• Aucun résultat trouvé

Reward processing under influence : Effects of stress and cognitive load on reward processing, and their clinical implications for the vulnerability to major depression

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Reward processing under influence : Effects of stress and cognitive load on reward processing, and their clinical implications for the vulnerability to major depression"

Copied!
301
0
0

Texte intégral

Figure

Figure 2.1.  Relationships  linking  the  learning,  motivational,  and  affective  components,  and  their  functions  in  reward  processing
Figure 2.2. Illustration of a version of the slot-machine task, a passive reward task
Figure 2.3.  Illustration  of  a  version  of  the  Monetary  Incentive  Delay  (MID)  task
Figure 2.4. Illustration of a version of the Wheel of Fortune (WOF) task. A trial of the  WOF  task  with  moderate  likelihood  of  winning  $1  (70%  of  risk)  and  moderate  likelihood of winning $2 (30% of chance)
+7

Références

Documents relatifs

mPF C: medial prefrontal cortex; CeA: Central Amygdala; BLA: Basolateral nucleus of the Amygdala; vSUB: ventral subiculum; BNST: Bed nucleus of the Stria Terminalis; dCA3:

An experiment for the study of the effects of exposure to a winter-like photoperiod on the diurnal rodent Arvicanthis ansorgei indicated that shortened day length with

First, undocu- mented migrants participating in our study may not be representative of the total undocumented population in Geneva because of the predominance of Latin American women

À travers une lecture qui se veut détachée de la seule figure de l’auteur comme principe d’ana- lyse et d’interprétation de l’écriture romanesque d’Abdellah Taïa,

Beha- vioral reaction times, reward-anticipating licking dura- tions and error rates varied for the same reward when tested in two different reward combinations, although the

The greater P300 amplitudes observed when the participants are chosen by the proposer suggest an increase in attentional resources allocated to the task when the participants

Null Hypothesis: There will be no difference in biomechanical or neuromuscular features (spine posture, muscle activity, perceived pain rating, spine flexibility and muscle

REWARD can help improve interoper- ability and integration among different reward schemes employed by different service providers and define a uniform process for creating