
transition, but presents a H-L transitionjust
before L/C reaches I. In the next sections, the transitionQ~~~-H
andH-Q~~°
will beinvestigated
inmore detail.
4.
HexagonaLcubic phase
transition :epitaxial relationships.
4,
HEXAGONAL-Q~~°
CUBIC PHASE TRANSITION. Theepitaxial relationships
between thehexagonal phase
and the cubicQ~" Phase
were first establishedby Ran~on
and Charvolin65
PaLPC
°~'~
~' 55
I
fl#
~lll ~~~~
45
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
c
60
oLpc
~~
~ ~°
d Q~~°
~ ~~' ~m
40
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
c
40
di,,Q~~' DTAC
~
3
i~
~
i
h~
~ ~Q
~l
I1
~~~~
25
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
c
Fig.
7.Epitaxial relationships
variation of the (10)spacing
of thehexagonal
phase observed in the three considered systems as a function of theweight
concentration c. The arrows point to the repeat distance between the (211jcrystallographic
planes observed in the corresponding cubic phases. The reported lines are only guides to the eyes.[23]
andextensively analysed by
Clerc et al.[?4].
The present results confirm theserelationships.
In fact, the two lattices appear commensurate : asreported
infigure
7 for both DTAC and OLPC systems, the repeat distance between thelo) planes
in thehexagonal phase
is continuou~ with the repeat distance between the
(?
ii)planes
in the cubicphase.
Asdemonstrated in references
[23, 24],
the lo)planes
of thehexagonal phase
are in factparallel
to the
(211) planes
of theQ~"
cubicphase
both are theplanes
ofhighest density
in the twophases
[14, 23, see also10].
Therefore, the twoadjacent mesophases
arestrongly
related : inparticular,
thegrowth
of thehexagonal phase
ishighly
favouredalong
the[I
I] direction of the cubic structure, or, what isequivalent,
theQ~~°
cubicphase develops along
the direction of thecylinders
of thehexagonal phase,
that transforms into a[I I]
cubic direction[23, 24].
In order to obtain information about the mechanism of
phase
transformation, we show infigure
8 some electrondensity
maps tracedperpendicularly
to theii
direction as well as thefi
@
fi
Fig.
8. DTAC system perspective view of few sections Ap normal to the ill Ii direction and of theprojection
Ap jjjj~ of the electrondensity
map of theQ2'°
phase calculated from the raw data of table II.The first section at the bottom contains the point 0,0,0, the last one at the top the point
a/2,a/2,a/2 the distance between two successive sections is a
(,5/24). According
to the
projection,
the heavy lines indicate the two different positions where rods form at the transition to thehexagonal
phasenote that one third of the
hexagonal cylinders
forms from the successive coplanarjunctions
(forexample,
along the heavy line passingthrough
the center of the sections), the last two thirds form from the threefoldhelices (for example, along the heavy line traced in the
right
side). For sake of clarity, the structure elements of the cubicphase
involved in the process of formation of twohexagonal
cylinders arerepresented in grey.
JOURN~L DE PHYSIQUE ,i T 4 ~' x ~UGUST 1994 v
corresponding projection
of the electrondensity
of the unit cell in thisdirection, Apjj~jj.
Inparticular,
theprojection Apjjjjj (see
alsoFig. 9)
shows apseudo-hexagonal
symmetry and appearsperfectly superposable
to the electrondensity
map of theneighbouring hexagonal phase. Considering
the content of the differentsections,
it ispossible
toanalyse
from a
geometrical point
of view how the cubic networks transform intohexagonal
rods, Inparticular,
3hexagonal cylinders
derive from one cubic unit cell. However, aspointed
outby
Clerc et a/.
[24],
at thetransition,
one third ofhexagonal cylinders
forms from the succession ofjunctions
where threecoplanar
rods are connected, in tumbelonging
to each 3D networks.By
contrast, the last two thirds ofcylinders
form from the infinite threefold helices, each helixbeing entirely
contained inonly
one of the two 3D networks.The first
transformation,
which has beengracefully
describedby
Clerc et a/.[24]
toimply
« tower » fluctuations
[see
also Ref.23],
is characterizedby
the fusion of the twoparaffinic
o o
o o
o o
o o
' ' ' '
',
' ,
_, ' ,
, ',-,
J
I
' I
J
,' , , , ,
,' . ,J ,
'
'
. I
,'
, '
, '
"
Fig. 9. DTAC system. Upper frame : electron density maps calculated from the raw data of H sample~
respectively extrapolated
to. the concentration of the cubicQ22'
phase (left side) [8] and to theconcentration of the cubic
Q~~'
Phase (right side). Lower frame projectionsApjjjjj
of the electrondensity
map of the cubic Q~~'Phase
calculated from the raw data reported in reference [8] (left side) and of the electronden~ity
map of the cubic Q~~'Phase
calculated from the raw data indicatedin table II
(right side). In the maps~ the hexagonal and pseudo-hexagonal unit cells are marked by heavy lines. The bar represents