HAL Id: jpa-00246784
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00246784
Submitted on 1 Jan 1993
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Vitreous B2O3 : a geometrical study
J. de Miranda-Neto, Fernando Moraes
To cite this version:
J. de Miranda-Neto, Fernando Moraes. Vitreous B2O3 : a geometrical study. Journal de Physique I,
EDP Sciences, 1993, 3 (5), pp.1119-1130. �10.1051/jp1:1993260�. �jpa-00246784�
Classification
Physics
Abstracts61.40D 64.60C 02.40
Vitreous B~O~
: ageometrical study
J. A. de Miranda-Neto and Femando Moraes
Departarnento de Fisica, UFPE, 50739 Recife, PE, Brazil
(Received18
September
1992, re»ised 22 December1992,accepted
15 January 1993)Abstract. Vitreous boron trioxide
(B~O~)
is an intrinsicnoncrystalline
material with planarequilateral triangles (BO~ triangles)
as structural units,presenting
an overall two-dimensionalcharacter, a solid-like membrane structure. The local structural similarities between that glass and the
negatively
curved Bethe lattice motivated us to build an ideal model for vitreous B~O~,propagating
its local order on a surface of constantnegative
Gaussian curvature (thehyperbolic plane H~) and
using
non-Euclidean hierarchical lattices as structural substrates. Basedon the metric and symmetry
properties
of such lattices, we make an analyticalinvestigation
of thestructure of the ideal glass model. This way, we obtain the
peaks
of thegeometrical
radialdistribution function for the ideal
glass
structure, which are ingood
agreement with experimental data and theoretical studies for vitreous B~O~. Those facts suggest the evidence of non-Euclidean local order for thatamorphous
solid,indicating
the arrangement ofplanar triangular
units on anegatively
curved surface,forming
few orno six-membered (boroxol) rings.
1. Introduction.
Boron trioxide
(B~O~)
may be called an « ideal »glass-former,
since it presents a remarkabletendency
tovitrify. B~O~ glass
neverrecrystallises
beforemelting
onheating
and vitrifies from the melt even at very low rates ofcooling.
As this inherentglass forming
feature and otherimportant physical properties
may be associated with structuraldetails,
thestudy
of the structure of that material assumes a veryimportant
role in theunderstanding
of its variousproperties.
Two basic types of structural models, which are inconsistent with each
other,
have beenproposed
up to nowgenerating
an intense debate and considerableuncertainty
on the structure of thisamorphous
material. Thegenerally accepted
model for the structure of vitreousB~O~
is a network with aplanar equilateral BO~ triangle
as the basic structural unit(Fig. la)
;the threefold coordination of boron and the two-dimensional character of that
triangular
structural unit arefirmly
evidencedby
NMRexperiments Ill.
On the otherhand,
it haslong
beenthought
that there may be a certain fraction of alarger
unit in the form of a six-memberedring,
the so-called boroxolring B~O~, consisting
of threetriangular BO~
units(Fig. lb).
In the literature one finds a consensus about the existence ofplanar equilateral BO~ triangles,
but there is no consensus about thenecessity
ofintroducing
boroxolrings
and in what fractionthey
(a)
(b)
Fig.
I. Possible structural units ofglassy B203.
(a) PlanarB03 triangle
(b) Planar B~O~ boroxolring.
The open circles represent boron atoms and the filled circles, oxygen atoms.would be present.
Krogh-Moe [2]
in an earlier article hasproposed
that the structure of theglass
consistssolely
ofrandomly
connected boroxolrings,
Mozzi and Warren[3] performed X-ray
diffractionexperiments
andinterpreted
their results asbeing
in accordance with aglass
composed basically by
boroxolrings.
Guha and Walrafen[4] using
Raman spectroscopypostulated
that the structure of theglass
iscomprised
of anequal proportion
of boroxolrings
and isolated
BO~ triangles.
Johnson et al.[5, 6] performed
neutron diffractionexperiments
andsuggested
a mixture of six-membered boroxolrings
andsimple BO~ triangles
with a fraction of boron atoms in boroxolrings equal
to 0.6 ± 0.2[71.
Prabakar et al.[8 through
a NMRstudy
suggest that around 66 §b of boron atoms islikely
to be present in the boroxol units, the restbeing
present inBO~
units.Finally,
continuous random network(CRN)
models based in computer simulations[91
or in ball-and-stick models[10]
and moleculardynamics
calculations[11-14],
show that the structure of theglass
can beexplained by randomly
connectedBO~ triangles,
where no or almost no boroxolrings
are formed.Despite
thediversity
ofinterpretations
of variousexperimental
results and theoreticalmodels,
there are two well established facts about theB~O~ glass (a)
the presence ofplanar BO~ triangular
units with the O-B-O bondangle equal
to 120° and(b)
an overall two-dimensional character for theglass, making
it agood example
of a solid-like membrane[15].
In this work we infer some information on the structure of
B~O~ glass
from ageometrical study, propagating
its local order(planar equilateral triangle BO~)
on a surface of constantnegative
Gaussian curvature(the hyperbolic plane H~). Very recently,
surfaces ofnegative
Gaussian curvature have been used to
study graphitic
sheets[16, 17], analogue
forms ofC60 i18], amorphous
carbon[19],
surfaces and films[20]
; furthermore, non-Euclideanhyperbolic symmetries
wererecently
found inhexagonal
andcubic-close-packed crystals [21].
Use of non-Euclidean surfaces for the
study
of disordered(amorphous)
systems wasproposed
some years ago
by
Kldman and Sadoc[22]
since that seminal work, avariety
of frustrated solids(disordered syitems)
have been modelledby
ideal lattices in curved spaces and surfaces.Many
authors have used the space of constantpositive
Gaussian curvature(three-dimensional spherical
space5~)
tostudy
metallic[23-25]
and covalent[26, 27] glasses, liquid crystals (blue phases) [28-30], polymer packings [3 II, quasicrystals [32],
etc. Inspite
of the success of curvedcrystal approach [33],
models on spaces and surfaces of constantnegative
Gaussiancurvature have not received as much attention as those on
5~.
In part, thisneglect
could be due to the lack offamiliarity
withhyperbolic
geometry.Contrary
to whathappened
tospherical
models, only
a few authors haveexplored
the geometry ofnegatively
curved spaces andsurfaces to
analyse
disordered systems : Nelson[23, 34]
and Rubinstein and Nelson[35]
studied dense
packing
of hard discs and the statistical mechanics of denseliquids
onH~,
Kldman[36, 37]
and Kldman and Donnadieu[38],
studied defects onH~
andsuggested
structural
description
of covalentglasses
on spaces of constantnegative
curvature. Aninteresting
workusing
surfaces ofnegative
curvature is the article of Mosseri and Sadoc[39],
where
they pointed
out that the Bethe lattice[40] (an
infinite ramified networkcontaining
norings, widely
used in solid statephysics
and statisticalmechanics),
can berepresented
as aregular
lattice(a perfect crystal)
on thehyperbolic plane H~. Recently
we used that idea tostudy
the metric[41]
and the symmetry[42] properties
of the Bethe lattice and otherhierarchical structures on
H~.
In this paper weanalyse
the similarities between thosehierarchical lattices and the structure of
B~O~ glass
and draw structural information based on itsnegatively
curvedcrystal
counterpart.At this
point
we would like to call the attention of the reader to the fact that thenegatively
curved
crystallographic approach
for the Bethe latticepermits
its use in theinvestigation
of structuralproperties
ofamorphous
systems. InH~
that lattice has well defined bondangles
andlengths,
what makespossible
the definition of a metric(geodesic)
distance[41],
a conceptcompletely meaningless
in conventional uses of hierarchical lattices[43]. Obviously,
theordinary
Bethe lattice used in condensed matterphysics,
e-g-, in cluster-Bethe lattice models[44]
or in statistical mechanics[45],
is a poor model for the structure ofamorphous
solids[46].
In our earlier work
[41, 42],
in addition tointroducing
a metric distance, weinvestigated
the intrinsicsymmetries
of thehyperbolic
Bethelattice,
whichhelp finding
thespatial
localisation of each vertex of the structure. Those metric and symmetryproperties
are used in this work toexplore
an ideal infiniteregular
structure based on the Bethe lattice which contains the localsymmetries
ofB~O~ glass.
The model structure preserves the intrinsic stuctural aspects of theglass
andproduces
results ingood
agreement withexperimental
and theoretical data. In summary, we obtain information about the structuralproperties
of anamorphous
material(B~O~ glass), propagating
its local order on anegatively
curved surface(hyperbolic
Bethelattice
substrate), using hyperbolic
geometry as a mathematical tool,In part
II,
weanalyse
the metric and the symmetryproperties
of thenegatively
curved hierarchicallattices, connecting
thoseproperties
with the structural aspects ofglassy B~O~. Then,
we build an ideal model for thatglass
on such structures and compare ourtheoretical results with
experimental
data and with a continuous random network(CRN)
model.
Finally
in part III we discuss the results andpresent
our conclusions.2. Geometrical
investigation
of vitreousB20~.
As stated in the
introduction,
the boron trioxideglass
presentsplanar B03 triangles
with the O- B-O bondangle equal
to120°, arranged together
to form a solid-like membrane. In thissection,
we build an ideal model that preserves the structuralrequirements
cited above andpermits
ananalytical investigation
thatpoints
out some details of the structure of thatamorphous
solid. Our ideal model does not include boroxol and otherrings, providing,
in this first theoreticalapproximation,
atotally
open structurecontaining only BO~ triangles.
Thisideal situation
provides
ananalytical
tool for thestudy
of the local and intermediate order inglassy B~O~, fumishing
newinsights
on the structure of theglass.
Geometrically speaking,
we need a threefold coordinated two-dimensional lattice withangles
of 120° andpresenting
norings
but this ideal structure isexactly
thenegatively
curved Bethe lattice[39,
41,42].
In that sense, the Bethe lattice is aregular tiling
of a surface ofconstant
negative
curvature(the hyperbolic plane H~),
atotally
open two-dimensional structure where theangle
betweenadjacent edges
isprecisely
120°. This motivated us to model thestructure of
B20~ glass
on suchnegatively
curved ideal lattice,decorating
it with atoms,satisfying
therequirements
of coordination three for boron and two for oxygen. With the model thus constructed, we obtain theposition
of thepeaks
of the radial distribution function(the angular
average of thedensity-density
correlationfunction)
for that structure,using
the metric[41]
and the symmetry[42] properties
ofnegatively
curved hierarchical lattices. We compareour results with
experimental
data[5, 6]
and with a continuous random network model[10]
also without boroxol
rings.
Before
getting
into the details of the calculation wegive
aquick
review of the metric[4 Ii
and the symmetry[42] properties
of non-Euclidean hierarchicallattices, using
basic facts of the geometry of constantnegatively
curved surfaces(hyperbolic geometry).
Thehyperbolic
geometry is the geometry of the
hyperbolic
orLobachevsky plane H~ [47],
which cannot bewholly
embedded inordinary
three-dimensional Euclidean space[48]
and hence canonly
be visualisedthrough
suitableprojective
models. One such a model is a conformalmapping
of the wholehyperbolic plane
onto adisc,
the Poincarddisc,
which will be usedthroughout
thiswork. In the
projective
model ofPoincar6, H~
isrepresented by
a disc whoseboundary
isdenominated the Absolute. This
limiting
circle represents thepoints
ofH~
atinfinity
and theorthogonal
arcs to theAbsolute,
thegeodesics.
Whileangles
arepreserved
in thisrepresentation (conformal mapping),
distances are more and more deformed as one goes fromthe centre of the disc towards the
boundary.
The Bethe lattice[40]
appearsnaturally
inH~
asa limit case of its
tiling by regular polygons.
Inparticular,
the threefold coordinated Bethe lattice is atiling
ofH~ by regular apeirogons (polygons
of an infinite number ofedges),
three of them around each vertex
defining
the bondangles
as 120°. Infigure
2 we show the Poincard discrepresentation
of the threefold coordinatedhyperbolic
Bethe lattice and thestructure obtained
by joining
its midedges,
the Husimi cactus[49].
In thisrepresentation
thosestructures can have coordinates
assigned
to their vertices and distances can thus be measuredwith the
help
of non-Euclideanhyperbolic
geometry ; thespatial
localisation of the vertices(atoms)
and the calculation of the distances amongthem,
will be necessary in thecomparison
with
experimental
and theoretical radial distribution functions forB~03 glass.
In thefollowing
we will show how to calculate the coordinates of each vertex
(atom)
in thenegatively
curved Bethe lattice and in the Husimi cactus, and also show how to measure the distances between agiven
vertex and another one taken as theorigin,
for both structures.We use
barycentric
coordinates[50]
on theprojective plane.
This coordinate systemrequires
the use of a
triangle
of reference on whose vertices we put «masses» to, ti and t~.Fixing
the vertices of thattriangle,
anypoint
of theprojective plane
can be describedby
aset
(to,
ti,t~).
The Absolute isrepresented
on theprojective plane by
a conic(a quadratic
a) b)
Fig.
2.Negatively
curved hierarchical lattices conforrnally represented in the Poincard disc model. (a) The threefold coordinated Bethe lattice and (b) itscorresponding
Husimi cactus.equation
of thecoordinates).
Forsimplicity,
we take Q= xo xi + xi x~ + xo x~ =
0.
Choosing
an
equilateral triangle
of reference with the coordinates(1, 0,
0), (0, 1,
0 and(0, 0,
for its vertices, thatexpression
represents acircle,
theboundary
of the Poincar6 disc. Pointssatisfying xoxi+xix~+xox~~0
are inside the disc and hence representpoints
ofH~,
In this coordinate system the vertices of the threefold coordinated Bethe lattice and its associated Husimi cactus are
given by
solutions ofdiophantine equations [41].
The vertices of the threefoldnegatively
curved Bethe lattice aregiven by
the oddintegral
solutions ofxo xi + xi x~ + xox~ =
3, (1)
and the vertices of its associated Husimi cactus are
given by
theintegral
solutions of' xo xi + xi x~ + xo x~ =
(2)
The rotational and translational
symmetries
of suchnegatively
curved hierarchical lattices[42]
are in this coordinate systemgiven respectively by
the transformationsS1 (X0, Xl,
X2)
~(Xl,
Xi,X0) (3)
and
T
(xo,
xi, x~)
-(2
xo + xi, xo, 2 xo +x~)
,
(4)
which leave
equations (I)
and(2)
invariant.Expressing (xo,
xi,x~)
as a column vector, we find that S and T assume the matrix forms0
0S
=
0 0
(5)
0 0
and
12
0T
= 0 0
(6)
2 0
The matrices S and T suffice to generate the coordinates of all the vertices of both
negatively
curved hierarchical
lattices; they actually
form a discrete group withpresentation
(S,
T ;S~, (TS)~) (notice
that S~=
(TS)~
= l
),
the so-called modular group[51].
The vertices of both lattices are obtainedby
successiveapplications
of the matrices S and T to astarting point
in a hierarchical waygiven by
thealgorithm [42]
TS~ X~ TX~
~~~
followed
by
iteration.X~
represents all the 2~~ ~lpoints
of agiven generation
n of vertices.Each new
generation
ofpoints
is obtainedhierarchically by application
ofoperators TS~
and T to allpoints
of theprevious generation.
Thestarting points
are I, I, I)
for the Bethe lattice(the
centre of the Poincarddisc)
and(1,
0,1)
for the Husimi cactus. This process generatesonly
one of the branches of either lattice, the order two branches can be obtainedapplying
the rotational operators S and S~ to thepoints generated
above.With the coordinates of the vertices of the
negatively
curved Bethe lattice and Husimi cactus, thegeodesic
distances betweenpairs
of vertices on those structures can be obtained from theexpressions
derived in reference[41].
The
geodesic
distance d between twogeneric points (xo,
xi,x~)
and~yo,yi,y~)
inH~
is found to bed
= k~ arc cash ~0 ~Yl + Y2 + Xl~Y0 +
Y2)
+ X2~Y0 + yi)
~
~~~~
~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~° ~2~~°
Yl ~ Yl Y2 + Y0 Y2~~~
The real constant k, related to the Gaussian curvature K
by
k= , K, sets the unit
length
inH~.
In thefollowing,
we detail theexpressions
of distances betweengiven
vertices on bothhierarchical structures these compact
expressions
will be useful in theexplicit
calculation of thepeak positions
of thepartial
radial distribution functionsB-B,
O-O and B-O for the idealB20~
model.The
geodesic
distance between ageneric
vertex(xo,
xi,x~)
and the latticepoint (I,
I, I),
in the Bethelattice,
is thenXo + Xi + X~
d
=
k~ arc cosh ;
(9)
3
(where
the x~ are relatedby Eq. (I))
on the otherhand,
thegeodesic
distance between ageneric
vertex
(xo,
xi,x~)
and the latticepoint (1, 0, 1),
in the Husimi cactus, isxo + 2 xi + xi
~ ~ ~~~ ~°~~
2 ~~~~
(here
the x~ are relatedby Eq. (2)).
The distance between the
point (1, 1,
of the Bethelattice,
theorigin
of the Poincarddisc,
and a
generic
vertex(xo,
xi,x~)
of the Husimi cactus is found to belxo
+ xi + x~
d
=
k~ arc Cosh
~
3 ;(l1)
the distances calculated above in
expression (11)
can also be obtainedby
lxo
+ 2 xi+ x~
d
= k~ arc COSh
~
,(12)
2 3
where d represents the distance between the
point (1, 0,
of the Husimi cactus and ageneric
vertex
(xo,
xi,x~)
of the Bethe lattice. Since in both lattices all the vertices areequivalent,
instead of
measuring
distances between twogeneric
vertices weconveniently
choose agiven
vertex as the
origin
and measure the distances to it. Thus the choice(I, I,
I for the Bethelattice and
(1, 0, 1)
for the Husimi cactus.The calculation of coordinates and distances on both
negatively
curved hierarchical lattices and the local structural similarities between theglass
and thehyperbolic
Bethe lattice, motivated us to model the structure of theglass
on theoverlap
of the threefold coordinated Bethe lattice and its associated cactusalong
the lines set forwardby
K16man and Sadoc[22].
As shown in
figure 3,
we put boron atoms on the vertices of the threefold coordinated Bethe lattice and the oxygen atoms on the vertices of the cactus, the chemical bondsbeing
thegeodesic
segments of the Bethe lattice. This satisfies therequirements
of coordination three forboron and two for oxygen,
propagating BO~ triangles
with O-B-Oangles
of 120° in at
, t
'
,
',,
,' 1'
la) 16)
Fig.
3. (a) Structural ideal modelproposed
for vitreousB203
in thehyperbolic plane
H~ (conforrnalprojection
in the Poincard disc), the continuous lines represent the Bethe lattice and the dashed lines, the Husimi cactus (b) Finite portion of thehyperbolic
plane H~isometrically
immersed in R~,containing
apiece of the ideal B203 model. The open circles represent boron atoms and the filled circles, oxygen
atoms.
negatively
curved surface. Thespatial
localisation of boron and oxygen atoms is doneusing
the
algorithm (7) applied respectively
to thestarting points (I,
I,I)
and(1, 0, 1).
Thisdevelopment permits
the calculus of thepeak positions
of thepartial
radial distribution functions for atoms of agiven
type in ananalytical
form B-Bpair
functions can becomputed by equation (9);
O-Oby equation (10)
andfinally
B-Opair
functions with thehelp
ofequation (I I)
or(12).
In
figures
4 and 5 one can see that the calculatedpeak positions
for ournegatively
curvedmodel for the
B~O~ glass
is ingood
agreement with the continuous random network modelproposed by
reference[10]
(which also does not include any boroxolring)
and with theexperimental
radial distribution function(neutron
diffractionscattering)
obtainedby
references[5]
and[6].
Weemphasise
that there are noadjustable
parameters in ournegatively
curvedBethe lattice ideal model for this
glass
the constant k was obtainedusing
theexperimental
value
d=1.363Ji [6]
for the first distance B-O and the distance between thepoints
(I, I,
I)
and(1, 0, 1),
kd= In
/,
from eitherequation (11)
or
(12).
3. Discussion and conclusions.
In this paper we constructed an ideal
crystalline
model forB20~ glass
based in anegatively
curved Bethe lattice that shares structural similarities with that
amorphous
solid. Wepropagated
the local structural unit of theglass (the B03 triangles), decorating
the vertices ofnegatively
curved hierarchical lattices with atoms of boron and oxygen. Thepeaks
of thepartial
radial distribution function wereanalytically
obtained for this modelperforming
the calculation with thehelp
of the metric andsymmetry properties
of the substrate lattices of the idealglass
structure. We would like toemphasize
that we make ananalytical study
of theglass
structure
through
an orderedcrystal counterpart,
contrary to other theoreticalanalysis,
where the ideal model is also disordered ; the curvature of the idealcrystal
may be associated with theglass
intrinsic frustration.B-B O-o
as as
~ o.5 ~ o.5
$ ~
r r
a) b)
1.o
B-o
$o,5/s
~
r
C)
Fig.
4, Partial radial distribution functions for (a) B-B correlations (b) O-O correlations and (c) B-O correlations. The continuous curves represent the partial RDF calculated in reference [10] (continuous random network model) and the vertical lines indicate the peakpositions
for our geometric model for vitreous B~O~,One
important advantage
ofsimulating
the structure ofglassy B~O~ by
means of thenegatively
curved Bethe lattice model is that thepartial
radial distribution functions(RDF) peaks
for atoms of agiven
type may beindividually computed (in
ananalytical form), providing
a way ofidentifying
theorigin
of theexperimental peaks,
I,e., whether agiven peak
comes from
B-B,
B-O or O-O correlations(Fig. 5),
which cannot otherwise be done for asingle
diffractionexperiment,
Thepeak positions exactly
calculatedby
our model result to be ingood
agreement with neutron diffractionexperiments
for theglass
and with a theoreticalcontinuous random network model
containing
no boroxolrings.
At thispoint
we call theattention of the reader to
figure
4a : notice that there is a visible difference between theposition
of the first B-B
peak
calculated from ourgeometrical
model and the theoretical CRNcalculation
[10].
On the other hand, the first B-Bpeak position computed by
our model agrees with theexperimental
neutron correlation function[5], corresponding
to the thirdpeak
shown infigure
5. These factssupport
ourgeometrical computation.
.o
~0.8
jf
a B-Bo o-o
C a B-o
~ 0.6
~
~~G
ji
DA~
/s0.2
~ , o oo . o
~~/
o-o
r
(angstroms)
Fig. 5.
Experimental
neutron correlation function for vitreous B~O~ from reference [6] (continuous curve) and the calculatedpeak positions
(vertical lines) for our geometricnegatively
curved model.Despite
a theorem due to Hilbert[48],
which states that acomplete
two-dimensionalRiemannian manifold of constant
negative
curvature cannot beisometrically
immersed inthree-dimensional Euclidean space, we are allowed to compare our
negatively
curved model results with three-dimensional realexperiments
and theoretical models built in real space :Cartan
[52]
showed that a n-dimensionalhyperbolic
form(I.e.,
a finiteportion
of thehyperbolic
n-dimensionalspace)
can beisometrically
immersed in a(2
n I)-dimensional
Euclidean space. In our case n=
2 and a finite
portion
ofH~
can be
isometrically
immersed inM~, the three-dimensional Euclidean space.
Then,
this finiteportion
ofH~
appearsas a
wrinkled surface in M~
(Fig. 3b), reinforcing
the relation between curvature(negatively
curved idealmodel)
and frustration. Notice that as the local order detected in radial distributionfunctions
(experiments
of neutron diffraction andX-ray scattering)
varies in the range 6-8Ji
[3, 5],
then we needjust
a finiteportion
ofH~
to make thecomparison
in addition suchportion
isperfectly (isometrically)
immersed in M~. The reader may argue that instead ofmeasuring
interatomicgeodesic
distances on the immersedportion
ofH~
we should calculate
the Euclidean 3D distances after the immersion
(with
the shortest chordsconnecting
theatoms).
That is correct.Unfortunately,
the immersed surface isonly
one-time differentiable[53],
what forbids itsdescription
in terms ofanalytical
functions. That makes the identification of the 3D coordinates of the atoms andconsequently
thecomputation
of distances among thema very
complicated
matter. On the otherhand,
since the RDF of aglass
involvesonly
the firstfew shells of atoms and since
H~
islocally
Euclidean, the distances as measured inH~
will not be much distorted incomparison
to the Euclidean ones consider forexample
ageodesic
segment oflength
d inH~
; after the
immersion,
the curvature I/R of this segment in M~is,
in eachpoint,
less orequal
than the maximum of the twoprincipal
curvatures of the immersed surface[53],
which are nolonger
constant. In the worst case, the distance d between the extremities of the segment will be thelength
of an arc of circle of radius R. In this case thecorresponding
3D distance is 2 R sin ~,
where d ~ 2 arR and R m The error in
taking
2 R k
the
hyperbolic
distance instead of the 3D one is then less than d-2R sin£
=
~3 ~5
~ + O
~ Since the relevant distances for
comparison
with theexperiment
are at most24 R R
of order 2/k 5
h
our
approach
isjustified.
The agreement between our model and theoretical and
experimental
datagives
the evidence of anegatively
curved local order for theglass, similarly
to what wassuggested recently
in theliterature for various carbon forms
[16-19], implying
non-Euclidean localsymmetries
in theglass,
a feature alsorecently
detected in Euclideancrystals [21]
and inamphiphile
films[20].
Also, molecular
dynamics
studies for vitreousB20~ [1Ii
suggest that steric forces causeadjacent BO~ triangles
to be twisted with respect to each other,excluding
the formation of boroxolrings having
thepreference
to be not in the sameplane, inducing
the connection between curvature and frustration. We would like to stress that even notincluding
any kind ofrings,
our ideal model presentsgood
agreement withexperimental
data of the realglass
structure and with a continuous random network
(CRN) containing
no boroxolrings [10].
Such facts support thehypothesis
of a networkcontaining
a greatquantity
ofB03 triangular
units andperhaps
a low fraction of boroxol and otherlarger rings [9-14].
Boroxolrings
have beensuggested
asresponsible
for the anomalous Raman spectrum of vitreousB203 154],
however,as Williams and Elliott
[55]
havepointed
out, this connection is not conclusive.A refinement of this ideal model may be obtained
by
the introduction of defects associated tothe intrinsic
hyperbolic symmetries (disclinations [38, 56]
and disvections[38]),
Thisprocedure
on thenegatively
curved Bethelattice,
besidesproviding
a way ofadding dangling
bonds and
rings,
mayprovide
also additional disorder to the network,Thus, glassy
boron trioxide can be seen as an overall two-dimensional network ofBO~ triangles,
connectedtogether, exhibiting
a certaintopological ordering;
an open and lowdensity
structure,presenting negatively
curvedhyperbolic
domains,interrupted by
defect-rich tissue that maycontain
dangling bonds,
boroxolrings,
etc. Further refinement of the model could be obtainedby using
theprocedure
devisedby
Sadoc and Rivier[57, 58]
to decurve a curvedcrystal
whileintroducing
disorder in a hierarchical way. Thisprocedure
has been used to obtain bothpartial
RDF and structure factors for a metallic
glass [59].
The local geometry is
primarily responsible
for the character of manyphysical properties
ofa solid
[46].
Thestudy
of electronic and acousticproperties
for the idealnegatively
curvedmodel, through
a group theoreticalapproach,
inanalogy
to whathappened
in well known idealspherical crystals [60],
would revealphysical properties
reminiscent of the realamorphous
solid, We leave to aforthcoming publication [61]
astudy
of suchphysical properties.
We finaliseby remarking
that our model onH~
does not resolve theuncertainty
on the structure ofB~03 glass.
Itdoes, however,
contribute with some new ideas to thecontroversy.
Acknowledgements.
We are very much indebted to the referees and to Dr. S.
Levy (Department
of Math.-U. C.Berkeley)
forhelpful
comments andsuggestions.
We also thankCNPq
and FINEP for financial support and Drs. Adrian C.Wright
andRoger
N. Sinclair forkindly supplying
their numericalneutron diffraction data.
References
[Ii SILVER A. H. and BRAY P. J., J.
Phys.
Chem. 29(1958j
984.[2] KROGH-MOE J., Phys. Chem. Glasses 6 (1965) 46.
[3] Mozzi R. L. and WARREN B. E., J.
Appl.
Cryst. 3 (1970j 251.[4] GUHA S. and WALRAFEN G. E., .I. Chem. Phys 80 (1984) 3807.
[5] JOHNSON P. A, V., WRIGHT A, C. and SINCLAIR R. N., J.
Non-Cryst.
Solids 50 (1982) 281, [6] SINCLAIR R. N., ERWIN DESA J. A., ETHERINGTON G,, JOHNSON P. A. V, and WRIGHT A, C., J.Non-Cryst. Solids 42 (1980) 107.
[7] Notice that this number does not give a fracIion of boroxol rings in B~O~, but gives the fraction of boron atoms in boroxol rings for example, if that fraction is 0,75 it means that there is
an equal number of boroxol rings and triangular units in the glass.
[8] PRABAKAR S., RAG K. J. and RAG C. N, R., F. R, S., Proc R, Sac. Land. A 429 (1991) 1, [9] ELLtOTT S. R., Pllilos. Mag, B 37 (1978) 435.
[10] WILLtAMS S. J. and ELLtOTT S. R.. Proc. R. Sac. Land. A 380 (1982) 427.
[I I] SOPPE W, and DEN HARTOG H. W., J.
Phys.
C 21 (1988) L 689.[12] SOPPE W,. VAN DER MAREL C., VAN GUNSTEREN W. F, and DEN HARTOG H. W., J.
Non-Cryst.
Solids 103 (1988) 201.
[13] SouLEs T, F., J Chem,
Phys.
73 (1980) 4032.[14] AMINI M., MITRA S. K. and HOCKNEY R. W., J. Phys. C14 (1981) 3689.
[15] NELSON D. R., in Statistical Mechanics of Membranes and Surfaces, D. Nelson, T. Piran and S. Weinberg Eds, (World Scientific, Teaneck, NJ, 1989).
[16] MACKAY A. L. and TERRONES H., Nature 352 (1991) 762, [17] LENOSKY T. et al., Nature 355 (1992) 333.
[18] VANDERBILT D. and TERSOFF J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 511 SCUSERIA G. E., Chem, Phys. Lett. 195 (1992) 534.
[19] TOWNSEND S. J., LENOSKY T. J., MULLER D. A., NicHoLs C. S. and ELSER V., Phys. Rev, Lett. 69 (1992) 921.
[20] SADOC J. F, and CHARVOLIN J., J. Phys. France Colloq. 51-C7 (1990) 319.
[21] JANNER A,, Phys. Rev. Lent. 67 (1991) 2159.
[22] KLtMAN M, and SADOC J, F., J. Phys. France Lett. 40 (1979) L-596.
[23] NELSON D, R,, Pllys, Rev. B 28 (1983) 5515.
[24] NELSON D, R, and WIDOM M., Nucl. Phys. B 240 (1984) 113, [25] SACHDEV S. and NELSON D. R., Phys. Rev. B 32 (1985) 1480.
[26] DI VINCENzO D. P., Phys. Rev. B 37 (1988) 1245 and references therein.
[27] MossERi R. et al,, Phys. Rev. B 32 (1985) 3974.
[28] SETHNA J, P., WRIGHT D. C. and MERMIN N. D., Phys, Ret,. Lett. 51(1983) 467.
[29] SETHNA J. P,, Phys. Rev. Lent. 51(1983) 2198.
[30] SETHNA J, P,,
Phys.
Rev. B 51 (1985) 6278.[31] KLtMAN M,, J. Pllys. France Lett. 46 (1985) L-723,
[32] SADOC J. F, and MossERi R., J. Pllys. France 51(1991) 205,
[33] For a recent review see KLtMAN M., Adv, Phys. 38 (1989) 605,
[341 NELSON D. R., in Topological Disorder in Condensed Matter, F. Yonezana and T,
Ninomiya
Eds,(Springer,
Berlin, 1983).[35] RUBtNSTEIN M. and NELSON D. R., Pllys. Rev. B 28 (1983) 6377.
[36] KLtMAN M., J. Pllys. France 43 (1982) 1389, [37] KLtMAN M., J. Ph»s. France Lett. 44 (1983) L-295.
[38] KLtMAN M. and DONNADIEU P., Pllilos.
Mag,
B 52 (1985) 121.[39] MossERi R. and SADOC J. F,, J. Pllys. France Lett. 43 (1982) L-249.
[40] ZALLEN R., The Physics of Amorphous Solids (John
Wiley
& Sons, New York, 1983).[41] DE MtRANDA-NETO J, A. and MORAES F., J. Pllys. I France 2 (1992) 1657.
[42] DE MIRANDA-NETO J, A. and MORAES F.. I Phys I Fiafi(.e 3 (1993) 29.
[43]
THORPE M. F., in Excitations in DisorderedSystems,
NATO ASI Series, Vol. B 78 (Plenum Press, New York, 1982) and references therein.[44] JoANNoPouLos J, D. and YNDURAIN F,,
Pllys.
Rev. 812 (1974) 5164.[45] BAXTER R, J.,
Exactly
Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics(Academic
Press, London, 1982), [46] LAUGHLIN R. B, and JoANNoPouLos J. D., Phys. Rev. B 16 (1977) 2942,[47] COXETER H, S. M,, Non-Euclidean Geometry (Univ. of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1947), [481 HILBERT D., Trans. Amer. Math. Sac. 2 (1901) 87.
[491 RIDDELL R, J. and UHLEMBECK G, E., J. Chem.
Phys.
21(1953) 2056.[501 COXETER H. S. M., Introduction to
Geometry
(JohnWiley
& Sons, Inc., New York, 1961).[sll MAGNUS W., Non-Euclidean Tessellations and their
Groups
(Academic, New York, 1974).[521 CARTAN E., Bull. Sac. Math. France 47 (1919) 125 ; CARTAN E., ibid. 48 (1920) 132.
[531 LEVY S.,
private
communication.[54] GALEENER F. L., « The Structure of
Non-Crystalline
Materials », Gaskell P. H., Parker J. M. and Davis E. A. Ed.(Taylor
and Francis, London,1982)
p. 337GALEENER F. L. and THORPE M. F.,
Phys.
Rev. B 28 (1983) 5802.[55] WILLIAMS S. J. and ELLtOTT S. R., « The Structure of
Non-Crystalline
Materials », Gaskell P. H., Parker J. M. and Davis E. A. Ed. (Taylor and Francis, London, 1982) p. 407.[56] SADOC J. F. and MOSSERI R., J.
Phys.
France 46 (1985) 1809.[571 SADOC J. F. and RIVIER N., Philos. Mag. B 55 (1987) 537.
[58] RIVIER N. and SADOC J. F., J.
Non-Cryst.
Solids 106 (1988) 282.[591 SADOC J. F., RIVIER N. and MOSSERI R., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 106 (1988) 274.
[601 WIDOM M., Phys. Rev. B 31 (1985) 6456 WIDOM M., ibid. 34 (1986) 756.
[611 DE MIRANDA-NETO J, A. and MORAES F., to be