• Aucun résultat trouvé

Paper

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Paper"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON DATA STREAM ANALYSIS • March, 14-16, 2007 • Caserta, Italy

© Revue MODULAD, 2007 114 Numéro 36

(2)

EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON DATA STREAM ANALYSIS • March, 14-16, 2007 • Caserta, Italy

© Revue MODULAD, 2007 115 Numéro 36

(3)

EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON DATA STREAM ANALYSIS • March, 14-16, 2007 • Caserta, Italy

© Revue MODULAD, 2007 116 Numéro 36

(4)

EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON DATA STREAM ANALYSIS • March, 14-16, 2007 • Caserta, Italy

© Revue MODULAD, 2007 117 Numéro 36

(5)

EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON DATA STREAM ANALYSIS • March, 14-16, 2007 • Caserta, Italy

© Revue MODULAD, 2007 118 Numéro 36

(6)

EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON DATA STREAM ANALYSIS • March, 14-16, 2007 • Caserta, Italy

© Revue MODULAD, 2007 119 Numéro 36

(7)

EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON DATA STREAM ANALYSIS • March, 14-16, 2007 • Caserta, Italy

© Revue MODULAD, 2007 120 Numéro 36

(8)

EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON DATA STREAM ANALYSIS • March, 14-16, 2007 • Caserta, Italy

© Revue MODULAD, 2007 121 Numéro 36

Références

Documents relatifs

[r]

[r]

[r]

[r]

Given the above example, we know what a model transformation contract must contain two kinds of constraints: First, it must specify constraints on source and target models and

• a set of constraints on the evolution of elements from the source to the target model The last set of constraints is generally defined under the form of pre- and

For adapting a model execution, these models@run.time principles can of course be applied (case (b) in Fig. One can notice that in this particular case, there are two models at

All required transitions, starting from or leading to this new state, have also to be added: Each existing state must be the source of a transition state machine, independently of