• Aucun résultat trouvé

Recorded energy consumption in school buildings

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Recorded energy consumption in school buildings"

Copied!
43
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

Building Research Note, 1982-01

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC : https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=bb9b37d8-2b3b-4f4d-a233-b909f67c9d29 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=bb9b37d8-2b3b-4f4d-a233-b909f67c9d29

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/40000530

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Recorded energy consumption in school buildings

(2)
(3)

RECORDED ENERGY C O N S W TION

IN

SCHOOL BUILDINGS

A.H. Elmahdy

The Standing Committee an Energy Conservation in Buildings is a t t e m p t i n g , on behalf of t h e National Research C o u n c i l Associate Committee on the National Building Code, ta define appropriate energy

consmp tion Eargets for d i f f e r e n t classes of b u i l d i n g s . These targets

are p a r t i a l l y based on rhe energy consamption af existing buildings. I n

support of the work of the Standing C o m d t t e e , t h i s r e p o r t contains data on the annual energy consumption in elementary, j unior-high and

secondary/high s c h o o l buildings. These schools are Located in Ottawa, Toronto, Montreal, Winnipeg, Regina, Edmonton, Vancouver and various r e g i o n s in Ontario.

The data presented in this report have been extracted f r o m

i n f o r m a t i o n provided by various schools and boards of education and i t s accuracy has n o t been verified. Also, because of the multitude of

v a r i a b l e s i n v o l v e d and the n a t u r e of t h e d a t a distribution, no attempt was made to correlate the energy consumption w l t h other v a r i a b l e s such

as t h e floor area of schools.

Table 1 shows a sununary of the maximum, m i n i m u m and average f l o o r

areas and a n n u a l energy c o n s m p t i o n in

M J / d y r ,

f o r each sample of

s c h o o l s , together with other i n f o r m a t i o n on t h e type of school I n v o l v e d , t h e sample size

and

t h e year in which r h e data

w e r e

recorded.

The information given in T a b l e 1 indicates t h a t energy

consump t i o n v a r i e s considerably within a specific l o c a t i o n , This is due to many f a c t o r s , such as the a c t i v i t y l e v e l in each s c h o o l , t h e type of construction, the h e a t i n g and c o o l i n g system used and t h e existence of energy conservation programs. For example, the P r o t e s t a n t Schaol Board

in Montreal has been a c t i v e l y involved

in

an energy conservation program

f o r its school buildings. The r e s u l t s , which are listed in T a b l e I , i n d i c a t e that f o r a g i v e n group of high schools in the Board t h e average annual energy cansumption decreased from 1118

m/m2

yr. in 1976/77 t o

1020 ~ ~ / m ~ ~ r . in 1978139. A s i m i l a r r e d u c t i o n occurred a l s o in i t s elementary schools, and

in

ather school boards as well ( e . g . , the

Ottma/CarEeton Board of E d u c a t i o n ) .

Since the d a t a presented in Table

1

cover a wide geographical area, it was necessary so take into account: the number of annual heating degree days i n t h e last f i v e years f o r the various school locations. Table 2 shows a summary of t h e annual heating degree days in degrees

C e l s i u s below 1BnC*.

(4)

The a v a i l a b l e

school

samples are organized in one af two ways. One set-up shows the annual energy consumption for each i n d i v i d u a l school in a c e r t a i n location (Montreal, Toronto, O t t a w a , etc. ). The other s e t - u p , used by the Ontario M i n i s t r y of Education, presents t h e t o t a l energy consumption data for each s c h o o l board in the s i x regions:

C e n t r a l , Eastern, Xid-Northern, Norrh-Eastern, Worth-Western and Western

Ontario.

Thus, although on f i r s t s i g h t the latter approach results i n

r a t h e r small numbers ( 4 2 , 16, 11, 17,

14

and

17

school boards), the actual number of schools w i t h i n each school board is considerable (2524,

652, 229, 244, 163 a n d 6 4 2 s c h o o l s , r e s p e c t i v e l y ) .

A c o m p l e t e listlng of energy consumption d a t a f o r various schools

and school boards is gPven in Tables 3 rhrough 2 3 . Also, F i g u r e s 1 through 32 show the p l o t s o f energy consumption in ~ ~ J d y r . versus floor area in m2. The vertical a x i s on the right-hand s i d e of each p l o t shows the frequency of occurrence in the corresponding energy consumption b i n s

i n d i c a t e d o n t h e vertical left-hand side of t h e plot.

When

more than one year of data f o r a particular group of schools

w a s available, a p l o t was added to show a l l changes in energy

consumption greater than o r equal t o 0.3 G J / & ~ ~ . These p l o t s are shown

in Figures 11, 1 7 , 21, 27 and 3 1 .

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The author wishes to acknowledge the help provided by various schmf boards i n making the energy ccmsmption data available to the

D i v i s i o n of B u i l d i n g Research. The author a l s o wishes to thank

(5)
(6)
(7)

TAEiLE 2: SUMMXY OF HEATING

DEGREE

DAYS

below

18"C,

July I - June 30

Winnipeg

Int

'

l** (North-Western) Ottawa

Int'l

(North-Eastern) Toronto I n t '1 Ilontreal

Int

'

l

*

Airport

**

I n t e r n a t i o n a l Airport

***

Estimated

(8)

TABLE 3: REGINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS

(9)

TAELE 4 :

EDMONTON

PUBLIC SCHOOLS TABLE

5

: EDMONTON PUELIC SCHOOLS

A

-

SECONDARY

1978/79

B -

JUWIOR

HIGH 1978/79

TABLE 6: EDMONTON PUBLIC

SCHOOLS

C - ELEMENTARY AND J U N I O R H I G H 1978179 School NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 4 Area m2 18239 13747 26149 37262 1023 1 3999 12759 25120 17880 226 18 18740 3125 38729 21723 Energy Consumption MJ /mPyr. 1628 2650 2 3 4 6 2205 1704 1 3 9 4 2908 2688 2303 2309 2177 205 1 2694 3783

(10)

TABLE 7:

EDMONTON

PUBLIC

SCHOOLS

D

-

ELEMENTARY 1978/79

(11)

TABLE

8: OTTAWA-CARLETON SECONDARY SCHOOLS I School

No.

1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

9

10 1 1 Area m2 16422 1 1729 12100 19061 12427' 20223 9 9 4 4 16970 6143 18773 16636

E n e r g y Consump t i o n

w/&

yr.

1978

95

1 95 1 986 862 1216 1105

LO64

1096

1540 7 88 1212 1973 1615 1553

1363

1326 1729 1796 127 1 1384 1348 1251 1728 1974

1794

1500 1294 1484 1728 1620 127 1

1395

1162 1279 182 1 1975 1976 134 1

L348

1236 1240 1666 1600

1391

1081 1589

9

34 1469 1213 1162 8 9 1 942 1 4 14 1484 1310

1190

1364 7 87 1379

(12)

TABLE 9 : OTTAWA-CARLETON E L E H E N T M SCHOOLS

(13)

TABLE 9 (cont'd): OTTAWA-CARLETON ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

S

choal

No.

39 40 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 45 4 6 47 Area

mz

3494 3439 3801 5195 5576 5570 5390 6208

5158

Energy Consumption

~ ~ / d y r .

1978 1634

1044

936 842

117

E

839 986 894 763 1 9 7 3 1457 1 4 24 1355 I 5 2 4 1434 1030 1391 1031 823 1974 1975 1976 1252 1391 96 1 1356 1414 996 L116 1116 767 I 1399 1348 11 16 1 4

5

3 1562

L

186 1321 1259 872 1228 , 1496 1209

1352

1515 l 3 4 8 1190 1073 740

(14)

TABLE

10:

WINNIPEG PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 1973

TABLE 11: WINNIPEG

PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS

1973 School NO.

1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

9

10 1 1 12 13

P

4 15 Energy Consumption

w/rnzyr.

1593 Area

m2

639

1220 1861 1984 203 1 2033 2200

2357

2462 2 4 6 3 2560 2667

2807

2810 3 160 S c h o o l

NO.

1 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8

School

NO. 16 Area m2 7462 11632 13598 13886 15602 20781 15234 16357 Energy Consmprion

~ ~ l r n ~ ~ r .

13 2 1 957

1596

1352 1472 13

LO

1879 1717 I Area

m2

33 25 89

1

1906 1236 1810 1 4 5 3 577 1252 1248 1961 1697 1670 L589 1422 1159 Energy Consumption XJ/dyr. 1635

3537

3764 3 809 3820 3891 3903 4061 4099 4424 4 4 9 8 4674 5807 4 9 5 3 6074 17 18 19 20 2 1 22 2 3 1 24 25 26 27 28 2

9

30

1511

I

1457

1666

2666

1182 1763 , 1213 1445 3030 7

13

1527 lQ15 1046 945

(15)
(16)

TABLE 1 2 ( c o n t - ) :

TORONTO

ELEBENTARY SCHOOLS S c h o o l No. 6 1 6 2 6 3 6 4 6 5 66 6 7 68

69

70

71

7 2

73

7 4 7 5 76 7 7

78

79

80

School

No.

Area

m2

6682 4837

16396

5232 5 5 6 7 46

L

5 2497 3452 236 2610 1345 3197 9368 4628 6001 6440 10379 10362 8509 54

7

6 Area u? Energy Consumption w / m 2 y r . 1976177 18 10 1627 1503 1383

L

228 1407 lo50 Energy Consumption w / m 2 y r . . 8 1 8 2 83; 84 1977/78 1542 1325 1480 1418 11 12 1333 8 3

3

1976177 1565 1352 13 10 103 1 8 6 5 4 6562 6884 7871

1977/78

1724 1484 1426 1209 85

86

87 88 89 90 9 1 92 9 3 9 4 9 5

96

9 7 98

99

100 1461 922 1414 2263 1728 1608 1294 1228 127 5 1170 1217 1035 984 7 490

5099

1938 10720 883 9 7 6 2151 2290 1042 1325 1143 1542 1275 1190

E

182 1004 1201 783 1314 1585 1104 852

1658

1639 1186 9 2 7 1 1100 984 12 17 1585 12 13

1038

876

1058 1228 1066 6 6 3 9541 1608 4060 420 1

751

1 6240 4739 4809 7 3 7 9 16830 9 7 06

6609

1209 1193 1 2 6 3 1438 1410 115 1 1 2 3 2 1275 1174 1283

8

8 7 787

(17)
(18)
(19)

TABLE 15: EASTERN ONTARIO SCEOOL BOARDS

1977/78

TABLE 16: HID-NORTHERN

ONTARIO

SCHOOL BOARDS 1977/78

(20)

TABLE 17: NORTHFEASTERN

ONTARIO SCHOOL

BOARDS

1977178

TABLE

18: NORTH-WESTERN

ONTARIO SCHOOL BOARDS

1977178

(21)

TABLE

19:

WESTEW

ONTARIO

SCHOOL BOARDS

(22)

TABLE 20: PROTESTANT SCHOOL BOARD OF GREATER MONTREAL

HIGH SCHOOLS

(23)

TABLE 21:

PROTESTANT

SCHOOL

BOAHI

OF GREATER NONTREAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

(24)

TABLE 2 1 (cont' d ) : PROTESTANT SCHOOL BQm OF GREATER MONTREAL

(25)
(26)
(27)

TABLE 23: B R I T I S H COLUMBIA

DELTA SCHOOL

DISTRICT NO. 37

19

7 7

(28)

FIGURE

1

REG

l NA

PUBLl

C

SCHOOLS

1975-19716

FIGURE

2

SECONDARY

SCHOOLS

(29)

FIGURE 3

JUNIOR-HIGH SCHOOLS

EDMONTON

1978-1979

FIGURE

4

ELEMENTARY JUN I

OR-H

I

GH

SCHOOLS

EDMONTON 1978-1979

0 t I I

0 5 10 I5 20

(30)

FIGURE

5

ELEMENTARY

SCHOOLS

EDMONTON

1978-1979

Area

rn2

lo3

FIGURE 6

SECONDARY

SCHOOLS

(31)

FIGURE 7

SECONDARY

SCHOOLS

OTTAWA-CARLETON 1974

FIGURE

8 SECONDARY SCHOOLS

OTTAWA-CARLETON

1975

-

0

-

PJ 9 C 0 O 3 t 0 0

-

0 % 0 0

2

-

C IIE 3 w

n

CJ L 5 4

-

L

"E

'.

I 3 0

S

0 o m 0 IL U

-

0 Area

rn2

10'

.-

-CI

e

2 - 3 IR B a MEAN c -d---~~--~---*-~---d---d----4----d---d--- a

(32)

FIGURE

9

SECONDARY

SCHOOLS

OTTAWA-CARLETON

1976

2

A r e a

m

10'

Fl

GURE 10

SECONDARY SCHOOLS

OTTAWA-CARLETON 1978

(33)

FI GURE 11 SECONDARY SCHOO

tS

OTTAWA-CARLETON 1973 AND 1978

S ~ l e c t e d buildings showing a change i n energy conswrpti on

greotsr tlm 0.3 ~ ~ / r n ' ~ r .

0 Yn73 SAMPLES

+

m7& SAMPLES

----

P73 TOTA M E MEAN

---

1878 TOTAL SAlulPtE MEAN

Area

m2

7 0 ~

FIGURE 12

ELEMENTARY

SCHOOLS

OTTAWA-CARLETON

1973

r 0

-

9,

u

C ID 3 0 U - 0 9- 2 0 h 0 - c P) T 5

-

4 - L >. N

E

\ 3 - 23 C a -- 4

E

2 - 3 0 0 0 O 0 p 0 0 m C 0 0 1 - n . 0 0 Oi?B O MEAN --2--~7---~-~n---u,---..---.F---.---.----..---.---4--- *o 0 0 0 O 0 0 m 0 0 0 I 0 r I .cI

(34)

Fl

GURE

13

ELEMENTARY

SCHOOLS

OTTAWA-CARLETON

1974

Area

m2

Fl

GURE

14

ELEMENTARY

SCHOOLS

(35)

Fl

GURE

15 ELEMENTARY

SCHOOLS

OTTAWA-CARLETON 1976

Fl CURE 16

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

OTTAWA-CARLETON

1978

5 - 4

-

L h

'E

\

=

3 - 3 C 0

.-

4 - 0

-

aJ

U c bl

O

k

3 9 0 - 0 rt 0

a

X 0 7 c

2

' 0 0 0

.

7 V3 C 0 WFl 0 0 '8 8 o m ---,-a0*-a0--m--d---d=---4---d--- CP *e; P CI 0 1 * o 0 0 - 0 I 0 rn 0 a, 3 37

z

2

-

50 0 , I I I 5 10 15 20 Q

Area rnZ

loJ

(36)

FIGURE 17 MMENTARY SCHOOLS OTTAWA-CARLETON 1973 AND 7378

Selectad buildings showing o c h g e i n energy c p n s y p t i o n greo t a r than 0.3 GJ/m yr.

0 1 8 7 3 ~ E S

+

m78SALPLES

,--,1875 , TOTAL w lAUlN ,,, 1978 TOTAL W liEPH

Area

rn2

lo3

(37)

Fl

GURE 19

ELEMENTARY

SCHOOLS

TORONTO

1976-1977

FI

GURE

20

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

TORONTO 1977-1978

(38)

FlGURE 21 ELEMENTARY

SCHOOLS

TORONTO 1976-1978

Selected bundlnge ghbwlng a ehangr I n snargy eonwmptlon z

grwter than 0.3 GJ/m yr.

0 1978-

t

#77SCJQLES

, , , , l076 TOTAL W kLAH

,--19n TOTAL ShPLE hEW

1

+

I I t: I

5 10 15 20

Area

rn2

10"

Fl

GURE 22

SECONDARY

SCHOOLS

(39)

F1

GURE

23

SECONDARY SCHOOLS

TORONTO

1976-1977

Area

m2

Fl

GURE

24 HIGH SCHOOLS

MONTREAL 1976-7977

a

-

0

-

1 - 28 - I 4 3

-

0 2 0 0 0

=

Q 0 MEAN 'm---,_-__-m---d---d--d----_~-~---d----d---d----.---d---. O 8 $ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 D P 20 30 40 50 60 0 10 1

-

0 0 I I I I r

(40)

Fl

GURE 25

H I G H

SCHOOLS

MONTREAL 1977-1978

FIGURE

26 HIGH SCHOOLS

MONTREAL 1978-1979

0 B MEAN 0 0 - - - m - - - d - - - * - - - M - - - & - - - 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 I 1 I L I I I 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 - 0 - 0 - 0

-

7 14 40

(41)

Fl GURE ,27 H 1 43-l SCHOOLS MONTREAL 1976-1979

Selected buildings ahoalng n

change i n energy c o n a u p t l on greater thun OJ W/rn yr.

O 7R78 SA-

+ P78 SAM-

,,,- em TOTAL SAMPLE MEAN ,-la78 TOTAL -SAMPLE MEAN

Area rn'

70'

Fl

GURE

28 ELEMENTARY

SCHOOLS

(42)

Fl

GURE

29

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

MONTREAL 1977-1978

Fl

GURE 30 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

MONTREAL 1978-1979

(43)

Fl GURE 31 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MONTREAL 1976/77 AND 1978/79

Selected buildings showing o change i n energy cansump ti on

2

g r e a t e r t h n n 0.3 G S / ~ yr.

0 1976 SAMPLES

I978 SAMPLES

----, 197B TOTAL SAMPLE MEAFI! ,

,

, 1878 TOTAL SAhPLE MEAN

FIGURE

32

VANCOUVER

SCHOOL BOARD

1977-1978

Figure

Table  1  shows  a  sununary  of  the  maximum,  m i n i m u m   and  average f l o o r   areas  and  a n n u a l   energy  c o n s m p t i o n   in  M J / d y r ,   f o r   each  sample  of
TABLE  3:  REGINA  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS  1975176
TABLE  6:  EDMONTON  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS
TABLE  7:  EDMONTON  PUBLIC  SCHOOLS  D  -  ELEMENTARY  1978/79
+7

Références

Documents relatifs

(2013) Length-weight relationship and seasonal effects of the Summer Monsoon on condition factor of Terapon jarbua (Forsskål, 1775) from the wider Gulf of Aden including

Identification and detection of a novel point mutation in the Chitin Synthase gene of Culex pipiens associated with diflubenzuron resistance...

These depend on which actor controls the trait (the vector or the parasite) and, when there is manipulation, whether it is realised via infected hosts (to attract vectors) or

Brennan TP, Woods JO, Sedaghat AR, Siliciano JD, Siliciano RF, Wilke CO: Analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 viremia and provirus in resting CD4+ T cells reveals a

The newly employed reactive magnetron co-sputtering technique has allowed us to enhance the absorption coefficient from the MLs owing to the high density of Si-ncs achieved and/or the

Market and communication schemes have taken a noticeable place in temples and some of them can be regarded as types of “mega-temples.” 2 This article describes the

Altogether, these results indicate that expression of the endogenous DRP1 protein is important for maintaining normal mitochondrial morphology in NHEK and that loss of this

sour rot symptoms in the field and in the laboratory (n = 5 bunches), ‘Post-harvest mild rot’ indicates fruit that were collected without rot symptoms but showed mild rot in