Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
Building Research Note, 1979-04
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=a982f20b-3c76-4698-ab33-ab07d898e671 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=a982f20b-3c76-4698-ab33-ab07d898e671
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/40000566
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Log and timber structures of the Ottawa area
.. - ISSN 0701 -5232
LOG AND
TIMBER
STRUCTURES OF THEOTTAWA AREA*
Log c o n s t r u c t i o n was t h e primary b u i l d i n g method during t h e s e t t l e -
ment of the Ottawz area, w h i c h began in t h e firsr y e a r of t h e l a s t century. The extensive use of t h i s construction is e v i d e n t in records
(1)
of t h e
County of Carleton, o f which Bytoun, l a t e r Ottawa, became the p r i n c i p a l community. They show t h a tin
1851 almost 9 2 p e r cent o f t h edwellings in the County were b u i l t o f logs, while about
s i x
per cent were o f frame construction and t h e remainder were o f stone.Although more than 5C0 a d d i t i o n a l l o g houses were b u i l t in t h e
County from 1851 to 1861, the proportion o f log houses declined, however,
such that by 1861 log dwellings accounted f o r about 85 per cent
of
the t o t a l , as i n d i c a t e d b y County records (2) f o r that year. Log construc- tion was used e x t e n s i v e l y for b a r n s and s c h o o l s ;in
1864, the eight schools of The County's Huntley Township were log b u i l d i n g s , as were 13 of t h e 16 schools o f Osgoode Township.Later records of t h e types of dwellings unfortunately do not differentiate between those of log and frame, but undoubtedly t h e
proportion o f l o g houses continued to d e c l i n e , as d i d wood houses
generally, in favour of b r i c k and o t h e r m a t e r i a l s . S t a t i s t i c s on the
dwellings of Carleton County given in the Census o f Canada show t h a t b r i c k houses (of which there were o n l y seven in t h e County in 1861)
comprised almost 50 p e r cent of the t o t a l by 1921, well ahead of wood houses which made up 44 p e r cent of the total.
I'hcrc c:tn b e little doubt about the reason f o r the extensive e a r l y usc of log construction
-
it provided a cheap and f a s t method of b u i l d i n g . 'I'l~c m n t c r i a l w a s r e a d i l y availableand in
any case the land had to beclcnred f a r settlement. The r e l a t i v e cheapness of l o g b u i l d i n g s is i n d i c a t e d
in
the account (33 of a visitor who came to one of thescttlcmcnt nrcas of Upper Canada in 1855; he wrote that l o g houses c o s t
as l i t t l c n s 5 pounds and as much as 5 0 , whereas frame houses c o s t
*Paper p r e s e n t e d a t t h e Conference on Log S t r u c t u r e s in Canada h e l d i n Banff, Alberta, O c t o b e r 1977 and reprinted i n this form w i t h permission
of The Resource C e n t r e , Faculty of Environmental Design, The University o f Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
between 75 and 300 pounds. The low c o s t undoubtedly r e s u l t e d in part from t h e speed w i t h which a l o g house could be erected. I n a booklet printed
in
1857 (4) i n t e n d e d f o r s e t t l e r san
the Ottawa Road, t h e Crown Land Agent claimed t h a t , I'Twelve mancan
b u i l d a good shanty in a day, - t h e timber of which it i s c o n s t r u c t e d b e i n g always t o b e had on t h e s p a t-
"Log b u i l d i n g s predominated
in
t h e townships b u t were l e s s usedi n
t h e towns and villages, a situation t h a t perhaps reflected the economic status o f t h e i r owners. This d i f f e r e n c e between c o u n t r y and town houses
was observed (5) by a resident of t h e Rideau Setslement, who wrote in 1819 t h a t "The country houses are b u i l t o f l o g s and covered w i t h planks o r
bark
of trees," b u t in c o n t r a s t , "The town houses are framesc o v e ~ e d w i t h planed boards, lapped o v e r one another to s e n d o f f the rain
and covered w i t h p i e c e s
of
wood about the size of slats. These axe c a l l e d shingles."CONSTRUCTION METHODS
Three techniques o f logwork, which had been used
i n
e a r l i e r s e t t l e - ment elsewhere, were mainly employedin
the Ottawa area: l o g s l a i d horizontally w i t h dovetailed corner j o i n t s ; v e r t i c a l l o g s spaced a l o n g awall
w i t h t h e i n t e r v a l s between these p o s t sfilled
w i t h h o r i z o n t a l l o g stenoned to f i t grooves cut into the s i d e s of the p o s t s ; and s h o r t l e n g t h s o f l o g s stacked like stovewood t o form a w a l l .
The first technique, which was previously well known in
t h e
UnitedS t a t e s , u n d o u b t e d l y migrated to t h e Ottawa area w i t h settlers from that
country. The d o v e t a i l corner was e x t e n s i v e l y used
in
the region w i t h b u t occasional use of s a d d l e - , square- and V-notch c o r n e r i n g .The second construction, a combination o f
v e r t i c a l
a n d h o r i z o n t a l l o g s , r e f l e c t s an i n f l u e n c e from Quebec. T h i s type of cunstruction had been e x t e n s i v e l y used in New France and subsequently appeared along theOttawa River, a main route f o r t h e fur t r a d e r s . 'Ihe t h i r d type of log c o n s T r u c t i o n , stovewood, which appeared later in t h e O t t a w a area, p r o h a h I y o r i g i n a t e d in t h e United StaTes.
LO(;
1:ONS'rRUCTT ONWITH DOVETAILED
CORNERS---
'lhc dovctsiled corner j o i n t , a k i n d of mortise-and-tenon inter-
locking c u n n c c t i o n where the tenon of a l o g o f one w a l l f i t s a mortise
citt i n t o t h e logs of t h e o t h e r wall, was employed in l o g b u i l d i n g s o f tllc O t t a w a arc7 i n i t s two forms o f h a l f - and full-dovetail corners. In
h i l l f - J o v c t a i l work thc n a t u r e of t h e slope o f the upper and lower
s u r f n c c s o f a t e n o n i s s u c h that the extremity of t h e bottom s u r f a c e forms n hosizuntal l i n e on t h e wall while t h e e x t r e m i t y of its t o p
surface forms a s l o p i n g line. I n c o n t r a s t , in t h e full-dovetail corner,
t h e extremities sf b a t h t h e t o p and bottom surfaces
of
the tenon form sloping lines on the w a l l surface.The l o g b u i l d i n g s o f the farms in t h e Ottawa area sometimes comprise a c u r i o u s mixture of corner techniques, f o r example those used i n the house a n d barns of a
farm
located west of Ottawa on t h e Carp-Stittsville Road, and b e l i e v e d to have been c o n s t r u c t e d about 1850. The logwork o fthe small house (Figure l), which has been boarded over except on t h e
west wall where t h e r e was a s h e d , c o n s i s t s o f c a r e f u l h a l f - d o v e t a i l work of logs about 7 in. t h i c k and between 12 and 24 in. w i d e . In a d d i t i o n
to their h a l f - d o v e t a i l interlocking, however, several legs have been secured b y wooden p i n s passing through them i n t o t h e ad j o i n i n g l o g s .
Half-dovetail cornering was also employed i n one o f t h e b a r n s of t h e farm, while another barn (Figure 23 was constructed with f u l l - dovetail corners. A t h i r d barn on The p r o p e r t y ( F i g u r e 3) e x h i b i t s yedt a n o t h e r type of corner, the V-notch.
The corners
of
a log building w e r e usually constructed entirelyof
h a l f - d o v e t a i l or full-dovetail joints. In the Ottawa area, however, itis n o t unusual to find a building w i t h corner j o i n t s of b o t h types, i n t e r s p e r s e d w i t h square-notch j o i n t s .
"EN COUL ISSE" CONSTRUCTION
A form o f timber-frame c o n s t r u c t i o n employed in New France c o n s i s t e d
of corner and intermediate posts that were grooved along the s i d e s ; the
s l o t s , about 2 in. wide and 3 in. deep, provided a continuous mortise f o r the t e n o n s of horizontal Logs l a i d between the p o s t s . A general term applied to such construction is "2 poteaux et ii pisces c o u l i s s a n t e s "
( 6 ) ; o t h e r terms used, r e f l e c t i n g d i f f e r e n c e s in the nature o f t h e
h o r i z o n t a l members, arc "pieux en coul isse," 'Ipoteaux en coul i s s e f t or "madriers e n c o u l i s s e " (7). O t h e r names include "'Hudson s Bay S t y l e " ' (reflecting e x t e n s i v e u s e of t h i s construction by t h e Company], "Red
River Frame," "Manitoba Frame," and (by Americans in t h e
U
.S
.
Noxth- West), "Canadian S t y l e . * iThe e a r l y use of lten ceulisse" construction
i n
the Montreal area, where voyageurs were recruited for t h e fur trade, i n d i c a t e s that t h ec o n s t r u c t i o n migrated w i t h them ( 8 ) . Because t h e Ottawa River served as t h c route o f t h e n o r t h w e s t f u r trade, "en c o u 1 i s s e ' ~ o n s t r u c t i o n a p p c a r c d in thc p o s t s and settlements e s t a b l i s h e d along t h e r i v e r .
Iixnapl es i n c l ude a small house within the grounds of t h e monastery at O k a
a n d n b a r n ( c . 1805) of Duldregan Hall at L 'Orignal (Figure 4 ) . The f a c t n r l s house and o t h e r buildings of t h e o l d t r a d i n g p o s t at F o r t
W i l l i a m , ahout 100 milcs w e s t of Ottawa, provide additional examples of "cn coulisse" c o n s t r u c t i o n , which has also been observed in b u i l d i n g s
i n
t h e c o m m u ~ i t i e s o f Aylmer, Lachute and ChGnCville. I t s u s e i n Ottawa has hcen revc,;led b y the demolition of o l d houses, one of them believedto h a v e been built early in t h e h i s t o r y o f the community ( 9 ) . An example of t h e construction [ F i g u r e 5) was revealed when p a r t of t h e s i d i n g w a s removed from a b u i l d i n g on St. Patrick St., believed t o have been b u i l t
STOVEWOOD CONSTRUCTION
Stovewood w a l l s , sometimes also termed stack wall, l o g b u t t and cedar l o g construction, are a form o f l o g masonry consisting of s h o r t
l e n g t h s o f logs laid across t h e plane of t h e wall
Tn t h e
manner o f stacked stovewood, with t h e spaces between t h e logs f i l l e d w i t h mortar.Unlike d o v e t a i l e d and "en coulisse" logwork, whose o r i g i n s
can
b etraced ultimately to Europe, stovewood construction appears to have o r i g i n a t e d in N o r t h America, perhaps in t h e early years of the l a s t
century. I n Wisconsin, b u i l d i n g s o f t h i s type, c o n s t r u c t e d in 1848 and 1850, were a t t r i b u t e d (10) to b u i l d e r s from New York S t a t e , which is p o s s i b l y also the place o f o r i g i n o f t h e stavewood canstruction that
f i r s t appeared i n t h e Ottawa r e g i o n .
This
method o f building h a s been used in many areas, i~cluding Quebec, the Penetanguishene region on Georgian Bay in Ontario, and Michigan.Stovewood c o n s t r u c t i o n has been employed in some cases simply as an
i n f i E ling o r n o g g i n g between the posts o f timber-frame structures, b u t
usually it h a s been used t o provide a s t r u c t u r a l w a l l . Ground-floor walls o f barns c o n s t r u c t e d in stovewood
are
a camman sight in the Ottawaa r e a , but t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n has a l s o been used f o r t h e walls
of
h o u s e s and o t h e s s t r u c t u r e s . A number of stevewood b u i l d i n g s in Hull, k n o t i c k and North Gower, b u i l t between 1937 and 1 9 4 9 , and examined b y G.W. S h o r t e r of t h e Division of Building Research o f the National Research Council o f Canada, had been b u i l t of cedar l o g s varying from 12 to 16 in. in length. In one case t h e l a g s had been obtained from a demolished barn, a p p a r e n t l ya comon source o f m a t e r i a l for t h e construction.
One o f t h e b u i l d i n g s examfned had 1 2 - i n . square cedar p o s t s a t t h e c o r n e r s , b u t the o t h e r s , representing the general p r a c t i c e , had t h e i r c o r n e r s arranged as a combination o f short l o g s and much l o n g e r squared
l o g s , t h e l a t t e r l a i d parallel to t h e w a l l face and o v e r l a p p e d at the c o r n e r s [Figure 6 ) . The m o r t a r was sometimes continuous through t h e w a l l , b u t o t h e r w i s e , as shown
i n
Figure 7, it contracted t h e logs o n l y n e a r t h e i r ends. Various i n t e r i o r f i n i s h i n g s , including plasteringd i r c c t l y
an
thc logs and a p p l y i n g furring s t r i p s and wallboard, were used i n t I ~ c buildings, some of w h i c h were f i n i s h e d externally with stucco.Stavcwood c o n s t r u c t i o n c o n t i n u e s to be employed in the O t t a w a area. A s r c c c n t l y as 1961, a t l c a s t one c o n t r a c t o r of t h e region specialized
i n t h c cscction o f stovcwaod buildings ( 1 1 ) . H e had s t a r t e d ta use the construction :I dccade earl i e r , employing cedar logs, which are r e a d i l y
available; a b o u t 2 7 c o r d s a r e r e q u i r e d t o construct a house.
SI! I (;N TORY CLUB LODGE
tIndouhtcJ1y t h e l a r g e s t log b u i l d i n g o f the O t t a w a area, t h e
Scigniary C l u h I,odgc (12) was erected as t h e S e i g n e u r i e d e l a Petite- N;t t lot\ ncar M o n t e l ~ c l l o , Quebec, in 1930, u s i n g a v a r i a n t o f "en coulisse"
t e c h n i q u e , although c e r t a i n corners of t h e building were c o n s t r u c t e d w i t h saddle-notch j o i n t s . Built of West Coast r e d cedar l o g s , t h e l o d g e
takes t h e form of f i v e w i n g s radiating from a central area. Figure 7
shows t h e lodge under construction; details are shown in Figure 9 .
The walls are g e n e r a l l y two s t o r e y s high, consisting of p o s t s 23 ft
h i g h , spaced about 29 ft a p a r t , with h o r i z o n t a l l o g s l a i d between t h e
p s t s . Instead of a grooved-post arrangement, however, the h o r i z o n t a l
l o g s were grooved on t h e i r ends to r e c e i v e a wooden s t r i p 2 in. w i d e , nailed to each s i d e of the p o s t s , which had been slabbed t o provide f l a t surfaces.
To account for t h e i r t a p e r , t h e l o g s were laid w i t h t h e wide end o f one l o g over the narrow end sf that below it. The logs were bonded t o g e t h e r by means of thick wooden dowels, located about 3 Et from each end, p a s s i n g through one log into the log beneath. The wide spacing o f the p o s t s made it desirable t o provide i n t e r m e d i a t e posts, which were
made of squared timber. These p o s t s , located behind the facing logs
and t i e d t o them by means o f l o n g screws, a l s o served to support t h e f l o o r system of t h e second s t o r e y .
To reduce their s h i p p i n g weight, to lessen s h r i n k a g e effects, a n d t o make them easier t o work, t h e l a g s were c u t a y e a r b e f o r e u s e . Provision f o r their dimensional changes in t h e b u i l d i n g was made b y
Leaving a space between t h e bottom o f l i n t e l s and t h e t o p s o f t h e window- and door-frames; for flexibility, the screws that t i e d t h e f a c i n g l o g s t o the intermediate posts passed through slots in the posts.
To seal the walls, oakum w a s placed along she scored top s u r f a c e o f a l o g b c f o r e the next l o g was s e t . T h i s material was also placed between the posts and the ends o f t h e h o r i z o n t a l l o g s . The e x t e r i o r
j o i n t s between t h e l o g s were caulked w i t h a plastic cement, while on t h e i n s i d e , quarter-round wood s t r i p s n a i l e d between t h e logs s e r v e d to h o l d t h e oakum in place as well as to p r o v i d e a f i n i s h e d appearance.
Iko i m p o r t a n t features of t h e constructian of the S e i g n i o r y Club
Lodge were t h e magnitude of t h e project, which required 8,600 l o g s ,
and t h e attractively rustic appearance of t h e f i n i s h e d work. A t h i r d f e a t u r e , however, is n o t e w o r t h y - the p r o j e c t was completed in a short t'imc, h a v i n g becn s t a r t e d in February and f i n i s h e d in July of t h e same y car.
111 thc general dcvcIopment of wood c o n s t r u c t i o n i n N o ~ t h America, tjmhcr-frame nncl l o g construction was r e p l a c e d by balloon-framing, a system i n v e n t e d in Chicago
in
t h e 1 8 3 Q t s , in which l i g h t , sawn s t r i p s ofwood were n a i l e d t o g e t h e r to form t h e s t r u c t u r e . A l t h o u g h b a l l o o n -
f r a m i n g a l s o became t h e general method of wood construction in the O t t a w a
c o n n e c t i o n s , and b o t h derived from logwork, were used b y Ottawa b u i l d e r s
.
These b u i l d i n g techniques employed planks, probably t h e "deals" pfoduced by O t t a w a mills f o r t h e E n g l i s h lumber trade.In one of the c o n s t r u c t i o n s , which p o s s i b l y o r i g i n a t e d in Ottawa, over1 apping logwork was d u p l i c a t e d by stacking planks on edge one above
thc e t h e r , w h i c h overlapped at the corners, The end surface of a plank
was madc f l u s h w i t h the o u t s i d e surface o f the planks o f t h e o t h e r wall,
and n a i l s d r i v e n through t h e p l a n k i n t o the plank it a b u t t e d held them together. Nails were a l s o d r i v e n t h r o u g h t h e bottom part of a plank
i n t o the one b e n e a t h it. Because planks of random w i d t h were generally used, t h e i r ends had ta be notched t o fit t h e a d j o i n i n g plank of t h e o t h e r wall.
Several examples of t h i s construction have been observed in b u i l d i n g s of t h e 1880's r e c e n t l y d e m l i s h e d
in
O t t a w a (131, t h e plank- work in some cases covered w i t h b r i c kveneer,
andin
others, with tongue-and-groove boards; the interior f i n i s h was usually lath andp l a s t e r on furring s t r i p s . Some o f the b u i l d i n g s were c o n s t r u c t e d o f
3 - i n . p l a n k s , t h e o t h e r s , of 2-in. p l a n k s .
A form of p l a n k canstruction, undoubtedly derived f r o m 'ken coulisse" logwork (14), comprises v e r t i c a l planks t h a t correspond t o t h e p o s t s of t h e e a r l i e r c o n s t r u c t i o n , w i t h h o r i z o n t a l planks o f t h e same t h i c k n e s s l a i d
on
edge t o f i l l t h e space between t h e vertical members, and t h e planks nailed to each o t h e r . The e n d s o f t h o s e p l a n k s t h a t serve as l i n t e l s p r o j e c t i n t o cut-away areas o f t h e v e r t i c a l planks that s u p p o r t them.Such plank constructian probably o r i g i n a t e d
in
Montreal, where it was r e f e r r e d t o i n that city's building r e g u l a t i o n s (15) f o r the y e a r1891 as Ifen pans de bois
."
Its use was permitted in b u i l d i n g snot
exceeding two s t o r e y s , provided t h a t t h e planks were sound, n o t l e s s than 3 in. t h i c k , and well fastened t o g e t h e r , and t h a t t h e wall w a s
vcncered -with b r i c k s as soon as it was erected, w i t h l o n g nails t y i n g the brickwork to t h e planks. T h i s c o n s t r u c t i o n , d e t a i l s o f which a r e shown in F i g u r e 9, has been termed elsewhere (16) llun systSme de pans 5 c h a r p e n t e p 3 e i n e f b n d "une construction 5 charpente pleine.'"
A l s o known as "plank frame walls,lt the construction has been long
cmploycd b y builders i n t h e Ottawa area, as revealed by t h e d e m o l i t i o n of I) u i l d i n g s i n Ottawa a n d IIull
,
some of which had p r o b a b l y been built I ~ c f n r c thc crld o f t h c l a s t century. But: i t s use h a s n c t d i e d out and i t rcmnins i l c u r r e n t technique o f b u i l d i n g in t h e r e g i o n .CUNCLLR IONS
Leg construction was the most important b u i l d i n g t e c h n i q u e i n the
scttlemcnt of t h e Ottawa area, undoubtedly because it was expedient, p r o v i d i n g a t once an inexpensive, rapid and simple method o f b u i l d i n g .
T t a l s o provided reasonably d u r a b l e s t r u c t u r e s ,
many
e a r l y l o g l ~ l ~ i l d i r ~ g sof the area hawing s u r v i v e d f o r a century
o r more.
Three forms
of
log constructian, a l l of which o r i g i n a t e d elsewhere, have been usedin
buildings o f the Ottawa area - horizontal logs a v e r -lapped a t t h e corners, grooved p o s t s w i t h horizontal infilling l o g s , and
stovewood c o n s t r u c t i o n . In the f i r s t of t h e s e constructions, h a l f - a n d
full-dovetail joints were e x t e n s i v e l y used, with but occasional employment of s a d d l e - , square-, and V-notch work.
t o g c o n s t r u c t i o n i n t h e Ottawa area w a s largely displaced, probably in the l a t t e r decades o f t h e last century, by balloon-frame consTruction, and b y two t y p e s of p l a n k c o n s t r u c t i o n d e r i v e d from methods o f b u i l d i n g
with l o g s . One of the plank c o n s t r u c t i o n s , c o n s i s t i n g o f planks on edge
overlapped at t h e carriers, may have o r i g i n a t e d locally, b u t t h e o t h e r , o f vertical p l a n k s acting as p o s t s and i n f i l l e d with h o r i z o n t a l planks,
p r o b a b l y came from Montreal.
Although l o g b u i l d i n g s continue to b e erected
i n
the Otrawa r e g i o n ,such c o n s t r u c t i o n is considered to account f o r b u t a small p r o p o r t i o n o f t h e total b u i l d i n g c a r r i e d out i n t h e area. The logwork now used is mainly saddle-notch and stovewood construction.
REFERENCES
(11 Belden, H . , " I l l u s t r a t e d Historical A t l a s sf the County of C a r l e t o n , O n t a r i o , ' ' Toronto, Belden, 1 8 7 9 .
(23 Walker, H . and Walker, O., " C a r l e t o n Saga," Ottawa, Runge P r e s s
L t d . , 1968.
(3) Held, C . R . , - in "Early T r a v e l l e r s i n t h e Canadas, 1791-1867,'' G . M . Craig, ed., Toronto, Macmillan, 1955, pp. 202-211.
( 4 ) F r e n c h , T . P . , "Information f o r I n t e n d i n g S e t t l e r s on the Ottawa
and Opcango I4oad and its V i c i n i t y , " Ottawa, n . p . , 1857.
5 t i1
,
J S,
"A Pionccr Ilistory o f the County o f Lanark,'"
q u o t a t i o n of Andrew B e l l , Toronto, Best P r i n t i n g Co., 1 9 6 8 , p . 2 8 . ( 6 ) SGguin, R.
-L
.
,
''La maison en Nouvelle-France,"
National blusemso f Canada, B u l l e t i n 226, O t t a w a , 1968,
(7) Richardson, A . J . H . , "A Comparative Historical Study of Tiniber Buildi;:: i n Canada," Bulletin of t h e Association f o r Preservation Technology, Vol. V, No. 3, 1973, pp. 77-102.
8 Richardson, A.3. ti., t'Voyageur C o n s t r u c t i o n Methods
,"
B u l l e t i n of thc Associationfor
Preservation Technology, V o l . V, No. 4 , 1973,(9) "Log Mouses
in
t h e G r e e n b e l t , " N a t i o n a l CapitalCommission,
Information and Historical Division, Ottawa, 1964, 5 p -(10) P e r r i n ,
W.
W,,
'"Wisconsin'
Stovewood' Walls," Wisconsin Magazine o f History, Vol. 4 6 , No. 3, 1 9 6 3 , pp. 215-219.( 1 1) Couillnrd, R . G . , "La V a l f E e de ltOutaeuais et ses maisons en
rondins
dc ctidrc," I l a h i t a t , Vol.IV,
no 6 , 1961, p p . 26-27.t i 2 3 Ihrst, 11.
L.,
"Methods Usedin Erecting Large
Hotel o f LagC o n s t r u c t i o n , " Contract Record and Engineering Review, Vol. 4 4 , NO. 23, 1930, p p . 6 8 3 - 6 8 7 .
113) R i t c h i e , T., "The Use o f Planks
in
Wall Construction," Bulletin of t h e Association f o r Preservation Technology, Vol. VI, No. 3,1974, pp. 26-34.
( 1 4 ) Ritchie, T., "Plankwall Framing,
a
Modem Wall Construction w i t han Ancient H i s t o r y , ' l Journal o f t h e Society of Architectural
l l i s t o r i a n s , V o l . XXX, No. 1, 1971, pp. 6 6 - 7 0 .
( 1 5 ) Pel i s s i e r , L . E . , " T r a i t g thGorique et pratique de l a
responsah i l i t E de s a s c h i t e c t e s e t d e s e n t r e p r e n e u r s , " M o n t r e a l , PGrjard, A , , 1891.
(16) Grcnier,
C.,
"Guide du constructeur," S e c r e t a r i a t de la ProvinceFigure l a Figure lb Figure 2 P i gurc 3a F i g u r e
36
Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8LOG AND
TIMBER STRUCTURESOF
THE O?TAi'iA AREAT.
R i t c h i eFIGURE
CAPTIONSFarmliouse built about 1850, o f lags about 7
i n .
t h i c k and up t o 24in.
wide, laid w i t h h a l f - d o v e t a i l corners.Corner detail of the farmhause
o f
F i g u r e 1.A l o g b a r n constructed w i t h full -dovetai l c o r n e r s , (same farm as F i g u r e la).
A log barn w i t h V-notch corner, a type of logwork n o t common in t h e Ottawa area, (same farm as Figure la). Corner detail of barn shown in Figure 3a.
Barn
of
"en coulisse" logwork, constructed about 1805 a t Alexander Grant % t ' l l ~ l d r e g a n Hall" a t LfOrignal.Building of "en coulisseu logwork
on
St. P a t r i c k St., Ottawa, b e l i e v e d to have been built i n 1 8 4 7 .Stovewood wall of a b u i l d i n g at N o r t h go we^, c o n s t r u c t e d in 1949.
Sketch o f corner arrangement of stovewood construction. Sci g n i o r y Club Lodge, Montebell o, Quebec, u n d e r c o n s t r u c t i o n i n 1930. (Photograph courtesy
o f
David R . Smith, Manager,) S c i g n i a r y C l u b Lodge, detail of wall construction showing p o s t s w i t h horizontal i n f i l l i n g logs and saddle-notch c o r n e r ." C o n s t r u c t i o n 5 charpente pleine" ( p l a n k frame wall c o n s t r u c t i o n > , a d e r i v a t i v e of "en c o ~ l i s s e ' ~ logwork; a f t e r Char1 es Grenier, "Guide du c o n s t m c t e u r , '"942.
r i . $. ,
. . I
5 ' f :
. , ' * . .
-. +.- - '-T
-
, , . ,&, - - ,A.- .- I,., FIGURE 5i r "
12" cedar l o g s apprax. 4" t o 6" d i a m . 1 a e p t n o M o r t a r for a C e d a r c o r n e r pasts L I , - 1 - - - - / I ' s i l l p t a t e F o u n d a t i o n