• Aucun résultat trouvé

The ICE-IPAC project: Testing the protocol on Norwegian and French learners of English

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "The ICE-IPAC project: Testing the protocol on Norwegian and French learners of English"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01431432

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01431432

Submitted on 10 Jan 2017

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

The ICE-IPAC project: Testing the protocol on Norwegian and French learners of English

Takeki Kamiyama, Véronique Lacoste, Nadine Herry-Benit

To cite this version:

Takeki Kamiyama, Véronique Lacoste, Nadine Herry-Benit. The ICE-IPAC project: Testing the

protocol on Norwegian and French learners of English. New Sounds 2016: 8th International Conference

on Second Language Speech, Jun 2016, Århus, Denmark. �hal-01431432�

(2)

References

The ICE-IPAC project:

Testing the protocol on Norwegian and French learners of English

Takeki Kamiyama1, Véronique Lacoste2, Nadine Herry-Bénit1

1 Linguistique Empirique : Cognition, Société et Langage (LECSeL), EA 1569, Université Paris 8, Paris, France

2 Universität Freiburg, Germany

Tasks 1) repetition task: word lists 2) reading tasks: word lists and text

3) conversations: formal interview and informal conversation

Interphonology of Contemporary English - InterPhonologie de l’Anglais Contemporain

PROTOCOL: ICE-IPAC

PRELIMINARY RECORDING DATA: Norwegian- and French-speaking learners

Mother projects

IPFC (InterPhonologie du Français Contemporain):

Learner corpus of French as a Foreign Language

PAC (Phonologie de l’Anglais Contemporain):

Regional and sociolinguistic variation in contemporary English

PFC (Phonologie du Français Contemporain):

Regional and sociolinguistic variation in contemporary French

PROSPECT

The phenomena observed in the preliminary recordings will be compared with future recordings of speakers of other languages in foreign and second language contexts.

Facteurs significatifs (Anova mesures répétées) F3-F2 /y/: contexte (voyelle isolée vs logatome, V1 vs V2 et consonne dans les logatomes: F=4,5; p=.002)

ICE-IPAC: originality

- International database of L2 English phonology and phonetics

- Learners with different L1s (French, Spanish, Norwegian, etc.)

- Learners with different L1 varieties (Hexagonal French, Canadian French, etc.) - Learners with different L2 varieties as their target/model

- Different tasks within the same dataset

(repetition, reading, conversation) - Intra-speaker variability

- Inter-speaker variability

Word lists

1) a common list applied to all learners, regardless of their L1 2) an L1 specific list adapted to verify the difficulties frequently observed in the L2/L3 production of the learners of a given L1

Conversations

1) a formal interview led by a native Anglophone investigator 2) an informal conversation between 2 learners

Two female Norwegian learners (NW1 and NW2)

enrolled at UiT The Arctic University of Norway Learners

- Reading of two word lists

- Informal conversation between the two learners Tasks

1) Devoicing of fricatives /z, ʒ/ and affricate /dʒ/

Sounds not part of the Norwegian sound system

- /z/ -> [s]: seal-zeal near-homophonous; graze [ɡɹeɪs] or [ɡɹæs]

- /ʒ/ -> [ʃ]: leisure [ˈleɪʃɚ]

- /dʒ/ -> [tʃ]: batch-badge both produced with [tʃ]

2) Partial neutralization of lenis-fortis in word-final stops

Pre-fortis clipping observed, but voicing ceases well before release of the lenis coda - /b/ -> [p]: lap-lab near-homophonous: [læ̆p]-[læp]

- /d/ -> [t]: fat-fad near-homophonous: [fæ̆t]-[fæt]

- sack [sæ̆kh] vs sag [sæk]: observation anticipated by the Norwegian L1 system: the underlying contrast in the L1 of the learners is primarily expressed through aspiration on the edges of words, not voicing

3) Post-vocalic rhoticity (NW1 displays more consistent use) carter [ˈkaɹɾɚ]

4) Labial-velar approximant /w/ -> [v]

Sound not part of the Norwegian sound system - word [vɔɹd], which [vɪtʃ], worthy [ˈvɜːɹdi]

- hypercorrected [w] for /v/: vexed [wɛkst]

- epenthesis of [v] or [w] in front of rounded, single onset: [ɹ]: written [ˈvɹɪtn], run [vɹʌn]

5) Interdental fricatives /θ, ð/ -> plosives

Sounds not part of the Norwegian sound system /ð/ -> [d]: farther [ˈfɑɹdɚ], worthy [ˈvɜːɹdi]

Special thanks to Helene N. Andreassen

1) Vowels /iː/ - /ɪ/; /ɔː/ - /ɒ/

No systematic difference in quality

2) <i> pronounced [aɪ] in sinner, simmer

Overgeneralization of one of the L2 pronunciation rules for <i>?

3) h-dropping

/h/ is deleted in here, hurry, etc. (FR2 displays more consistent use)

4) Influence by the L1 relationship between sound and writing

<ch> pronounced [ʃ] in witch, China

5) Post-vocalic rhoticity

carter [kaɹtɚ]; garter [ɡaɹtɚ]

Special thanks to Audrey Bonfiglioli and Ioana Trifu

NW

FR

Similar protocols -> comparability between corpora

- ICE-IPAC / PAC: comparison between learners and native speakers of English

- ICE-IPAC / IPFC: comparison between speakers of the same L1 learning English vs. French as a foreign / second language

Text

“Christmas interview of a television evangelist”

If television evangelists are anything like the rest of us, all they really want to do in Christmas week is snap at their families, criticize their friends and make their neighbours' children cry by glaring at them over the garden fence. Yet society expects them to be as jovial and beaming as they are for the other fifty-one weeks of the year. If anything, more so. […]

Two female French learners (FR1 and FR2) enrolled at the University of Lyon

Detey, S., Racine, I., Kawaguchi, Y., Zay, F. in press. Variation among non-native speakers: the InterPhonology of Contemporary French.

In: Detey, S., Durand, J., Laks, B., Lyche, C. (eds.), Varieties of Spoken French: a Source Book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Durand, J., Przewozny, A. (2012). La Phonologie de l’Anglais Contemporain: usages, variétés et structure. Les approches de corpus à orientation phonologico-phonétique pour l'anglais. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 17(1) , 25-37.

Gut, U. (2009). Non-native Speech. A corpus-based analysis of the phonetic and phonological properties of L2 English and L2 German. Frankfurt:

Peter Lang.

Kondo, M. (2012). Design and analysis of Asian English speech corpus —How to elicit L1 phonology in L2 English data—. In: Tono, Y., Kawaguchi, Y., Minegishi, M. (eds.), Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 251-278.

Références

Documents relatifs

(Ohta, Masaru &amp; Wakamatsu 1990; Aguerri et al. 2000), identifica- tion of a change in the slope of the surface-brightness profile along the bar’s major axis (Chapelon, Contini

3, the simulated temperature distributions at three different exposure times (t = 1, 7 and 9.5 hours) are shown for a plate with a height of 100mm and a black spot at the

نامحرلا دبع يواز دلاوأ ةعماج فيرشلا دمحم ةيدعاسم - سارها قوس ةعماج ةيدعاسم فيرشلا دمحم - سارها قوس ومنلا ةيلمع عفد في امهم ارود يحايسلا رامثتسلإا

19 The participants whose responses exhibited Patterns 1 (33a) and 2 (33b) accepted Sub(Acc)/Obj(Acc) in the same way that child L1 learners do; those with Patterns 3 (33c) and 4

In this study, we focused on a structure that contrasts these two factors: ERP responses to morphosyntactic violations of the past tense in polar questions in French learners

describing the differences in the use of certain syntactic, lexical and discoursal features between native and non-native speakers, and so forth. It is necessary to assess

The main results concern i) intra- and inter-speaker variability, ii) the phonetic distribution of intrusive h, and iii) the role of the task. First, only 48 intrusive tokens

Figure 4 shows relative RMS values classified by the target phoneme (/h/ or null consonant) and its phonetic realisation. These figures indicate that the glottis was as open as