A NNALI DELLA
S CUOLA N ORMALE S UPERIORE DI P ISA Classe di Scienze
G EORGE N. G ALANIS
E FSTATHIOS E. V ASSILIOU
A Floquet-Liapunov theorem in Fréchet spaces
Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze 4
esérie, tome 27, n
o3-4 (1998), p. 427-436
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASNSP_1998_4_27_3-4_427_0>
© Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 1998, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze » (http://www.sns.it/it/edizioni/riviste/annaliscienze/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale.
Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
427
A Floquet-Liapunov
Theoremin Fréchet Spaces
GEORGE N. GALANIS - EFSTATHIOS E. VASSILIOU
Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) Vol. XXVII (1998),
Abstract. Based on [4], we prove a variation of the theorem in title, for equations
with periodic coefficients, in Frechet spaces. The main result gives equivalent
conditions ensuring the reduction of such an equation to one with constant coeffi-
cient. In the particular case of Coo, we obtain the exact analogue of the classical theorem. Our approach essentially uses the fact that a Frechet space is the limit of a projective sequence of Banach spaces. This method can also be applied for a geometric interpretation of the same theorem within the context of total differential
equations in Frechet fiber bundles.
Mathematics Subject Classification (1991): 34C25, 34G 10 (primary), 53C05 (secondary).
Introduction
In
spite
of thegreat
progress in thestudy
oftopological
vector spaces andtheir rich structure, a
general solvability theory
of differentialequations
in thenon Banach case is still
missing.
This led many authors(see
e.g. R.S. Hamilton[5],
R. Lemmert[7]
and the survey article[2])
tostudy special
classes of differentialequations
where some types of solutions can be found. Also in this context, G. Galanis in[4], published
in thisjournal,
has studied a class of linear differentialequations
in a Frechet space F, which can bealways uniquely
solvedunder
given
initial conditions. Thekey
to thisapproach
is the fact that F canbe
though
of as the limit of aprojective
system of Banach spaces: F =limIEi .
4
As a matter of
fact,
this class consists of allequations
x =A(t)
x whosecoefficient A can be factored in the form
where A* :
[0, 1]
~H(F)
is a continuous map,H(F)
is the Frechetsubspace
of
containing
all the sequences which formprojective
sys-tems and E : -
,C (IF) :
Hlim fi .
+--Pervenuto alla Redazione il 14 luglio 1997.
Though
theCauchy problem
for linearequations,
asabove,
could be studied yetby
more advanced methods(referring
toequations
inlocally
convex spaces, cf. e.g.[2], [7]), [4] expounds
anelementary approach leading
to anexplicit description
of the solutions(apart
from their theoreticalexistence)
asprojective
limits of solutions in Banach spaces, where the
corresponding theory
isfairly complete.
A natural
question
that arises now is whether we canexploit
the sameapproach
to obtain a kind of aFloquet-Liapunov
theorem in the context ofFrechet spaces.
As it is well
known,
the classical theorem asserts that a differentialequation
x =
At) ’
x, withA(t)
aperiodic complex matrix,
canalways
be reduced to anequation
with constant coefficient(cf.
e.g.[1], [10], [16]).
Thekey
to thisreduction is the existence of the
logarithm
if (D is the fundamental solution of theequation
and r theperiod.
However,
this result is not true, ingeneral,
even in the case of Banachspaces, since the existence of such a
logarithm
is notalways
ensured. In thisrespect we refer to
[9]
and[12],
where the reader can also find some sufficientconditions for the
validity
of the result in this context.In the present paper, which is a natural
outgrowth
of[4],
we present a variation of the theorem in title. Moreprecisely,
in the first main result(The-
orem
2.3)
we obtainequivalent
conditionsimplying
the reduction of aperiodic equation
to one with constant coefficient. The basicidea,
in thisdirection,
isto consider a
generalized monodromy homomorphism
of theequation
athand,
in which the
pathological
groupGL(F) (fundamentally
involved in the classi-cal or Banach
case)
isreplaced by
anappropriate subgroup
ofH(F) fully
described in Section1,
since the classicalhomomorphism
is useless inour context.
For the sake of
completeness,
weapply
the main Theorem 2.3 also to thecase of C°. It is
worthy
to notethat, although
we still work in a Frechetspace, now the reduction under discussion
always
holds true. Therefore(see
Theorem3.2),
we obtain the exactanalogue
of the classicaltheory.
The results of this note can be also
profitably
used for ageneralization
of the
Floquet-Liapunov theory
within thegeometric
context of Frechet fiber bundles. In thelatter, ordinary
linearequations correspond
toequations
withtotal differentials
which,
in turn, areinterpreted
as flat connections.Hence,
thegeneralized analogue
of the main result leads to the reduction of a flat connection to one with "constant" coefficients on a trivialbundle,
as webriefly
discuss in Section 4.
1. - Preliminaries
Let F be a Frechet space. It is well known
(see
for instance[11])
that Fcan be identified with the limit of a
projective
system(Ei ; pjili,jEN
of Banach429 spaces, i.e. F -
limEi .
- Moreprecisely,
eachIEi
is thecompletion
of thenormed space
F/Ker(pi),
where are the seminorms of F and pji are the extensions of the naturalprojections
As
explained
in theIntroduction,
in order tostudy
linear differential equa- tions in a Frechet space F asabove,
we consider thefollowing
space:It can be
proved
thatH(IF)
- where each-
is a Banach space. Thus
H (IF)
is a Frechet space.Similarly,
we setThis is is a
topological
group, as the limit(within
anisomorphism)
of theprojective
system of the Banach-Lie groupsIn the
study
of differentialequations
theexponential mapping plays
a fun-damental role
(cf.
e.g.[3]). However,
in the case of a Frechet space F, anexponential
map of the form exp :£(F)
-~G L (IF) (in analogy
to the Banachcase)
cannot bedefined,
as a consequence of theincompleteness
of£(F)
andthe
pathological
structure ofGL(F).
Thisdifficulty
is overcomeby inducing
ageneralized exponential Exp : H (F)
-H°(F)
defined in thefollowing
way:If F -
limej,
we denoteby
expi : ---> theordinary exponential
-
mapping
of the Banach-Lie groupGL(Ei).
We check that the finiteproducts
form a
projective system,
thus we may defineUsing
now thedifferentiability
ofmappings
between Frechet spaces in thesense of J. Leslie
([8]),
theprevious
considerations lead to thefollowing
mainresult.
THEOREM l. l. Let IF be a Frechet space and the
(homogeneous)
linearequation
where the
coefficient
A : I= [0, 1]
~£(JF)
is continuousand factors
inthe form
A = s o
A*,
with A* : I ~H (F) being
a continuousmapping
and s :H (F)
~L (F) given by e ( ( fi ) )
=lim fi .
Then(1)
admits aunique
solutionfor
anygiven
initial condition.
The
complete study
ofequations
oftype ( 1 )
has beenalready given
in[4].
However,
since we need the exact form of thesolutions,
we outline the basicsteps
of theproof.
PROOF. Let
(to, xo)
x 1F be an initial condition.Considering
aprojective
system
[Ei;
of Banach spaces with IF we obtain theequation (on Ei):
where Ai
is theprojection
of A to the i -factor. SinceIEi
isBanach,
there existsa
unique solution fi
of(1.~) through (to, pi (xo)),
if pi : IF -IEi
denotes the canonicalprojection.
Forany j > i ,
we check that pji0 h
is also a solution of( 1. i )
with the same initialdata,
hencefi.
As aresult,
theC -mapping
f :
:=lim fi
- can be defined andyields
Therefore, f
is the desired solution of(1). Moreover, f
isunique
withrespect
to
(to, xo),
since for any othersolution g
we maycheck, using analogous techniques
asbefore, that pi
o g = pi of,
i E N. 0REMARKS. From the
preceding proof
it is clear that the methodapplied
therein
provides explicit
solutions ofequation (1). Moreover,
the present ap-proach, apart
frombeing elementary (in
contrast to moregeneral
methods known forequations
inarbitrary locally
convex spaces; cf.[2], [7]),
is very convenient for thegeometric generalization
discussed in Section 4.2. -
Floquet-Liapunov theory
In this section we consider
again
a differentialequation
of the form(1)
with a
periodic coefficient A, satisfying
A = s o A* as in Theorem 1.1. Withoutloss of
generality,
we may assume that theperiod
is 1.431 LEMMA 2. l . The
coefficient
A isperiodic if and only if
A* is.PROOF. The
periodicity
of A*clearly implies
that of A.Conversely, equality A (t
--~1 )
=A (t) implies
thatlim(Ai (t
+1 )) = lim(Ai (t)),
thuswhere pi : F -~
Ei
are the canonicalprojections. Taking
into account that anyelement of
Ei
is the limit of a sequence of elements ofF/ Ker(pi )
and IF isprojected
onto theprevious quotient (for
each ie N), (2)
results inAi (t -~-1 )
=Ai (t),
thusensuring
theperiodicity
of A*. DIn the
proof
of the main Theorem we shall also need thefollowing auxiliary
result
LEMMA 2.2
([4, Proposition 3 .1 ] ) . Let f
E£(F).
Thenf
=fi
E£(E, ),
---
if and only if, for
each i E N, there existsMi
> 0 such thatFrom Lemma
2.1,
it follows that each differentialequation
of type( 1. i )
hasperiodic
coefficient.Therefore,
thecorresponding monodromy homomorphisms ([1,6])
have the formwhere
4$I
is the fundamental solution(resolvant)
of(1.~).
Since the solutions of
(1)
are limits of solutions of theprojective system
ofequations ( 1.i ),
thefamily (a1(n))iEN,
for forms aprojective system.
Hence we can define thehomomorphism
The
previous homomorphism
is thekey
to ourapproach
asreplacing
the classicalmonodromy homomorphism
with values inGL(F).
Thelatter,
as is wellknown,
is useless in the Frechet framework since it does not admit even atopological
group structure. ’
We are now in a
position
to prove the first main result of this note.THEOREM 2.3
(Floquet-Liapunov).
Assume that thecoefficient
Aof (1)
isperiodic.
Thenthe following
conditions areequivalent:
(i) Equation (1)
reduces to an(equivalent) equation
by
meansof
aperiodic transformation
y =(s
oQ*) (t) .
x,for
some continuousQ* :
1R ~Ho (F).
_(ii)
There exists B EH (IF)
such thatExp(B )
=a#( 1 ).
(iii)
Themonodromy homomorphism a#
can be extended to ahomomorphism
F:R -
HO(IF).
PROOF. Assume that
(i)
holds true.Then, setting Q
:= E oQ*,
we seethat
Q(t)
=lim(Qi(t)),
for every t E R, whereQi : R
-GL(Ei).
Since-
B . Q = Q. x + Q x (as
a result of the transformationQ)
we check that(4) B(u)
=Q (o) (A (o) ~ u)
+(2(0) .
u, u E IF.By
Lemma2.2, along
withA(0)
=lim(Ai (0))
andQ (0)
=lim(Qi (0)),
-(4)
implies
that B =limBi, where Bi
- E£(E,). Transforming
now each( 1. i )
viayi -
Qi (t) .
xi, we observe thaty~ -p~(y)=p~(B~y)=B~
with B constant.
Therefore, applying
the Theorem ofFloquet
in Banach spaces,= i E N.
Hence, a#(1),
which proves(ii)
forB=
B .-(l#i )ieN.
_ _If
(ii) holds, B
hasnecessarily
the form Bwith Bi
e and=
Therefore,
onceagain by Floquet’s Theorem,
there exists ahomomorphism Fi : R
-extending a#.
SinceFi(t)
=Bi),
we check that is a
projective
system, for any t E R, thus we obtain condition(iii) by defining
Finally, (iii) implies (i)
as follows: For an F as in the statement, we have that F = witha#. Thus,
eachequation ( 1. i ) (with periodic
coefficient)
reduces to theequation
with constant coefficientby
means of the transformation yi =Qi (t) ~
xi , whereand Bi =
We check that is aprojective
system, for each t E and we setQ*(t)
:=(Qi (t))ieN.
On the otherhand,
forany j
> i ,=
jj(0),
where yj is the solution of(5)
with initial condition(0, u).
Since xj =
yj is a solution of( 1. i )
with coefficientAj(t), clearly
pji o xj is a solution of
( 1. i )
with coefficientAi (t). Therefore,
is the solution of
(5)
with coefficientBi
and initial condition(0,
More-over, Pji o yj = yi. Hence,
As a
result, B
:=limBi
E£(F)
exists and is constant.Applying
now thetransformation y =
(E
oQ *) (t) -
x, we see thatfor every t E R, thus
completing
theproof.
DREMARK. We note that in the
previous
theorem thequantities B, B
do notcoincide,
as in the Banach case, butthey
are related vias(B)
= B.433 3. - An
application: equations
in CooIn this section we shall prove that the conditions of Theorem 2.3 are
always
satisfied in the case of aperiodic equation
of type( 1 )
with IF = Coo.This illustrates the
elementary
methods of Section 2 in the concrete case of Here Coo is viewed as the limitlimCn,
n E N, withcorresponding connecting morphisms
pji :Ci
-(Ci (i, j
EN; j
>i )
the naturalprojections.
To this end we first need the
following
LEMMA 3.1. Let
If, :
(Cn ~ bea family of
continuous linear map-pings
and let{Mn
E be thecorresponding
matrices with respect to the natural basisof Cn.
Then thefollowing
conditions areequivalent:
(i) { fn
is aprojective
system.where E
Cn,
andhn
E C.PROOF. If
(i) holds,
then Pn+l,, 0fn+l = fn o (n
EN) implies
thatwhere is the natural basis of C" and E C.
Therefore,
which
gives (ii)
for :=Conversely,
if we assume(ii),
then for every(x 1, ... ,
eCn+ 1 ,
which concludes the
proof.
F-1We are now in a
position
to show that the exactanalogue
of the classicalFloquet-Liapunov
theorem is true in Moreprecisely,
we haveTHEOREM 3. 2. Consider the
equation (1)
with aperiodic coefficient of the form
A : I ~
Then,
the(equivalent)
conditionsof
Theorem 2.3 arealways
satisfied.
PROOF.
Clearly,
it suffices to prove the existence of aprojective
system(Bi)iEN
EH(Coo)
such that =Uo(l).
As we have seen in Section 2(see
also(3)), a#( 1 )
= - For the sake ofsimplicity
we setThe
previous
matricessatisfy
condition(ii)
of Lemma 3.1. We definewhere
log hj
I isarbitrarily
chosen but fixed.By induction,
we setHere yn is determined
through
thefollowing equivalent
conditions:Note that the last
equation
can be solved since the(n
xn )
matrixfiguring
in itis
always
nonsingular. Indeed,
the above mentioned matrix istriangular,
sinceBn
is.Therefore,
its determinantequals
theproduct
ofwhere bi
are thediagonals
ofBn satisfying exp(bi) = Ài.
If( 1
in -
1), then yl
=(Ài - 0,
for every i . IfXn
= for some i,then yi = kn
which is also non zero sinceMn+
1 EG L (n + 1, C).
As aresult,
the determinant ofis,
in any case, non zero.Using
onceagain
Lemma3.1,
we check that(Bn)nEN E H(C°). Moreover,
and the
proof
is nowcomplete.
DREMARK.
Clearly,
theproof
of the above Theorem isessentially
based onthe
appropriate
choice of thelogarithms Bn, n
EN, satisfying
condition(ii)
ofTheorem
2.3,
instead ofconsidering arbitrarily
chosenlogarithms
ofot"(I).
435 4. - A
geometric generalization
In this section we
briefly
describe anapplication
of theprevious
methodsto the
geometric
framework of Frechet fiber bundles. Since thecomplete
detailsare
beyond
the scope of this paper, we restrict ourselves to a mere outline of theseideas,
the Banachanalogues
of which can be found in[13], [14].
Assume that the coefficient A of
(1)
isperiodic.
With the notations ofSection
2,
if weinterpret
Z as the fundamental group of the unitcircle;
thatis,
Z ~ and R as the universalcovering
space ofS
1(:
then thecorresponding
fundamental solution of(1), given by
determines the
H(F)-valued
smooth 1-formWe recall that
d ~ ~ ~ -1
denotes theright
total differentialwhere 1 is the
right
translation ofUsing projective limits, along
with[13]
and[14,]
we check that there existsan
integrable
0 E 1~1 ( S 1, H (F)) (that is,
dO =1 /2 . [0, 0 1)
such thatwhere -~
S 1 : t
HThen,
we can find aunique
connection toD on the trivial
bundle lo
=(Sl
xH°(F), H°(F), SI, prl )
withunique (local)
connectionform - 8,
i.e. - 8 =a*wo,
if a :S’
-S’
xH°(IF)
is the natural section of the bundle. It turns out that wo is a flat connection with
corresponding holonomy homomorphism coinciding,
up toconjugation,
witha . Moreover,
the coefficient of(1)
is related with cvby
if a is the fundamental vector field of R. The converse is also true.
Thus,
there is abijection
between flat connections onto
andequations
of type( 1 ) with, periodic
coefficients.Similarly,
we can construct an NF for anymorphism
F: R -
H°(F).
Now, thegeometric analogue
of Theorem 2.3 can be statedas follows:
If
themonodromy homomorphism a# of (1) (with periodic coefficient)
extends to amorphism
F : R -~H°(JF),
thenthe connection (J) F
corresponds
to a constantcoefficient
B.We note that wo are
gauge-equivalent
and that the coefficient B isprecisely
the coefficient of Theorem 2.3.
The
previous
result could motivate ananalogous study
onarbitrary (non trivial) H°(F)-bundles.
This idea has beenapplied
in[15]
REFERENCES
[1] H. AMANN, "Ordinary Differential Equations", W. de Gruyter, Berlin, 1990.
[2] V. I. BOGACHEV, Deterministic and stochastic differential equations in infinite-dimensional
spaces, Acta Appl. Math. 40 (1995), 25-93.
[3] H. CARTAN, "Differential Calculus", Hermann, Paris, 1971.
[4] G. GALANIS, On a type of linear differential equations in Fréchet spaces, Ann. Scuola Norm.
Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 24 (1997), 501-510.
[5] R. S. HAMILTON, The Inversefunction theorem of Nash and Moser, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.
7 (1982), 65-222.
[6] S. G. KREIN - N. I. JACKIN, "Linear Differential Equations on Manifolds", Veronez. Gos.
Univ., 1980 (in Russian).
[7] R. LEMMERT, On ordinary differential equations in locally convex spaces, Nonlinear Anal.
10 (1986), 1385-1390.
[8] J. A. LESLIE, On a differential structure for the group of diffeomorphisms, Topology 6 (1967),263-271.
[9] J. L. MASSERA - J. J. SCHAEFFER, "Linear Differential Equations and Function Spaces",
Academic Press, London, 1966.
[10] L. S. PONTRYAGIN, "Ordinary Differential Equations", Addison-Wesley, Reading Mass.,
1962.
[11] H. H. SCHAEFFER, "Topological Vector Spaces", Springer-Verlag, 1980.
[12] J. J. SCHAEFFER, On Floquet’s theorem in Hilbert spaces, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 70 (1964), 243-245.
[13] E. VASSILIOU, Floquet-type connections on principal bundles, Tensor (N.S.) 43 (1986), 189-195.
[14] E. VASSILIOU, Total differential equations and the structure of fibre bundles, Bull. Greek Math. Soc. 27 (1986), 149-159.
[15] E. VASSILIOU - G. GALANIS, Flat Fréchet principal bundles and their holonomy homomor- phisms, (submitted).
[16] H. K. WILSON, "Ordinary Differential Equations", Addison-Wesley, Reading Mass., 1971.
University of Athens Department of Mathematics
Panepistimiopolis
Athens 157 84, Greece ggalanis @ atlas.uoa.gr
evassil @ atlas.uoa. gr