• Aucun résultat trouvé

Isradipine Twice Daily Lowers Blood Pressure Over 24 H

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Isradipine Twice Daily Lowers Blood Pressure Over 24 H"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

AJH 1991; 4:131S-134S

Isradipine Twice Daily Lowers Blood Pressure

Over 24 H

Arie J. Man in't Veld, David G. Holmes, Antonius Lasance, and Peter de Zw art

T h e o b j e c t i v e of t h i s s t u d y w a s to c o m p a r e t h e ef­ fects of i s r a d i p i n e a n d p l a c e b o o n b l o o d p r e s s u r e (BP) at t h e e n d of t h e d o s i n g i n t e r v a l ('trough'). F o l ­ l o w i n g a t h r e e - w e e k p l a c e b o p e r i o d , 187 p a t i e n t s w h o h a d p r e v i o u s l y s h o w n a r e s p o n s e t o t r e a t m e n t w i t h i s r a d i p i n e ( b a s e d o n office BP m e a s u r e m e n t s ) w e r e r a n d o m i z e d to d o u b l e - b l i n d t r e a t m e n t w i t h 2.5 m g i s r a d i p i n e t w i c e d a i l y or p l a c e b o for six w e e k s . F o u r of t h e s e p a t i e n t s w i t h d r e w f r o m t h e s t u d y d u r i n g t h e d o u b l e - b l i n d p h a s e b e c a u s e of a d ­ v e r s e e v e n t s (one t a k i n g i s r a d i p i n e a n d t h r e e t a k i n g p l a c e b o ) . Blood p r e s s u r e d u r i n g t h e d o u b l e - b l i n d s t u d y w a s a l w a y s m e a s u r e d 12 h after d r u g a d m i n ­ i s t r a t i o n ( t r o u g h v a l u e s ) . T h e r a t e of n o r m a l i z a t i o n

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Hospital, Rot­ terdam, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Research, S a n d o z Pharma, Basle, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Research, S a n d o z BV, U d e n , The Netherlands.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to David G. Holmes, MB, ChB, D C H , Department of Clinical Research, Sandoz Pharma, Lichtstrasse 35, C H - 4 0 0 2 , Basle, Switzerland.

[defined a s d i a s t o l i c BP (DBP) < 90 m m H g ] w a s 5 2 / 96 (54%) i n t h e i s r a d i p i n e - t r e a t e d g r o u p c o m p a r e d w i t h 3 0 / 8 7 (33%) i n t h e p l a c e b o g r o u p . A f u r t h e r 1 2 / 9 6 (12%) p a t i e n t s t a k i n g i s r a d i p i n e s h o w e d a fall i n D B P of > 10 m m H g , a l t h o u g h t h e i r D B P w a s still n o t < 90 m m H g , c o m p a r e d w i t h 5 / 8 7 (6%) p a t i e n t s r e c e i v i n g p l a c e b o . T h i s d i f f e r e n c e w a s s t a t i s t i c a l l y significant (P = .003). T h u s , i s r a d i p i n e i n a d o s e of 2.5 m g t w i c e d a i l y l o w e r s b l o o d p r e s s u r e o v e r 24 h . A m J H y p e r t e n s 1991;4:131S-134S KEY W O R D S : I s r a d i p i n e , t r o u g h b l o o d p r e s s u r e , d u ­ r a t i o n of a c t i o n , p l a c e b o . additional a n t i h y p e r t e n s i v e benefit w a s a p p a r e n t w i t h doses a b o v e 7.5 m g twice daily. T h u s , using doses h i g h e r t h a n t h o s e required to lower blood p r e s s u r e served only to increase t h e frequency a n d / o r severity of side effects.

Most of these results, h o w e v e r , w e r e b a s e d on b l o o d pressure m e a s u r e m e n t s t a k e n 4 to 6 h after d r u g a d m i n ­ istration (office m e a s u r e m e n t s , as is t h e usual practice). Relatively few data are available from studies in w h i c h b l o o d pressure w a s m e a s u r e d at t h e e n d of t h e 12 h dosing interval (trough m e a s u r e m e n t s ) , a l t h o u g h w h a t data there are did s h o w t h a t t h e therapeutic effect lasts for 12 h w i t h isradipine at a d o s e of 2.5 m g twice daily. Because t h e inclusion of patients n o t r e s p o n d i n g to t r e a t m e n t w a s t h o u g h t to m a k e t h e evaluation of t h e d u r a t i o n of effect less accurate, t h e s t u d y w a s carried out d o u b l e - b l i n d a n d placebo-controlled in p a t i e n t s w h o h a d already s h o w n a clinical r e s p o n s e to 2.5 m g isradipine twice daily.

P A T I E N T S A N D M E T H O D S

P a t i e n t S e l e c t i o n T h e following w e r e t h e criteria for entry into t h e placebo p h a s e of t h e study. Patients h a d

I

sradipine is a d i h y d r o p y r i d i n e characterized as a p o t e n t inhibitor of calcium c h a n n e l influx w i t h a h i g h specificity for vascular s m o o t h muscle as o p ­ p o s e d to cardiac muscle. In anesthetized cats a n d dogs, isradipine p r o d u c e s vasodilatation a n d increased coronary, cerebral, a n d skeletal blood flows. Cardiac o u t p u t a n d m y o c a r d i a l contractility a r e i n c r e a s e d w h e r e a s myocardial oxygen c o n s u m p t i o n is r e d u c e d . Isradipine h a s b e e n evaluated in several r a n d o m i z e d , double-blind, parallel-group trials in t h e t r e a t m e n t of patients w i t h essential h y p e r t e n s i o n . These trials u s e d doses of 1.25 to 10 m g twice daily. T h e results of these trials indicated t h a t 1.25 m g twice daily is effective in reducing blood pressure a n d t h a t a d o s e - r e s p o n s e rela­ tionship applies w i t h doses u p to 7.5 m g twice daily. N o

(2)

132S M A N I N T V E L D ET AL AJH-FEBRUARY 1991-VOL 4, NO. 2, PART 2

to h a v e received t r e a t m e n t w i t h 2.5 m g isradipine twice daily as m o n o t h e r a p y for at least four w e e k s a n d h a d to h a v e a d o c u m e n t e d diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 95 m m H g or a reduction in DBP of at least 10 m m H g d u r i n g t h e isradipine t r e a t m e n t . Patients w e r e to s h o w n o clinically relevant a b n o r m a l laboratory test results. To qualify for e n t r y into t h e d o u b l e - b l i n d p h a s e , p a ­ tients w e r e to h a v e a resting, sitting DBP of at least 95 m m H g , b u t n o t > 115 m m Hg, at t h e e n d of t h e placebo p h a s e .

S t u d y D e s i g n A multicenter, double-blind, parallel-g r o u p , placebo-controlled s t u d y desiparallel-gn w a s used. Total d u r a t i o n of t h e s t u d y per patient w a s n i n e w e e k s as follows: w e e k s 1 to 3, placebo w a s h - o u t p h a s e ; w e e k s 4 to 9, 2.5 m g isradipine twice daily or placebo. Patients w h o s e r e s p o n s e to isradipine h a d b e e n d e m o n s t r a t e d in a p r e c e d i n g clinical study directly e n t e r e d t h e placebo p h a s e of t h e comparative study. Patients w h o h a d n o t already s h o w n a response w i t h 2.5 m g isradipine twice daily initially received placebo for t w o w e e k s to estab­ lish t h e diagnosis of h y p e r t e n s i o n ; this w a s followed b y 2.5 m g isradipine twice daily for four w e e k s to establish t h e r e s p o n s e to t r e a t m e n t before entering t h e placebo p h a s e .

Patients eligible for t h e s t u d y received o n e placebo tablet twice daily (at 9 AM a n d at 9 PM) for t h r e e w e e k s . If, after three weeks of placebo, t h e blood pressure h a d still n o t reached the level required for inclusion, t h e p l a c e b o period w a s e x t e n d e d b y t w o w e e k s to a maxi­ m u m total duration of five w e e k s . Patients w h o con­ formed to t h e admission criteria at t h e e n d of t h e pla­ cebo p h a s e were r a n d o m i z e d to receive t r e a t m e n t w i t h either 2.5 m g isradipine or placebo twice daily. This w a s given for six weeks.

B l o o d P r e s s u r e M e a s u r e m e n t Sitting pulse a n d blood p r e s s u r e recordings w e r e t a k e n after t h e patient h a d b e e n in t h e clinic for at least 20 m i n a n d h a d rested in a sitting position for at least 3 m i n . Systolic b l o o d pressure (SBP) w a s recorded w i t h a m e r c u r y s p h y g m o m a n o m e ­ ter at Korotkoff p h a s e I a n d DBP w a s recorded at Korot-koff p h a s e V. T h r o u g h o u t t h e study, blood pressure m e a s u r e m e n t for each patient w a s p e r f o r m e d w i t h t h e s a m e cuff size (appropriate to t h e circumference of t h e arm), from t h e s a m e a r m a n d , if possible, b y t h e s a m e investigator.

For t h e examinations at t h e e n d of t h e placebo period a n d after four a n d six w e e k s of t h e d o u b l e - b l i n d treat­ m e n t , t h e p a t i e n t a t t e n d e d t h e clinic in t h e m o r n i n g b e t w e e n 8:30 a n d 9:30 AM, 12 h ( ± 3 0 m i n ) after t h e previous e v e n i n g medication at 9 PM. Blood pressure w a s m e a s u r e d (trough values), followed b y administra­ tion of t h e m o r n i n g dose of isradipine. T h e effect o n b l o o d pressure at p e a k w a s n o t recorded. If, o n t h e d a y s of these t h r e e visits t h e m o r n i n g dose h a d i n a d v e r t e n t l y b e e n t a k e n before a t t e n d i n g t h e clinic, or t h e previous

e v e n i n g dose h a d b e e n taken m o r e t h a n 13 or less t h a n 11 h before, t h e examination w a s p o s t p o n e d until t h e next d a y to e n s u r e that true t r o u g h values w e r e o b ­ tained.

Statistical M e t h o d s T h e n u l l - h y p o t h e s i s to b e tested w a s : there are n o differences in t r o u g h blood p r e s s u r e -lowering effects b e t w e e n t r e a t m e n t w i t h 2.5 m g isradi­ p i n e twice daily a n d placebo twice daily after six w e e k s of treatment. T h e Wilcoxon signed-rank test w a s u s e d to c o m p a r e t h e c h a n g e s from baseline w i t h i n each treat­ m e n t g r o u p , a n d t h e Utest according to M a n n W h i t -ney-Wilcoxon w a s u s e d to assess t h e c h a n g e s from b a s e ­ line b e t w e e n t h e t w o t r e a t m e n t groups.

In addition, a categorical analysis of t h e blood p r e s ­ sure results in évaluable patients w a s also c o n d u c t e d , using t h e following categories of DBP r e s p o n s e at w e e k 9 (six w e e k s of treatment) a n d t h e m i n i m u m discrimina­ tion statistic (2 I test): 1. < 9 0 m m Hg; 2. > 9 0 m m Hg, b u t w i t h reduction > 10 m m Hg; 3. > 9 0 m m H g , b u t w i t h reduction < 1 0 a n d ^ 5 m m Hg; 4. > 9 0 m m H g a n d w i t h reduction < 5 m m Hg.

R E S U L T S

A total of 188 patients w e r e recruited into t h e study. O n e w i t h d r e w d u r i n g t h e placebo p h a s e b e c a u s e of gas­ trointestinal bleeding, leaving 187 patients to b e r a n ­ d o m i z e d . Four patients discontinued t h e d o u b l e - b l i n d t r e a t m e n t because of adverse events. T h e placebo g r o u p comprised 90 patients (46 m e n , 44 w o m e n ; m e a n age 50 years, r a n g e 27 to 64 years), a n d t h e active t r e a t m e n t g r o u p included 97 patients (53 m e n , 44 w o m e n ; m e a n age 49 years, r a n g e 23 to 65 years). O n e h u n d r e d a n d ten patients received isradipine in t h e four-week selection p h a s e ; t h e r e m a i n i n g 77 patients h a d already received isradipine for periods of u p to 127 w e e k s before entering t h e study.

Table 1 s h o w s t h e average blood pressure values for t h e 183 patients w h o completed t h e d o u b l e - b l i n d study. T h e t w o t r e a t m e n t g r o u p s w e r e c o m p a r a b l e for b o t h SBP a n d DBP at baseline, a n d b o t h g r o u p s s h o w e d a statistically significant reduction in DBP after four a n d six w e e k s of treatment. H o w e v e r , t h e isradipine-treated patients s h o w e d a further fall in blood pressure b e t w e e n t h e fourth a n d sixth w e e k s of t r e a t m e n t w h e r e a s , in the placebo-treated patients, there w a s n o relevant c h a n g e in blood pressure after t h e fourth w e e k of treatment. T h e reduction in DBP from baseline w a s statistically significantly greater (P = .001) in t h e isradipine-treated patients after six w e e k s t h a n in t h e placebo-treated p a ­ tients.

T h e percentage of patients achieving a s u p i n e DBP of 90 m m H g or less w a s greater ( 5 2 / 9 6 , 5 4 % ) in t h e active-t r e a active-t m e n active-t g r o u p active-t h a n in active-t h e placebo-active-treaactive-ted g r o u p ( 3 0 / 87, 3 3 % ) . Also greater w a s t h e n u m b e r of patients w h o did n o t attain a DBP of 90 m m H g or less, b u t did

(3)

AJH-FEBRUARY 1991-VOL 4, NO. 2, PART 2 I S R A D I P I N E O V E R 24 H O U R S 133S

TABLE 1. AVERAGE BLOOD PRESSURE VALUES AND NORMALIZATION RATE BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER TREATMENT WITH 2.5 MG ISRADIPINE OR PLACEBO TWICE DAILY

Placebo Double-blind Phase Beforef After* 4 Weeks}: 6 Weeks* Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)

Isradipine Placebo

Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) Isradipine Placebo Responder rate§ Isradipine (n = 96) Placebo (n = 87)

Γ

142 ± 12 144 ± 14 88 ± 6 88 ± 6

I

158 ± 12 160 ± 14

I

151 ±15—] 148: NS 153 ±

18-I

153: 102 ±5 102 ± 5

1

94 ± 9 -96 ±

8-I

NS

L

92 ± 96 ±

I

14- 179 9 -64/96 35/87 (66%) (39%)

f Office' blood-pressure measurement. f Blood pressure measured 12 h after dosage.

§ Response = diastolic blood pressure ^ 90 mm Hg or a fall of^lO mm Hg. *F = .034; *** Ρ < .001; NS = not significant.

achieve a reduction of at least 10 m m H g in DBP [ 1 2 / 9 6 (12%) ν 5 / 8 7 (6%)]. T h u s , t h e total n u m b e r of patients w i t h either a normalization of blood pressure or a g o o d blood pressure r e s p o n s e w a s 6 4 / 9 6 (66%) in t h e isradi­ pine g r o u p a n d 3 5 / 8 7 (39%) in t h e placebo g r o u p . T h e difference in categorical r e s p o n s e b e t w e e n t h e t w o g r o u p s w a s statistically significant (P = .003).

T h e m o s t c o m m o n adverse event r e p o r t e d d u r i n g t h e s t u d y in b o t h t r e a t m e n t g r o u p s w a s h e a d a c h e (six occur­ rences w i t h isradipine a n d n i n e w i t h placebo). A l t h o u g h t h e p e r c e n t a g e of all patients entering t h e d o u b l e - b l i n d s t u d y w h o r e p o r t e d adverse events w a s similar for b o t h t r e a t m e n t g r o u p s ( 1 6 / 9 7 , 1 6 % w i t h isradipine a n d 1 3 / 90, 1 4 % w i t h placebo), t h e total n u m b e r of adverse e v e n t s w a s greater in those receiving isradipine (n = 26) t h a n placebo (n = 18). There w e r e t w o reports of flush­ ing a n d three of e d e m a in patients receiving active treat­ m e n t , b u t n o reports of either in patients taking placebo. Four patients discontinued t h e d o u b l e - b l i n d t r e a t m e n t b e c a u s e of adverse events: o n e because of e d e m a (isra­ dipine) a n d three because of h e a d a c h e (placebo).

D I S C U S S I O N

T h e blood pressure-lowering effect of isradipine u n d e r n o r m a l clinic conditions is well e s t a b l i s h e d .1 - 5 In those

studies, h o w e v e r , blood pressure w a s m e a s u r e d w h e n ­ ever t h e patient a t t e n d e d t h e clinic, a n d t h e r a p y w a s taken twice daily, once in t h e m o r n i n g a n d again in t h e evening. T h u s , t h e blood pressure m e a s u r e m e n t s re­

flected t h e effects of t h e d r u g b e t w e e n its p e a k period a n d its trough. This is t h e blood pressure v a l u e generally u s e d by physicians in their u s u a l care of patients, b u t it does n o t clearly establish t h a t t h e d r u g h a s a blood p r e s ­ sure-lowering effect t h a t persists t h r o u g h o u t t h e dosing interval. T h a t t h e effect is still p r e s e n t at t h e e n d of t h e 12 h dosing interval h a s b e e n s h o w n in o t h e r s t u d i e s .6'7

Those studies w e r e , h o w e v e r , either s i n g l e - b l i n d6 or

w e r e carried out in elderly p a t i e n t s .7

T h e s t u d y r e p o r t e d h e r e w a s p e r f o r m e d to assess t h e 12 h d u r a t i o n of action using a placebo-controlled s t u d y design in y o u n g e r patients. T h e results s h o w e d a statis­ tically significantly greater lowering of DBP w i t h isradi­ p i n e t h a n w i t h placebo. In this study, t h e r a p y w a s given at 9 PM on t h e e v e n i n g before t h e next m o r n i n g ' s clinic visit, w h i c h w a s at 9 AM ± 30 m i n . T h u s , t h e b l o o d pressure values recorded w e r e true t r o u g h values a n d t h e blood pressure-lowering effect w a s t h a t at t h e e n d of t h e dosing interval.

It can, therefore, b e c o n c l u d e d t h a t t h e blood p r e s s u r e -lowering effect of isradipine is p r e s e n t t h r o u g h o u t t h e dosing interval a n d t h a t a twice-daily regimen is a p p r o ­ priate. T h e fact t h a t t h e blood pressure fell in t h e isradi­ pine-treated patients b e t w e e n t h e fourth a n d sixth w e e k s of t r e a t m e n t while r e m a i n i n g stable, or e v e n ris­ ing slightly, in t h e placebo-treated patients is further evidence t h a t t h e reduction in b l o o d pressure is a n effect of t h e t r e a t m e n t a n d n o t a s p o n t a n e o u s c h a n g e . This is also a n indication t h a t t h e effect of isradipine is n o t m a x i m u m at, for example, t w o w e e k s of t r e a t m e n t a n d ,

(4)

134S M A N IN'T V E L D ET A L AJH-FEBRUARY 1991-VOL. 4, NO. 2, PART 2

therefore, conclusions as to t h e m a g n i t u d e a n d d u r a t i o n of a n t i h y p e r t e n s i v e effect b a s e d o n studies in w h i c h t h e effects are assessed after only t w o w e e k s are of limited value.

A l t h o u g h t h e s t u d y w a s n o t i n t e n d e d to assess t h e tolerability of isradipine but, rather, to e x a m i n e t h e d u r a ­ tion of action in patients w h o h a d already s h o w n a re­ s p o n s e to t r e a t m e n t , these results also d e m o n s t r a t e t h a t isradipine is well tolerated. A l t h o u g h t h e n u m b e r of a d v e r s e e v e n t s ( b u t n o t t h e n u m b e r of patients report­ ing a d v e r s e events) w a s h i g h e r in t h e isradipine-treated patients t h a n in t h e placebo-treated patients, t h e overall safety w a s a d j u d g e d b y t h e investigators to b e t h e s a m e for b o t h t r e a t m e n t s .

R E F E R E N C E S

1. Sundstedt CD, Rüegg PC, Keller A, Waite R: A multicenter evaluation of the safety, tolerability and efficacy of isradi­ pine in the treatment of essential hypertension. Am J Med 1989;86(suppl 4A):98-102.

2. Shepherd AMM, Carr AA, Davidov M, et al: Efficacy and safety of isradipine in hypertension. J Cardiovasc Phar­ macol 1989;13:580-585.

3. Simonsen K, Sundstedt CD: Dose-response relationship and incidence of adverse drug reactions with isradipine in patients with essential hypertension. Am J Med 1989; 86(suppl 4A):91-93.

4. Kirch W, Burger KJ, Weidinger G, Welzel D: Efficacy and tolerability of the new calcium antagonist isradipine in essential hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1990: 15(suppl 1):S55-S59.

5. Miller H: Isradipine: overall clinical experience in hyper­ tension in the United States. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1990;15(suppl 1):S60-S64.

6. De Keyser P, Bouvé J, Clement D, et al: Isradipine in es­ sential hypertension: the Belgian General Practitioners' Study. Am J Med 1989;86(suppl 4A):103-109.

7. The British Isradipine Hypertension Group: Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of isradipine in elderly patients with essential hypertension. Am J Med 1989;86(suppl 4A):110-114.

Figure

TABLE 1. AVERAGE BLOOD PRESSURE VALUES AND NORMALIZATION RATE BEFORE, DURING, AND  AFTER TREATMENT WITH 2.5 MG ISRADIPINE OR PLACEBO TWICE DAILY

Références

Documents relatifs

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a fixed combination of bimatoprost 0.03% and timolol (BTFC) in a clinical setting, in a large sample

This paper reports the clinical and anatomical results, including mid-term (1-year) follow-up, of WEB aneurysm treatment in the accumulated population of the WEBCAST, French

Introduction Corticosteroids and azathioprine provide complete response with good tolerance in most patients for the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis AIH.1,2 Although some

[r]

Einige Autoren verstehen die oben besprochenen technischen Nutzungsmöglich- keiten überhaupt nicht als interaktiv, sondern erst das Zustandekommen von

We are convinced that the dialectical square of cultural difference as well as the three metaphors of culture developed in this article contributes to a dynamic and

As the ionic concentration is expected, via screening effects, to play a key role in controlling both chain conformation (via the electrostatic persistence length)

Influencé par ses pairs, Jean Cousin fait largement référence aux proportions de Vitruve divulguées grâce au Traité des proportions d'Albrecht Dürer (1528) et aux