• Aucun résultat trouvé

14 C Sources and Distribution in the Vicinity of La Hague Nuclear Reprocessing Plant: Part Ii—Marine Environment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "14 C Sources and Distribution in the Vicinity of La Hague Nuclear Reprocessing Plant: Part Ii—Marine Environment"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02470607

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02470607

Submitted on 18 Jun 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

14 C Sources and Distribution in the Vicinity of La Hague Nuclear Reprocessing Plant: Part Ii-Marine

Environment

D. Maro, M. Fontugne, C. Hatté, D Hebert, M. Rozet

To cite this version:

D. Maro, M. Fontugne, C. Hatté, D Hebert, M. Rozet. 14 C Sources and Distribution in the Vicinity of La Hague Nuclear Reprocessing Plant: Part Ii-Marine Environment. Radiocarbon, University of Arizona, 2004, Proceedings of the 18th International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 2 of 2), 46 (2), pp.831-839. �10.1017/S0033822200035864�. �hal-02470607�

(2)

14C SOURCES AND DISTRIBUTION IN THE VICINITY OF LA HAGUE NUCLEAR REPROCESSING PLANT: PART II—MARINE ENVIRONMENT

D Maro1,2 M Fontugne3,4 C Hatté3 D Hebert1 M Rozet1

ABST RAC T. Car bon dioxid e p artial pr essur e and ra dioc arb on activity wer e m eas ure d in air a nd s ea w ate r in the B ay of S eine and around the COGEMA-La Hague nuclear reprocessing plant (northwest France) during 3 cruises in 2000 and 2002.

Results clea rly sho w th at the s ea is a so ur ce of C O2 and 1 4C to the atm osph er e. High 1 4C con ce ntrations in air an d wat er r elated to the La Hague liquid waste are c learly recorded. For the restricted a rea of the Bay of Se ine, CO2 ca rbon and 14C flu xes were estimated, indicating that less than 3% of the liquid 14C release is introduced in the atmosphere.

INTRODUCTION

The COGEMA-La Hague nuclear reprocessing plant is located in the northwest of the Cotentin Pen- insula, near Cherbourg (France). This nuclear plant releases radioelements in the atmosphere and in the English Channel. About 8.5 TBq.yr–1 of radiocarbon is released as liquid waste through a pipe a few km off the shore, west of the reprocessing plant (COGEMA data 2000). Recent studies in the peninsula (Fontugne et al., this issue) show anomalously high 14C contents in vegetation near the coast which suggest a supplementary marine contribution through the degassing of the 14C excess supplied by the liquid release of the nuclear plant.

The aim of this study is to estimate the 14C fluxes between seawater and atmosphere in the northwest part of the Cotentin Peninsula and in the Bay of Seine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Methods

In order to estimate 14CO2 fluxes across the surface seawater and the atmosphere interface, the par- tial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) was calculated using measurements of the total alkalinity and pH of water. According to Henry’s law, the difference between pCO2 in air and water indicates if seawater is a source of CO2 to the atmosphere.

Carbon dioxide fluxes were calculated using Equation 1:

 CO2) (mole.m–2.s–1) = K. S. pCO2 (1), where K (m.s–1) is the CO2 transfer coefficient between seawater and the atmosphere, S is solubility of CO2 (mole.m–3.atm–1), and pCO2 (atm) is the difference between partial pressure in water and air. pCO2 in air was considered as a constant mean value of 367 atm according to values published by Copin-Montégut (1996), Boehme et al. (1998), Frankignoulle and Borges (2001), and Keir et al.

(2001). K is a parameter depending on wind speed; its values are available in Liss and Merlivat (1986), Tans et al. (1990), or Wanninkhof and McGillis (1999). As these K values are slightly dif- ferent in these 3 studies, we present the 3 CO2 flux estimates.

1Laboratoire de Radioécologie de Cherbourg-Octeville (IRSN/DEI/SECRE/ LRC), F-50130 Cherbourg-Octeville, France.

2Email: denis.maro@irsn.fr.

3Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, UMR 1572-CEA/CNRS, Domaine du CNRS, F-91198-Gif sur Yvette cedex, France.

4Corresponding author. Email: Michel.Fontugne@lsce.cnrs -gif.fr.

(3)

The exchange of CO2 between the atmosphere and the surface seawater is an equilibrium process;

the net CO2 flux is the difference between gas going from water to air and gas going from air to water. Both these fluxes carry 14C at concentrations appropriate to the medium from where they originate, and the net 14C flux is, once again, the difference. The expression for the net 14C flux from the ocean surface to the atmosphere is given in Equation 2:

(14C) = [14C]OOA (CO2) – [14C]AAO (CO2) (2).

Regarding the constant factor due to the use of appropriate units, 14C fluxes were calculated follow- ing Equation 3:

(14C) (Bq.km–2.d–1) = 109 ([14C]O .OA– [14C]AAO) (3), where [14C]O and [14C]A are the 14C concentrations (Bq.Kg–1C) in the surface ocean and air, respec- tively, and OA and AO are the CO2 fluxes (mole.m–2.s–1) from ocean to air, and air to ocean, respectively.

Sampling and Analytical Procedures

Seawater and air samples were collected simultaneously during 3 cruises (TE-SEA cruise, 1–4 June 2000; TRANSAT 1 cruise, 24–28 February 2002; and TRANSAT 2 cruise, 27–31 August 2002) around the northern Cotentin Peninsula and the Bay of Seine (Figure 1). During these cruises, kryp- ton-85 (85Kr) was measured continuously at a frequency of 1 measurement.s–1 (Maro et al. 2002).

The detection of 85Kr emitted from the chimney of the reprocessing plant allows air to be sampled for 14C measurements free of direct contamination coming from the plume of the chimney. CO2 in a few liters of air was trapped by bubbling air in sodium hydroxide solution. Sodium hydroxide was prepared a few hours before sampling to avoid contamination by sodium carbonate, generally present within sodium hydroxide tablets. In the laboratory, barium hydroxide was added to a sodium hydroxide solution to get a precipitate of barium carbonate. This carbonate was then rinsed with degassed distilled water and dried at 50 °C before reaction with orthophosphoric acid under vacuum to evolve CO2. Water used to prepare the solution was previously degassed. Precipitation, filtration of precipitate, and rinsing were performed under a controlled nitrogen atmosphere. The blank was determined following this procedure on the same solution used for sampling.

Water samples were collected in glass bottles and poisoned with mercury chloride. In the laboratory, total CO2 (CO2) was extracted from seawater following the procedure described by Bard et al.

(1988) and Leboucher et al. (1999).

The temperature and salinity of seawater were measured using SBE 19-03 Seabird equipment, and wind direction and speed were recorded. For the TRANSAT cruises, CO2 partial pressure in surface seawater was calculated using the pH and total alkalinity measurements following the “Standard Operating Procedures SOP3 and SOP6” of the US Department of Energy (DOE 1994).

The 14C activity was measured at the Laboratoire de Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement using the Gif accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) facilities. Results are expressed in Bq.kg–1 C (100 pMC = 226 Bq.kg–1 C). The relative precision varies between 0.5 and 2%.

(4)

English Channel 1 2

3 à 8 Cherbourg

9

Nord Cotentin 10 Bay of Seine

11 12 13 19 20 Le Havre

14 15 16 17

18 Seine

river

Caen

km

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

8 English Channel

2 38

3 9 1

7 4 Cherbourg

Bay of Seine

6 Nord Cotentin 37 Le Havre

18

5 36

35 19 20 à 33

34 Seine

river

Caen

km 0 1 0 2 0

49.75

49.70

49.65

49.60

-2..15 -2..10 -2..05 -2..00 -1..95 -1..90 -1..85

TE_SEA : June 2000

5 0 .0

4 9 .9

4 9 .8

4 9 .7

4 9 .6

4 9 .5

4 9 .4

4 9 .3

4 9 .2

4 9 .1

49.0

--2.0 --1..5 --1.0 --0.5 0..0 0.5

50..1 50..0

49..9 49..8

49..7 49..6 49..5

49..4 49..3 49..2 49..1 49..0

--2 ..5 -2 ..0 -1 .5 -1 .0 -0 ..5 0 ..0 0 ..5 1 ..0

TRANSAT-1 : February 2002 TRANSAT-2 : August 2002 Figure 1 Location of sampling stations during the TE-SEA, TRANSAT 1, and TRANSAT 2 cruises RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Carbon Dioxide Flux

pCO2 values (Figure 2 a, b) vary from 373 to 614 atm for the TRANSAT 1 cruise data, and between 423 and 1408 atm for TRANSAT 2 cruise data. pCO2 measurements in water show similar high values compared to air during the winter and summer cruises and increase toward the Seine River estuary. This indicates CO2 flux to the atmosphere since the mean atmospheric pCO2 value is 367

atm. These results are easily predictable because coastal, shelf, and estuarine areas exhibit high biological activity due to the nutrient input near the river mouths and organic matter recycling in the water column (Savoye et al. 2003). This heterotrophic activity, resulting in high degradation rates at the sediment surface and in the water column, produces high dissolved CO2 concentrations (April 1999).

CO2 fluxes to the atmosphere calculated from Equation 1 are reported in Figure 3 a, b. Carbon fluxes range from very few to 911 and 493 kg C km–2.d–1 for TRANSAT 1 and TRANSAT 2 cruises, respectively. These values are strongly dependent on the K transfer coefficient chosen (Liss and Merlivat [1986], Tan et al. [1990], or Wanninkhof and McGillis [1999]), the difference between esti- mations may vary by a factor of 2 or more, especially considering high wind speed.

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

8 2 3 9

English Channel 38

1

7 4 Cherbourg

6 Bay of Seine

Nord Cotentin 37 5 36

18

35 19

34 Le Havre

20 à 33 Seine

river

Caen

km 0 1 0 2 0

11

6 1

La Hague nuclear

Engli s h Chan n el 2

Outlet pipe 7 1 2 5

8 3

10 4

9

km

00 0 .220 5.5 0 .551

English Channel

1 2

3 à 8 Cherbourg

9

Nord Cotentin 10

11

Bay of Seine 12 13

14 15 16 19 17

18 20 Le Havre

Seine river

Caen

km

0 1 0 2 0

(5)

Wanninkhof & Mac Gillis Liss & Merlivat Tans et al.

Wanninkhof & Mc Gillis Liss & Merlivat Tans et al.

T RANSAT-1 : 2002 TRANSAT-2 : 2002

700 1600

600 1400

500

400

300

200

1200 1000

800

600

400

100 200

0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Distan ce from COGE M A outlet pipe (km)

0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Distance from COGEMA outlet pipe (km)

Figure 2 Variation of CO2 partial pressure in surface seawater versus distance from pipe outlet during TRANSAT 1 and 2 cruises

TRANSAT -1 : 2002

1000 900

800 700

600 500 400

300 200 100 0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Distance from COGEMA outlet pipe (km) TRANSAT-2 : 2002

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Distanc e from COG E M A outlet pipe (km)

Figure 3 Variatio ns of CO2 fluxes versus distan ce from pipe outlet during TRAN S A T 1 (above ) and 2 (below) cruises

pCO2 (10 -6 atm) CO2 Flux (kgC.km .d) -2 -1 CO2Flux(kgC.km-2.d-1) pCO2 (10-6 atm)

(6)

14C Flux

Preliminary experiments performed during the TE-SEA cruise are reported in Table 1 and Figure 4.

The 14C activities of CO2 in seawater vary between 342.2 Bq.kg–1 at station 11 in the northwest part of the studied area to 580.8 Bq.kg–1 C near the mouth of the pipe. The values (except station 11) range between 479.6 to 580.8 Bq.kg–1 C, decreasing from south to north and recording clearly the plume and the dilution of waste. These values are about twice the reference values in 2000 (248 Bq.kg–1 C) for modern surface waters measured in Brittany, off Brest. 14C values in air samples are more homogenous, varying between 257.6 to 292.2 Bq.kg–1 C. However, these values are higher than the atmospheric reference (248 Bq.kg–1 C).

Table 1 Location of sampling, distance from the pipe outlet, 14C activity in seawater and air during the TE-SEA cruise. Shaded rows are under plume influence (see Fontugne et al., these proceedings).

Station TE-SEA

Latitude (N)

() Longitude (W)

() Distance

(km)

14C in water (Bq/kg C)

14C in air (Bq/kg C)

1 49.70 2.00 5.2 480.7 268.5

2 49.68 1.97 2.2 506.0 279.1

3 49.65 1.96 1.5 527.0 257.6

4 49.63 1.92 4.4 562.3 269.8

5 49.66 1.94 1.2 520.3 259.4

6 49.71 2.00 5.9 479.6 428.9

7 49.66 1.97 0.9 539.7 468.7

8 49.66 1.94 1.4 559.6 435.1

9 49.63 1.91 5.1 557.8 908.1

10 49.64 1.96 2.5 506.2 426.0

11 49.74 2.11 14.0 342.2 271.2

12 49.66 1.96 0.0 580.8 292.2

TE- S E A 2 0 0 0

7 0 0 4 0 0

6 0 0

3 8 0

3 6 0

5 0 0 3 4 0

3 2 0

4 0 0 3 0 0

3 0 0

2 8 0

2 6 0

2 0 0 2 4 0

2 2 0

1 0 0

0 2 4 6 8 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6

D is ta n c e f r o m C O G EM A o u t let pip e ( k m )

2 0 0

Figure 4 Variations of 14C activities (Bq.kg–1 C) in surface seawater and air versus distance from the pipe outlet during the TE-SEA cruise

W a te r - D IC A ir

W a te r (B q . k-1g C ) Ai r (B q . k-1g C

(7)

Table 2 Location of sampling, distance from the pipe outlet, 14C activity in seawater and air, wind speed at 10 m, temperature, salinity, and CO2 partial pressure in surface seawater during TRANSAT cruises.

Station TRANSAT 1

Latitude (N)

() Longitude

() Distance

(km)

[14C] water (Bq/kg C)

u10 (m/s)

Temperature

(C) Salinity (pm)

pCO2

(atm) [14C] air (Bq/kg C)

1 49.73 1.88W 15.0 587.8 12.0 9.7 33.91 373.4 238.8

2 49.70 1.73W 22.4 11.0 9.8 33.86 378.6

3 49.67 1.63W 29.4 410.2 12.0 9.5 33.49 377.1 239.4

4 49.67 1.62W 29.6 11.0 9.5 33.61 386.3

5 49.67 1.62W 29.6 10.0 9.6 33.55 384.1

6 49.67 1.62W 29.6 10.0 9.6 33.42 386

8 49.67 1.62W 29.6 10.0 9.6 33.63 373.5

9 49.57 1.24W 58.3 378.4 8.0 8.7 33.01 387.5 237.1

10 49.51 1.03W 74.4 379.5 12.0 9.2 33.43 378.5 239.3

11 49.48 0.93W 82.5 9.0 8.8 33.05 402.8

12 49.46 0.82W 90.7 353.3 9.0 8.7 32.88 400.7 236.4

13 49.44 0.71W 98.5 9.0 8.6 32.41 416.8

14 49.43 0.60W 107.2 331.0 10.0 8.5 32.35 415.3 236.2

15 49.42 0.48W 115.5 10.0 8.5 32.31 419.9

16 49.40 0.35W 125.4 324.8 10.0 8.5 32.17 430.3 241.3

17 49.40 0.17W 137.9 10.0 8.5 32.37 421

18 49.39 0.09W 143.6 10.0 8.4 31.26 441.2 242.7

19 49.44 0.09W 142.8 10.0 8.4 31.65 448.6

20 49.47 0.04E 151.5 286.3 10.0 8.1 25.63 613.6 236.2

TRANSAT 2

1 49.70 1.73W 22.40 342.5 7.3 17.9 34.78 465.7 226.4

5 49.42 2.25W 33.7 270.7 6.2 18.0 35.10 422.7 222.2

7 49.64 2.44W 34.4 3.4 16.7 35.10 424.0

9 49.69 1.96W 3.6 706.7 3.4 17.8 34.89 462.9 346.4

10 50.00 1.94W 37.7 281.6 4.1 17.1 35.06 438.0 240.9

13 50.00 1.01W 83.4 3.4 17.7 34.90 442.5

17 50.00 0.35E 175.4 343.6 1.8 18.6 34.56 452.0 262.6

18 49.47 0.04E 151.3 258.3 3.1 19.6 29.01 759.0 243.5

19 49.45 0.05E 152.7 5.9 19.5 22.40 1407.6

34 49.38 0.09W 144.4 5.5 19.4 31.66 464.3

36 49.46 0.66W 101.7 4.8 19.6 33.30 402.0

37 49.51 1.04W 74.0 351.5 4.6 18.7 34.35 441.0 262.2

(8)

Water - DIC Air

During the TRANSAT cruises, 14C activities in the surface seawater vary between 258.3 to 706.7 Bq.kg–1 C (Table 2). The highest value corresponds to a station within the plume of the liquid waste near the pipe outlet (Figures 5 a,b). All these values are higher than the reference value of 239 Bq.kg–1 C (year 2002). During TRANSAT 1, winter cruise atmospheric values are near the ref- erence value mainly due to the stormy meteorological conditions which induce a greater mixing of the atmosphere. During the TRANSAT 2 summer cruise, 14C activities in the air present a positive correlation with 14C in surface water, confirming transfer from the sea.

TRANSAT-1 : 2002

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

400 380 360 340 320 300 280 260 240 220 200

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Distance from COGEMA outlet pipe (km) TRA NSA T-2 : 2002

800 400

700

600

500

400

300

200

380

360

340

320

300

280

260

240

220

100 200

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Dis tanc e f rom COGEMA outlet pipe ( km)

Figure 5 Variations of 14C activities (Bq.kg–1 C) in surface seawater and air versus distance from pipe outlet during TRANSAT 1(above) and 2 (below) cruises

For each estimate of carbon dioxide flux, the 14C fluxes were estimated using Equation 3. Maximum fluxes are 6.4 105 and 1.7 105 Bq.km–2.d–1 for TRANSAT 1 and 2, respectively (Figures 6 a,b). Dur- ing TRANSAT 1, the highest 14C flux is encountered near the city of Cherbourg, and the lowest between Cherbourg and the Seine River estuary. The TRANSAT 2 cruise presents a maximum value near Cherbourg and a minimum value near the Seine River estuary due to lower CO2 fluxes during these cruises (low wind speed near the Seine estuary). Following estimates derived from the Tans et al. model, the mean flux in the Bay of Seine due to the COGEMA-La Hague liquid waste would

Water - DIC Air

Wate r (Bq.k g-1 C) Water (Bq.kg-1 C) Air (Bq.kg-1C)Air (Bq.k g-1 C)

(9)

W a n n in k h o f & M a c G illis L is s & M e r liv a t T a n s e t a l.

W a nn in kh of & M c G illis Lis s & M e r liv a t T a n s et a l.

reach 2.3 105 and 3.9 104 Bq.km–2.d–1 for TRANSAT 1 and 2, respectively. A rough annual estima- tion would give 216 GBq for the 4400 km–2 of the Bay of Seine, representing less than 3% of the liq- uid release from COGEMA-La Hague nuclear reprocessing plant.

T R A N S A T - 1 : 2 0 0 2

7 0 0 0 0 0

6 0 0 0 0 0

5 0 0 0 0 0

4 0 0 0 0 0

3 0 0 0 0 0

2 0 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 0 0 0

0

0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 6 0

D is t a n c e f r o m C O G E M A o u t le t p ip e ( k m )

TR A N S A T - 2 : 2 0 0 2

2 0 0 0 00 1 8 0 0 00 1 6 0 0 00 1 4 0 0 00 1 2 0 0 00 1 0 0 0 00 8 0 0 00 6 0 0 00 4 0 0 00 2 0 0 00 0

0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 6 0

D is ta n c e f r o m CO G EM A o u tle t p ip e ( km )

Figure 6 Varia tion s of 14C fluxes versus distanc e from pipe outlet during TRAN S A T 1 (above ) and 2 (below ) cruise s

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous measurements of CO2 partial pressure and 14C activity in air and seawater indicate that the English Channel and Bay of Seine are a source a carbon dioxide to the atmosphere in good agreement with previous studies. 14C activities decrease from the west to the east according to the dilution of the waste plume of the plant. Estimations of CO2 and 14C flux show that a minor part of the 14C liquid release by industrial activity is recycled to the atmosphere. These estimates are not very accurate due to the variation of CO2 transfer coefficients proposed by different models. How- ever, the 14C releases in the Bay of Seine could provide a good opportunity to perform new experi- ments in order to get better estimates of CO2 transfer coefficients between water and atmosphere.

1 4C OFlu x ( B q-2..dk- 1m) 21 4CO F lu x (B q .-k2.md-1) 2

(10)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Thanks are due to M Paterne for helpful discussions and M Arnold for AMS measurements and S Le Bar and M L Fitament from COGEMA for their help during the cruises. We are very grateful to Rodger Sparks for suggestions and corrections of the manuscript. We thank Mr Le Bourhis and Mr Henri captains of the crew of the R/V “Côtes de la Manche.” TE-SEA and TRANSAT cruises were supported by CNRS.LSCE contribution nr 1102.

REFERENCES

Ab ril G. 1 999. D yn a mique du car bon e d ans les estuaires européens: processus de minéra lisation et transfert continent-océan-atmosphère [PhD dissertation]. Uni- versité de Bordeaux I. p 173–209.

Bard E, Arnold M, Ostlund HG, Maurice P, Monfray P, Duplessy JC. 1988. Penetration of bo mb radiocarbon in the tropical Indian Ocean measured by means of accelerator mass spectrometry. Earth and Planetary Sciences Letters 87:379–89.

Boeh me SE, Sab ine CL, Re imers CE. 1998. CO2 flu xes fro m a coastal transect: a time -series approach.

Marine Chemistry 63:49–67.

C O GE M A . 200 0. S urv eillan ce trim estrielle de l’en viron - nement de la Hague. Rapport Hag. 055000120013.

84 p.

Copin- M ontég ut G. 1 996. C himie d e l’ea u de m er . P aris:

Institut Océanographique. 319 p.

D ep artm ent of E ne rgy ( D O E). Dic kson A G, G oy et C, ed - itors. 1994. Handbook of Methods for the Analysis of the Various P ara m eters of th e Carb on Dioxid e Syste m in Seawater. Version 2. ORNL/CDIAC-74.

F ontugn e M , M aro D, Ba ron Y, H atté C , H éb ert D, D ou - ville E. Sources and distribution of radiocarbon in the vicinity of La Hague nuclear reprocessing plant: part I—terrestria l environ ment. Radiocarbon, these pro- ceedings.

F ran kignoulle M , Bor ges A V. 20 01. E urop e an co ntinen- tal shelf as a significant sink for at mospheric carbon dio xide. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 15(3):569–

76.

K eir RS , R ehd er G, F r an kignoulle M. 2 001. P artial pres - sure and air-sea flux of CO2 in the Northeast Atlantic

during September 1995. Deep Sea Research Part II:

Topical Studies in Oceanography 48(14–15):3179–

89.

Le bou ch er V , O rr J, Je an- Ba ptiste P , Arn old M, Mo nfr ay P , Tisn er at -L abor de N, P oisson A , D uplessy JC. 19 99.

Oceanic radiocarbon between Antarctica and South Africa a long WOCE section I6 at 30°E. Radiocarbon 41(1):51–73.

Liss PS, Me rlivat L. 1986. Air-sea e xchange rates: intro- duction and synthesis. In: Buat-Ménard P, editor. The Role of Air-Sea Exchange in Geochemical Cycling.

Hingha m, Massachusetts: D Riedel Publishing Co.

p 113–27.

Maro D, Crabol B, Germain. P, Baron Y, Hebert D, Bou- isset P . 2 002. A study of the n ea r fi eld atmosp he ric dis - persion of emission at height: Co mparison of Gauss - ian plu me models (Doury, Pasquill-Briggs, Ca ire) with krypton-85 measurements taken around La Hague nuclear reprocessing plant. Radioprotection 37(C1):1277–82.

Savoy e N, Aminot A, Trégue r P, Fontugne M, Naulet N, Kérouel R. 2003. Dynamics of particulate organic matter 15N and 13C during spring phytoplankton blooms in a microtidal ecosystem (Bay of Seine, France). Marine Ecology Progress Series 255:27–41.

Tans PP, Fung IY, Takahashi T. 1990. Observational constraints on the global atmospheric CO2 budget.

Science 247:1431– 38.

Wanninkhof R, Mc Gillis WR. 1999. A cubic relat ionship between air-sea CO2 e xchange and wind speed.

Geophysical Research Letters 26(13):1889–92.

Références

Documents relatifs

The concept that the near-Sun solar wind is divided into ’quiet’ magnetic flux tubes (where near-f ce waves are preferentially observed) and ’strong turbulence’ flux tubes where

While the velocity fluctuations associated with these spikes are typically under 100 km/s, due to the rather low Alfv´ en speeds in the streams observed by the spacecraft to date,

When the indirect coupling between f-electrons on differrent sites is not strong enough to yield the ordering of electronic spins, the ordering of nuclear spins takes

In the con- text of the problem of source localization, one can see three contributions: (1) propose new efficient algorithms/estimators [9], (2) study the estimation

The visualized results are (a) com- ponent planes, (b) U-matrix labeled with geology (B: Brussel sands, S: St.. Peeters et al. Title Page Abstract Introduction Conclusions

To solve these problems and test the hypothesis of stress- induced reprogramming of tRNA copy numbers, we de- veloped a comprehensive method for quantifying changes in the levels of

I include both externally visible attributes of differentiation and internal areas of difference commonly associated with different ethnicity, and evaluate their association

Title Page Abstract Introduction Conclusions References Tables Figures J I J I Back Close Full Screen / Esc.. Print Version