• Aucun résultat trouvé

ON HIGHER ORDER DIFFERENTIAL IDEALS A. MASTROMARTINO and Y. VILLARROEL Let

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "ON HIGHER ORDER DIFFERENTIAL IDEALS A. MASTROMARTINO and Y. VILLARROEL Let"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

A. MASTROMARTINO and Y. VILLARROEL

LetM be a smoothm-dimensional manifold, and (Ck,nM)0,n m, the man- ifold of co-contact of order k and codimension n over M. Given a differen- tial system (Wk)0 (Ck,nM)0 in a neighborhood of X0k (Wk)0,we asso- ciate with (Wk)0 an ideal Yk(Wk)0 definite in a open of (Ck−1,nM)0. We prove that Yk(Wk)0 is an ideal locally generated by a set of independent 1- forms. It coincides locally with the ideal in Λ(Ck−1,nM)0 generated by the setτk−11 =Λ1(Ck−1,nM)0/iXω= 0, X τ χk−1(M)}. Here,τ χk−1(M) is the submodule of vector-fields in (Ck−1,nM)0 lying in the distribution that every pointθk−1 of an open in (Ck−1,nM)0 associates with then-dimensionalR-plane Lθk, atθk−1. Moreover, conditions on the differential system (Wk)0 are given for the idealYk(Wk)0 to be a differential closed.

AMS 2000 Subject Classification: Primary 53C15; Secondary 53B25.

Key words: differential system, geometric structure on a manifold, contact theory, co-contact theory.

1. INTRODUCTION

Let M be a smooth m-dimensional manifold, and Ck,nM, n ≤ m, the manifold of contact elements of order kand dimensionnoverM ([4]). Given an n-submanifold S ⊂M, we denote byCxkS a contact element of orderk of S at x ∈S and by ρkr the canonical projection over Cr,nM, with 0 ≤r ≤ k.

Put C0,nM = M. Let TkM ' J0kM be the kth order tangent vector of M, identified with thekth order jet at 0 of curvesγ : (−δ, δ)⊂ < →M,δ≥0 ([1]).

We say that two n-dimensional submanifolds S1, S2 have co-contact of order k and codimension nat x ∈S1∩S2 if the annihilator of the rth order tangent vector at x ∈S1, denoted by (TxrS1)0, coincides with the annihilator of the rth order tangent vector at x∈S2, where 0≤r ≤k([3]).

The equivalence class of co-contact elements of an n-dimensional sub- manifoldS is called the co-contact element of orderkand codimensionnatx, and is denoted by (CxkS)0. The set (Ck,nM)0 of all co-contact elements of or- derkand codimensionnonM has a differentiable manifold structure induced by local bijections with coordinate neighborhoods of the manifold Ck,nM.

REV. ROUMAINE MATH. PURES APPL.,53(2008),2–3, 181–188

(2)

By a differential system of order k and dimension n in M we mean an imbedded submanifold W0 ⊂(Ck,nM)0.

One of the result of this paper says that with a system differential (Wk)0 we can associate an ideal Yk(Wk)0 defined in an open (Uk−1)0 of (Wk−1)0= (ρkr)0(Wk)0such that it is an ideal locally generated by (dk−1−n) independent 1-forms, and that there exists a unique distribution τk of dimension n on (Uk−1)0 for which Yk(Wk)0 = Yk−1, the ideal in Λ(Ck−1,nM)0 generated by the set τk−11 = {ω ∈ Λ1(Ck−1,nM)0/iXω = 0, X ∈ τ χk−1(M)}, where τ χk−1(M) is the submodule of vector-fields lying inτk.

The first prolongation of ann-submanifoldW0 ⊂(Ck,nM)0 is defined in [3] as

P(W0) = (C1,nW0)0∩(Ck+1,nM)0.

The main result of this paper can be stated as follows. Let W0 ⊂ (Ck,nM)0 be an imbedded submanifold and (Xk)0 ∈ W0. Then Yk(Wk)0 is an ideal differential if and only the map (ρk+1k )0 :P(W0)→W0 is a local submersion in a neighborhood of (Xk)0.

2. CO-CONTACT MANIFOLDS

Given an n dimensional subspace V ⊂TxM, we will denote by V0 the set of forms ω ∈ TxM which annihilate V. We say that two n-dimensional submanifolds S1, S2 have co-contact of order k and codimension n at x ∈ S1 ∩S2 if the annihilator of the rth order tangent vector at x ∈S1, denoted by (TxrS1)0, coincides with the annihilator of the rth order tangent vector at x∈S2, where 0≤r ≤k.

The equivalence class of co-contact elements of an n-dimensional sub- manifold S is called theco-contact element of orderkand codimensionnatx and is denoted by (CxkS)0.

Let us also denote by (Ck,nM)0the set of all co-contact elements of order k and codimensionnoverM, and put (C0,nM)0 =M.

Let (Xk)0 = (CxkS)0 be a co-contact element in (Ck,nM)0, and consider a local coordinate system (V, ϕ = (xi, xj)), 1 ≤ i ≤ n, n+ 1 ≤ j ≤ m, at x∈M, such that {dxi} generates TxS.

Let (V, U, ρ) be a local fibration of V associated with S and let Vk and (Vk)0, the sets of all k-contacts and k-co-contacts of sections of (V, U, ρ), be defined as,

(2.1) Vk=CkV, (Vk)0= (CkV)0. Then the map,

(2.2) ΨkV :Vk→(Vk)0, Cxkg(U)7→(Cxkg(U))0,

(3)

is differentiable.

The maps ΨkV allow us to define a differential structure on (Ck,nM)0. A coordinate neighborhood at (Xk)0= (CxkS)0 is given by ((Vk)0, xi, xj, pjI

r), where the{xi, xj, pjI

r}are defined. With this differential structure, the natural injection (ik)0 :S ,→(Ck,nM)0 is given in coordinates as

(ik)0(xi, fj(xi)) =

xi, fj, pjIr(S) = ∂r

∂xi1· · ·∂xir

fj(x)

,

wheref(U) =Sis an imbedding and (ik)0(S), denoted by (CkS)0, is a regular submanifold of dimension n. Moreover, the natural projection

({ωIj

s(xi, fj), 0≤s≤k}) ∈ (Ck,nM)0

 y

 y(ρkr)0 ({ωjI

s(xi, fj), 0≤s≤r}) ∈ (Cr,nM)0 is a submersion.

Let (Xk)0 = (CxkS)0 be a co-contact element in (Ck,nM)0 and (V, U, ρ) a local fibration of V associated with S atx. Then the diagram,

ΨkV

CkV −→ (CkV)0 ρks

 y

 y(ρks)0 CsV −→ (CsV)0

ΨsV commutes.

By a differential system of order k and dimension n in M we mean an imbedded submanifoldW0⊂(Ck,nM)0. A solution of a differential systemW0 at (X0k)0 ∈W0 is ann-dimensional imbedded submanifold S⊂M withx0= (ρk0)0((X0k)0)∈S such that (CxkS)0∈W0,x∈S, and (Cxk0S)0 = (X0k)0 ([3]).

A differential systemW0, of orderkand dimensionninM is completely integrableif, given (X0k)0 ∈W0, there exists a solutionS ⊂M at (X0k)0.

3. IDEALS AND MANIFOLD OF CO-CONTACT

If M is a smooth n-dimensional manifold, then we denote by dk the dimension of (Ck,nM)0 and by Fk0(M) the algebra of smooth functions on (Ck,nM)0.

The Lie algebra overRwith respect to the commutator product [X, Y] in the set of all vector-fields on (Ck,nM)0 is denoted by Ξk(M). Let Λi(Ck,nM)0 be the algebra of all smooth i-forms on (Ck,nM)0. The set of all differential

(4)

forms on (Ck,nM)0is denoted by Λ?(Ck,nM)0. It has the structure of a module over the ring Fk0 with respect to the operation of wedge product. Let

Tk: (Ck,nM)0k 7→ Tθkk ∈Tθk(Ck,nM)0

be ann-dimensional distribution. Denote byTΞk(M)⊂Ξk(M) the submod- ule of vector fields lying in Tk. Let

Tk1 ={ω ∈Λ1(Ck,nM)0|iXω = 0, X ∈ TΞk(M)},

whereiX is the inner product. Consider the idealYkgenerated in Λ?(Ck,nM)0 by Tk1.

Proposition 3.1. The distribution Tk is integrable if and only if the ideal Yk is a differential closed: dYk⊂ Yk.

Proof. See [7].

Let (Wk)0 ⊂ (Ck,nM)0 be an n-dimensional differential regular sys- tem of order k and (Xk)0 ∈ (Wk)0. We associate with (Wk)0 an ideal de- noted by Y(Wk)0 defined in an arbitrary neighborhood (Uk−1)0 of (Xk−1)0= (ρkk−1)0(Xk)0.

Proposition 3.2. If (ρkk−1)0 is an immersion in a neighborhood (Uk)0 of (Xk)0, then there exists an ideal defined in a open (Uk−1)0 of (Wk−1)0 = (ρkk−1)0(Wk)0, such that it is an ideal locally generated by independent1-forms in (Uk−1)0.

Proof. Let (Wk)0 ⊂ (Ck,nM)0 be a regular differential system and (Xk)0= (CxkS)0 ∈(Wk)0. Let (V, U, ρ) be a local fibration associated withS and (Vk)0 = (CkV)0.

Since (ρkk−1)0 is an immersion in (Uk)0 = (Vk)0 ∩(Wk)0, in the open (Uk−1)0 = (ρkk−1)0(Uk)0 the projection (ρkk−1)0 : (Uk)0 → (Uk−1)0 is a bijec- tion, andσ= (ρkk−1)0−1

|(Uk)0 is a section of the fiber bundle ((Uk)0,(Uk−1)0, (ρkk−1)0).

Now, a point (Yk)0= (Cxkϕ(U))0 ∈(Wk)0∩(Uk)0, whereϕ:U ⊂Rn→ M is an immersion,S =ϕ(U) is identified with the pair (Yk−1)0, L(Yk)0

(see [6]), where (Yk−1)0kk−1(Yk)0 ∈ (Uk−1)0 while L(Yk)0 ⊂ T(Yk−1)0(Uk−1)0 is the n-dimensional R-plane at (Yk−1)0 corresponding to (Yk)0, i.e.,

(3.1) L(Yk)0 =T(Yk−1)0(ik−1)0(S).

Hence the section σ may be understood as ann-dimensional distribution Tk−1: (Uk−1)0 3(Yk−1)07→Lσ(Yk−1)0.

(5)

We can find a local coordinate system (V, xi, xj) and (V0, xi, xj, pjI

k) of x = (ρk0)0(Xk)0 ∈ M and (Xk)0, respectively, such that the section σ is given as σ(xi, xj, pjk−1) while (Wk)0 is represented as

(3.2) pjI

k =FIj

k(xi, xj, pjI

k−1), i= 1, . . . , n, j=n+ 1, . . . , dk−1, with smooth functions FIj

k : (Uk−1)0 →R.

Representation (3.1) shows that Tk−1 is given by the 1-forms (3.3) ωjIr =dpjIr

n

X

i=1

FIjr−1,idxi, 1≤r≤k, n+ 1≤j ≤dk−1, wheredpjI

0 =dxj andIr,i denotes the orderedr+ 1-uple of integers{1, . . . , n}

given by {i1, . . . , ir, i}.

Hence with (Wk)0 we associated an ideal in Λ?(Ck−1,nM)0, denoted by Y(Wk)0 locally generated by the independent 1-forms ωIj

r in (Uk−1)0. Proposition 3.3.The idealY(Wk)0 coincides locally with the idealYk−1. Proof. Let (Xk)0= (CxkS)0 ∈(Wk)0. Consider the distribution Tk−1 in (Uk−1)0 given by equation (3.2). ThenTk−1 is locally generated by the vector fields in (Uk−1)0 given by

(3.4) (Ck−1S)?

∂xi

x

=Lk−1i =

= ∂

∂xi

(Xk)0 +X

j,Il

pjI

l,i

∂pjI

l

(Xk)0 +X

Ik−1

FIj

k−1,i

∂pjI

k−1

(Xk)0

and the system of 1-forms ωjI

r annihilate the distribution Tk−1 in (Uk−1)0, i.e., a vector field lying in Tk−1 if and only if iXωIj

r = 0, n+ 1 ≤j ≤dk−1. Then the idealY(Wk)0 coincides with the ideal Yk−1 in (Uk−1)0.

The idealY(Wk)0 is called the ideal associated with the differential sys- tem (Wk)0.

The purpose of this paper is to prove

Theorem 3.4. The projection(ρk+1k )0 :P((Wk)0)→ ((Wk)0) is a local submersion on a neighborhood of (Xk)0 ∈((Wk)0) if and only if Yk(Wk)0 is an ideal differential closed.

Proof. Let (Xk)0 ∈ (Wk)0 and ((Vk)0, V,(ρk0)0

(Wk)0 ∩(Vk)0) be the adapted fibration to (Xk)0. Since (Wk)0 ⊂(Ck,nM)0 is a regular n-submani- fold, there are smooth functions

FIi

k : (Vk−1)0 →R

(6)

such that (Vk−1)0 is a neighborhood of (ρkk−1)0(Xk)0, and (Wk)0∩(Vk)0 = (xi, xi, FIi

k). Then the idealY(Wk)0 is generated by the set of 1-forms Wj =dxj

n

X

i=1

pjidxi, WIj

k =dFIj

k

n

X

i=1

FIj

k,idxi.

Suppose that the projection

k+1k )0:P(Wk)0 →(Wk)0 is a local submersion. Then, given

(Yk)0 = (xi, xi, FIj

k−1, FIj

k)∈(Wk)0∩(Vk)0, there is an element

(Zk)0 = (xi, xj, pjI

k, pjI

k,i)∈P(Wk)0 = (C1,n(Wk)0)0∩(Ck+1,nM)0 such that

k+1k )0(Zk)0 = (Yk)0. Thus,

pjI

k =FIj

k, pjI

k,i= ∂

∂xipjI

k = ∂

∂xiFIj

k

and

pjI

k,i=pjIk−1,α,i =pjIk−1,i,α

in (Wk)0 since (Zk)0 ∈(C1,n(Wk)0)0∩(Ck+1,nM)0.Then, the condition pjI

k−1,α,i(Yk)0=pjI

k−1,i,α(Yk)0

implies that the formal derivatives agree, thus [Li, Lα] = 0, hence wIj

r([Li, Lα]) = 0.

Moreover, dwIj

r(Li, Lα) = 0 for all i, α = 1, . . . , n and 1 ≤ r ≤ k since as wjI

r ∈ Yk(Wk)0 we have dwIj

r(Li, Lα) = LiwIj

r(Lα)−LαwIj

r(Li)− wIj

r([Li, Lα]) = 0.Then dwjI

r ∈ Yk(Wk)0 for all j≥n+ 1, . . . , m, 0≤r ≤k, hence dYk(Wk)0⊂ Yk(Wk)0.

Conversely, suppose now thatdYk(Wk)0 ⊂ Yk(Wk)0. Let (Yk)0∈(Wk)0∩(Vk)0,

where ((Vk)0, V,(ρk0)0) is a local fibration adapted to (Xk)0 ∈ (Wk)0. Then, in coordinates, (Yk)0 = (xi, xj, FIj

k) ∈ (Wk)0 ⊂ (Vk)0), with differentiable functions FIj

k : (Vk−1)0 →R. Let us consider the co-contact element (Zk+1)0 = (xi, xj, pjI

k, pjI

k,i),

(7)

where pjI

k = FIj

k. Since dI(Wk)0 ⊂ I(Wk)0, we have [Li, Ls] = 0, where the Li are the fields that spanWck= (Ψk)−1(Wk)0). Therefore,

pjI

k,i=pjI

k−1,α,i =pjI

k−1,i,α. Thus,

(Zk+1)0 ∈(Ck+1,nM)0 since the coordinates

(xi, xj, FIj

k)∈(Wk)0 ⊂(Ck,nM)0.

Furthermore, it is clear that (Zk+1)0 ∈(C1,n(Wk)0)0. Therefore, the projec- tion (ρkk−1)0 :P(Wk)0→(Wk)0 is a local submersion.

Examples 3.5. 1. Let G be the rigid motions group of R3 and H = SO(3). Consider the submanifold (W2)0 ⊂ (C2,2M)0 defined by the section, σ(x1, x2, x3(x1, x2),0,0, k,0,0, k) , i.e., θ3 = 0, $13 =kθ1, $23 = kθ2, k ∈ R, k >0.

Let K ⊂ G be the analytic subgroup of G whose Lie algebra is the annihilator of (W2)0, and let K(0) be the orbit of 0 = π(H), under the restriction ofα toK.

Denote by (Gk)0 the isotropy subgroup of Gof the induced action (αk)0 on the space of co-contact elements at (C0kK(0))0, and by (gk)0 its Lie alge- bra [3].

Then as (W2)0 =G.(C02K(0))0 defines an integrable differential system of order 2 and dimension 2, the ideal Y(W2)0 is differential closed.

2. Consider a homogeneous manifoldM =G/H, a closed subgroupK⊂ G with dimK(0) = n. Let (X2)0 = (C02K(0))0 and assume that G acts transitively on (C1,nM)0.

Let K(z) be a totally geodesic submanifold. By [3], the order of the orbitK(0) is one and, moreover, the orbit K(0) is the solution at (C02K(0))0 of a differential system (W2)0 =G(C02K(0))0 of order 2 and dimension n= dimK(0) overM. Therefore,Y(Wk)0 is an ideal differential closed.

Acknowledgement.This work was supported by CDCHT, Universidad Centro Oc- cidental Lisandro Alvarado, Decanato de Ciencias y Tecnolog´ıas, Barquisimeto, De- partamento de matem´aticas, Barquisimeto, Venezuela.

REFERENCES

[1] D. Krupka and M. Krupka, Jets and contact elements. In: Mathematical Publications, Vol. 2, pp. 39–85. Silesian University in Opava, Opava, 2000.

(8)

[2] M. Kuranishi,Lectures on Involutive Systems of Partial Differential Equations. Publ. Sci.

Mat., S˜ao Paulo, Brazil, 1967.

[3] A. Mastromartino and Y. Villarroel,The annihilator of ak-contact manifold. Math. Rep.

6(56)(2004),4, 431–443.

[4] Y. Villarroel, On completely integrable systems. Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl. 41 (1996),5–6, 417–427.

[5] S. Sternberg, Lectures on Differential Geometry. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1964.

[6] A. Verbovetsky and J. Krasilshchik,Homological Methods in Equations of Mathematical Physics.Moscow, 1998.

[7] F.W. Warner,Foundation of Differentiable Manifolds and Lie Groups.Scott, Foresmann

& Co., Glenview, Illinois, 1967.

Received 15 May 2007 Universidad Centro Occidental Lisandro Alvarado Departamento de matem´aticas

Barquisimeto, Venezuela, amastrom@ucla.edu.ve

and

Universidad Central de Venezuela Escuela de matem´aticas

Caracas, Venezuela yulivilla@yahoo.com

Références

Documents relatifs

Hemos avanzado en: la formación y actualización del profesorado de ciencias de los niveles básico y medio superior; la organización de eventos de divulgación de la ciencia; el

The Nevanlinna order of a transcendental meromorphic solution of a kth order Briot Bouquet differential equation is at most two and this value is reached if

extensions to the ground congruence closure procedure to account for partial applications and extensionality (Section 2.1); and extensions to the E-matching algorithm to account

not available (i.e., M and N are general microlinear spaces without further conditions imposed) and secondly in case that coordinates are available (i.e., M and N

Just the fact of including this new LECZ com- ponent changed the relative position of coun- tries (as is shown below for LDCs), compared to the position that would have resulted

smoothness assumptions on the ambient subcategory of A-Mod (satis- fied, with appropriate choices of :1J, for example, by smooth real mani- folds of finite dimension

and the launching, three years later, of WHO's Programme for the Pre- vention of Blindness came the reorientation of strategies away from single-cause prevention

The objectives of the study were to compare the ovarian activity of Holstein-Friesian (CH HF), Fleckvieh (CH FV) and Brown Swiss (CH BS) dairy cows of Swiss origin with that