• Aucun résultat trouvé

Binary quadratic forms and Eichler orders

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Binary quadratic forms and Eichler orders"

Copied!
12
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Montserrat Alsina

Binary quadratic forms and Eichler orders Tome 17, no1 (2005), p. 13-23.

<http://jtnb.cedram.org/item?id=JTNB_2005__17_1_13_0>

© Université Bordeaux 1, 2005, tous droits réservés.

L’accès aux articles de la revue « Journal de Théorie des Nom-bres de Bordeaux » (http://jtnb.cedram.org/), implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://jtnb.cedram. org/legal/). Toute reproduction en tout ou partie cet article sous quelque forme que ce soit pour tout usage autre que l’utilisation à fin strictement personnelle du copiste est constitutive d’une infrac-tion pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.

cedram

Article mis en ligne dans le cadre du

Centre de diffusion des revues académiques de mathématiques http://www.cedram.org/

(2)

de Bordeaux 17 (2005), 13–23

Binary quadratic forms and Eichler orders

par Montserrat ALSINA

R´esum´e. Pour tout ordre d’Eichler O(D, N ) de niveau N dans une alg`ebre de quaternions ind´efinie de discriminant D, il existe un groupe Fuchsien Γ(D, N ) ⊆ SL(2, R) et une courbe de Shimura X(D, N ). Nous associons `a O(D, N ) un ensemble H(O(D, N )) de formes quadratiques binaires ayant des coefficients semi-entiers quadratiques et developpons une classification des formes quadra-tiques primitives de H(O(D, N )) pour rapport `a Γ(D, N ). En par-ticulier nous retrouvons la classification des formes quadratiques primitives et enti`eres de SL(2, Z). Un domaine fondamental ex-plicite pour Γ(D, N ) permet de caract´eriser les Γ(D, N ) formes r´eduites.

Abstract. For any Eichler order O(D, N ) of level N in an in-definite quaternion algebra of discriminant D there is a Fuchsian group Γ(D, N ) ⊆ SL(2, R) and a Shimura curve X(D, N ). We associate to O(D, N ) a set H(O(D, N )) of binary quadratic forms which have semi-integer quadratic coefficients, and we develop a classification theory, with respect to Γ(D, N ), for primitive forms contained in H(O(D, N )). In particular, the classification the-ory of primitive integral binary quadratic forms by SL(2, Z) is recovered. Explicit fundamental domains for Γ(D, N ) allow the characterization of the Γ(D, N )-reduced forms.

1. Preliminars Let H =  a,b Q 

be the quaternion Q-algebra of basis {1, i, j, ij}, satisfying i2 = a, j2 = b, ji = −ij, a, b ∈ Q∗. Assume H is an indefinite quaternion algebra, that is, H ⊗Q R ' M(2, R). Then the discriminant DH of H is

the product of an even number of different primes DH = p1· · · p2r ≥ 1 and

we can assume a > 0. Actually, a discriminant D determines a quaternion algebra H such that DH = D up to isomorphism. Let us denote by n(ω)

the reduced norm of ω ∈ H.

Fix any embedding Φ : H ,→ M(2, R). For simplicity we can keep in mind the embedding given at the following lemma.

(3)

Lemma 1.1. Let H =a,b

Q



be an indefinite quaternion algebra with a > 0. An embedding Φ : H ,→ M(2, R) is obtained by:

Φ(x + yi + zj + tij) =  x + y√a z + t√a b(z − t√a) x − y√a  .

Given N ≥ 1, gcd(D, N ) = 1, let us consider an Eichler order of level N , that is a Z-module of rank 4, subring of H, intersection of two maximal orders. By Eichler’s results it is unique up to conjugation and we denote it by O(D, N ).

Consider Γ(D, N ) := Φ({ω ∈ O(D, N )∗ | n(ω) > 0}) ⊆ SL(2, R) a group of quaternion transformations. This group acts on the upper complex half plane H = {x + ιy ∈ C | y > 0}. We denote by X(D, N ) the canonical model of the Shimura curve defined by the quotient Γ(D, N )\H, cf. [Shi67], [AAB01].

For any γ = a b

c d ∈ GL(2, R) we denote by P(γ) the set of fixed points

in C of the transformation defined by γ(z) = az+bcz+d.

Let us denote by E (H, F ) the set of embeddings of a quadratic field F into the quaternion algebra H. Assume there is an embedding ϕ ∈ E (H, F ). Then, all the quaternion transformations in Φ(ϕ(F∗)) ⊂ GL(2, R) have the same set of fixed points, which we denote by P(ϕ). In the case that F is an imaginary quadratic field it yields to complex multiplication points, since P(ϕ) ∩ H is just a point, z(ϕ).

Now, we take in account the arithmetic of the orders. Let us consider the set of optimal embeddings of quadratic orders Λ into quaternion orders O,

E∗(O, Λ) := {ϕ | ϕ : Λ ,→ O, ϕ(F ) ∩ O = ϕ(Λ)}.

Any group G ≤ Nor(O) acts on E∗(O, Λ), and we can consider the quo-tient E∗(O, Λ)/G. Put ν(O, Λ; G) := ] E∗(O, Λ)/G. We will also use the notation ν(D, N, d, m; G) for an Eichler order O(D, N ) ⊆ H of level N and the quadratic order of conductor m in F = Q(√d), which we denote Λ(d, m).

Since further class numbers in this paper will be related to this one, we include next theorem (cf. [Eic55]). It provides the well-known relation between the class numbers of local and global embeddings, and collects the formulas for the class number of local embeddings given in [Ogg83] and [Vig80] in the case G = O∗. Consider ψp the multiplicative function given

by ψp(pk) = pk(1 + 1p), ψp(a) = 1 if p - a. Put h(d, m) the ideal class

number of the quadratic order Λ(d, m).

Theorem 1.2. Let O = O(D, N ) be an Eichler order of level N in an indefinite quaternion Q-algebra H of discriminant D. Let Λ(d, m) be the quadratic order of conductor m in Q(√d). Assume that E (H, Q(√d)) 6= ∅

(4)

and gcd(m, D) = 1. Then,

ν(D, N, d, m; O∗) = h(d, m) Y

p|DN

νp(D, N, d, m; O∗).

The local class numbers of embeddings νp(D, N, d, m; O∗), for the primes

p|DN , are given by (i) If p|D, then νp(D, N, d, m; O∗) = 1 −  DF p  . (ii) If p k N , then νp(D, N, d, m; O∗) is equal to 1 +

 DF p  if p - m, and equal to 2 if p|m.

(iii) Assume N = pru1, with p - u1, r ≥ 2. Put m = pku2, p - u2.

(a) If r ≥ 2k + 2, then νp(D, N, d, m; O∗) is equal to 2ψp(m) if



DF

p



= 1, and equal to 0 otherwise.

(b) If r = 2k + 1, then νp(D, N, d, m; O∗) is equal to 2ψp(m) if  DF p  = 1, equal to pk if DF p  = 0, and equal to 0 if DF p  = −1. (c) If r = 2k, then νp(D, N, d, m; O∗) = pk−1  p + 1 +DF p  . (d) If r ≤ 2k − 1, then νp(D, N, d, m; O∗) is equal to pk/2+ pk/2−1

if k is even, and equal to 2pk−1/2 if k is odd.

2. Classification theory of binary forms associated to quaternions

Given α = a bc d ∈ M(2, R), we put fα(x, y) := cx2+ (d − a)xy − by2. It

is called the binary quadratic form associated to α.

For a binary quadratic form f (x, y) := Ax2+ Bxy + Cy2 = (A, B, C), we

consider the associated matrix A(f ) = 

A B/2 B/2 C



, and the determinants det1(f ) = det A(f ) and det2(f ) = 22det A(f ) = −(B2− 4AC). Denote by

P(f ) the set of solutions in C of Az2+ Bz + C = 0. If f is (positive or

negative) definite, then P(f ) ∩ H is just a point which we denote by τ (f ). The proof of the following lemma is straightforward.

Lemma 2.1. Let α ∈ M(2, R).

(i) For all λ, µ ∈ Q, we have fλα= λfα and fα+µ Id= fα; in particular,

P(fλα+µ Id) = P(fα).

(ii) z ∈ C is a fixed point of α if and only if z ∈ P(fα), that is, P(fα) =

P(α).

(iii) Let γ ∈ GL(2, R). Then A(fγ−1αγ) = (det γ−1)γtA(fα)γ; in

particu-lar, if γ ∈ SL(2, R), z ∈ P(fα) if and only if γ−1(z) ∈ P(fγ−1αγ).

Definition 2.2. For a quaternion ω ∈ H∗, we define the binary quadratic form associated to ω as the binary quadratic form fΦ(ω).

(5)

Given a quaternion algebra H denote by H0 the pure quaternions. By

using lemma 2.1 it is enough to consider the binary forms associated to pure quaternions:

H(a, b) = {fΦ(ω) : ω ∈ H0}, H(O) = {fΦ(ω): ω ∈ O ∩ H0}.

Definition 2.3. Let O be an order in a quaternion algebra H. We define the denominator mOof O as the minimal positive integer such that mO·O ⊆

Z[1, i, j, ij]. Then the ideal (mO) is the conductor of O in Z[1, i, j, ij].

Properties for these binary forms are collected in the following proposi-tion, easy to be verified.

Proposition 2.4. Consider an indefinite quaternion algebra H = a,b

Q

 , and an order O ⊆ H. Fix the embedding Φ as in lemma 1.1. Then:

(i) There is a bijective mapping H0 → H(a, b) defined by ω 7→ fΦ(ω).

Moreover det1(fΦ(ω)) = n(ω). (ii) H(a, b) = {(b(λ2+ λ3 √ a), λ1 √ a, −λ2+ λ3 √ a) | λ1, λ2, λ3 ∈ Q} = {(bβ0, α, −β) | α, β ∈ Q(√a), tr(α) = 0} . (iii) the binary quadratic forms of H(O) have coefficients in Z

h 1 mO, √ a i Given a quaternion order O and a quadratic order Λ, put

H(O, Λ) := {f ∈ H(O) : det1(f ) = −DΛ}.

Remark that an imaginary quadratic order yields to consider definite bi-nary quadratic forms, and a real quadratic order yields to indefinite bibi-nary forms. Given ω ∈ O ∩H0, consider Fω = Q( √ d), d = − n(ω). Then ϕω( √ d) = ω defines an embedding ϕω ∈ E(H, Fω). By considering Λω := ϕ−1ω (O) ∩

Fω, we have ϕω ∈ E∗(O, Λω). Therefore, by construction, it is clear that

P(fΦ(ω)) = P(Φ(ω)) = P(ϕω). In particular, if we deal with quaternions of

positive norm, we obtain definite binary forms, imaginary quadratic fields and a unique solution τ (fΦ(ω)) = z(ϕω) ∈ H. The points corresponding to

these binary quadratic forms are in fact the complex multiplication points. Theorem 4.53 in [AB04] states a bijective mapping f from the set E (O, Λ) of embeddings of a quadratic order Λ into a quaternion order O onto the set H(Z + 2O, Λ) of binary quadratic forms associated to the orders Z + 2O and Λ. By using optimal embeddings, a definition of primitivity for the forms in H(Z + 2O, Λ) was introduced. We denote by H∗(Z + 2O, Λ) the corresponding subset of (O, Λ)-primitive binary forms. Then equivalence of embeddings yields to equivalence of forms.

Corollary 2.5. Given orders O and Λ as above, for any G ⊆ O∗ consider Φ(G) ⊆ GL(2, R). There is a bijective mapping between E∗(O, Λ)/G and H∗(Z + 2O, Λ)/Φ(G).

(6)

Fix O = O(D, N ), Λ = Λ(d, m) and G = O∗. We use the notation h(D, N, d, m) := ]H∗(Z + 2O(D, N ), Λ(d, m))/ΓO∗. Thus, h(D, N, d, m) =

ν(D, N, d, m; O∗), which can be computed explicitly by Eichler results (cf. theorem 1.2).

3. Generalized reduced binary forms

Fix an Eichler order O(D, N ) in an indefinite quaternion algebra H. Consider the associated group Γ(D, N ) and the Shimura curve X(D, N ).

For a quadratic order Λ(d, m), consider the set H∗(Z + 2O(2p, N ), Λ) of binary quadratic forms. As above, for a definite binary quadratic form f = Ax2+ Bxy + Cy2, denote by τ (f ) the solution of Az2+ Bz + C = 0 in H.

Definition 3.1. Fix a fundamental domain D(D, N ) for Γ(D, N ) in H. Make a choice about the boundary in such a way that every point in H is equivalent to a unique point of D(D, N ). A binary form f ∈ H∗(Z + 2O(D, N ), Λ) is called Γ(D, N )-reduced form if τ (f ) ∈ D(D, N ). Theorem 3.2. The number of positive definite Γ(D, N )-reduced forms in H∗(Z + 2O(D, N ), Λ(d, m)) is finite and equal to h(D, N, d, m).

Proof. We can assume d < 0, in order H∗(Z + 2O(D, N ), Λ(d, m)) consists on definite binary forms. By lemma 2.1 (iii), we have that Γ(D, N )-equivalence of forms yields to Γ(D, N )-equivalence of points. Note that τ (f ) = τ (−f ), but f is not Γ(D, N )-equivalent to −f . Thus, in each class of Γ(D, N )-equivalence of forms there is a unique reduced binary form. Consider G = {ω ∈ O∗| n(ω) > 0} in order to get Φ(G) = Γ(D, N ). The group G has index 2 in O∗and the number of classes of Γ(D, N )-equivalence in H∗(Z + 2O(D, N ), Λ(d, m)) is 2 h(D, N, d, m). In that set, positive and negative definite forms were included, thus the number of classes of positive

definite forms is exactly h(D, N, d, m). 

4. Non-ramified and small ramified cases

Definition 4.1. Let H be a quaternion algebra of discriminant D. We say that H is nonramified if D = 1, that is H ' M(2, Q). We say H is small ramified if D = pq; in this case, we say it is of type A if D = 2p, p ≡ 3 mod 4, and we say it is of type B if DH = pq, q ≡ 1 mod 4 and



p q

 = −1. It makes sense because of the following statement.

(7)

Proposition 4.2. For H =p,q

Q



, p, q primes, exactly one of the following statements holds:

(i) H is nonramified.

(ii) H is small ramified of type A. (iii) H is small ramified of type B.

We are going to specialize above results for reduced binary forms for each one of these cases.

4.1. Nonramified case. Consider H = M(2, Q) and take the Eichler order

O0(1, N ) :=

 a b

cN d | a, b, c, d ∈ Z .

Then Γ(1, N ) = Γ0(N ) and the curve X(1, N ) is the modular curve X0(N ).

To unify results with the ramified case, it is also interesting to work with the Eichler order O(1, N ) := Zh1,j+ij2 , N(−j+ij)2 ,1−i2 i in the nonramified quaternion algebra 1,−1

Q

 .

Proposition 4.3. Consider the Eichler order O = O0(1, N ) ⊆ M(2, Q)

and the quadratic order Λ = Λ(d, m). Then:

(i) H∗(Z + 2O, Λ) ' {f = (N a, b, c) | a, b, c ∈ Z, det2(f ) = −DΛ}.

(ii) The (O, Λ)-primitivity condition is gcd(a, b, c) = 1.

(iii) If d < 0, the number of Γ0(N )-reduced positive definite primitive

binary quadratic forms in H∗(Z + 2O, Λ) is equal to h(1, N, d, m). For N = 1, the well-known theory on reduced integer binary quadratic forms is recovered. In particular, the class number of SL(2, Z)-equivalence is h(d, m).

For N > 1, a general theory of reduced binary forms is obtained. For N equal to a prime, let us fix the symmetrical fundamental domain

D(1, N ) =z ∈ H | | Re(z)| ≤ 1/2,

z − Nk > N1, k ∈ Z, 0 < |k| ≤ N −12 given at [AB04]; a detailed construction can be found in [Als00]. Then a positive definite binary form f = (N a, b, c), a > 0, is Γ0(N )-reduced if

and only if |b| ≤ N a and |τ (f ) − Nk| > 1

N for k ∈ Z, 0 < |k| ≤ N −1

2 .

Figure 4.1 shows the 46 points corresponding to reduced binary forms in H∗(Z + 2O

0(1, 23), Λ) for DΛ = 7, 11, 19, 23, 28, 43, 56, 67, 76, 83, 88, 91, 92,

which occurs in an special graphical position. In fact these points are exactly the special complex multiplication points of X(1, 23), characterized by the existence of elements α ∈ Λ(d, m) of norm DN (cf. [AB04]). The table describes the n = h(1, 23, d, m) inequivalent points for each quadratic order Λ(d, m).

(8)

Note that for these symmetrical domains it is easy to implement an algorithm to decide if a form in this set is reduced or not, by using isometric circles.

Figure 4.1. The points τ (f ) for some f reduced binary forms corresponding to quadratic orders Λ(d, m) in a fun-damental domain for X(1, 23).

(d, m) n τ (f ) (-7, 1) 2 nτ1=−19+ √ 7ι 46 , τ2= 19+√7ι 46 o (-7, 2) 2 nτ3=−4+ √ 7ι 23 , τ4= 4+√7ι 23 o (-11, 1) 2 nτ5=−9+ √ 11ι 46 , τ6= 9+√11ι 46 o (-14, 1) 8 n τ7=−20+ √ 14ι 46 , τ8= −26+√14ι 69 , τ9= −20+√14ι 69 , τ10= −3+√14ι 23 , τ11=3+ √ 14ι 23 , τ12= 20+√14ι 69 , τ13= 26+√14ι 69 , τ14= 20+√14ι 46 o (-19, 1) 2 nτ15= −21+ √ 19ι 46 , τ16= 21+√19ι 46 o (-19, 2) 6 n τ17= −25+ √ 19ι 92 , τ18= −21+√19ι 92 , τ19= −2+√19ι 23 , τ20=2+ √ 19ι 23 , τ21= 21+√19ι 92 , τ22= 25+√19ι 92 o (-22, 1) 4 nτ23= −22+ √ 22ι 46 , τ24= −1+√22ι 23 , τ25= 1+√22ι 23 , τ26= 22+√22ι 46 o (-23, 1) 3 n τ27= −23+ √ 23ι 92 , τ28= 23+√23ι 92 , τ29= −23+√23ι 46 ∼ 23+√23ι 46 o (-23, 2) 3 nτ30= −23+ √ 23ι 69 , τ31= √ 23ι 23 , τ32= 23+√23ι 69 o (-43, 1) 2 nτ33= −7+ √ 43ι 46 , τ34= 7+√43ι 46 o (-67, 1) 2 nτ35= −5+ √ 67ι 46 , τ36= 5+√67ι 46 o (-83, 1) 6 n τ37= −49+ √ 83ι 138 , τ38= −43+√83ι 138 , τ39= −3+√83ι 46 , τ40=3+ √ 83ι 46 , τ41= 43+√83ι 138 , τ42= 49+√83ι 138 o (-91, 1) 4 nτ43= −47+ √ 91ι 230 , τ44= −1+√91ι 46 , τ45= 1+√91ι 46 , τ46= 47+√91ι 230 o

(9)

4.2. Small ramified case of type A. Let us consider HA(p) :=



p,−1 Q

 and the Eichler order OA(2p, N ) := Z

h

1, i, N j,1+i+j+ij2 i

, for N | p−12 , N square-free. The elements in the group ΓA(2p, N ) are γ = 12



α β −β0α0

 such that α, β ∈ Z[√p], α ≡ β ≡ α√p mod 2, det γ = 1, N |



tr(β) −β−β√ 0 p

 . We denote by XA(2p, N ) the Shimura curve of type A defined by ΓA(2p, N ).

Proposition 4.4. Consider the Eichler order OA(2p, N ) and the quadratic

order Λ = Λ(d, m).

(i) The set H(Z + 2OA(2p, N ), Λ) of binary forms is equal to

{f = (a + b√p, 2c√p, a − b√p) : a, b, c ∈ Z, a ≡ b ≡ c mod 2, N | (a + b), det1(f ) = −DΛ}.

(ii) The (OA(2p, N ), Λ)-primitivity condition for these binary quadratic

forms is gcd c+b2 ,a+b2N , b = 1.

(iii) If d < 0, the number of ΓA(2p, N )-reduced positive definite primitive

binary forms in H∗(Z + 2OA(2p, N ), Λ) is equal to h(2p, N, d, m).

For example, consider the fundamental domain D(6, 1) for the Shimura curve XA(6, 1) in the Poincar´e half plane defined by the hyperbolic

polygon of vertices {v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6} at figure 4.2 (cf. [AB04]). The

table contains the corresponding reduced binary quadratic forms f ∈ H∗(Z + 2O

A(6, 1), Λ(d, 1)) and the associated points τ (f ) for det1(f ) =

4, 3, 24, 40, that is d = −1, −3, −6, −10. Since the vertices are elliptic points of order 2 or 3, they are the associated points to forms of determinant 4 or 3, respectively. We put n = h(6, 1, d, 1) the number of such reduced forms for each determinant.

4.3. Small ramified case of type B. Consider HB(p, q) :=



p,q Q

 and the Eichler order OB(pq, N ) := Z

h

1, N i,1+j2 ,i+ij2 i, where N |q−14 , N square-free and gcd(N, p) = 1. Then the group of quaternion transfor-mations is ΓB(pq, N ) = n γ = 12  α β qβ0 α0  : α, β ∈ Z[√p], α ≡ β mod 2, N | α−α20√−β+β0 p , det γ = 1 o . We denote by XB(pq, N ) the corresponding Shimura curve of type B.

(10)

Figure 4.2. Reduced binary forms in a fundamental do-main for XA(6, 1). det1(f ) n f τ (f ) 3 2 (3 +√3)x2+ 2√3xy + (3 −√3)y2 v2= 1− √ 3 2 (1 − ι) (3 +√3)x2− 2√3xy + (3 −√3)y2 v4= −1+ √ 3 2 (1 − ι) 4 2 4x2+ 43xy + 4y2 v 1= − √ 3+ι 2 ∼ v3∼ v5 2x2+ 2y2 v6= ι 24 2 (6 + 2√3)x2− (−6 + 2√3)y2 τ1=( √ 6−√2)ι 2 6x2− 4√3xy + 6y2 τ2=− √ 3+√6ι 3 ∼ τ 0 2 40 4 (10 + 2√3)x2+ 83xy − (−10 + 23)y2 τ 3=3−5 √ 3 11 + 5√10−√30 22 ι (8 + 2√3)x2+ 4√3xy − (−8 + 2√3)y2 τ4=3−4 √ 3 13 + 4√10−√30 22 ι (8 + 2√3)x2− 4√3xy − (−8 + 2√3)y2 τ5=−3+4 √ 3 13 + 4√10−√30 22 ι (10 + 2√3)x2− 8√3xy − (−10 + 2√3)y2 τ6=−3+5 √ 3 11 + 5√10−√30 22 ι

Proposition 4.5. Consider the Eichler order OB(pq, N ) in HB(p, q) and

the quadratic order Λ = Λ(d, m).

(i) The set H(Z + 2OB(pq, N ), Λ) of binary forms contains precisely the

forms f = (q(a + b√p), 2c√p, −a + b√p) where a, b, c ∈ Z, 2N |(c − b) and det1(f ) = −DΛ.

(ii) The (OB(pq, N ), Λ)-primitivity condition for these binary quadratic

forms in (i) is gcd a, b,c−b2N = 1.

(iii) If d < 0, the number of ΓB(pq, N )-reduced positive definite primitive

binary forms in H∗(Z + 2OB(pq, N ), Λ) is equal to h(pq, N, d, m).

In figure 4.3 we show a fundamental domain for ΓB(10, 1) given by the

hyperbolic polygon of vertices {w1, w2, w3, w4, w5, w6}. All the vertices are

(11)

Figure 4.3. Reduced binary forms in a fundamental do-main for XB(10, 1). det1(f ) n f τ (f ) 3 4 (−5 + 5√2)x2+ 2√2xy + (1 +√2)y2 w1= − √ 2+√3ι 5(−1+√2) ∼ w3 (5 + 5√2)x2+ 2√2xy + (−1 +√2)y2 w2=− √ 2+√3ι 5(1+√2) (35 + 25√2)x2− 22xy + (−7 + 52)y2 w 4= √ 2+√3ι 5(7+5√2) ∼ w6 (5 + 5√2)x2+ 22xy + (−1 +2)y2 w 5= √ 2+√3ι 5(1+√2) 8 2 5√2x2+ 22xy +2y2 τ 1=−1+2ι5 (5√2x2+ 2√2xy +√2y2 τ2=1+2ι5 20 2 (10 + 10√2)x2+ (−2 + 2√2)y2 τ3=( √ 10−√5)ι 5 (−10 + 10√2)x2+ (2 + 2√2)y2 τ4=( √ 10+√5)ι 5 40 2 (40 + 30√2)x2+ (−8 + 6√2)y2 τ5=(3 √ 5−2√10)ι 5 10√2x2+ 2√2y2 τ6= √ 5ι 5

forms of determinant 3. We also represent the points corresponding to reduced binary quadratic forms f with det1(f ) = 40, which correspond to

special complex points. The table also contains the explicit reduced definite positive binary forms and the corresponding points for determinants 8 and 20.

(12)

References

[AAB01] M. Alsina, A. Arenas, P. Bayer (eds.), Corbes de Shimura i aplicacions. STNB, Barcelona, 2001.

[AB04] M. Alsina, P. Bayer, Quaternion orders, quadratic forms and Shimura curves. CRM Monograph Series, vol. 22, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004. [Als00] M. Alsina, Dominios fundamentales modulares. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exact. Fis. Nat.

94 (2000), no. 3, 309–322.

[Eic55] M. Eichler, Zur Zahlentheorie der Quaternionen-Algebren. J. reine angew. Math. 195 (1955), 127–151.

[Ogg83] A. P. Ogg, Real points on Shimura curves. Arithmetic and geometry, Vol. I, Progr. Math., vol. 35, Birkh¨auser Boston, Boston, MA, 1983, pp. 277–307.

[Shi67] G. Shimura, Construction of class fields and zeta functions of algebraic curves. Annals of Math. 85 (1967), 58–159.

[Vig80] M.F. Vigneras, Arithm´etique des alg`ebres de quaternions. Lecture Notes in Math., no. 800, Springer, 1980.

Montserrat Alsina

Dept. Matem`atica Aplicada III EUPM

Av. Bases de Manresa 61-73, Manresa-08240, Catalunya, Spain E-mail : Montserrat.alsina@upc.edu

Figure

Figure 4.1. The points τ (f) for some f reduced binary forms corresponding to quadratic orders Λ(d, m) in a  fun-damental domain for X(1, 23).
Figure 4.2. Reduced binary forms in a fundamental do- do-main for X A (6, 1). det 1 (f) n f τ (f ) 3 2 (3 + √ 3)x 2 + 2 √ 3xy + (3 − √ 3)y 2 v 2 = 1− √ 3 2 (1 − ι) (3 + √ 3)x 2 − 2 √ 3xy + (3 − √ 3)y 2 v 4 = −1+ √ 3 2 (1 − ι) 4 2 4x 2 + 4 √ 3xy + 4y 2 v 1
Figure 4.3. Reduced binary forms in a fundamental do- do-main for X B (10, 1). det 1 (f) n f τ (f ) 3 4 (−5 + 5 √ 2)x 2 + 2 √ 2xy + (1 + √ 2)y 2 w 1 = − √ 2+ √ 3ι 5(−1+ √ 2) ∼ w 3 (5 + 5 √ 2)x 2 + 2 √ 2xy + (−1 + √ 2)y 2 w 2 = − √ 2+ √ 3ι 5(1+ √ 2) (35 + 2

Références

Documents relatifs

To obtain these results, we use the general theory of two dimensional inhomoge- neous lattices developed in Barnes and Swinnerton-Dyer [1] (henceforth this paper

Using Hooley's method and the earlier estimate of Klooster- man, a weaker result could be derived which would still be sufficient for our purpose... QUADRATIC POLYNOM-f~,LS

The foregoing analysis provides a 'local' method for the evaluation of Dm ana- logous to that provided by ordinary simple continued fractions for corresponding

THE INHOMOGENEOUS MINIMA OF BINARY QUADRATIC FORMS (IV) 261 Lemma 5.7.. BARNES, Non-homogeneous binary quadratic forms,

[.1], Zur Frage des Euklidischen Algorithmus in quadratischen ZahlkSrpern, Math.. [1], ~ber den Euklidischen Algorithmus in reellquadratischen ZahlkSrpern,

There we were mainly concerned with finding the inhomogeneous minimum M (/) of a rational indefinite binary quadratic form; and occasionally the methods yielded

I am also grateful to the Royal Commission of I85I Exhibition for the award of an Overseas Science Research Scholarship which enabled me to carry out this work

It provides the well-known relation between the class numbers of local and global embeddings, and collects the formulas for the class number of local embeddings given in