• Aucun résultat trouvé

Europe Bets on Norms Rather Than on Force

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Europe Bets on Norms Rather Than on Force"

Copied!
15
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01066092

https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01066092

Preprint submitted on 19 Sep 2014

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Europe Bets on Norms Rather Than on Force

Zaki Laïdi

To cite this version:

Zaki Laïdi. Europe Bets on Norms Rather Than on Force. 2007. �hal-01066092�

(2)

1 .

UESI/ON. In your latest booko), y o u w r i t e t h a t E u r o p e w i l l

never be a great power. Why?

First we hove to ogree on whot we meon by o greot power. ïo me, o greot power is o greot civil ond militory power, roughly comporoble to Americon powertodoy ond Chinese power in the future. This seems to me to be o very remote possibility for o number of strucfurol reosons. The first is thot Europe is not o stote but o federotion of notion stotes. Consequently, this meons thot Europe does not reflect the existence of o Europeon people. Às long os there is no notion of Europeon people, there will be no European stote. And os long qs there is no notion of Europeon people, there con be no common representotive of its interests before the world ond its chollenges.

Ànother reoson, which is connected to the first, stems from the foct thot E u r o p e o n s d o n ' t c o n s i d e r t h e m s e l v e s to be the finol guorantors of their own security. Together with fopon, we ore t h e o n l y o n e s i n t h i s s i t u o t i o n . T h e Àmericons, the Chinese, the Russions ond the Brozilions consider themselves to be the finol guorontors of their security.

Europeons tolk o lot obout Europeon forces, moke the Petersberg missions(2) oppeor more importont thon they ore, ond hold forth obout the deployment o f f o r c e s i n À f r i c o . N o n e o f t h i s i s insignificont, but we should not forget

Zoki Loïdi, La Norme sans Ia force. L'énigme de Ia puissance européenne (Norms without force: the enigmo of European power), Sciences Po (Les presses), 2005, p.711.

In o historic decision in'1,992, ot Hotel Petersberg neor Bonn, the Western Europeon Union (WEU) defined o ronge of crisis- monogement missions to which member governments wonted to respond. The "Petersberg missions" include humonitorion ond rescue tosks, peocekeeping ond tosks for combot forces in crisis monogement.

Vof . 4, No. 3,luly 2007

o n e s s e n t i o l p o i n t : m o s t E u r o p e o n n o t i o n s t h i n k t h o t , i n t h e e n d , t h e defence of their own territory is not their responsibility but NATO's ond, in foct, Americo's. This perception hos not been modified, but hos in fact been reinforced, os o result of Europeon enlorgement. The Bolts ond the Poles look to the Americons for their security. The Europeon Union ploys on important role, but its function i s e c o n o m i c , c e r t o i n l y n o t m i l i t o r y . Things could conceivobly chonge over time. But you reolly hove to be French to believe thot "l'Europe-puissonce"- Europe os o power-is inevitoble, or even on ideo thot is moking heodwoy. As long os Europeons don't consider themselves the finol guorontors of their security, ony tolk of "Europe os o power" will remoin merely incontotory. The sixty- four thousond dollor question is whether this ottitude will be tenoble in tomorrow's world-o world in which Chino, Indio o n d R u s s i o c o n s i d e r t h e m s e l v e s th e finol guorantors of their own security.

In todoy's world, only Europe ond fopon find themselves in this situotion.

Q. Nevertheless, hasn't the lraq crisis shown the ability of certain European states to free themselve s from American tutelage?

True. The most spectaculor ospect of the Iroqi offoir is not the French stonce but r o t h e r G e r m o n y ' s e m o n c i p o t i o n . B u t opposing the Americons is evidently not sufficient to formulote o Europeon policy.

Fronce ond Germony foiled to rolly o lot

of countries behind them; in thot respect,

they foiled. Hos this crisis prompted the

Germons to ottoch more importonce to

militory questions ond to moke o more

substontiol effort to strengthen their

defence capobility? Certainly not. The

24

(3)

Et/,il+ËeTlnË

EuropeBets on Norms Rather Than on Force

An Interview with Zaki Laïdi

Zaki Laïdi o ILE fÙ{FiÊ

+LË.tû{Figxifit

n-+ErlhfH*4*ÉttrE* É +rxf+ -+Fq' EFEtlll'l L*'/kH +E,fû,,ffl E JÊ (F F â H È+fuI R*

'ffrPÈ^. +t1ll5 E ^-Ëel+rst+

-f+I *. tr[+E^, +tr^' 'ffi

E^D)&.8 É^*Ffilli È'fù4fl É É

HùËË âHÈ+fuI6-4TRWA"

& i/+l ^ xf E^ i/'l'l É! F + h É 1 # ' Æ t H \ 4 T , " t È . î + f f i 4 e 4 +

*" (Petersberg missions) (a ff':qFa-"f€

H e,ILtù,4f1 ât 7' 4t'll1i:E11i1TÆ tui^l/ùÊ ÆlFi/lj Ét tr +*[E . ir']-h

æA É!-,F. *.ll16ù17.ËiÉ' fFdù

ftÆ,x?ry.ffi Eft i/'fl ExâFi^h, w

mziÊtrh

1 .

2.

lll ru, æ,gEiEHËFtss I l-_| I +, .'',gEË, Eril|'|x f -J xnoJÊEFrh-t3eX

t!718. 'Uh{qË^Éw?

Eâ, Êlt, +tîl?+ffi "1fr,X.fu1)J Ë " É!âXiâFl-5{ËrÛ. xÛ&m È, tEtÉ!7TËËIÉ5EtÉ'I frr.f.fn T+hÊ, ,t'f4fHg+âXÉ!*tr

D)&-**.tuI+trÉ!iË" whfrÆ

Ê 4R + ÆtrJ,WÊ! ftr tr, Ffi u)ffii^h Efti/{{Fïà -fdEt Ét 7T Ë Ét4ÊÉ'l+

\W+N'È,û. " Ê LvLi)'l{ +6 Ë-1 tr

x, mË-1È?+RI4tr XFnzH FrÉiffi+t3, Elrfi , itrË4Ëeti/'il+

tkH Ftrn* fr tF h - I Eft i/'l'l F'rLfr\ æ Æ. R*6frÆ8ft i/'l'l RÈ4ri',ù Z^àH et/'fltr. +-EL , RgI}AÉ Efti/ji R fiî, flY' /aÆffi xt Ê. ry D) &ffixÛ Ë 4 Ét f+f+ ubût E{È,ùT ÊâÊ ËftJ ffi Ét + lE4t*.

TL-E' lnFjÉ, Lo Norme sans Io force: L'(1igm: de Io puissance eurooéenne(*\,'fr,rfi lLrrt ,b, Eîitl'l liEI,E i.dB'l /: E) ' Sciences Po (Les presses) ' zoos ts. ffilttTl"

\ïgï +E*.n.w+fr.kl tÈ.t+Ffr.etÉtÈ ' ffiErw.ffireH T Æ Èt+

nt t+ t, É' u T Ë Ë E ÉIrÈ tF P 4 tr ÉIE É! ; 4t tlîï'+n'Ê rE t++'- 'tp.t+yn1âl++" ' =+Effi^Ë*\æ.- ?Et+tE+

u et\ Ë\HXâ F 4 h É Ù,4t frp'tn'.

f f i E Ë f f = f f i 2 0 0 7 + 7 F 2 5

(4)

m o j o r i t y o f Germons think thot the forther away they get from militory problems, the better off they will be. I om not judging; merely noting o foct.

Lostly, there is o third, historicol, foctor, which there is no getting owoy from: Europe wos creoted in opposition to wor ond militory power. The Europeon project wos founded on the ideo thot wor must be sublimoted. Noturolly, one could think thot the world hos chonged ond thot Europeons hove chonged with it. But I om not so sure. In o woy, the common feoture thot binds Europeons is their reticence to use force ond their tendency to promote norms, which is not in controdiction to the development of o militory force. Besides, these post 15 yeors hove shown thot the use of force hos, when oll is soid ond done, foiled to solve ony problems. Thot's why those who scoff of European noiveté ore not necessorily right. After oll, the greot strotegic event of the lote twentieth century wos the collopse of communism. Yet this collopse w o s n o t brought obout by o wor of conquest, but by the implosion of the system. Let's remember the debote obout t h e H e l s i n k i Accords ond its fomous Bosket III, which wos focused on humon rights. Mony soid thot the Accords were o fool's borgoin between Eost ond West.

It wos indeed o fool's borgoin, but not in the woy they thought. Ideos turned o u t t o be stronger thon missiles. It is this historicol exomple thot leods me to conclude thot purely reolist visions of the world moke no sense.

Possessing o militory instrument is not outomaticolly going to turn Europe into a greot power. It is the purpose to which power is directed thot gives meoning to militory power. I'm ostonished thot this

Vof . 4, No. 3,luly 2007

obvious point is not recognised ond thot we ore still asking ourselves how to build o Europeon force to turn Europe into o greot power.

Q. If, as you argue, European power is based solely on norrns, isn't it condemned to play second fiddle?

It oll depends on how one envisions the world system, on how one looks ot its structure ond chollenges. If you see the world in "reolist" terms, thot is to soy, if you think thot whot counts is the power ond interest of stotes, ond thot their volues, ideos ond opinions don't count, you will be led to think thot Europe does not motter. On the other hond, if you believe thot the world's problems ore never solved by force olone, you will think thot Europe stonds o chonce.

Neither the problems of poverty nor of the environment con be solved through force. The some is true of democrocy, olthough in this oreo motters ore more c o m p l e x . Without externol pressure, regimes do not budge. But pressure olone is not enough. Thot hos been true from the conquest of Egypt to thot of Iroq.

T h u s t h e q u e s t i o n is this: ore we moving towords o world orgonised ond reguloted by norms-which is whot the Europeon project is oll obout-or ore we witnessing the return of realpolitik, with the rise in power of Chino, Indio ond Russio? It is o genuine question. The Europeons ore betting thot internotionol norms con govern the world. Thot is whot they hope, ond it is olso in their interest. But I om not sure thot the other greot stotes shore this vision of the world.

fherein lies the ombiguity of the French

insistence on o "multipolor world". The

French think thot o multipolor world

26

(5)

i/t't E L pÈ ffi tuI 4r + inîtJ /È T Ë4ù,11 ilIrtÆ, ffiiÉ)LntuI, +E+*i Ë+ tr wfrlr. ffiË&ti/ilÆ+r x., a-r[âT IEYïH î+îU ÉtA, F-fri

vÈlEtX,T " W.YillWBxîEtÈ.)4 )\

TFH+ tr ^*,ffr +È,fù,,fn É! qâ. [i HEff#iiÊT -+Éryil1Hg, IH È,fuI lE ffi *fi E#.^tfi1m, mzi Ë ÆF+nffi " E,*'l XiAÆS'fÉ H nl âVÉ,à ffiË Et' I'Hl m Ê +.Y.|-L, ' f E q F 6 n t , I B R H I F h - 1 i * t r

^t à *lïlè'* "

WjlllZdE l'E,.,rope- puissonce " - Wt)'l lF h ttllYL

--ni.4ZFnffi, ùâ.,t.P.X fF^tsf Ê Êî+EE ÉtrEâ.,F, 4 &i/'il A+E trJÊTEFHâHÈèfr\ffi-

44lftFÈ ^, flY. /al+.E FnlH " W$NZ tE " É! ii,i* âr, RÊ?HF-tr î+A_?f . -+r'l Dl ËI É H **fr4 É! tE ËE,i'rù 8., rxfFAÈÆ*XÉtË4+Ëâ

16++?+T* 1+8. EF

Ë r u f f i E a v i ô + E Ë E + i f Ê H È +R.4IXFÈÉ!Ëry . Æ\+Étr81 Ë+8, RHWJJ'IIfI B ÆË-TNAd_

f"l ' flTm, IFfrfr?le,tll,TIEæBEH E EÎilt'l tr âHffihlfr.âel^. tr t!

{RrÈ+ËHX0-9?

E, ËfË. Fnfr.+l++ËËl^iÈ

H É,!{flZiËi*EÉ!44, mËÆtr

WffiTlt, (emoncipotion) . 'fE tr Xt*

E ED)Ët h Dti/t'lÉi-4rI

fr. i*4#ffitriAÊEruA?ilIEAW

t*^Ætû,Il\H )ù-, Ær8-È8, Ifu,lll XtM,T " ffii :alîfe,tn EÆ -EJi,lEl*.îH

tr^+iâÉm?+rEff, +'fffiHE

iln*Æ'14 W,%h*.j..JJI9E,fù,'fl] É! FÈI â?,hEE? g *tkâ " %,X3#\.1H

tr^t È,,fû'fflrujruÈtrStEËEÊ,tù ruEntr. +,tLL IJ+iAÊT+tJtsf , È

lv lv z ]A-/\É'ri

l ) \ 1 ^ Y , 2 \ / t - l F : ; < o

ffi.Ê, ffi= +W$ll)t i*+gfii ilI m *.,14 E ËdùË' Etiit'l Éëæ E x{ùt +îET+hÉ.rs-ËfË + t?+D)Èl+.t1 " " Eii/{{ilttj " (rne

Europeon project) ËË + rS- IEÈi--

t, Ertw+,ytnËÈÈ1É'1. gft , ItstrJ D)i hÈ na^&N.T, &i/rj

^&, 4rrRËrï-ft &A .'fE+txf Éh

*pzi++€ËÈ " -nffi, +EEfti/'il^

HX^6Æ-ru É'I* tE++,fi, nF-xt

'fÉ Æ Et )r tuIfr friJD) }-xt *I Ë iI [U

(norms) É!+ÊÉ' r{ 5 È.RT+ h

É.+T7É. m-EL, Ë*ffi+n+

rll Éttttt 8B,5 , iÈSttj/È , 4È.HÊir +tk H ffi WI|FI tbl ËE . g.rir,fth 4ï laBfl N W $ N ^ ^ Ë t u I f l 1 s È 3 ^ + 6 n Æ

)iiùËxûÉt. +È, - +Ë^e,*H Ê É).5t E6 Ë X É'f +'f+ Ë +t È È X É!'â â, {Er8+6Ë É îEEV'I+

tuI hr,+51 ru É'I, m Ë É Ë,fAffilj É'l

Ê iffi (tmptosion) FfrW" iËit+tflliÉ, 'fÈ*T " Tfr,F+Hti'tX " (Helsinki Accords) &. ^Ë-# Z fuI ' = fE ^ â" Bosket trr V1+1/t, ià+rtfuIÊ ,fiËÆ^fx (human rights) nffi " 'lP.

* ^inlz| iY'e_Rffin zIEJ -I^ Ê /ltfr É,I iï,f/f )6 11 " È6h9- E - th lE, Â\ il É! i.I,f/f 6 4ll, IE+T æ.D)Af) rt-b

LFfi M^*1ÈttË11 tT . xnÀr$ R EL+9Ër6tr g " ÉËr8-EE'l+S I+|fr#.l//..H T r{f'+ fr\t.^ië. D)tqÆ IL q È X É'T m F.Ê Ê n# fi ,s.* X "

f f æ Ë t r = Æ 2 0 0 7 + 7 F

(6)

is outomoticolly o multiloterol world orgonised occording to strict rules. But this definition is not occepted by oll. I om not ot oll sure thot the Chinese see things from this ongle. To them, whot counts is Americon recognition; they don't much core obout the rest. Whot they wont is to ploy with the big boys; not to uphold internotionol norms, but to defend their own interests.

Whot needs to be recognised is thot the Europeons hove no olternotive model.

T h e i r p o l i t i c o l m o d e l i s " g o v e r n m e n t by norms." They ore not obout to turn oround overnight ond soy, "This model doesn't work. Let's proctise realpolitik like everyone else." Europe connot chonge its position becouse, os I soid before, it is not o stote. Europe con only return to realpolitik if its vorious members decide to go it olone. Collectively, militory force is not on option for them. They con only try to convince the others to ploy occording to o binding set of rules thot opply to oll, including the most powerful.

Q. But hasn't the lraq war, in fact, proven the failure of this approach?

Y e s , o f c o u r s e . T h e E u r o p e o n s were d i v i d e d , o n d t h o s e w h o did shore o number of positions did not succeed in c r e o t i n g o r e o l E u r o p e o n d y n a m i c . Nonetheless, subsequent events showed thot the Americon opprooch wos not n e c e s s o r i l y th e b e s t , o n d thot their woy of exporting democrocy by force remoins highly problemotic if there ore no locol forces to support it. Thot soid, I om not sure thot the Europeons hove originol ideos to tockle these problems.

But, so for, the Americon opprooch hos remoined fruitless. Àfter the first elections, one would hove thought thot the trend

Vof. 4, No. 3, luly 2007

would be reversed. But since then, thot optimism hos been doshed. In oddition, the Syrion crisis-ond the internotionol consensus it has produced-shows thot the UN remoins on institution with o power of legitimocy thot is by no meons negligible. No one contests the foct thot the injunction directed ot Domoscus to cooperote with the UN to find out who wos behind Rofik Horiri's murder wos iustified, becouse there is o consensus behind it-including within the Àrob countries.

f o h n B o l t o n , t h e A m e r i c q n ombossodor to the United Notions who hos olso been o leoding Àmericon onti- UN theorist for 50 yeors, is pleosed to see the UN tockle the Iranion ond Syrion questions which the United Stotes con no longer monoge on its own.

I t i s o b v i o u s t h o t A m e r i c o n uniloterolism hos reoched its limits ond thot the pronouncements thot were mode obout the demise of multiloterolism were premoture. Internotionol offoirs obey the logic of the pendulum.

Q. Does this retum of the pendulum favour Europe?

In o woy, yes, becouse it ollows Europe to get bock in the gome ond underscores the foct thot multiloterolism con produce results. Nevertheless, todoy, Europe is too obsorbed in its internol problems to reop even the slightest profit from this situotion.

This introversion is lorgely due to o totol lock of strotegic vision regording its own future, the difficulty of notional systems in odopting to the constroints o f g l o b o l i s o t i o n , t h e t e n d e n c y t o renotionolise choices ond the temptotion to moke of Europe o constroint rother thon on opportunity.

28

(7)

ffiHTH+W.+Z^à87)rÆW i/rlArt-îrL|.-ilI h Ê " T E hÊ

É! Ë X * â l&tUr Ê.Ffr 'ffi.*rntuI H É!. â+t'H +fuI,--, txf'+-f+..fl m n nÊUfr, F.È,*tÈH î+flli^r'1, +t

$1ltllÉ.Æ.t* Ê ltJHf-f *1Èr7-qEft

i/r'l tr M,*,fÊ Eft i/r'l E[ t - t .

hl, loRlo,UFfiËû!, EI),l|'|9eT!.'fn XinntJinË ( norm ) hH*2EfU,

il13 AÈ, æ6.:-?fi )f Ë R Ëg # tq Ee Æ ? Æ, rsdùÈâ4 Ê IBE \nlq*ÆsB Ë +ZI^^, tnlal *Ê 1+È tuI Æfq fiU&&Ëi " lnRlBD) "rnXÈX" Éi tjfl, F.*É't*Ërl, Ufri*.ihtn RItr i^h â tJt IHtu1 R F& + E xâ\ * h fi fuË, m Èfi tu1lflaxn, Ïgafr Hitùt-rrt â$#H tit IÊÉi iÉ' AY. /a llr -rJi,à

i^h wiltl F-r,rniË É! . fri fr - nffi , ln RItr'lHIÈËry É'! f+ff rE tr 'fxFrti ft)ûl*,h9t+'g1, ttïÈ1î,+ i N Eft i/l'lr6Ê Ëxrh fr\al â?,. fr WtT'ff H r'"]tr4Ê8EËEt, *fr1t{, RÈ rE ËEt Ë-f+, KÊÆa,âfri4 rE Ë8 Tt h -æ:/A " tkH tl-Éf. E)J, lÆffiiJZ.

àN.lX,, IE RH fi'h & FTrtt fr1 "

^xt r^&îu xû,fË Tù Ê il1 îEEF.+, rs -r[,fi -Ë Dl *ÈtùËiE 6hfr\ "

EÉL, lhlffi7]æT' +t'fflËÉ

ËË H -1É TT,IAIJTilfrFfr?;H2ATNÊ }E É!ËrT (rshË' Eiii'ilittû " É!

* â F f i Æ ) , i 6 Ë + t 4 [ É A p Ë Ë t r tr . EFÈ fn II!"ry ffiÉ!rlÆËffi -[, iÉ TF rrù q EI iâ É! tr rl ? lr Ë -1^H q

É'l tbt tr " Ei i/t'[^ â EE T E ptr'i4 [lJ Ê2r lâ Ë rI . rF liiù Ë i,ù,\l1Ffr ,H.Â:g..

fr\, +Ë-t Ë,fÙ,,fltÉ! É w9frÆ" IE

+t *F ^ ÊE Ë Ë Ë,ft t tr xt' l- Ë 4 e,H )zf+ kI iË îF . :x Efr îtÊ It E ^8Effi tI " ?th.Ê ryr" Ffr FH É ! t Ë # 8 , 1 4 " y * E ^ i h , ? f f i . Ë . +'x *Bù Ë - I rR rE P Æ V.1 il,Nl

(rures) Ffr 4LËtafr\ ? y4-LËn- "'fE rx

î+ ryÈ.+Tà4È.FfrH ^T*É. + tr ^â T à ^lI I Æ È-É'I+ l"J Fn fr Èâ e.H w+tr. xt',fù,,fflm Ë,

É g É ! Ë + E ^ É ! j E I , â T ^ Ë

,fû,s'lË [u + ^ Z\â Ë .,f&,ff] J1 Æ EFJ<TàT\1EJIft, H É!RËAf ++

r,f&,ffl H H wlfljffi , m+Z.ËîF

*Æ+È E F,o*IËÆIU.

ffi full1'r' tfri.^ i stJ & i/t l ^ Ë iË É El Ë4tôHrtÉt. ,fù,'fflÉlEfhtËfr

E "filffiÉIf.l' ( " government by

norms" ) IHfr. 4û114 trIâj",Æ^-&-

Z Èl H+€**iï,'' lxïf tËrtTË lF m " iL+klll &,ffi^Ë,fth ^ f F f+ X ifr

ifrI)t{giy6 (reolpolitik) rE. " &ti/l'l

fil*,&N.ïItr, Bh, +iil,ù' È

&Fxfrtr i^Ë &iE &E&É'Itn"rn F ' Eft /'il /' EI ÊE E rl: q q Ét iâ " R ,fA'lË /ÂT, T+)rËlFÊjârn, Èr\â?, tr 7T * iï, ER Ë'f& E 4É1Ê -# â R

H hR.h Ét*[[U (rules) 11+ , È,]-b

irfluuuiÉÆ +FfrâEx-@tÊ&.h tE'-i(É!Ex"

lbt, {E {FÎùÊ tt +T=Æ+*-tiiE 8Ef Ëf+Ë')Ëû!*,Wû-9?

Æ, ËÉ'I. &i/t{^ËI,Tfr,-, fri flf) ti ÆH rti444444444444444 ïLth L- î\.fr\ B x e, + ÊE H+fFËÉ tlW.IJ'II'rhhW G

reol Europeon dynomic). ffiiÉ*-F.

t r æ Ë æ = Æ 2 0 0 7 + 7 8

(8)

r

European feeling and the EU's norms and values celebrated during Europe Day in March 2007 @ AFP

The only ploce where Europe enjoys reol politicol visibility is in the WTO. But, unfortunotely, it is Europe thot is wrongly held responsible for the blockoges in the Doho Round (3)negotiotions becouse of its support for its ogriculture.

Q. You show in your book that the Euro- p e a n s ' a t t a c h m e n t to n o r m s r e s u l t s in s t r i c t e r a d h e r e n c e t o m u l t i l a t e r a l r u l e s and that, in this respect, they are different from other great nations. Is fhis a cultural difference?

N o , t h e r e ' s n o t h i n g c u l t u r o l o b o u t i t .

3. The fourth ministeriol conference of the WTO wos held ot Doho, Q o t o r , f r o m 9 T o 1 4 N o v e m b e r 2 0 0 1 . A t t h e c o n f e r e n c e , 1 2 1 governments presented o lorge number of proposols for negotiotion.

The negotiotions were conducted within the ftomework of the Doho Declorotion, which set o series of deodlines. Almost oll the negotiotions concerning ogriculture were supposed to be completed no loter thon 1

|onuory 2005. The unofficiol objective is now the end of 2006.

30 Vol. 4, No. 3,luly 2007

T h i s p r e f e r e n c e i s p o r t o n d p o r c e l o f the Europeon project in thot it oims to t r o n s c e n d o w o r l d i n w h i c h r e l o t i o n s between stotes ore defined by conflict ond in which oll that counts ore relotions between stotes. Europe mointoins thot, i n o m o r e i n t e r d e p e n d e n t w o r l d , t h e rules of the gome ought to be bosed on norms ond no Ionger just on politicol Orrûngements omongst stotes.

If you wont to solve the problem of

climote chonge you hove to stort with

t h e i d e o t h o t t h e r e i s o g l o b o l p u b l i c

good colled the environment ond thot

its preservotion requires going beyond

s t r i c t r e g u l o t i o n b e t w e e n s t o t e s . T h e

Europeons consider thot globolisotion

b y i t s v e r y n o t u r e i m p o s e s o g r e o t e r

shoring of sovereignty omongst stotes

ond thot this is not the leost of its ossets.

(9)

âÉ!-Lt'+ Æ#w, + E ^ É'!ËFff Wt&T nÆ E mtl fr\ TJ'tt " 4fi,{;11 D)î\hffiH RÈ ÊlrFfF,ffi i*, [Fi4n tkH +rT+, ËÉdâ frTiÉ, ftîp.

FTlhlruffi" gf*, :'Éinî.lrLt, +tt!, Tâ?,nf È æ-if, Efti/l'l^Ê 4ï /dtfi tuIlfl

i**4ltErx,tjtEËE, 'fBÉ5U E Êît

rL, +tr^É'!/:.l*F*Z^ËÈrhfu1 " Itr HI â?,+ l,^h ffi - tR)L4 É, F +nn,

il1Ê*àHek'.il,,fEArF D)É, F IffiÈX*F+HËtrÈT. rLU,tl, flfU fi,futl1,-D)D-ÈFfrP Ëû! tr p,r'*

in-#ry4xâtr,f,3Ë-1E^Hà I|txh tulttLttJ, rà1+âi*,817+6 Êâ

4È-Æ.m. iqâ ^ËâtrÈ-Sq, B|r

j.ttq++54iâ trâ,fE+ftrù+

Ê . ÊEE (noRl Horiri) H^*HÉ

ÊXÉ,TôâNETEhfu1, tr'hÈfuI H É#ÆÊrii,r-@+ÊÆFq+ufr Exlf F-tnJLU,.

æ tr 9r4xâ E xtfr.h fâ . te

fi ûF (lor'" Botton) 'ffiË so +û1F-H*

â tr É4'E të4 Gntt-uN theorist),

,fE xt+4*â tr Ë+fi+7Â lrFnînîy,rtrl trtEË8,,fù,ËF-[,ËF[ÛI, tr.hË

1R..E*, Ë E fuîÉù_È X C,Ë su 7 R*, ffii Èfitï? ù_È. x,+r"wJ ÈffÆÈzË+. trPtr'+*ë1Êfr\E

+++xÈ1+.

tE, f+ û! EtT*xi&tll'lËrlJ 0-9?

E, A+1ffiÈ.i+F.HîrJtu1 " tr È rx'fÈ Æ et i/|.| 1+ D)ÉE )r? tt , ld HHI&,æHtry 4)ù_ÈXe,Ëq Dl â Ffi lEh tl " *m, Mi/tjrrùÆtr + t ^Ë ^Ë Èll r"l ffiFfrt&4| , D)Æ+

ftt* ^rxf+ l^ A + tf ?+ ry['É Ë æ

,J'Ét-,fi11&1.

rSf+ ^l Fl{ll (introversion) lRt

frËËtËÉ XT-LbtrtrËEttI' xf Eft /t'l É! +xfi â# z fiiE6Hp)b,

&tsÆtsxftilÈ.trmxË XÉDâ$

IX,frtlPlÈ(constroints) ; Æffit16&îF

ËT+ Bt' H -r+ É+Jî E ^lX,tullWFt

(the tendenry to renotionolise choices) ;

D) &-ffiDt i/l{ = F[ - î 2\ R 1* ("

constroint) m] F -f+fl Ë É! i4* . Eft i/l'l rÈ - EI DJ, E z. ^H & iâ X X

(politicol visibility) VI IMn m,FÆwro

*+ " ,fE^+ffië, ,Ê,fâËEii/tlE ry.û.ilshn E É! tit ËEmiÆfsi+'& g

IET "&WEà" t/**IÉ!FÈ65. c)

lE, JÆÆëIE+TES, Ef),il'lxiinË û!{&il'ùtôEHFhrêË+Aù inflUû!-îJF8, ^tÈîÉEË, q),lllzii IETH{Ët tr . }ÊiËËE- Æ , T , x E H A E Æ É X . I L , B R. rsf+xt'*Iffi t1lffitf E " E^ii'l'lj.ï

tUUUUUU " (E,r.opeon project) RÉ9-frtJtilËf.

i+F I J ' tr .h È PI H fn Ë,Erurxf-f Ét ËJT, EPF trâzr'El fr\X Ë-É7+æ FfrAWt\, +Ht RÊ tr5trzfgl t\x^t ftÉPttfr\ " w)'tli).h, fi.

-îfH q lnl 4eæ'Hfr&Xru d É! Ë 4 +, ir?&iIlUDXiIËlæ6H, m iââfiFt.

z. È,ffiffiV\lR-ÉFKr*.+iyâ zoot'+ tt E s+l+ E , T + jâ,riÈ-

#lt * v'à 4 Tt . à L t zt I É{ Æ të û T )<Ê:# 4 t!**tj É! të tX " i4 +! A âfr FRF,q€, +t4' 4W:à É " *Ittr#-Zh, iri tL+ffi h

* T t<\I,!a.*l fr\ FR {Ë â[ dt æ zoo s 4 t E Zffi " iEtn4 17' U' O * fl tolltjëê zooa 4Rint "

H A Ë # - - Æ 2 0 0 7 + 7

E 3 1

(10)

I

I

I

After oll, whot is the Europeon Union i f n o t o p o l i t i c o l s y s t e m f o u n d e d o n the sharing of sovereignty? This ideo wos very strong, ond even dominont, t h r o u g h o u t t h e 1 9 9 0 s . T h e r e w o s t h e foll of the Berlin Woll, the Rio Summit, t h e K y o t o P r o t o c o l o n d t h e c r e o t i o n o f t h e I n t e r n a t i o n o l C r i m i n o l C o u r t . T h i s c y c l e h o s c l e o r l y b e e n r e v e r s e d s i n c e S e p t e m b e r 1 1 t h . P e o p l e h o v e not only discovered thot globolisotion i s m u l t i f o c e t e d b u t o l s o t h o t t h e deregulotion of morkets colls for the s t r e n g t h e n i n g o f s t o t e s o s s o v e r e i g n o c t o r s . S o m e p e o p l e i m p r u d e n t l y t h o u g h t t h o t t h i s r e t u r n o f t h e stotes would leod to o retreot of neo- liberolism, but they were mistoken. The two dynomics ore quite different. Ultro- powerful morkets ond equolly powerful security stotes con coexist. To understond this one need only Iook ot the United Stotes. The morket lies ot the heort of A m e r i c o n s o c i e t y , b u t t h e s o v e r e i g n Stote is equolly powerful in Americo, often more so thon in Europe, becouse it is quick to reoct. After September L1th, the Bush odministrotion went overnight from o budget surplus to on enormous budget deficit, becouse it wos not bound by the Moostricht criterio.

The crux of the motter is this: the U n i t e d S t o t e s i s o s t o t e ; E u r o p e i s not o stote. Everything follows from this difference, which is politicol, not culturol. To the Europeons, norms ore the meons to rein in stotes, of subjecting them to discipline, of restroining them.

Thot is why norms ore omnipresent in the construction of Europe. Europe is betting thot it is possible to envision equivolent norms ot o globol level: to opply norms in the greotest number of

Vof . 4 No. 3,luly 2OO7

domoins in the world system to moke it more predictoble, more monogeoble, less errotic ond eosier to monitor. In the globol oreno, the Europeon project seeks the normolisqtion of the internotionol system. But this preference for norms is not purely oesthetic; it corresponds to Europe's interests becouse it reflects i t s p r e f e r e n c e s . W e n e e d s t r o n g environmentol norms becouse we wont to protect our environment. We seek to institute fundomentol sociol protections b e c o u s e w e f e o r t h o t c o m p e t i t i o n f r o m l o w - w o g e c o u n t r i e s c o u l d e n d up determining our sociol model. We m o k e e v e r y e f f o r t t o d e f e n d m u l t i - f u n c t i o n o l i t y i n o g r i c u l t u r e b e c o u s e w e d o n ' t w o n t t o s e e o u r f o r m e r s d i s o p p e o r e n m o s s e . W e w o n t m o r e politicol conflict resolution becouse we ore unwilling to go to wor...

Q. In your book you, by and large, equate the defence of the European model with the defence of non-market preferences. ls agriculture part of this? And by protecting our agriculture aren't we harming developing countries?

Àt the moment this is o centrol question ot the WTO, ond Europe is ot the heort of the controversy. At one level, the issue oppeors simple enough: the rich ought to stick to the high odded-volue sectors- such os the service industries-to give developing countries on odvontoge in the ogriculturol sector. This is reloted to the concept of comporotive odvontoge, which mokes no sense in this context.

There ore two difficulties with this. The first is olmost philosophicol in noture:

is ogriculture on octivity like ony other?

Should we give up ogriculture like we

gove up cool ond like we will give up

(11)

ln RI/IâF É4 7^ -l {É PI r"l tr , lFfrÈTôî+ Xrsf'4 É!-îU ÆhiB Ét H Ê,fi, EltÊ+ÆË-îâ$'l+

É ! ^ + f , r J # , lF d ù Ë r r i È , + Ë - 44.È.l#{lÈ ffi4ËÊ& E â fnl tuIf"ffi ryFR. Efti/t'l^i^t, â$ftÈtùÊ

^ t f r . f f i i a Ë - Æ x t ' & t r 1 ë H E l n

f iLklÈfl+t Èfu1tr--F (o ereoter

shoring of sovereignty) , ine,HË

+ $ t x . É ' I - f + à 4 | . + È , f f R

EtH6 Ë tëï æÈ,fi. ÆÈ (shorine of sovereisnty) ÉtH6ilt.il1iÉ, ËF

/ d È à Ë4t /zt+îrv? ÆW+

leeo +,ft, rs-tnâ H -ËlRtE î ) r , Ë â F f T È + ' E l t I . f É T } È

{$tj}fi. HnW+ (Rio Summit) . (

È#FtXËfi) . E F^fflj+Y*ffiË[

frrnT , IEg.11FrÀ-ÉWilrn T tt ++, ^fil T lYÈ.tnâ$'ftË

?ffi'f+k1 , ffi-E-16 tr-InBI#fr ta Ê ftiJ E-m ffi 4 9Â'f-t E x Ètxrfi,ln

(sovereign octors) . Ê'jt-b^Æ g ft

t&i^h, Èff E%IbtrutuItr tr :|+ + î\.*fr â É Èx ffi tnitÉ, Itrlù.\11ffi

T " rSffiff A h (ayno ics) Ë&*

T lE É!. Ë98 *Ifr Ih (ultro-powerful

morkets) 5ltrT'+RÊ Ë98ÈâÉ'T tr xB.Ê\rg*æilI " qrgfi4rà-,fi ' I t ï R t f r 9 Ê Ê + 8 . E , f t + t r , i + à fuItk,ù''+fs Ffr a, IEÈ ff h

È ôX E â ( sou.t.isn Stote) lE t+ Ë

TB,â h WI , + HÆ4F.41Ê RT 'Â i$ Efti/'ft , Bh È Ê8fliÉ'e,ffi s D xt. " s.\r" D)Ê , fr|tÉf'Ft-&

zBMffiHÆ.#++ r"t T trtV,11frH

*+, EJhÈ+Z^-y- " qffiftH

7Æ[U " (Moostricht criterio) nfr.

+ ' f É É ' I x æ Æ F , æ f u t r â

A trË-1Eâ., Efti/'rl[tj4iË-1 Ex " sxt+ ÊfriJF-Ét {â .6ffiffi 6Ë Y.4Ln ffi ilI ÉnJ, H^ * +)l'Êffi tr +Éh. x{Eiiril^mË, rwû,ftnffi.

â8, 4fr.LHÊat 1Ê, H Ffrr'p.ftrl?l + W., Exdù Ë*I Ë ÆERIXl4fà f"M +nFfrTÆÉ!trtr. EiiljfHfÈ, trI

D) ffiÆæ,èi* Ë E të u fH D *[ Ë,

+HtrtÊ2ÆËtËE ^4ÊZiÉÆ+

g1Ën,f6^z+, itÈ41+EÆ +miru. Eif Ë18, ïù,).Èffi6f9 È,81, æ_n+'nw. E* "Eii/t'lj.t ttj " Æâ$ffi H Él ++tË tr Pz''f46

ffït4ffi'14 (normotivity),'fErSfFXt

+*[ilË tuIçffifi+Z^âtFë++ËX -tÉ!, mËffEtiitjftJ#ftTED, ts hÈ F-sxT Efti/'t'l É!ffi g. ftîtffi g l&H )r É'IqiH*IË, tr'hffilflÆ4

IftttÈq:È. ft ,fllifr K tërz#A É'I,i+

'fr B x kI È,+EI â?.à 4 *" #,f ll,i{ â tËfr É'TtÎÆ . &'fllDdBRâ7T *f+

_E &'l-L fu\& rhÊÉ,E, tr X+t{lJTâ 4Ê îl&I[ É'I & iL ^ Ë t *rTH]e iH

rE',9æ+ +telFl. Emt{{tËtf x{A -t -5 ïF ]l. t Ffr th 481È11 + E frA *,

H+Ë @ +Éæ!L Ë - 8llâo-B? fk.{fl Æxi Ê a â! æ!L ËtrRlÈ É5 lE 0'JE 6Æ+fiËr&E+trAffiTUËr Æ, gÊtr81 lE tre,EËwro fuItà ,ù lol FE, Efti/l'ldù&lêÉ-+iâ Ét +

,ù " æHfEmt, tà1"1ffiM+tt1.

ffiÉ, HtrDro7:ËÆtrÆËF{fln

f i E Ë H = S 2 O O 7 + 7 8

(12)

textiles tomorrow? Becouse we need to recognise thot if we open our agriculturol morket to globol competition, our formers will disoppeor. There is o second difficulty in oddition to the first one. If we open our morkets to Brozil, thot country will profit hondsomely but it will go on to crush the Àfricon countries. Is thot the solution?

The problem is even more complex thon thot, becouse the protection of o g r i c u l t u r e r e m o i n s v e r y u n e q u o l ot the sociol level ond hos very little tronsporency ot the politicol level... If the French knew who profits from the Common Agriculturol Policy would they defend the protection of forming os much os they do? I don't know the onswer to thot but the question evidently deserves to be osked.

Q . T h e r e f o r e , g l o b a l i s a t i o n o u g h t t o encourage Europe to come together. But we are seeing the opposite happening. Why?

I've alwoys thought thot globolisotion wos very good ot reveoling the strengths ond weaknesses of every notion, ond thus olso of Europe. First of oll, one must u n d e r s t o n d t h o t w i t h e n l o r g e m e n t , Europe has become more diversified in chorocter ond consequently olso in timetobles. Not oll Europeons feel thot they ore living in o unique historicol m o m e n t . O f c o u r s e t h e y f o c e t h e some globol chollenges but thot does n o t c h o n g e h o w t h e y p e r c e i v e these constroints.

Toke the new member countries. For them, joining Europe meqns returning to history, the opporfunity to join ogoin with their own history, to rediscover t p o l i t i c o l s o v e r e i g n t y t h o t w o s undermined by the Soviet system. The concept of shored sovereignty thot lies ot

Vol. d No. 3, luly 2O07

the heort of the Europeon project is not oxiomotic os for os they ore concerned.

And while they ore willing to occept s h o r e d s o v e r e i g n t y i n t h e e c o n o m i c s p h e r e , t h e y c e r t o i n l y d o n ' t w o n t i t to spreod to the sociol or diplomotic spheres. Their priority is to protect, ond even to promote, their outonomy within o Europeon whole. For them Europe is not so much o project os o mechonism thot is meont to help them get bock i n t h e g o m e o f E u r o p e o n n o t i o n o l powers. Their relotionship to Europe is olso different ot both the economic ond sociol levels. They consider the logic of sociol ond fiscol hormonisotion to run counter to their notionol interests. Like the British, they believe in competition omongst Europeon stotes. People olwoys believe in competition when they profit from it. Besides, the ideo of hormonising s o c i o l p o l i c y s m e l l s s u s p i c i o u s l y o f Sovietism to them. Lostly, in the oreo of security, the issue is even more cleor-cut:

NÀTO remoins the best romport ogoinst the Russions.

In these three oreos the differences

are widening. To this, one would hove

to odd Fronco-British rivolries-to soy

nothing of the temptotion omongst some

Europeons to insist thot Europe is not

quolified to confront globolisotion. This

is notobly the cose with the British: in

their eyes, Europe will henceforth be too

smoll to confront globol problems ond

too big to foce locol chollenges. This is

evidently not on innocent orgument,

becouse by insisting on Europe's inobility

to odopt to globolisotion on vorious

levels, they ore costing doubt on its

p e r t i n e n c e ond usefulness. F o l l o w i n g

this line of thinking, they olso reject

Europeon regulotion, porticulorly in the

34

(13)

,fËffi È[ ft, vr,tnflF..+\L, u)lElg&

itÈ[ [l: -]' É'l I)È#w h È.8 + E â . rs - É it Ë E VLYt 0r# É! iffi â fH Ht

^tuI, mr8Ê+t'fn?nffiû É'! ËF + ârËiËÊ ËXÉ!. È,HffinffiwTW xÈ, ffi- F.Æ+rfr l.I'+Ê F.W,mi t+ É'IffiË . F\Yft.I ^ËltîÎ\lLflf' f+ Ét-fFiÉ drlq ? *X+\ll1àI rlf.

+'xlFfr.lLt1 2n 2N F"frrstrrrr,+ B,\tI q ? +i'fllD"a.* i.f,3U, ln Rfulll+Eæ

\Lfr t^ f"r âl*'l+ É! '*n+J+rr(,, fl$ /z ft,ffl Ét&!L rlF#nftàiË ^. ffi - lExËËPËÊH-+ ExÈm*ÉT.

inRft'fflIEfrt^t11É Tffrt ' E * NFl tr Aà)',TilTHÉffi , IEflT'ÆTË ry]Fi/il8x" flr.F-hqt*ZÉ?

l"l ËE ttrxi64F-+, Bh LX+È RÊ.F,Æ++âEffitËZ(+-+W, Æ89.tâ Effi Lù,FTWiâ EX Ét ... ...

tnRi*trÀfnËiÆ ^ " XIEæ{LÉI

ffi" (Common Agriculturol Policy) F

'ltë Êt iÉ, 4ù,,fft )6â InrnÆfrr'ff * T+r& ll,ffr +È Ét ffi.Â4 ? xt'Éh+t 6 fr

Éæ+, IE1'II{|H-INI.

tE, ElIb, Êr*,lLMgE)ffFrEr/{'l Ë4U - Ë ",lE +t,fft *IËFIJIE tr t54'8*

inÆ.F*." ùÊ,.!ftaw

Æ, fr ,Ë. Ëi,l l è$IX,ttPÛ.lleTE€

-18 xilIffi(,#tr È ( Ê *e,F,ttw /'fl) âFæffiT H* " Êft, ItrVi^

Exl+, ffiË&i/{i É!+lt, È-Æ-1 ffi.LÈl+æin7ffiIx,, + E trÈhÉ, Æ Ef I'Bl l[,ât .'B H T *t+'l+. '*T FrnH witil ^âFi à Itu ll1 +ÉÆ4il ++É!EËH{^tJZ+. -ft , E *fû, ,fll ffi xf Ë i iô â r*,f-t, É! r+ fF +rh tt,

'fE rs + 6 â É{ q'ru'fll xf â $'ft É! trÛ ABRilWEhl.

D)BLffi,*f Et fi E h lrtJ, x{ Ë {ll ** iT.,lï ^ EkT/'l'l Ë ftRÉ trt) ) m q, û,Ë4Ë-ff d1â, BFru,Èî1

E H W n *.H-tLtfr,2t^8ft i/'il, É

+f +t tr - 1 rÈfr'W.l+6ErAT tu1f9.

iâÈfX" " Efti/'l{I t?" fu1f2,ù,Ë+

Ê ÈfnÉ!fif â (ttt. concept of shared sovereignty),'fB Xt'dlj}-''.b+TEt F E *

i#, rsf+Uâ+lF^ÏE . E'ÊÆ ifiêF14, itrLb+f EtË EFTÊÉlt ÊÈôx,,fEÈ,fll.Dffi ftÆ.È,+rx îrJ4tàîn4. 4 " È,111ÛùtiâR.

Ét +'tË Ëæâ&i/il É'r ffi E ^r,ffr +È . HâË'f/Brt Ê iâ. Xf È'fll*jl ' Ei i/l'l 5 Êil, Ë-îittU, tôT4nifr.E

-+ É Æ+# Eh È lf l tr 5tJ &irri E â^n

hiÉ*,z+ É!dlftlj . È,ffl 5 Eft i/t'l É'I X^Æâ,ùfl,i+âtrffi&,E&Z^fiE lol É'l . Èllli hiràîû,w 5t//]tfq,îE

iw tuvv+Ê 5È ît É'l tr â fu ë Ë Ë Ë

mgùÉ'I . -ù(,1^#E^-f'+, Èîlf'H {à Eft i/'ll trfrZtn|I| ÆÊ'*F,+ " + ^ lll MÈ,+ + H Ffr W-È"É! HT'fÉ Ètù,Èl' â fE'fÈ È fr\ IE H " rh1,tl ' xt' È 1l m È, +E tlàÉ(.ffiWàÆ-ffiÉ'I/nâ ffi.p_ÊnÆ4ÈxÉ!*Ë " R.É,

ÆÈ.+E (oreo of securig) ' iÈ- E

ËE#êâETiË ETf , )LA TIl Efi ffi ,ffitrÉ'rffiffi1Æ&."

G r X = = n f f i , Ê # E f + . ï

;-iir . xû rlh IB rl Ê2T?+Tln i 4 i*z fnl H-4ryinfi È3 Eft irr't ^ i^ h wiltj æ H xû â $,ft Ht' ETFtbt& ilI . 4 tr ^ )ùH++ )LV,Ê i*, ft ft,IllHR + , Wi)'tlÆm rlfi â

æ 8 é # = Æ 2 O O 7 + 7 F 3 5

(14)

sociol ond fiscol fields...

T h o t ' s w h e r e w e ore, and I don't hove the impression thot the foilure o f t h e r e f e r e n d u m i s g o i n g to olter this situotion, which is extroordinorily worrisome for Europe.

Y e t n o t h i n g i s w r i t t e n in stone.

Thot is why the hostily written deoth c e r t i f i c o t e s f o r E u r o p e ore not very persuosive. Differences do exist but they ore oll likely to fode over time. I think, for exomple, thot ten yeors from now the gop between the "two Europes" will b e m u c h n o r r o w e r o n severol levels thon it is todoy. Factors fovouroble to hormonisotion do exist in Europe, ond should not be neglected. Whot is more problemotic is the deficit in leodership.

Since the Moostricht TreoÇ, Europe hos

been running idle ond hos kept moving through sheer inertio. In o sense, the foilure of the referendum signolled to Europe thot this situotion could not be sustoined. The Fronco-Germon duo no longer hos the propulsive force it once hod; ond Britain, controry to whot is soid, hos no project for Europe. There is o British project in Europe. But there is no British project for Europe. @

Translated from the French original by Paul Frank This interview is published here in Chinese and English with the permission of Zaki Laldi. The original French version was published in Etvdes, Vol. 40411 ,lanuary 2006.

36 Vof. d No. 3,luly 2OO7

(15)

$tX,fr1ff ff lbl tr H-f .E ?S:S,J. , ffi

æ m rJ È *r1 fÈ fÈ uh Ët r.r x _É 1+ Ë

;l.' " rxfF U F. .E f TÊ?inë iË ffi ,fi f,Â,ù, +â Éi, B hËt$ET+ Ei ilrlÆ & +Ë ffi â[ iÉ D Zi T +r* 4X, jl f+ xl[ ,fi , ,fù,,11] 4Ë ^,fll xt' Eft H Él

1â E '[l fl Ê'ffi'El ( pertinence ond usefulness) È Ë T'WFft , 1Ê )Ltffi

ih , ,fù,,fll &, H(,+F.Æ 7 & i/'tl É'r *r [f

(Europeon regulotion) , )tEftÆ4|

+rtnur'-ffij4...

r:i#ùË+t,fl1qfi I 4b É! ffi n " +t

T iM! +R ^ TË É'I ^ tn â 4É E^ i/'l'hI

f+ ++&4 iË'yù ilI ffinÈ.+Étq .

f m ' & É i t A E - F f 4 A ffI . Ffr ùin4'ltfr ]i.ft Êt Eft i/l'l tE È

#* fu16hæÆ, IE È,ffl fRq Êaâ

rer'tFlmABÉ, " VLin' +À#ùi,ll

!\ri[frË + +il18-f fn] Z Ê, * ffi

+Efti/'ft " Z14tu1É+ thË+Xx

Æj4R.* T ffi #f' àA rJ. " x{ Ei i/l'l f[

i!Éâ ttJÉt tr Ë /È*frÆ, + HT 1à&.K,4N. FT IE ËE ilIF-ÆêA + 7I )iffifu1€fÂ. â^"+-ffifrfr,&

n" (Moostricht Treoty) D)*, Efti/l'l

-É-î,Ffr (F h, lLfr,-ff jË'Elæ j5ggggggggggggggg+Ë. Ë.tù#-u E mF ' L?f.X tk,*.nÀ Eft i/'l'l H Êî rx f+ l 7n, T Êâ F r+2*T *T " i* tr fi îH tr Tâfg É

^W.Ê T ,^.ÊînF f+ Ét fË -dr h " t€

tr 5Ê FfrîBtH E, +rEfti/'ilitnu

(project for Europe) , ÈFfrH fuIR ËA Eii/lj *11 tuIæ tr ititj (eritish

p r o j e c t i n E u r o p e ) , R [ ' T Ë 4 t r T Æ H É'l&i/'l'litilJ (aritish project for E u r o p e ) . @

^ÀXi;nft1+îtlT zaur Laidi ÉtTÉfn, D)+

tËryiÉê^ rtJ È.*. tr {âi*ï ffiÈ.#+

E t v d e s ( ( T i + + É ) ), zooe 4 t E , v o t .

4 0 4 1 1 "

7A'mÈi+

TbE ' fi{Fig , DttggtFfuIfE &tr PnN

^Efr n+,ù, Ét Èrx Efr n fr , 15 E E&Wtâ +1fr,e-frÊ H Eilx'l+H ffi+frT*. fitïIbfrn xftEÆ+ TEii/tj5âl*,ft&â$ k vlwlâ iEg. el[kl+IF@ft " Ë,U,itâiFr[È X, EWKHUTWæ," , fi+ffiEfâ . ffi4è

fifrffièffiÉt (,irâ#t[ÈXil1Æffi)> , W iâ+HlilËF,ii, 2oo7+) ' (iIffiW.H)J Ë' BLiltl*)JZiË) , &Ë+PËHËÉ'i+' 2oos4; &- K=)\h7{t , (&qEfàfiHÉ 4L zoo+4; Ëtrëà ( trtâZg) (rhe Greot

Disruption), fttlffi , zoot 4"

Zaki Laïdi is a Senior Research Fellow at the Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Internationales (CERI) in Paris since 1981 , He is also Professor at Sciences Po (Paris) and at the College of Europe (Bruges). His main research interests focus on Europe & globalisation and the political regulation of globalisation. His most recent books include Sortir du pessimisme sociol. Essai sur l'identité de Ia gouche, (l-he End of Social Pessimism- R e f l e c t i n g o n t h e l d e n t i t y o f t h e L e f t , H a c h e t t e Littératures / Presses de Sciences Po, with Gérard Crunberg, 2007), La norme sons lo force-L'énigme de lo puissonce européenne (Norms Without Force: the Enigma of European Power, Presses de Sciences Po, 2005) and Lo Cronde perturbation (Flammarion, 2004, translated as The Great Disruption, Cambridge, 2007).

# t r Ë H = f f 2 o o 7 + 7 t r 3 7

Références

Documents relatifs

Nous exposons ici notre approche dans le cadre de l’éditeur de documents structurés

On peut mettre les variables n, t, s et i dans les registres au lieu de les mettre en m´emoire dans

FlipFlop is a Hedge strategy in the sense that it uses exponential weights defined by (9), but the learning rate η t ff now alternates between infinity, such that the algorithm

Drs Carvalho and Poirier are emergency physicians at the McGill University Health Centre, medical consultants for Air Canada, and fl ight physicians for Skyservice Air Ambulance

If you would like the opportunity to develop and write a future Janus Snapshot using the 2004 NPS results, please contact Sarah Scott, National Physician Survey and Janus

To avoid duplication of research effort in the disci- pline of general practice or family medicine, it is important that investigators in the United Kingdom and North America seek

Apart from these weakened restrictions which concern only the dependence of f on the variable y, our integrand may be any function measurable (B). We use

• We compare through simulations the overhead obtained with the optimal strategy introduced in this work (restart strategy, optimal checkpointing pe- riod) to those used in all