• Aucun résultat trouvé

Modeling executive functions in the prefrontal cortex

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Modeling executive functions in the prefrontal cortex"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02388018

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02388018

Submitted on 2 Dec 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Modeling executive functions in the prefrontal cortex

Frédéric Alexandre

To cite this version:

Frédéric Alexandre. Modeling executive functions in the prefrontal cortex. XI Dubrovnik Conference on Cognitive Science, May 2019, Dubrovnik, Croatia. �hal-02388018�

(2)

Modeling executive functions in the prefrontal cortex 


Frederic.Alexandre@inria.fr Inria, Institute of Neurodegenerative Diseases, LaBRI

Model-Based and Model-Free Reinforcement Learning

autonomous learning

We define our goals by ourselves :

detection of primary reinforcers

learning of secondary reinforcers

attentional processes

We have a motivation to act:

Fundamental needs

intrinsic motivation

goal-driven behavior

We self-evaluate our performances :

meta-control

We associate different kinds of learning and information representation :

cues

abstractions

episodes

working memory

We cumulate and re-exploit previously learnt knowledge and strategies in different context :

life-long learning and transfer learning

We adapt even if the world is changing and uncertain :

stochasticity and volatility

MF controls the behavior

Mb trains mf by replays (retrospective memory) And simulations (prospective memory)

A System of memories Main circuits for value prediction, decision making and planning

(Domenech, 2015)

Model-free (MF): long to learn, compact

Model-based (MB): use forward models, more flexible but heavy to compute

With forward models, goal-driven strategies more tractable than stimuli-driven strategies

Exteroception

Sensorimotor relations

Interoception

Motivational and emotional evaluation

Prediction learning

Value of Stimuli (Primary/Learned goals and sub-goals)

Decision Making

Value of Actions (motor decision, options, planning)

Behavior and Cognition:

A matter of loops …

(Sutton, 1990) (Krack, 2010)

role of the limbic loops : Foraging or decision between several targets ?

lOFC: learns values of stimuli (pavlov); menu dependent; sensory representation of rewards, consummatory behavior, Model Based; select the best two options

mOFC: reward representation for preparatory behavior (operant, Model Free), integrate levels of need; value difference signal; decide for the goal

ACC: integrate cost of effort to decide for the action; inverse value difference signal; if strong signal of conflict, ask for a switch

FEF: orientation toward the goal

MC: move forward for goal consumption

defining executive control for a cognitive agent in ecological conditions, by autonomous learning

Role of the loops between the frontal cortex and the basal ganglia for predicting values, decision making and planning

The limbic loops decide for the goal and the action

The associative loops bias the default behavior

The motor loops execute the behavior

Forward models associated with limbic and associative loops

The task set, powerful concept to describe this process

associative loops : bias the default behavior

Top-down control of behavior by PFC And hippocampus

PFC can bias competition for non-dominant behavior

Role of lPFC for Working Memory and attentional processeS

The Hippocampus can rapidly bind arbitrary representations not yet formed in the cortex

Explicit representation of episodes and replays

Define subgoals (intentions, means) and thoughts (covert actions encoded by their perceptual effects, forward models)

limbic and motor loops interactions

Task Set

Set of Rewarding S-R associations learned in the same context

Use the default task set, or switch or create a new one

Exogenous control (competition from stimuli)

Endogenous control (biasing from goals)

Références

Documents relatifs

Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent surgery for pri- mary lung carcinoma over the last 20 years at the University Hospital of Geneva, and we analyzed

Normally, Luxembourg is in favour of more influence for the Commission and the Parliament, but on this occasion, it is in its interest to defend the influence of the

En conclusion, cette revue de littérature traitant de l’attention et du contrôle postural chez des sujets âgés sains démontre (1) que le contrôle postural

For tree structured libraries with node inclusion properties, such an or-.. der structure exists and is derived hereafter from path and terminal node considerations. This

the red line delimits the attraction basin of the stable fixed point; the black line is the trajectory of the model in response to a short negative current pulse, while the blue line

Indeed, when a neuron eliits a spike in the integrate-and-re framework with no refratory period, its membrane potential is reset to a ertain value V r 1 Therefore.. the reset

In that case, a spike is emitted when the membrane potential blows up and subsequently we reset the membrane potential to a fixed value c and add to the value of adaptation variable

Most of the few studies that project the combined impacts of multiple threats such as climate and land use change on biodiversity are based on integrated assessment models