• Aucun résultat trouvé

EXAM #2 REPORT Number of Students Total 36 Submitted 36 Not Submitted 0

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "EXAM #2 REPORT Number of Students Total 36 Submitted 36 Not Submitted 0"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

EXAM #2 REPORT

Number of Students

Total 36

Submitted 36

Not Submitted 0

GRADE DISTRIBUTION

DISTRIBUTION PER PROBLEM

(2)

INDIVIDUAL PROBLEM BREAKDOWN

Problem1 Problem 2 Problem3 Total

Average 8.10 8.63 8.51 84.12

Std Dev 1.76 1.52 1.36 12.50

COMPARISON WITH LAST 4 YEARS

(3)

SPECIAL COMMENTS

Problem 1

 Most students did well on Pi/similarity, with a few students making mistakes in the number of Pi’s or getting non-dimensional Pi’s, or using similarity between model and prototype.

 Some students made mistake in reducing the angular momentum equations and find the bending moment.

 Some students did not replace velocity from continuity equation to get equation as a function of Q.

Problem 2

 A few students made incorrect assumptions when reducing z-momentum equation.

 A few students did not correctly integrate the z-momentum equation.

 A few students did not use the correct boundary conditions.

 Most errors were made applying B.C.s to find constants of integration.

Problem 3

 Many students made mistakes for finding hydraulic diameter: just one section instead of two sections. As a result, following Re, friction factors are solved for one section.

 Many students also made mistakes for finding velocity with flux Q: the students assumed the cross section circular shape instead of square.

 Some of students missed efficiency factor for finding the power of blower.

Références

Documents relatifs

 Many students were not able to simplify the cylindrical Navier Stokes equations with correct assumptions.  Some students who did simplify Navier Stokes were not able to solve

o By setting the model Reynolds number equal to the prototype Reynolds number, for fully dynamic similarity, the ratio of velocities is found and used when setting the model

 Nine students did not set the Reynolds number to 2000 in order to solve for the height of the water level in part c where the flow starts

 5 Students were setting the first location for the Energy equation at the top of the pipe at the bottom of the tank, this is incorrect because the pressure is not know at

 Only recurring error was identifying the correct Reynolds transition number for flow over a flat plate. o Reynolds number for flat plate external turbulent

 One recurring error was students were not using the correct table for.  Another recurring error was students were not using the plat

 Many students did not apply the proper boundary condition to solve for constant

 Some students used wrong units on speed of sound in air, units did not cancel correctly for Mach