• Aucun résultat trouvé

Piecewise Polynomial Model of the Aerodynamic Coefficients of the Cumulus One Unmanned Aircraft

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Piecewise Polynomial Model of the Aerodynamic Coefficients of the Cumulus One Unmanned Aircraft"

Copied!
6
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02280789

https://hal-enac.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02280789

Submitted on 6 Sep 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

Piecewise Polynomial Model of the Aerodynamic

Coefficients of the Cumulus One Unmanned Aircraft

Torbjørn Cunis, Anders La Cour-Harbo

To cite this version:

Torbjørn Cunis, Anders La Cour-Harbo. Piecewise Polynomial Model of the Aerodynamic Coefficients

of the Cumulus One Unmanned Aircraft. [Technical Report] SkyWatch A/S, Støvring, DK. 2019.

�hal-02280789�

(2)

Piecewise Polynomial Model of the Aerodynamic Coefficients of

the Cumulus One Unmanned Aircraft

Torbjørn Cunis

1

and Anders La Cour-Harbo

2

Abstract

This document illustrates a piecewise polynomial model for Cumulus One, based on continuous fluid dynamics simulation, derived using the pwpfit toolbox. The model has been developed in a joint project of Sky-Watch and the University of Aalborg.

Preliminaries

If not stated otherwise, all variables are in SI units. We will refer to the following axis systems of ISO 1151-1: the body axis system (xf, yf, zf) aligned with the aircraft’s fuselage; the air-path axis system (xa, ya, za) defined by the velocity vector VA; and the normal earth-fixed axis system (xg, yg, zg). The orientation of the body axes with respect to the normal earth-fixed system is given by the attitude angles Φ, Θ, Ψ and to the air-path system by angle of attack α and side-slip β; the orientation of the air-path axes to the normal earth-fixed system is given by azimuth χA, inclination γA, and bank-angle µA. (Fig. ??.)

xg xa xf zg za zf mg −ZA F −XA VA Θ γA α

(a) Longitudinal axes (β = µA= 0).

xg x0f xa yg y 0 f y a F0 −XA YA0 VA Ψ β0 χA (b) Horizontal axes (γA= 0).

Fig. 1: Axis systems with angles and vectors. Projections into the plane are marked by0.

I. Aerodynamic Coefficients The piece-wise polynomial models of the aerodynamic coefficients are given

C (α, β, ξ, η, ζ) =



C pre(α, β, . . . ) if α ≤ α0,

C post(α, β, . . . ) else, (1) where C ∈ {CX, CY, CZ, Cl, Cm, Cn} are polynomials in angle of attack, side-slip, and surface deflections; and the

boundary is found at

α0=17.949°. (2)

The polynomials in low and high angle of attack, Cpre

, C post, are sums

C pre = C αpre(α) + C ξ(β, ξ) + C ηpre(α, η) + C ζ(β, ζ) ; (3)

C post= C αpost(α) + C ξ(β, ξ) + C ηpost(α, η) + C ζ(β, ζ) . (4)

In the following subsections, we present the polynomial terms obtained using the pwpfit toolbox. Coefficients of absolute value lower than 10−2 have been omitted for readability.

1ONERA – The French Aerospace Lab, Department of Information Processing and Systems, Centre Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse, 31055, France, e-mail:torbjoern.cunis@onera.fr; and ENAC, Université de Toulouse, Drones Research Group, Toulouse, 31055, France.

(3)

A. Domain of low angle of attack

Polynomials in angle of attack:

Cpre= −2.566 × 10−2+5.722 × 10−1α +1.496α2−1.148 × 101α3; (5) Cpre=5.402 × 10−2−2.345 × 10−1α −2.001α2+7.054α3; (6) Cpre= −3.475 × 10−1−5.467α + 1.853α2+2.663 × 101α3; (7) Cpre=4.875 × 10−2−2.190 × 10−1α −2.004α2+7.146α3; (8) Cpre=6.214 × 10−2−1.755α − 3.427α2+1.256 × 101α3; (9) Cpre=4.748 × 10−2−2.097 × 10−1α −2.016α2+7.171α3; (10) Polynomials in angle of attack and elevator deflections:

Cpre=4.327 × 10−2η −4.458 × 10−1αη +3.370 × 10−1α2η −4.567 × 10−1αη2+7.331 × 10−2η3; (11) Cpre=1.832 × 10−2η +7.484 × 10−2αη −4.384 × 10−1α2η; (12) Cpre= −2.567 × 10−1η +3.085 × 10−1αη −5.105 × 10−2η27.394 × 10−1α2η +6.936 × 10−1αη2+1.337 × 10−1η3; (13) Cpre=1.699 × 10−2η +8.936 × 10−2αη −4.564 × 10−1α2η +1.571 × 10−2αη2; (14) Cpre= −9.028 × 10−1η +7.437 × 10−1αη −4.924 × 10−2η2−8.415 × 10−1α2η +2.210αη2+5.251 × 10−1η3; (15) Cpre=1.532 × 10−2η +8.758 × 10−2αη −4.513 × 10−1α2η +1.487 × 10−2αη2. (16)

B. Domain of high angle of attack

Polynomials in angle of attack:

Cpost=1.266 × 10−2−3.159 × 10−1α +3.832 × 10−1α2−1.226 × 10−1α3; (17) Cpost= −2.297 × 10−2α2+1.337 × 10−2α3; (18) Cpost= −4.179 × 10−1−2.345α + 9.586 × 10−1α2−3.665 × 10−2α3; (19) Cpost=2.006 × 10−2−8.200 × 10−2α +1.012 × 10−1α2−3.515 × 10−2α3; (20) Cpost= −2.552 × 10−1−5.131 × 10−1α −2.677 × 10−1α2+1.332 × 10−1α3; (21) Cpost=1.159 × 10−2−3.062 × 10−2α +2.727 × 10−2α2; (22) Polynomials in angle of attack and elevator deflections:

Cpost= −1.342 × 10−2η −1.663 × 10−1αη −1.796 × 10−1η2+2.254 × 10−2α2η +9.274 × 10−2αη2+7.331 × 10−2η3; (23) Cpost= −2.922 × 10−1η +1.829 × 10−1αη +1.277 × 10−1η2+2.284 × 10−2α2η +1.229 × 10−1αη2+1.337 × 10−1η3; (24) Cpost= −9.498 × 10−1η +6.099 × 10−1αη +5.093 × 10−1η2+6.456 × 10−2α2η +4.264 × 10−1αη2+5.251 × 10−1η3; (25) Cpost, Cpost, Cpost are approximately zero. (26)

(4)

C. Full-envelope polynomials

Polynomials in side-slip and aileron deflections: C= 6.557 × 10−2β2+4.214 × 10−2βξ −1.493ξ2+4.264 × 10−2ξ31.647 × 10−2β42.321 × 10−2β3ξ +9.649 × 10−2β2ξ2+2.859 × 10−2βξ3+3.084 × 101ξ4; (27) CYξ= −3.697 × 10−1β −1.570 × 10−1ξ −3.231 × 10−2β26.137ξ2+7.416 × 10−2β3+1.611 × 10−2βξ2+2.214ξ3+6.487 × 10−1β2ξ2+5.323 × 10−2βξ3+1.456 × 102ξ4; (28) C= 3.411 × 10−1β2+4.141 × 10−1βξ −3.717ξ2+4.234 × 10−2ξ39.915 × 10−2β41.922 × 10−1β3ξ +1.945 × 10−1β2ξ2+9.909 × 10−1βξ3+9.856 × 101ξ4; (29) C= −5.798 × 10−2β −3.929 × 10−1ξ −2.906 × 10−2β25.551ξ2+1.763 × 10−2β3+1.722 × 10−1β2ξ +4.557 × 10−1ξ3+5.835 × 10−1β2ξ2+5.332 × 10−2βξ3+1.319 × 102ξ4; (30) C= −3.978 × 10−2β2+5.554 × 10−1βξ −4.689ξ2+4.229 × 10−2ξ3+2.585 × 10−2β42.309 × 10−1β3ξ +4.077 × 10−1β2ξ25.068 × 10−1βξ3+1.160 × 102ξ4; (31) Cnξ= 3.686 × 10−2β +1.392 × 10−2ξ −2.828 × 10−2β25.410ξ21.160 × 10−1ξ3+5.678 × 10−1β2ξ2+5.334 × 10−2βξ3+1.286 × 102ξ4. (32) Polynomials in side-slip and rudder deflections:

CXζ = −1.031 × 10−2βζ −7.986 × 10−2ζ2+1.086 × 10−2βζ3+9.739 × 10−2ζ4; (33) C = −8.526 × 10−2ζ −2.128 × 10−2β23.569 × 10−1ζ2+1.049 × 10−2β2ζ +1.924 × 10−2βζ2+7.679 × 10−2ζ3+5.663 × 10−2β2ζ2+5.247 × 10−1ζ4; (34) CZζ= −2.036 × 10−2β2−1.332 × 10−2βζ −1.743 × 10−1ζ2+1.834 × 10−2β2ζ2+3.683 × 10−2βζ3+2.631 × 10−1ζ4; (35) Clζ= −1.930 × 10−2β2−3.221 × 10−1ζ2+5.111 × 10−2β2ζ2+4.735 × 10−1ζ4; (36) C = −3.231 × 10−2β21.436 × 10−2βζ −2.672 × 10−1ζ2+1.241 × 10−2β3ζ +1.472 × 10−2β2ζ2+1.051 × 10−2βζ3+4.193 × 10−1ζ4; (37) C=2.158 × 10−2ζ −1.882 × 10−2β2−3.137 × 10−1ζ2−1.338 × 10−2ζ3+4.978 × 10−2β2ζ2+4.611 × 10−1ζ4. (38) II. Equations of Motion

We have the aerodynamic forces and moments in body axis system   XA YA ZA   f = 1 2%SV 2 A   CX CY CZ  ;   LA MA NA   f = 1 2%SV 2 A   b Cl cACm b Cn  +   XA YA ZA   f × xcg− xrefcg ; (39)

and the weight force by rotation into the body axis system

XgG= −gsin Θ; (40) YgG= −gsin Φ cos Θ; (41) ZgG= −gcos Φ cos Θ; (42) The resulting forces lead to changes in the velocity vector, in body axis system, by

˙ VAf= 1 m   XA+ XG+ XF YA+ YG ZA+ ZG   f +   p q r  × VAf. (43)

(5)

with the thrust XF

f = F (engines aligned with the xf-axis). For a symmetric plane (Ixy = Iyz = 0), the resulting

moments in body axis are given as

Lf= LAf − q r (Iz− Iy) + p q Izx; (44)

Mf= MfA− p r (Ix− Iz) − p2− r2 Izx; (45)

Nf= NfA− p q (Iy− Ix) − q r Izx; (46)

with the inertias Ix, Iy, Iz, Izx. The changes of angular body rates are then given as

˙ p = 1 IxIz− Izx2 (IzLf+ IzxNf) ; (47) ˙ q = 1 Iy Mf; (48) ˙r = 1 IxIz− Izx2 (IzxLf+ IxNf) . (49)

Here, the normalized body rates have been used with   ˆ p ˆ q ˆ r  = 1 2VA   b p cAq b r  ⇐⇒   p q r  = 2VA   b−1pˆ c−1A qˆ b−1rˆ   (50) and   ˙ˆ p ˙ˆq ˙ˆr  = 1 VA   1 2   b ˙p cAq˙ b ˙r  − ˙VA   ˆ p ˆ q ˆ r    . (51)

The change of attitude is finally obtained by rotation into normal earth-fixed axis system: ˙

Φ = p + qsin Φ tan Θ + r cos Φ tan Θ; (52) ˙

Θ = qcos Φ − r sin Φ; (53) ˙

Ψ = qsin Φ cos−1Θ + rcos Φ cos−1Θ. (54) III. Longitudinal Model

The longitudinal model is restricted to the xa-za-plane, assuming β = µA= χA= 0.

A. Aerodynamic Coefficients

The longitudinal aerodynamic coefficients, CL, CD, Cm, are obtained as  CL CD  = +sin α − cos α −cos α − sin α  CX CZ  . (55) B. Equations of motion

The longitudinal equations of motion are given as ˙ VA= 1 m  Tcos α −1 2ρSV 2 ACD(α, η, q) − mgsin γA  , (56) ˙γA= 1 mVA  Tsin α + 1 2ρSV 2 ACL(α, η, q) − mgcos γA  , (57) ˙ q = 1 Iy 1 2ρScAV 2 ACm(α, η, q) ; (58) ˙ Θ = q; (59) with Θ = α + γ. (60)

(6)

Nomenclature α = Angle of attack (rad);

α0 = Low-angle of attack boundary (°);

β = Side-slip angle (rad);

γA = Flight-path angle relative to air (rad);

ζ = Rudder deflection (rad), negative if leading to positive yaw moment; η = Elevator deflection (rad), negative if leading to positive pitch moment; Θ = Pitch angle (rad);

µA = Air-path bank angle (rad);

ξ = Aileron deflection (rad), negative if leading to positive roll moment; % = Air density (% = 1.200 kg m−3);

χA = Air-path azimuth angle (rad); Φ = Bank angle (rad);

Ψ = Azimuth angle (rad);

Cl = Aerodynamic coefficient moment body xf-axis (·);

Cm = Aerodynamic coefficient moment body yf-axis (·);

Cn = Aerodynamic coefficient moment body zf-axis (·);

CD = Aerodynamic drag coefficient (·), positive along negative air-path xa-axis;

CL = Aerodynamic lift coefficient (·), positive along negative air-path za-axis;

CX = Aerodynamic coefficient force body xf-axis (·);

CY = Aerodynamic coefficient force body yf-axis (·);

CZ = Aerodynamic coefficient force body zf-axis (·);

D = Drag force (N), positive along negative air-path xa-axis;

F = Thrust force (N), positive along body xf-axis;

L = Lift force (N), positive along negative air-path za-axis;

q = Pitch rate (rad s−1);

b = Reference aerodynamic span (b = 2.088 m); cA = Aerodynamic mean chord (cA=2.800 × 10−1m); g = Standard gravitational acceleration (g ≈ 9.810 m s−2); m = Aircraft mass (m = 2.619 × 101kg);

p = Roll rate (rad s−1); r = Yaw rate (rad s−1);

Lf = Roll moment (N m), mathematically positive around xf-axis;

Mf = Pitch moment (N m), mathematically positive around yf-axis;

Nf = Yaw moment (N m), mathematically positive around zf-axis; S = Wing area (S = 5.500 × 10−1m2);

VA, VA = Aircraft speed and velocity relative to air (VA= kVAk2, m s−1); XfA = Aerodynamic force along body xf-axis (N);

XfF = Thrust force along body xf-axis (N); YfA = Aerodynamic force along body yf-axis (N); ZfA = Aerodynamic force along body zf-axis (N); (·)post = Domain of high angle of attack;

(·)pre = Domain of low angle of attack; xa, ya, za = Air-path axis system;

xf, yf, zf = Body axis system;

Figure

Fig. 1: Axis systems with angles and vectors. Projections into the plane are marked by 0 .

Références

Documents relatifs

Raised letters in a rectangular cartridge stamped on the top of the handle Production: Giancola, matrix A1 (Manacorda, Pallecchi 2012: 298) Unpublished stamp.. 3. 12 n.2)

Piecewise Polynomial Model of the Aerodynamic Coefficients of the Generic Transport Model and its Equations of Motion.. [Technical Report] Third corrected version, ONERA – The

The first is IRENE (or AE9/AP9) [4] and provides proton flux levels different from those in the AP8 model. The second is GREEN, developed at ONERA [5]. But for this 1-10 MeV

A comparative analysis of the spin parameters, as well as the spin entry/recovery behavior for the nominal and perturbed aerodynamic models, revealed the high sensitivity of

“A Multi-mode Upset Recovery Flight Control Sys- tem for Large Transport Aircraft,” in AIAA Guid- ance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Boston, US-MA, aug 2013..

In 2D woven composites (fabric formed by interlacing the longitudinal yarns (warp) and the transverse yarns (weft)), such as plain, twill or satin), four types of damage

So, to a large extent, when time came to identify a department that would work on the implementation of the Convention, it appeared quite obvious that it

Lastly Figure 13 shows the optimized deformations of the walls obtained with the current linearized potential flow approach (using the experimental pressure set for the flow past