Assessing Stakeholder Salience
through the view of Lean
Enterprise Transformation
Gwendolyn Sisto
SM 2010 Aero-Astro
Thesis motivation
1. Desire to elucidate connections between stakeholder salience
and Enterprise Architecture (EA). Specifically with respect to transformations (ie dynamic view of the enterprise)
2. Significant for practitioners to carry-out successful transformation
• Second Principle of Lean Enterprise Thinking: Identify
relevant stakeholders and determine their value propositions (Nightingale 2009)
• Enterprises that are better at engaging the structural, and
cultural aspects are more successful at Lean value creation (Roth 2006)
Key Definitions
• Three Lenses(Carroll 2002)
• Stakeholder -" any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the organization's
objectives“ (Freeman 1984).
• Salience - “the degree to which managers give priority to competing stakeholder claims” (Mitchell 1995)
• Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency- (1) power to influence the firm, (2) legitimacy of relationship with the firm, and (3) the urgency of the stakeholder's claim on the firm (Mitchell 1995)
• Saliency is dynamic- stakeholder influence is dependent on life cycle stage(Jawahar 2001)
• Epochs and Era’s – context and time space (Rhodes, Ross, Nightingale 2009
• Corporate Social Responsibility
• Core Ideology (Collins ad Porras 1996)
• Institutional and Resource dependency (Oliver 1991)
• Network versus dyadic behavior of stakeholders (Rowley 1997)
Literature Review
Research Question Relevant Body of work Rationale
How do the most salient enterprise stakeholders affect the Enterprise’s
Architecture (EA)? LAI Research Provides EA framework Enterprise thinking and
industry challenges Context for research motivations
Stakeholder Theory Provides stakeholder framework Enterprise Core Ideology Connects EA and Stakeholders
How do these stakeholder relationships
change as the enterprise transforms? Stakeholder Theory Provides stakeholder framework Stakeholder behavior and
decision making
Provides theory for Stakeholder relationships
Stakeholders and Corporate Social Responsibility
Connects stakeholder dynamics to enterprise dynamics
Enterprise Core Ideology
Connects stakeholder dynamics to enterprise dynamics
Policy / External Factors
Policy / External Factors
Process Process Organization Organization Knowledge Knowledge Strategy Strategy Products / A Services Products / Services Information Technology Information Technology
August 2009 February 2009 April 2008 Operations begin
Risto website fully operational B2B operations begin Full production of Risto model January 2010
Epoch 1 Epoch 2 Epoch 3 Epoch 4
Method
Complete a Case study on fast clock speed enterprise- Risto Sports-- using the EA framework
• Determine stakeholders and values using EA & ESAT to determine affect on architecture
• Map stakeholder in EA views over enterprise epochs
• Assess saliency with Normalized Stakeholder Saliency Index (NSSI) (Grossi 2003)
• Assess Network effects • Design future state EA
• Interview Stakeholders to assess validity, reliability of Future EA
Enterprise Background
Risto Goals and Core Values
Strategic goals :1. Grow market share 2. Gain Legitimacy 3. Grow profitability
Core Values:
1. Stronger:Promote and serve strength sports
2.Greener: Sustainable, socially
responsible products and services 3. Leaner: Aspire to be a Lean
Thinking Enterprise
4. Better: Highest quality and exceptional value
Background- Growth Strategy
Potential customers Customers Adoption Rate Word of Mouth Ease of ordering Cool Factor Marketing Distributor sites hits Risto Website hitsSales profit Order fullfillment costs + -+ Price Relative to competitors -Price + + + Website/process improvements R&D/investment dollars + + + Value relative to competitors Fashion Trends -Style improvements -+ + Website hits Search engine referencing + + Unique offerings People using free weights Potential customer conversion rate Knowledge of weightlifting shoes + + + + Unique searches + + + Satisfied customers + + Brand Legitimacy+ + + + + Institutional Affiliations + Sponsorships + + + returns production costs + + -+ +
Cool Factor Loop
W.O.M. Loop
Background-Stakeholders
Stakeholder Network model, January 2010
USAW Distributors Distributor 1 Leadership Customers Industrial Engineer Colombian Business Bureau US Customs Domestic Shipper IT Contractor Competitors US manufacturing policymakers B2B customers Credit/ banking Instituti ons Artisans Gym Affiliate Strategy View
Policy View Information View Knowledge View Leadership Customers B2B Customers Industrial Engineer Artisans Distributor 1 Distributors USAW Colombian Business Bureau US manufacturing Policymakers Colombian Business Bureau Banking Institutions Artisans Customers Leadership Gym Affiliate Leadership IT contractor Customers Industrial Engineer Artisans Distributor 1 Distributors Leadership Industrial Engineer Artisans B2B Customers Customers Distributors Distributor 1 IT Contractor Colombian Business Bureau
Process View Organization View Product View Services View Leadership Industrial Engineer Customers Distributors Distributor 1 B2B customers IT Contractor USAW Leadership Customers B2B Customers Industrial Engineer Distributors Distributor 1 Gym Affiliate Industrial engineer Distributors Customers B2B Customers Competitors USAW Artisans Leadership Customers Gym affiliate
Part I
- Epochs & Evolution
August 2009 February 2009 April 2008 Operations beginRisto website fully operational B2B operations begin Full production of Risto model January 2010
Core
Core
Ideology
Ideology
Enterprise Architecture
Enterprise Architecture
Stakeholders
Capabilities
Part I- EA Space
& Stakeholders
Core
Core
Ideology
Ideology
Business model
Business model
Stakeholders
Saliency
Part I- Business Strategy Space
& Stakeholders
Core
Core
Ideology
Ideology
Stakeholders
Business Model
Business Model
Enterprise Architecture
Enterprise Architecture
Epoch (t)
Epoch (t)
Part I- Time Dependency
& Constant Inputs
Normalized Stakeholder Salience with Enterprise Epoch 1 2 3 4 N S S I 100 50
Stakeholder Strategy IT Knowledge Product Policy Process Org Service Strategy IT Knowledge Product Policy Process Org Service
USAW 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Low End 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 High end 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 0 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 B2B customers 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 Distributors 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Distributor 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 2 2 0 IT Contractor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Artisans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 0 Industrial Engineer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 Leadership 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 CB Bureau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Gym Affiliate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OEM 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stakeholder Strategy IT Knowledge Product Policy Process Org Service Strategy IT Knowledge Product Policy Process Org Service
USAW 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Low End 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 High end 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 B2B customers 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 2 2 0 1 1 0 Distributors 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Distributor 1 2 1 1 0 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 0 1 2 2 0 IT Contractor 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 Artisans 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 0 Industrial Engineer 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 Leadership 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 CB Bureau 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 Gym Affiliate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 OEM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Epoch 3 Epoch 4 Epoch 1 Epoch 2
Results & Analysis
View prescence
None=0 Moderate=1Strong=2
1 2 3 4 5
Enterprise State
USAW Low End
High end B2B customers
Distributors Distributor 1
IT Contractor Artisans
Industrial Engineer Leadership
COL Business Bureau Gym Affiliate
Part 1- Conclusions
Core mission and purpose will drive results
Stakeholders must meet your needs dependent on the Epoch
dependent on Epoch context
• Stakeholders trade value with respect to business model
Stakeholders add capabilities to your enterprise (EA)
dependent on Epoch context
• Salient stakeholders permeate each view
Most salient stakeholders are ones that your architecture &
Strategy is inextricably dependent
Part II- Network Effects
Examine how stakeholders linked to each
other, resource dependency and institutional
power, how relationships evolve with EA &
business model
Per Part 1, define Core and Extended
Enterprise on stakeholder saliency
USAW Distributors Distributor 1 Leadership Customers Industrial Engineer Colombian Business Bureau US Customs Domestic Shipper IT Contractor Competitors US manufacturing policymakers B2B customers Credit/ banking Instituti ons Artisans Gym Affiliate
Epoch 4
USAW Distributors Distributor 1 Leadership Customers Industrial Engineer Colombian Business Bureau IT Contractor B2B customers Artisans Gym Affiliate Extended enterprise Core Enterprise
Epoch 4
Epoch 3
USAW Distributors Distributor 1 Leadership Customers Industrial Engineer Colombian Business Bureau IT Contractor B2B customers ArtisansEpoch 2
USAW Distributors Distributor 1 Leadership Customers Industrial Engineer Colombian Business Bureau B2B customers ArtisansUSAW Leadership Customers Industrial Engineer B2B Customers
Epoch 1
Insights on Network
• Most salient stakeholders are Core enterprise
• Extended enterprise comprised of less salient
stakeholders, saw most delta in NSSI across states
• Core stakeholders high centrality
– Control decision making and information flow
– Control via resource dependency through cluster
linkages
• Most dense where learning and information flow
needed to occur quickly
– Harnessing customer W.O.M., or communicating with
shop
• Network appropriate for organization seeking
higher legitimacy & institutional power
Strategy View Grow market share Gain Legitimacy
Become more profitable
IT View
Centralize information flow and collection Fewer hand-offs and easier accessibility Enable feedbacks
Policy View
Return policies in sync with market Manufacture where Policy’s stable Process View
More codified
Assess process compliance and maturity
Organization View Improve reflection of Risto values in Distributor to consumer interactions Extract more value from Resource rich stakeholders
Knowledge View
More Efficient & standardized extractions and retention
Harness B2B, B2C knowledge
Products/Services View Standardize offerings
Agile and adaptable Sophistication
Part III- Value Delivery Gaps
Stakeholder Strategy IT Knowledge Product Policy Process Organization Service
USAW 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 Low End 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 High end 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 B2B 2 1 2 2 0 1 1 0 Distributors 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Distributor 1 2 1 1 0 1 2 2 0 IT 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 Artisans 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 0 IE 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 Leadership 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 COL BB 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 Gym Affiliate 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
Epoch 4 - B2B Operations Begin
EVSMA 1.0 - For LAI Member Use Only © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2005
Colombian Business Bureau
Mapping Future State Stakeholder Value Delivery
High Low High C u rr e n t P e rf o rm a n c e
Relative Importance to Enterprise
USAW Distributors Distributor 1 B2B Industrial engineer High End Customers Artisans Colombian Business Bureau Leadership Low End Customers Gym Affiliate Distributors B2B Leadership Low End Customers
Distributor 1 Gym Affiliate
USAW High End
Customers Artisans
Key:
Present State, EA State 4
Part IV- Accuracy of
Management’s perceptions
• Interviewed lowest and highest salience
stakeholders, perceptions of management
and other stakeholders
• Shows Risto Sports living-up to Core
Ideology
• Confirms Gap Analysis
• Reveals context
Part IV-Excerpts
Artisans
• Improved living
standards, work/ wage predictability
• Pride in sending products to USA
• Insensitive to deadlines • “Gringo from Miami”
“we have to ship shoes for the Gringo”
IE
• Able to buy a house
• Growth of product design • “quality is better than
China”.
• “always looking for new, better quality materials” • Checking on Artisans • Uses local materials
D1
• Doing Risto a “favor” • Not core market
USAW
• Need “10-15[companies like] Ristos”
• Can “contribute more” to Risto
COL BB
• USA is the “first commercial ally of Colombia”
• Conscious of China • Controlling of small
Conclusions
• Core enterprise stakeholders are most salient and present in each view, they define Core Ideology
• Extended enterprise stakeholders may not be salient in every view, tied to the enterprise by the values and capabilities they add
• EA and business Model determine the stakeholders endogenously • Core enterprise less affected by context/Epochs, only constant in the
Enterprise system is Core Ideology
• On Corp. Social Responsibility, the enterprise must possess core values that management truly believes-in and abides consistent with well being of society
• Benevolence IS possible, it all depends on how the enterprise constructs its values and relationships and defines externalities • Much of an enterprise’s work is “invisible work” (Daniels 1987),
employing human relationships in political and cultural context (Carroll 2002)