• Aucun résultat trouvé

2016 Final Exam – Report General

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "2016 Final Exam – Report General"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

2016 Final Exam – Report

General

Total number of students 23

Attended 22

Missed 1

Number of problems 6

Average grade 82.12

Standard deviation of grades 11.79

Individual problem breakdown

Problem 1 2 3 4 5 6

Average grade 8.02 7.68 7.95 8.55 9.00 8.07 Standard deviation of grades 1.56 1.81 1.10 1.17 1.54 2.24

Grade distribution

(2)

Grade distribution per problem

Comparison with past years

Comparison of Exam1, Exam2, and Final average with past years

EV = 78.76 SD = 2.81

EV = 82.15 SD = 2.27

(3)

Comments OVERALL

• All students followed the rules for the formula sheet.

PROBLEM 1

• Some students did not integrate continuity equation over y.

• Some students used equations did not use the momentum equation to get the force.

Instead, they used equations from boundary layer theory and did not integrate over x.

• Some students when using the momentum equation to get the force did not squared u(y).

• Some students using momentum equation to get the force did not integrate the momentum over y.

PROBLEM 2

• Few students did not make correct assumptions when reducing the governing equation.

• Some students integrated reduced governing equation obtained from (a) to get the C1 and C2 by comparing with the given u(y) equation.

• Some students did not make correct assumption for boundary conditions.

PROBLEM 3

• Some students did not apply the balance of forces on the sphere (W = B + D).

• Many students, when applying the balance of forces, did not include the buoyancy.

• Few students did not check the Re to confirm laminar/turbulent conditions.

• Some students made mistakes in calculating the prototype velocity from the Re similarity or did not calculate it at all.

• Some students did not impose constant drag coefficient between model and prototype for calculating the drag.

PROBLEM 4

• Some students did not apply the energy equation to determine the velocity in part (a).

• Few students that applied the energy equation did not simplify it correctly.

• Many students wrote down the continuity equation but made mistakes in deriving the other two equations needed for the system, namely, the head loss along the A-B branch and the head loss along the A-C branch (deriving from the energy equation).

PROBLEM 5

• Some students did not properly re-arrange the Cf equation to get the velocity U.

• Some students did not calculate D or used a wrong area when calculating the D force from CD.

PROBLEM 6

• Some students did not add up the stream functions for the two basic flows.

• Some students did not calculate the velocity components to set as zero at the stagnation point.

• Some students used wrong values for applying stagnation point.

Références

Documents relatifs

The immediate aim of this project is to examine across cultures and religions the facets comprising the spirituality, religiousness and personal beliefs domain of quality of life

In the past decades, a considerable number of papers investigated various properties of Camassa-Holm equation such as lo- cal well-posedness, blow-up phenomena, persistence

In the present paper, we apply a similar strategy for the porous medium equation and the system of isentropic Euler equations in one space dimension, and derive numerical methods

The Wigner measures method for the mean field problem is based on the analysis of a Liouville equation (or a continuity equation) which is derived naturally from the dynamics of

Finally, the ratio λ max /λ min being called the condition number of the matrix A, state a condition that garanties a small instability in the resolution of a linear

Jerison & Kenig in [21] and many other authors study the case where Ω is only a bounded Lipschitz- continuous domain.. In this work, we are interested in the search of very

In a second part, we use our study of the trace problem to prove that any solution to the transport equation is, roughly speaking, continuous with respect to the spatial variable

In this work, we have derived the incompressible Euler equations from the Boltz- mann equation in the case of the initial boundary value problem, for a class of boundary conditions