• Aucun résultat trouvé

A Roof Space Condensation Problem

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "A Roof Space Condensation Problem"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Technical Note (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building Research), 1965-02-01

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la

première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/20338443

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

A Roof Space Condensation Problem

Robson, D. R.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC: https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=ff53b870-2313-476c-86fc-396696e95b84 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=ff53b870-2313-476c-86fc-396696e95b84

(2)

DIVISION OF BUILDING RESEARCH

No.

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA

432

NOTlE

'fE

C

1HIN ][

CAlL

••

PREPARED BY D. R. Robson CHECKED BY D.C.T. APPROVED BY N. B. H.

February 1965

PREPARED FOR Record Purposes

SUBJECT A ROOF SPACE CONDENSATION PROBLEM

In February 1960 an inquiry from a motel owner concerning

ventilation and condensation was answered by letter detailing the requirements for ventilation and the proper use of vapour barriers. During a visit to the area in 1961, the motel owner was contacted and he stated that he was not

having any more problems with condensation having followed the recommendation outlined in the letter of February 1960. The motel was not examined as the

owner seemed reluctant to go into the matter further.

Late in 1963, however, the new owner of this same motel con-tacted the Atlantic Regional Station. In his opinion, the former owner was having trouble late in 1961 but did not recognize the problem. The new

owner's examination of the building disclosed a severe condensation problem and in January 1964 a visit was made to the motel.

The building is of wood-frame construction built on a crawl space and fully insulated (Figure 1). The first phase of the building, consisting of ten units, was erected about nine year s ago. Although original units involved cathedral ceilings, some were later converted to flat ceilings at considerable cost to provide additional ventilation via an attic space.

A careful examination of the building disclosed that the wor st problem existed in the old section where the roof sheathing on the south-east exposure had rotted due to condensation. The roof rafters were still fairly sound and the roofing was intact. The owner was reluctant to repair or replace the roof before correcting the condensation problem. During the examination in January, the dew point in the motel rooms was 35° to 39° F and 41 ° to 55° F in the crawl space. The minimum vent area requirement of

(3)

2

-1/300 is met by the continuous strip vents in the soffit (Figure 1). To facilitate air movement a 5 -in. vent pipe was installed over each pair of bathroom units to vent the ceiling space above the bathrooms. Severe condensation was evident around these vents and also in motel rooms 7, 8, 9, and 10.

Although the original plans specified 45 -lb felt under 4-in. gravel fill in the crawl space (Figure 1), there was some doubt if this was placed over the entire area. On examination of the crawl space it was dis-covered that the ground was damp and when disturbed, wet. In one place free water was evident.

It was also evident that there were relatively large clearances around the plumbing pipes, and moisture from the crawl space could escape to the ceiling space via the plumbing wall and so bypass the ceiling vapour barrier and insulation.

It was recommended that the crawl space under the entire motel be covered with 4-mil polyethylene and that the areas around the plumbing pipes be caulked to prevent air movement from the crawl space to the roof

space.

On 17 January these suggestions were carried out, and a letter from the owner on 22 February 1964 stated that the condensation problem seemed to have been corrected. Satisfactory performance throughout the remaining winter months was confirmed at the time of a visit from the Station on 5 May 1964.

From the results of this experience it appears that a vent area that is l/300 of the ceiling area will not prevent condensation if a source of excess moisture that can gain ready access to the roof space is present. When, however, the source of moisture (in this case a damp crawl space) is controlled, the area of the vent is probably large enough. The problem was made mote acute by the low slope roof, particularly where the ceiling is directly on the under side of the roof rafter s, thereby reducing the volume of air over the ceiling. The absence of a continuous vent at the ridge also made the problem worse.

Once again this points out the need for very careful control of moisture sources and proper vapour barrier use and drainage in crawl

(4)

e

e

e

" , I Continuous vent strip Stale ""'1'-0" II セ

MセZセMMMMMセセ

ZZZbM[エィセッッセ

セャiゥョァ

line

I:

:1

wiセ

I

I .-Ii 01 : I Continuous vent strip

MineraI I'ml batt insulation with integral valXlur barrier Grade N.·.·'.".'c,j1@

4"gravel fill 45-lb roofingヲ・ャセ lapped 4" NNj、[[MMMMMMQVGMRBMMMMMMMMセ n i'll .• \-' .•ᄋLLセᄋᄋMᄋ セGN⦅ GZセK "

Grade

n\ll :,' :..

セN[LZNMc^」Nセ Air movemenl セpi b'

LZ[[LZセセLZL <::' -Se... セ um Ing vent

C、GwセLB °0

\'.: c:> From plumbing system

LZZNセ{ - - -

---

- -

---- --

--ゥセNBGZゥ

t

.:1 '.

,· ..·

::NセNL

FIGURE 1 SECTION THROUGH MOTEL UNIT

Figure

FIGURE 1 SECTION THROUGH MOTEL UNIT

Références

Documents relatifs

Suppose R is a right noetherian, left P-injective, and left min-CS ring such that every nonzero complement left ideal is not small (or not singular).. Then R

The CCITT V.22 standard defines synchronous opera- tion at 600 and 1200 bit/so The Bell 212A standard defines synchronous operation only at 1200 bit/so Operation

IOMATCH() must be disabled to prevent a read from terminating prematurely when the binary data appears as a decimal 10 (ie.. The format of the data stream into the Logic

Kerberos is based on Data Encryption Standard (DES) symmetric key encryption and uses a trusted (third party) host that knows the secret keys of all users

Once this constraint is lifted by the deployment of IPv6, and in the absence of a scalable routing strategy, the rapid DFZ RIB size growth problem today can potentially

datacomputer [1] information about the behavior of ARPA network hosts collected by DMS’s program SURVEY [2].. The information was to be stored at the datacomputer and retrieved

Potential action items for the W3C included investigating the formation of a privacy interest group and formulating guidance about fingerprinting, referrer headers,

The first was that the Internet Architecture Board should review and consider that document in the context of evaluating Birds of a Feather (BoF) session proposals at the