• Aucun résultat trouvé

Front matter

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Front matter"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Janis Grabis Marite Kirikova Jelena Zdravkovic Janis Stirna (eds.)

PoEM Short Papers 2013

Short Paper Proceedings of the 6 th IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modeling (PoEM 2013), Riga, Latvia, November 6- 7, 2013

CEUR-WS.org/Vol-1023

ISSN 1613-0073

(2)

Preface

PoEM 2013 – the 6th IFIP WG 8.1 Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modeling was held in November 2013 in Riga, Latvia. Since its foundation in 2008, the PoEM conference addresses the use of enterprise modeling in practice by bringing together the academic community and practitioners from industry to contribute to improved and novel enterprise modeling practices.

Enterprise Modeling (EM) is discipline that aims to externalize enterprise knowledge and thus adding to its value. It comprises modelling of the structure, behavior and organization of the enterprise. Using these models, the practitioners aim to better understand the enterprise’s functions, as well as to better link the functions to the models of Information Systems.

The PoEM 2013 conference included 39 presentations. The presented practitioner and short papers (on research in progress in enterprise modeling) are included in this volume. Other conference papers are available in PoEM 2013 Proceedings, published by Springer.

These Short Paper Proceedings include 20 practitioner or short papers. The authors of the papers represent ten countries: Colombia, France, Germany, Netherlands, Latvia, Luxembourg, Norway, Poland, Sweden, and Switzerland.

Reflecting different topics of EM research, practices and tools, the papers were presented in five sessions: Enterprise Architecture; EM and Business Processes; Conceptualizations, Notations and Ontology; EM and Information Systems; and Compliance in EM.

The organization of PoEM 2013 owes special thanks to the members of the International Program Committee for promoting the conference, as well as for providing valuable reviews for the submitted papers. Furthermore, we are grateful to all authors who submitted the papers to the conference, and all participants who contributed to the Short Paper sessions. Special thanks go to Riga Technical University for an engaging organization of the conference.

November 2013

Janis Grabis Marite Kirikova Jelena Zdravkovic

Janis Stirna

(3)

PoEM 2013 Organization

Steering Committee

Anne Persson, Skóvde University, Sweden Janis Stirna, Stockholm University, Sweden

General Chair

Jānis Grabis, Riga Technical University, Latvia

Organizers

Jānis Grabis, Riga Technical University, Latvia Gundega Lazdane, IIBA Latvia Chapter, Latvia Lilita Sparane, Latvian IT Cluster, Latvia

Renate Strazdina, Riga Technical University (industrial cooperation chair) Jānis Kampars, Riga Technical University, Latvia

Program Committee Co-chairs

Marite Kirikova, Riga Technical University, Latvia Jelena Zdravkovic, Stockholm University, Sweden

Program Committee

Daniel Amyot, University of Ottawa, Canada Marko Bajec, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia Janis Barzdins, University of Latvia, Latvia

Guiseppe Berio, University of South Brittany, France Robert Buchmann, University of Vienna, Austria

Rimantas Butleris, Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania Albertas Caplinskas, VU IMI, Lithuania

Steinar Carlsen, Computas, Norway

Wolfgang Deiters, Fraunhofer ISST, Germany

Sergio España, Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain Xavier Franch, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain Janis Grabis, Riga Technical University, Latvia

Norbert Gronau, University of Potsdam, Germany Remigijus Gustas, Karlstad University, Sweden Patrick Heymans, University of Namur, Belgium

Stijn Hoppenbrouwers, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands Jennifer Horkoff, University of Trento, Italy

Paul Johannesson, Stockholm University, Sweden Håvard Jørgensen, Commitment AS, Norway Marite Kirikova, Riga Technical University, Latvia

(4)

John Krogstie, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway Marc Lankhorst, Novay, The Netherlands

Birger Lantow, University of Rostock, Germany

Ulrike Lechner, Munich University of the Armed Forces, Germany Michel Leonard, Université de Genève, Switzerland

Peri Loucopoulos, Harokopio University of Athens, Greece /University of Loughborough, UK Florian Matthes, Munich University of Technology, Germany

Raimundas Matulevicius, University of Tartu, Estonia Graham McLeod, inspired.org, South Africa

Jan Mendling, Vienna University of Economics, Austria

Christer Nellborn, Nellborn Management Consulting AB, Sweden Björn Nilsson, Anatés AB, Luxembourg

Andreas Opdahl, University of Bergen, Norway

Sietse Overbeek, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany Oscar Pastor, Valencia University of Technology, Spain Anne Persson, University of Skovde, Sweden

Michael Petit, University of Namur, Belgium Tomas Pitner, Masaryk University, Czech Republic Naveen Prakash, GCET, India

Erik Proper, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands Jolita Ralyté, Université de Genève, Switzerland

Colette Rolland, Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne, France Irina Rychkova, Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne, France Kurt Sandkuhl, Jönköping Technical University, Sweden

Ulf Seigerroth, Jönköping International Business School, Sweden Khurram Shahzad, University of the Punjab, Pakistan

Nikolay Shilov, SPIIRAS, Russia Pnina Soffer, University of Haifa, Israel Maarten Steen, Novay, the Netherlands Janis Stirna, University of Stockholm, Sweden Darijus Strasunskas, DS Applied Science, Norway Renate Strazdina, Ernst&Young SIA, Latvia

Olegas Vasilecas, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania Mathias Weske, University of Potsdam, Germany

Eric Yu, University of Toronto, Canada

Jelena Zdravkovic, Stockholm University, Sweden

Additional Reviewers

Gundars Alksnis, Riga Technical University, Latvia Solviata Berzisa, Riga Technical University, Latvia

Nelly Condori-Fernandez, University of Twente, The Netherlands Sybren De Kinderen, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands Arturo Gonzalez, Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain

Matheus Hauder, Munich University of Technology, Germany Martin Henkel, Stockholm University, Sweden

Amin Jalali, Stockholm Univeristy, Sweden (PhD student)

(5)

Oleh Khovalko, University of Potsdam, Germany

Ivan Monahov, Munich University of Technology, Germany Laila Niedrite, University of Latvia, Latvia

Georgious Plataniotis, CRP Henri Tudor, Luxembourg Inese Polaka, Riga Technical University, Latvia

Diego Prado-Gesto, Valencia University of Technology, Spain Luise Pufahl, Munich University of Technology, Germany Marcela Ruiz, Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain Agris Sostaks, University of Latvia, Latvia

Inese Supulniece, Riga Technical University, Latvia

Vladimir Tarasov, Jönköping International Business School, Sweden Justas Trinkunas, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania André Ullrich, University of Potsdam, Germany

Dirk van der Linden, CRP Henri Tudor, Luxembourg Marin Zec, Munich University of Technology, Germany

(6)

Table of Contents

Enterprise Architecture

Embracing Imperfection in Enterprise Architecture Models ... 8 Hector Florez, Mario Sánchez and Jorge Villalobos

Challenges of EA Methodologies Facing Progressive Decentralization in

Modern Organizations ... 18 Irina Rychkova, Jelena Zdravkovic and Thomas Speckert

Connecting the Dots: Examining Visualization Techniques for Enterprise

Architecture Model Analysis ... 29 David Naranjo, Mario Sánchez and Jorge Villalobos

Software Migration Project Cost Estimation using COCOMO II and Enterprise Architecture Modeling ... 39

Alexander Hjalmarsson, Matus Korman and Robert Lagerström

Enterprise Modeling and Business Processes

Process Model Driven Requirements Engineering ... 49 Dag Rojahn Karlsen, Helle Frisak Sem and Steinar Carlsen

Comprehensive Business Process Management through Observation and

Navigation ... 59 Stefan Schönig, Michael Zeising and Stefan Jablonski

Building a High-Level Process Model for Soliciting Requirements on Software Tools to Support Software Development: Experience Report ... 70

Ilia Bider, Athanasios Karapantelakis and Nirjal Khadka

Enterprise Modeling and Information Systems

Towards Implementing IT Service Management in an ERP for the IT Service Industry ... 83

Johannes Hintsch and Klaus Turowski

Enterprise Modeling in Complex ERP Adoptions: Learning from the Experience of an IT Company ... 95

Jan Trąbka and Piotr Soja

(7)

Methodology of Building ALM Platform for Software Product Organizations ... 105 Ivo Pekšēns

Experiences from Teaching Enterprise Modelling to Students of Information

Systems ... 116 Sobah Abbas Petersen and John Krogstie

Conceptualizations, Notations, and Ontologies

Do Conceptual Modeling Languages Accommodate Enough Explicit Conceptual

Distinctions? ... 126 Dirk van der Linden and Henderik A. Proper

Granular Ontologies and Graphical In-Place Querying ... 136 Janis Barzdins, Edgars Rencis and Agris Sostaks

vGMQL – Introducing a Visual Notation for the Generic Model Query Language

GMQL ... 146 Matthias Steinhorst, Patrick Delfmann and Jörg Becker

Linking BPMN, ArchiMate, and BWW: Perfect Match for Complete and Lawful

Business Process Models? ... 156 Ludmila Penicina

Capturing and Representing Values for Requirements of Personal Health Records ... 166 Eric-Oluf Svee, Maria Kvist and Sumithra Velupillai

Compliance in Enterprise Modeling

Rule Governance, Social Coding and Social Modeling ... 176 Joost de Vries and Stijn Hoppenbrouwers

The Role of Invariants in the Co-evolution of Business and Technical Service

Specification of an Enterprise ... 183 Biljana Bajić-Bizumić, Irina Rychkova and Alain Wegmann

A Comparative Analysis of Enterprise Modeling Approaches for Modeling Business

Strategy ... 193 Constantinos Giannoulis, Iyad Zikra, Maria Bergholtz, Jelena Zdravkovic, Janis Stirna and Paul Johannesson

Integration of Business Rules and Model Driven Development ... 205 Lauma Jokste

Références

Documents relatifs

Purdie, Hattie & Douglas, 1996). Within the two macro categories of the learning conceptions, five categories were identified resulting from qualitative differences

You control what digital file format(s) to use when digitizing analog content for access and long-term preservation.. Making a well-informed decision at this stage will

They are involved in monotone dynamical systems, uniform persistence and coexistence states, basic reproduction ratios for compartmental epidemic models in periodic

Irena et Josef sont plutôt incités à retourner par les autres. Ce sont Sylvie et Gustaf qui poussent Irena à retourner. Les autres estiment que le retour au pays natal constitue

The main objective of this thesis is to enhance the reliability of decisions made using results obtained from quantitative analytical methods during different steps of their

Heleen Plaisier of Leiden University, the Netherlands, offers an introduction to the literature and orthography of Lepcha, a Tibeto-Burman language spoken in Sikkim

The purpose of this study. 1s to determine whether principals, department chairper-sons and teachers feel the supervisory functions, genezoally associated with the.

Our findings suggest that better access to finance (such as having a credit card or a few credit lines), savings from monthly income and financial literacy (such as knowledge