• Aucun résultat trouvé

Probing the internal structure of magnetic nanocomposites – thermo-sensitive gels and lamellar films – respectively by small angle neutron scattering and neutron reflectivity

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Probing the internal structure of magnetic nanocomposites – thermo-sensitive gels and lamellar films – respectively by small angle neutron scattering and neutron reflectivity"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00196454

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00196454

Submitted on 30 Jun 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Probing the internal structure of magnetic

nanocomposites – thermo-sensitive gels and lamellar films – respectively by small angle neutron scattering

and neutron reflectivity

Siham Douadi-Masrouki, Bruno Frka-Petesic, Delphine El Kharrat, Olivier Sandre, Maud Save, Bernadette Charleux, Valérie Cabuil

To cite this version:

Siham Douadi-Masrouki, Bruno Frka-Petesic, Delphine El Kharrat, Olivier Sandre, Maud Save, et al.. Probing the internal structure of magnetic nanocomposites – thermo-sensitive gels and lamellar films – respectively by small angle neutron scattering and neutron reflectivity. The 5th International Symposium on Bioscience and Nanotechnology, Dec 2007, Kawagoe, Japan. �hal-00196454�

(2)

Probing the internal structure of magnetic nanocomposites – thermo-sensitive gels and lamellar films –

respectively by small angle neutron scattering and neutron reflectivity

Siham Douadi-Masrouki 1 , Delphine El kharrat 1 , Olivier Sandre 1 , Maud Save 2 , Bernadette Charleux 2 and Valérie Cabuil 1

1 LI2C UMR7612, 2 LCP UMR76120, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique / Université Pierre et Marie Curie - 4 place Jussieu case 51 75252 Paris Cedex 5 France

II) Evidencing the lamellar structure of copolymer films doped or not with magnetic NPs

Nanoscope III (Digital Instrument),Tapping mode

 Tapping mode AFM enables to image 2 types of defects at the surface of the films - “islands”

and “holes” – typical of the lamellar order.

 The lamellar period should be measured from the height difference L 2 -L 1 but the AFM tip is too large to reach the second bilayer.

 The lamellar period is 28 nm for an analogous PS-b-P(nBMA) of Mw=82,000 as measured by X- rays reflectivity. [2]

P(nBMA) 425 -b-PS 490 Film deposited on silicon

e = 60.3 +/- 2.8 nm

(ellipsometric thickness)

P(nBMA) 405 -b-PS 460 Film deposited on silicon

e = 78.8 +/- 3.6 nm

Pico SPM LE (Molecular Imaging) Images by E. Lepleux (Scientec, Palaiseau, France)

By Atomic Force Microscopy By Neutron Reflectivity

HOLE depth = 6.1 nm

ISLAND height = 6.7 nm

PS SUBSTRATE

AIR L 1

L 2

Bibliography:

 [1] G. Coulon, B. Collin, D. Chatenay, Y. Gallot, “Kinetics of islands and holes on the free surface of thin diblock copolymer films”, J. Phys. II France 3 (1993) 697

 [2] G. Vignaud, A. Gibaud, G. Grübel, S. Joly, D. Ausserré, J-F. Legrand, Y. Gallot, “Ordering of diblock PS- PBMA thin films: An X-ray reflectivity study” Physica B 248 (1998) 250

 [3] B. Toperverg, V. Lauter-Pasyuk, H. Lauter, O. Nokonov, D. Ausséré, Y. Gallot, “Morphology of off-specular neutron scattering pattern from islands on a lamellar film”, Physica B 283 (2000) 60

L* 1

PS-grated NP’s

SUBSTRATE L* 2

We study nanocomposites consisting of the same iron oxide γ -Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles embedded in polymer matrices:

I) a gel matrix exhibiting a swelling transition triggered by temperature;

II) a lamellar matrix based on the self- assembly of a symmetrical diblock copolymer.

Rotation

Aspiration sous vide

Solution de copolymère avec ou

sansnanoparticules

Substrat de Silicium

Film de copolymère avec ou sans nanoparticules

Preparation of thin lamellar film samples:

Solutions of P(nBMA)-b-PS in toluene are “spin- coated” on smooth substrates (mica or silicone). After deposition, films are annealed at 150°C under vacuum for at least 48h. Their thickness is measured by ellipsometry.

Magnetic nanoparticles (NPs) as building blocks

Fe

3

O

4

+ Fe(NO

3

)

3

γ -Fe

2

O

3

(maghemite)

R. Massart IEEE Trans. Magn. 1981

50 nm

1) Synthesis TEM

Raw polydisperse sample

Size sorted sample

50 nm

Superparamagnetic behavior

M

s

= m

s

Φ

Magnetization normalized by its saturation value follows Langevin’s law

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Champ magnétique appliqué (gauss)

M/Ms

Smaller “S1S” size-sorted particles d=6nm

d

0

(nm) = 6.6 σ = 0.21 Φ (%) = 1.1

a. χ H

m

s

=2,6x10

5

A/M

Magnetic field (Oe)

0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Champ magnétique appliqué (gauss)

M/Ms

Larger “C1C” size-sorted particles d=9nm

d

0

(nm) = 9.1 σ = 0.35 Φ (%) = 2.7

b. χ H

m

s

=3,5x10

5

A/M

Magnetic field (Oe)

Citric acid

2) Grafting of thin ligand layer

Oleic acid

- - - - - - - -

- - - -

Hydrophilic polymer Hydrophobic polymer

Hydrophilic gels

3) Coating with polymer shell

PBMA PS

Hydrophobic films

4) Composite materials

Polystyrene Double Hydrophilic

Diblock Copolymer

PNIPAM

PE 1 000 - 10 000 g/mol Neutral 10 000 - 60 000 g/mol Molecular weights

Cationic-Neutral copolymer

Poly(trimethylammonium ethylacrylate) - b - Poly(acrylamide)

Rhodia Inc.

Double Hydrophilic Diblock Copolymers

Attractive electrostatic

Interaction between citrate grafted NPs

and DHBCs

DHBC – particles solutions

DYNAMIC LIGHT SCATTERING

J-F. Berret, O. Sandre, D. El kharrat, JACS 2006

60 nm < D H < 80 nm

PTEA(5k)-b-PAM(30k)

Copolymer + S1S NPs (d=6nm)

STATIC LIGHT SCATTERING

S1S Particles d=6nm 2 copolymers : PTEA(5k)-b-PAM(30k)

PTEA(11k)-b-PAM(30k) +

Xp = 2

Xp = 1 + +

excess excess

At X=Xp:

100% species in polymer – particles

clusters

- Dense clusters of nanoparticles with various sizes and shapes.

- Difference between hydrodynamic size (DLS) and core size (TEM) ascribed to neutral polymer shell protecting the clusters against aggregation.

CLUSTERS MORPHOLOGY

BY TEM S1S “smaller” Particles d=6nm

d

H

=60 nm

C1C “larger” Particles d=9nm

d

H

=95 nm

PTEA(5k)-b-PAM(30k) copolymer

STRUCTURAL STUDY BY SMALL ANGLE NEUTRON SCATTERING (SANS)

d o (63Å)

0,001 0,01 0,1 1 10 100

0,01 0,1 1

q (Å

-1

) Int ens ité (c m

-1

)

5k11k FF D41

NPs inside clusters are close-packed

0,1 1

5k 11k

0,1 1 10 100

0,001 0,01 0,1 1

q (Å

-1

)

S (q ) x Φ

loc

/ Φ

0

5k 11k

inter-NPs distances forbidden by polymer repulsion S1S Particles (d=6nm) + PTEA(5k)-b-PAM(30k) and PTEA(11k)-b-PAM(30k) copolymers

>

Å ~

2 70

max

max

= ≈

d q π

Gyration radius 2Rg=3-4 d

0

Clusters are well dispersed

I(q) / Φ ( ∆ρ )

2

= V

p

P(q) S(q) = V

agg

P

agg

(q)

Correlation distance:

PAXY spectrometer LLB, CEA-Saclay, 2006

Correlation deep

We use both neutron scattering & reflectivy techniques to probe the local structure at the mesoscopic scale.

I) Thermosensitive PNIPAM gels doped with magnetic NPs

H

3

C CH

3

Poly(N–isopropylacrylamide), PNIPAM, LCST=32°C

C — NH CH

O CH

2

CH

n

Semi-interpenetrated network 90% NIPAM-10%AM

Statistical network 90% NIPAM-10%AM

embedded in a 2% cross-linked PNIPAM gel vs. Temperature

0,01 0,1 1 10 100

0,001 0,01 0,1 1

q (Å-1) I(q) (cm-1 )

Gel@24°C Gel@32°C Gel@34°C Gel@39°C FF D41 D41/PTEA11

NPs are close-packed

d

max

~ 4 x do

2 π

d

max

= q

max

= 75 Å > d

o

Clusters are packed by the shrinking of the PNIPAM matrix

d

o

~ 4d

o

0,1 1 10 100

0,001 0,01 0,1 1

q (Å

-1

)

S( q) x Φ

loc

/ Φ

0

Gel@24°C Gel@32°C Gel@34°C Gel@39°C D41/PTEA11

STRUCTURAL STUDY BY SMALL ANGLE NEUTRON SCATTERING (SANS)

S1S Particles (d=6nm) + PTEA(11k)-b-PAM(30k) copolymers Gyration radii

Correlation peaks

Correlation deep

Clusters are well dispersed but the inter-clusters distance

decreases then the gel deswells Correlation peaks

shift to higher q

max

T=24°C T=39°C

0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1

26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46

température (°C)

m as se /m as se in iti al e

SIPN 90NIPAM - montée 80NIPAM - montée 90NIPAM - montée

SIPN 90NIPAM - descente 80NIPAM - descente 90NIPAM - descente

W ei ght (T ) / W ei ght (24 °C)

Temperature (°C)

Swelling curves for different gels prepared at C

X-link

=2 mol% and Φ

0

=1 vol.% of NPs

Statistical network 90% NIPAM-10%AM Statistical network 80% NIPAM-10%AM

Semi-interpenetrated network 90% NIPAM-10%AM

Poly(acrylamide), PAM

C — NH

2

O

CH

2

CH n

TEM + RuO

4

coloration

Kiessig fringes

 Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP)

 High molecular weight : Mn = 112 000 g/mol

 Low polydispersity: Ip 1.4

 Symmetrical Dibloc Copolymer: x=425 ≈ y=490

CH

2

CH

( ) y

CH

2

C CH

3

C

O O

(CH

2

)

3

CH

3

( CH

2

C ) x (

CH

3

C

O O

(CH

2

)

3

CH

3

( ) x

θ = 0.93°

Neutron wavelengths : 0.5 – 25 Ǻ

EROS spectrometer LLB, CEA-Saclay, 2007

1-layer

Multi-layers → interferences (over-oscillations)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

épaisseur (nm)

contraste b

L

1

L

2

L

3

PS

PS

PS PS

P(n-BMA)

P(n-BMA)

P(n-BMA)

substrat

air

Neutron scattering length density (109 cm-2)

Thickness (nm)

e

1.00E-05 1.00E-04 1.00E-03 1.00E-02 1.00E-01 1.00E+00

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

q (nm-1) = 4 π/λ sin θ

Réflectivité

P(n-BMA)425 -b-PS490 fit

Neutron Reflectivity signal

e L (nm) e film (nm)

Film γ -Fe

2

O

3

@PS

L

1

L

2

L

3

L

4

L

5

L

moy

RN Ellipso.

5 γ -Fe

2

O

3

@PS3 31.2 45.3 41.5 - - 39.3 117.9 114.6 13 γ -Fe

2

O

3

@PS1 34.0 46.1 49.0 54.5 - 45.9 183.6 184.0 14 γ -Fe

2

O

3

@PS1 47.3 45.9 47.0 44.4 45.7 46.1 230.3 248.4

Films doped at constant volume fraction Φ

NPs

= 0.025 vol% and increasing deposited materials amount

Layer number and thickness (nm) Total thickness g/L C

20 30 40

nm

± 1.6

± 4.9

± 17.4 roughness Macroscopic

view →

Bi-layer thickness ≈ 39 nm for the pure P(nBMA) 425 -b-PS 490 ] copolymer

 The insertion of increasing amount of magnetic nanoparticles leaves both the total thickness and the average period unchanged.

 The nanoparticles are confined inside internal inter-penetrated layers.

 The total thickness of the film and its roughness are proportional to the deposited materials amount.

Film e L (nm) e film (nm)

L

1

L

2

L

3

L

moy

RN Ellipsométrie

∆ e (nm)

8 32.2 48.0 21.5 37.2 111.7 108.1 1.4

9 32.8 48.0 33.3 38.0 114.0 109.4 3.5

10 32.8 48.7 30.0 37.2 111.5 106.6 0.4

0.05%

Layer number and thickness (nm) Total thickness (nm) Ellipsometry Φ

NPs

0.10%

0.15%

[P(nBMA)

425

-b-PS

490

]=20 g/L doped with γ -Fe

2

O

3

@PS1 at increasing volume fractions Φ

NPs

L average

rough -ness

poly(n-butylmethacrylate)-b–poly(styrene)

Références

Documents relatifs

Mossbauer spectroscopy) on the one hand and, because of the larger scattering factor of the minority species (Fe), for diffraction measurements (though some information is lost due

The experimental two-dimensional unpolarized SANS cross sections dΣ/dΩ are dis- played in Fig. In agreement with the field dependence of the count rates, the scattering.. Inset

In particular, for measurements at zero and high, saturating field strength, which are most commonly performed, it is for simplicity assumed that the magnetic moments of the

In summary, we have presented an analysis of magnetic SANS data in terms of the autocorrelation function of the spin misalignment, which allows one to study the magnetization-

- The concentric shell model of the micelle with the radial scattering length density profiles expressed in 101° cm- 2.. Upper part : SANS, lower part : SAXS for a

Absolute intensity measurements, and fits of the full scattering curves using models, suggest that these objects are chiral, possibly symmetrical double helices of

Finally we present a comparative study of the polarized neutron reflectivity data obtained from various instruments on different neutron sources, with the purpose to understand the

the prefactors b i in eq.(19a) in order to switch off or on certain contributions, or correlation functions. The simplest case, i.e.. It can be shown that simple contrast