• Aucun résultat trouvé

ON A CLASS OF ALMOST CONTACT STRUCTURES ON T

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "ON A CLASS OF ALMOST CONTACT STRUCTURES ON T"

Copied!
6
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

on the occasion of his 85thbirthday

ON A CLASS OF ALMOST CONTACT STRUCTURES ON T

2

M

ADRIAN SANDOVICI

A new class of almost contact structures on second order tangent bundle built on a Riemannian space is defined and studied in this paper. In particular, characteriza- tions for the integrability and normality of this class of almost contact structures are given. Also, compatible linear connections with this class of almost contact structures are introduced and certain characterization of them is obtained.

AMS 2010 Subject Classification: 53B40, 53C60, 58B20.

Key words:second order tangent bundle; almost contact structure; linear connec- tion.

1. INTRODUCTION

The generalized Lagrange geometry of second order was defined and stu- died by R. Miron [6, 7] and represents the geometry of generalized Lagrangians modeled on the second order tangent bundle T2M, p, M

. These spaces are useful in the study of the geometry of higher-order Lagrangians [6, 7], for the prolongation of Riemannian, Finslerian and Lagrangian structures [6, 7], for the study of stationary curves [9], and for the development of a gauge theory having the second order tangent bundle as the geometrical model [3, 10, 12].

The term “homogeneity” has been discussed in Miron’s papers [4, 5] where new geometrical models on Riemannian spaces and on Finslerian spaces are also introduced, respectively. In [12, 14] an extension of Miron’s theory of homogeneity to the second order tangent bundle is presented.

The main goal of this note is to define and study a new class of almost contact structures on second order tangent bundle built on a Riemannian space. In particular, characterizations for the integrability and normality of this class of almost contact structures are given. Also, compatible linear con- nections with this class of almost contact structures are introduced and certain characterization of them is obtained.

REV. ROUMAINE MATH. PURES APPL.,57(2012),2, 159-164

(2)

This paper can be seen as a natural continuation of our previous works [11, 14]. It should be also mentioned that the basic concepts and the notations coincide with those from [11, 14].

2. PRELIMINARIES

ConsiderRn= (M, γ) a Riemannian space generated by a real, differen- tiable,n-dimensional manifoldM and by a Riemannian metricγ onM, given by the local components (γij(x)), x ∈ U ⊂ M. It is possible to extend γ to p−1(U)⊂E =T2M by

(2.1) (γij◦p) (u) =γij(x), u∈p−1(U), p(u) =x.

In this case γij ◦p are the local components of a tensor field onE. Usually, we write these local components with γij as well. Furthermore, with γijk(x) we will denote the Christoffel symbols of the second species of the metric γ and with rijhk (x) we will denote the local components of the curvature tensor field of the metric γ. It is possible to introduce on E a nonlinear connection determined only by this metric, cf. [6]. Moreover, the coefficients of connection are determined by the following relations (see also [11])

N(1)j(0)i x, y(1)

j0i , (2.2)

N(2)j(0)i x, y(1), y(2)

= 1 2

∂γj0i

∂xpy(1)p0mi ·γmj0

! +γji¯0, (2.3)

where the notation “ 0 ” stands for the contraction by y(1)

and the notation

“ ¯0 ” stands for the contraction by y(2) .

The nonlinear connectionN assures the existence of a basis δk, δk(1), δk(2) adapted to the tangent space TuE. The vector fields of the adapted basis are defined with the help of the following relations

δk= ∂

∂xk −N(1)ki

∂y(1)i −N(2)ki

∂y(2)i, (2.4)

δ(1)k = ∂

∂y(1)i −N(1)ki

∂y(2)i, δk(2) = ∂

∂y(2)k. (2.5)

For further developments, we need the following result.

Theorem 2.1. The Lie brackets of the vector fields of the adapted basis δk, δk(1), δ(2)k

are given by

(2.6)

δj, δk

=Ri(01)jk·δ(1)i +Ri(02)jk·δi(2),

(3)

(2.7)

δj, δ(1)k

=Bi(11)jk·δ(1)i +B(12)jki ·δi(2),

(2.8)

δj, δ(2)k

=Bi(21)jk·δ(1)i +B(22)jki ·δi(2),

(2.9)

δj(1), δk(1)

=Ri(12)jk ·δi(2),

δ(1)j , δ(2)k

=B(21)jki ·δ(2)i , where

(2.10) Ri(01)jk =r0jki , Ri(12)jk = 0, (2.11) Ri(02)jk = 1

2·∂ri0jk

∂xp ·y(1)p+1

2· γ0mi ·r0jkm0jm·ri0km0km·ri0mj +ri¯0jk, (2.12) B(11)jki =B(22)jkijki , B(21)jki = 0,

(2.13) B(12)jki = 1

2·ri0jk0mi ·γjkm.

3. β ALMOST CONTACT STRUCTURES ON TTT222MMM

Assume that β :R→ (0,+∞) is a smooth function. Define locally the following F(E) linear map Fβ :X(E)→X(E) by

(3.1) Fβi) =− 1

β(F2)·δ(2)i , Fβi(1)) = 0, Fβ(2)i ) =β(F2)·δi, where F2ij ·y(1)iy(1)j.

The linear structure defined by (3.1) is called theβ almost contact struc- ture onT2M. Some basic properties of this structure are listed within the next result.

Theorem 3.1. The linear map Fβ has the following properties:

1. Fβ is globally defined on E;e 2. Fβ is a (1,1)tensor field on E;e

3. Fβ is an almost contract structure on E;e 4. (Fβ)3+Fβ = 0;

5. Fβ depends only on the Riemannian metricγ and on a strictly positive smooth function β;

6. ker(Fβ) =N1, Im(Fβ) =N0+V2; 7. rank(Fβ) = 2n.

It is easily seen thatFβ can be represented as

(3.2) Fβ =− 1

β(F2) ·δ(2)i ⊗dxi+β(F2)·δi⊗δy(2)i.

(4)

Definition 3.1. The almost contact structure Fβ is said to be normal if the following relation holds true

(3.3) NeFβ(X, Y) =NFβ(X, Y) + 2·

n

X

i=1

d(δy(1)i)(X, Y)·δ(1)i = 0, for allX,Y ∈X(E), wheree NFβ stands for the Nijenhuis tensor field associated toFβ.

One obtains the following characterization for the normality of the β almost contact structure Fβ.

Theorem3.2. The almost contact structureFβ is normal if and only if β is a positive constant and γjki (x) = 0.

The next result is an immediate consequence of a classical result due to T. Van Duc.

Theorem3.3. The almost contact structureFβ is integrable if and only if N(Fβ)2 = 0.

Using Theorem 3.3, a direct computation using local coordinates leads to the following characterization for the integrability of the β almost contact structure.

Theorem3.4. The almost contact structureFβ is integrable if and only if Ri(01)kh =rijhk= 0.

In other words, Theorem 3.4 says that the almost contact structure Fβ is integrable if and only if the underlying Riemannian space (M, γ) is flat.

4. COMPATIBLE CONNECTIONS WITH β CONTACT STRUCTURES With respect to the adapted basis δk, δk(1), δ(2)k

, any linear connection D on E can be represented as follows

(4.1) Dδkδj =L(H)ijk ·δi+L(1)ijk ·δi(1)+L(2)ijk ·δi(2), (4.2) Dδkδj(1) =L(3)ijk ·δi+L(vjk1)i·δi(1)+L(4)ijk ·δi(2), (4.3) Dδkδj(2) =L(5)ijk ·δi+L(6)ijk ·δi(1)+L(vjk2)i·δi(2), (4.4) Dδ(1)

k

δj =Fjk(H)i·δi+Fjk(1)i·δi(1)+Fjk(2)i·δ(2)i ,

(5)

(4.5) D

δ(1)k δj(1)=Fjk(3)i·δi+Fjk(v1)i·δi(1)+Fjk(4)i·δ(2)i , (4.6) Dδ(1)

k

δj(2)=Fjk(5)i·δi+Fjk(6)i·δi(1)+Fjk(v2)i·δ(2)i , (4.7) Dδ(2)

k

δj =Cjk(H)i·δi+Cjk(1)i·δi(1)+Cjk(2)i·δi(2),

(4.8) D

δ(2)k δj(1)=Cjk(3)i·δi+Cjk(v1)i·δi(1)+Cjk(4)i·δi(2),

(4.9) D

δ(2)k δj(2)=Cjk(5)i·δi+Cjk(6)i·δi(1)+Cjk(v2)i·δi(2).

The set consisting of the functionsL(Hjk)i, . . . , Cjk(v2)i represents the set of the coefficients of the linear connection D.

Definition 4.1. A linear connection D on E =T2M is said to be com- patible with theβ contact structure Fβ ifDXFβ = 0, for allX ∈X(E).

Concerning the notion of compatible connection with the β almost con- tact structure Fβ, the following result can be proved.

Theorem4.1. A linear connectionDonE is compatible with aβ almost contact structure Fβ if and only if the coefficients of the linear connection satisfy the following relations

L(Hjk)i=L(Vjk2)i, L(5)ijk =−β2·L(2)ijk , L(1)ijk =L(3)ijk =L(4)ijk =L(6)ijk = 0, Fjk(V2)i =Fjk(H)i+ 2· β

β0 ·yk(1)·δji,

Fjk(5)i=−β2·Fjk(2)i, Fjk(1)i=Fjk(3)i =Fjk(4)i =Fjk(6)i = 0,

Cjk(V2)i=Cjk(H)i, Cjk(5)i=−β2·Cjk(2)i, Cjk(1)i=Cjk(3)i=Cjk(4)i=Cjk(6)i= 0.

The next result provides necessary and sufficient conditions for ad-linear connection to be compatible with an almost contact structure Fβ.

Corollary 4.1. A d-linear connection D onE is compatible with a β almost contact structure Fβ if and only if the coefficients of the linear connec- tion satisfy the following relations

L(H)ijk =L(Vjk2)i, Fjk(H)i =Fjk(V2)i−2· β

β0 ·y(1)k ·δji, Cjk(H)i=Cjk(V2)i.

Acknowledgements. This work was supported by AM-POSDRU, project number:

POSDRU/89/1.5/S/49944.

(6)

REFERENCES

[1] M. Anastasiei and H. Shimada, Deformations of Finsler Metrics. In: P.L. Antonelli (Ed.),Finslerian Geometries. A Meeting of Minds, 53–66, Kluwer Academic Publishers, FTPH 109, 2000.

[2] A. Bejancu,Finsler Geometry and Applications. Ellis Horwood Limited, 1990.

[3] V. Balan, Gh. Munteanu and P.C. Stavrinos,Generalized Gauge Asanov Equations on Manifold. Proceedings of the Workshop on Global Analysis, Differential Geometry and Lie Algebras, 1995, 21–32.

[4] R. Miron, The homogeneous lift of a riemannian metric. An. S¸tiint¸. Univ. Al.I. Cuza Ia¸si Mat.46(2000),1, 73–81.

[5] R. Miron, The homogeneous lift to tangent bundle of a Finsler metric. Publ. Math.

Debrecen57(2000),3–4, 445–453.

[6] R. Miron,The Geometry of Higher Order Lagrange Spaces. Applications to Mechanics and Physics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.

[7] R. Miron,The Geometry of Higher Order Finsler Spaces. Hadronic Press, 1998.

[8] R. Miron and M. Anastasiei, The Geometry of Lagrange Spaces: Theory and Applica- tions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.

[9] R. Miron, V. Balan, P.C. Stavrinos and Gr. Tsagas,Deviations of stationary curves in the bundle. Balkan J. Geom. Appl.2(1997),1, 51–60.

[10] Gh. Munteanu,Higher order gauge-invariant lagrangians. Novi Sad J. Math.27(1997), 2, 101–115.

[11] A. Sandovici, Deformations of second order of Riemann spaces. Studii ¸si Cercet˘ari S¸tiint¸ifice, Seria Matematic˘a, Universitatea Bac˘au9(1999), 187–202.

[12] A. Sandovici,Implications of Homogeneity in Miron’s sense in Gauge Theories of Second Order. In: M. Anastasiei, P.L. Antonelli (Eds.),Finsler and Lagrange Geometries: Pro- ceedings of a Conference held in August 36-31, 2001, Ia¸si, Romˆania, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003, 277–285.

[13] A. Sandovici,Levi-Civita connection on second order tangent bundle. Studii ¸si Cercet˘ari S¸tiint¸ifice, Seria Matematic˘a, Universitatea Bac˘au13(2003).

[14] A. Sandovici and V. Blanuta, Homogeneous 2-metrical structures on manifold. Bull.

Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. (2)26(2003), 163–174.

Received 3 March 2012 “Al.I. Cuza” University

Department of Sciences Str. Lasc˘ar Catargi 54

700107 Ia¸si, Romania adrian.sandovici@uaic.ro

Références

Documents relatifs

Spin-polarized calculations confirmed these tendencies by identifying a finite spin only magnetic moment of 1.40 µ B carried by 5f(U) states.. The exchange splitting is observed

The simulated market contains a large number of sellers (100 for 25 buyers) – simulations are defined by 1/ the type of information that is used by agents (only image or image

On an n-dimensional connected Lie group the simplest ARSs are defined by a set of n − 1 left-invariant vector fields and one linear vector field, the rank of which is equal to n on

Cette condition peut être relaxée et remplacée par un problème approché faisant intervenir une pénalisation appelée encore compliance normale (cf. Le problème ainsi obtenu

Finally, in section 4, damped detuned structures are discussed and it is shown that few couplers to dampe a detuned structure is not at all

Indeed the heat kernel for the nilpotent approximation for Riemannian points is well known and type-2 points are a particular case of type-1 points.... By making the inverse

Finally, the full basis subspace-based MOR method uses increasing snapshots only (see Chapter 4)... The structures considered in this thesis are geometrically non-linear. This leads

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des