Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
NRCA/NBS Proceedings of the Symposium on Roofing Technology, pp. 187-192,
1977
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=4cd326bd-5519-44d8-b195-c69b0b15967a https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=4cd326bd-5519-44d8-b195-c69b0b15967a
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Temperature of bituminous roofing membrane and its relation to
ambient conditions
Ser TH.1
N21d
National Research
Conseil national
no.758
*
Council Canada
de recherches Canada
c. 2
TEMPERATURE OF BITUMINOUS ROOFING
MEMBRANE AND ITS RELATION TO
AMBIENT CONDITlONS
by H.O. Laaly
ANALYZED
Reprinted, with permission, from
Proceedings, Symposium on Roofing Technology held at Gaithersbutg, Md., 21
-
23 September 1977 p. 187-
192DBR Paper No. 758
Division of Building Research
Sommaire
Des mesures de la temperature d'une membrane multicouches bitumineuse ont et6 prises sur le toit d'un bztiment 2
Ottawa. Des thermocouples ont St6 installds sur le dessus et au milieu de la membrane et 2 un pouce (25.4 m) sous celle-ci. La lecture des tempgratures s'effectua P partir du milieu de l'hiver jusqu'au milieu de lfGt6. L'gpaisseur de neige 2 Ct6 d6terminGe 2 intervalles sur le toit et quotidiennement sur le sol 5 proximitg. Les rgsultats montrent que lorsque le couvert de neige est profond et que les tempgratures sont basses la membrane de couverture peut subir plusieurs cycles de gel et de ddgel chaque hiver. A cause d'une distribution irregulisre de la neige sur un toit, des regimes thermiques de sol different existent dans la membrane resultant ainsi dans des contraintes peu uniformes.
PAPER
NUMBER 211
TEMPERATURE OF BITUMINOUS ROOFING
MEMBRANE AND ITS RELATION TO
AMBIENT CONDITIONS
H. 0. LaalyBuilding Materials Section, Division of Building Research, National Research Council of Canada, Otrawa, Ontario, Canada
Key words: Bitumen Roofing Membrane
.
Snow Freeze -thaw Temperature Strength ABSTRACTTemperature measurements were made on a bituminous built-up roofing membrane on a building roof at O t - tawa. Thermocouples were installed at the top and middle of the membrane and one inch (25.4 mm) below it. Temperatures were measured from the middle of winter to the middle of summer. Depth of snow cover was determined at intervals on the roof and daily on nearby ground. The results show that when snow cover is shallow and temperatures are low a roof membrane may undergo many freeze-thaw cycles each winter. Because of uneven
,
snow distribution on a roof, different thermal regimes exist in the membrane resulting in non-uniform stresses?INTRODUCTION
It is generally assumed that a snow-covered bituminous BUR membrane on a heated building does not freeze. With its temperature thus moderated by an insulating blanket of snow, the membrane would be protected from the hazards of temperature cycling. Other research indicates that freeze-thaw cycling may reduce membrane strength! Minimum membrane surface temperature can fall as much as 14OF (lO°C)below minimum air tem- I
perature2, and maximum surface temperature can rise 20°F to 3O0F (12OC to 17OC) above air temperature in bright sunshine. The chief cause of membrane splitting is the daily temperature cycling, according to one theory?
Against this background, our research program was undertaken to measure membrane temperatures, freeze- thaw cycles, and the temperature effects of snow cover. ''
i
ICONCLUSIONS
Field temperature measurements of an actual roof in Ottawa during part of the winter and summer of 1976 contradict the assumption that snow cover, irrespective of depth, prevents freeze-thaw cycling in the membrane. Under light snow cover, membranes in cold climate may experience many freezebthaw cycles each winter.
Also emerging from the test program are the following conclusions:
*Snow cover of only 1 ft. does produce an essentially constant roof temperature at the freezing level.
*Snow depth can vary widely, between 2 and 38 in. (5 to 96 cm) at the same time. Because of variations in density, the effect of snow cover over an entire roof cannot be readily calculated.
*A membrane can be subjected not only to extreme daily temperatures in winter; it can also be frozen where moisture accumulates in the felts.
*In winter months, with no snow cover, membrane temperature parallels air temperature very closely, with repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
*In summer, the membrane temperature exceeds the maximum daytime air temperature by as much as 45OF (25OC), remaining slightly above the low air temperature during the night. (This conclusion is consistent with others' observations.)
EXPERIMENTAL
T h e roof of the main laboratory of the Division of Building Research (building M-20) was used for this study (see Figure 1). Thermocouples were located in two areas, A and B, 3 ft. (91.5 cm) apart and each about 1 yard square (0.84 m2). (Figure 2 shows the location of the thermocouples). One area was cleared of snow; the normal accumulation was left on the other. Snow depth was measured over most of the roof. Air temperature was measured by two thermocouples located about 39 in. (1 m) above the roof surface. ,
Temperatures were recorded continuously with a strip chart recorder. Values, extracted at 06:00, 12 :00, 18:00, and 24:00, were used to determine maximum and minimum temperatures during each 24 hrs., from February 5 to July 4, 1976. Air temperature was measured with a "bare" thermocouple subject to radiation effects.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author sincerely thanks P. J. Sereda and H. E; Ashton for their frequent, useful discussions and con- structive suggestions. This paper is a contribution from the Division of Building Research, National Research Council of Canada, and is published with the approval of the Director of the Division. '
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
On February 21, 1976, snow depths varied from a minimum of 2 in. (5 cm) in the middle of some roof areas to a maximum of 38 in. (96 cm) next to the parapet. On that same day snow depth on the ground was about 28 in. (71 cm). In area B, where snow was left over the thermocouples, the snow depth was about 1 ft. (30.5 cm) at the beginning of tests and a maximum of about 2 ft. (61.0 cm) before melting began at the end of March.
Maximum and minimum air temperatures measured by the thermocouples located 39 in. (1 m) from the roof are presented in Figures 3 to 6. A comparison of these temperatures with corresponding temperatures obtained at a nearby meteorological station manned by DBR staff &owed that they differed randomly by 1 to 2OF (0.5 to 1 OC). , These ambient temperature values are therefore adequate to assess the temperature differences experienced by the membrane in the snow-covered and snow-cleared areas of the roof.
In the snow-covered test area, membrane surface temperature remained constant (just above the freezing point) for the duration of the snow-covered period, even though the minimum air temperature dropped repeatedly to around O°F ( - 18OC) (see Figure 3). The temperature in the middle of the membrane was essentially the same as at the surface.
The temperature 1 in. (2.54 cm) inside the insulation, during periods of snow cover, remained at about 40°F (5OC), as shown in Figure 4, except for a short period in mid-March when the temperature dropped to near freezing. There is no obvious explanation for this behavior.
For the roof section cleared of snow, membrane surface temperature responded to the air temperature, as shown in Figure 5, cycling between a high of 55OF (1S0C) to a low of about O°F ( - 18OC). It thus experienced repeated cycles of freezing and thawing. Exceptions to freeze-thaw cycles occured on days 24 to 29, when mem- brane temperature remained constant at the freezing point, presumably because freshly fallen snow had not been removed. Even the temperature 1 in. (2.54 cm) deep in the insulation showed values considerably below freezing during the period when the air temperature dropped to about O°F ( - 18OC) (Figure 6).
In the months following the melting of rooftop snow, temperatures were found to be as expected and as reported by other workers (Figures 3 to 6). Surface temperature and membrane temperature exceeded the maximum air temperature during the day by as much as 45OF (25OC); minimum was about equal to the minimum air temperature during the night.
Snow depth and its distribution on roofs depends on many design variables such as slope of the roof, non- uniformity due to gables and hips, arched and curved roofs,'drifting of snow, influence of penthouses, chimneys, parapet walls and adjacent roofs 4 y 5 . Membrane temperature is clearly dependent on snow depth, and since this is
variable so will the temperature difference be variable.
In summary, our results indicate that the conventionally assumed insulating effects of snow are undependable. A minimum depth of 12 in. is apparently required in a climate like Ottawa's to assure essentially constant tem- perature.
REFERENCES
1. Laaly, H. O., "The Effect of Moisture and Freeze-Thaw Cycles on the Strength of Bituminous Built - U p
Roofing Membrane. "Presented at Symposium on Roofing Technology, Nat. Bur. Stand., September F377.
2. Handegord,
G.
0. "Problems in Flat Roofs - A Review of Research. " Nat. Res. Council Canada, Division ofBuilding Research, Tech. Paper 182, Ottawa, June 1964.
3. Solvason, K. R. and Handegord, G. O., "Ridging, Shrinkage and Splitting of Built-Up Roofzng Membranes. "
Nat. Res. Council Canada, Division of Building Research, Building Research Note 112, Ottawa, June 1976.
4. Lutes, D. A . , "Snowloads for the Design of Roofs in Canada, "Proc. Western Snow Conference, Victoria, B.C. April 1970. p. 61-67 (NRCC 11911).
5 . "Snow Loath. " Commentary H in Commentaries on Part 4 of the National Building Code of Canada 1975.
Nat. Res. Council Canada, Associate Committee on the National Building Code, Ottawa. P. 119-130 (NRCC
D R A I N
0
FIGURE 1 -DESIGNATED AREAS A AND B ON THE ROOF OF BUILDING M-20, NRC SITE, OTTAWA
( In Air)
9-
S N O W
. \ - . k ? < ' ,.
T H E R M O C O U P L E S
-
'\- ;
-
-
/-A .- \ \\
.
4 0 LB TYPE FELT BASE
SHEET
BUR
(3 P L Y TYPE
1 5
LB
O R G A N I C F E L T )
PEA G R A V E L
2 " T H I C K
C O N C R E T E D E C K
V A P O U R BARRIER
S T Y R O F O A M I N S U L A T I O N
FIGURE 2-THERMOCOUPLE LOCATIONS AND CODES FOR AREA A (SNOW REMOVED) AND AREA B (SNOW COVERED)
F E 8 I M A R C H I A P R I L I M A Y I J U N E I I 8 0 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ ~ I H I I ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I ~ I ~ I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-
A I R M A X , M I N 3----
S U R F A C E M A X...*..
S U R F A C E M I N ". 1 2 0 - -7 LL E k7 5 r-
1 0 0 g Y = . - - - =2
-- - - = -"
8 0 5 w - - - ", - - - & - - ~- - z - -- = 6 0 5 r D A Y S ( D A Y 1-
5 F E B R U A R Y 1 9 7 6 )FIGURE 3- ROOF SURFACE TEMPERATURES AND DAILY AIR EXTREMES (1976), SNOW COVERED
A P R I L I M A Y J U N E M A R C H 1 8 0 1 6 0
-
A I R M A X , M I N----
I N S U ~ A T I G N M A XE
..-....
I N S U L A T I O N M I N 1 4 0 D A Y S ( D A Y 1 = 5 F E B R U A R Y 1 9 7 6 )FIGURE 4-INSULATION TEMPERATURES (1 INCH DEEP) AND DAILY AIR EXTREMES (1976). SNOW COVERED
i a o
-
A I R M A X , M I N4
M E M B R A N E M A X
...
M E M B R A N E M I N,;
D A Y S ( D A Y 1 5 F E B R U A R Y 1 9 7 6 )
FIGURE 5-MEMBRANE TEMPERATURES AND DAILY AIR EXTREMES (1976), SNOW REMOVED
1 6 0 - & I R M A X , M I N
- - - - I N S U L A T I O N M A X
D A Y S ( D A Y I = 5 F E B R U A R Y 1 9 7 6 )
FIGURE 6 -INSULATION TEMPERATURES ( 1 INCH DEEP) AND DAILY AIR EXTREMES (1976). SNOW REMOVED
T h i s publication i s being d i s t r i b u t e d by the Division of Building R e s e a r c h of the National R e s e a r c h Council of Canada. I t should n o t b e r e p r o d u c e d in whole o r in p a r t without p e r m i s s i o n of the o r i g i n a l p u b l i s h e r . The Di- v i s i o n would b e glad t o b e of a s s i s t a n c e in obtaining s u c h p e r m i s s i o n .
P u b l i c a t i o n s of the Division m a y b e obtained by m a i l - ing the a p p r o p r i a t e r e m i t t a n c e ( a Bank, E x p r e s s , o r P o s t Office Money O r d e r , o r a cheque, m a d e payable t o t h e R e c e i v e r G e n e r a l of Canada, c r e d i t NRC) t o the National R e s e a r c h Council of Canada, Ottawa. K I A OR6. S t a m p s a r e not a c c e p t a b l e .
A l i s t of a l l publications of the Division i s a v a i l a b l e and m a y b e obtained f r o m the P u b l i c a t i o n s Section, Division of Building R e s e a r c h , National R e s e a r c h Council of Canada. Ottawa. KIA OR 6.