• Aucun résultat trouvé

17 African Law students qualify for final round of 15th WTO Moot Court Competition

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "17 African Law students qualify for final round of 15th WTO Moot Court Competition"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Published on United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (http://www.uneca.org)

Home > 17 African Law students qualify for final round of 15th WTO Moot Court Competition

Addis Ababa, 27 April 2017 (ECA) – Seventeen African law students, including 9 women and 8 men, have qualified for the final oral round of the 15th European Law Students’ Association (ELSA) Moot Court Competition on World Trade Organization (WTO) law, which will be held at the WTO headquarters in Geneva from 6 to 11 June 2016.

The ELSA Moot Court Competition is an academic simulation of judicial procedures by law students, helping to foster their awareness and experience in international trade negotiations. It is also a forum for students to acquire practical experience on how to prepare and present legal arguments and how to debate current legal and social issues.

The African Trade Policy Centre (ATPC) of the Economic Commission for Africa (ECA)

sponsored the competing teams from Ethiopia, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, South Africa, Tanzania and Uganda in the fourth African Regional Round of the ELSA Moot Court Competition from 9 to 13 April 2017, which was hosted by Rhodes University in Grahamstown, South Africa.

ATPC has been supporting the competition since 2016 as part of its commitment and efforts in capacity-building. Ultimately, the initiative seeks to contribute to legal education, foster mutual understanding and promote social responsibility of law students and young lawyers in Africa.

Mr. Melaku Desta, Principal Adviser in the Capacity Development Division of ECA who participated in adjudicating the competition in Grahamstown said, “Through ECA’s support, African universities have an opportunity to grow in the knowledge of international trade law and WTO dispute settlement procedures; this should enhance capacity in Africa in the long term”.

This year’s winning teams are from Kenya (School of Law of Kenya; Strathmore University and Kabarak University) and from South Africa:- University of the Witwatersrand. They will compete against the finalists from the other regional rounds, i.e. the All-America, Asia-Pacific, and European regional rounds in Geneva.

Issued by:

Communications Section

Economic Commission for Africa PO Box 3001

Addis Ababa Ethiopia

Tel: +251 11 551 5826

17 African Law students qualify for final round of 15th WTO Moot Court... http://www.uneca.org/print/13492

1 of 2 5/8/2017 11:44 AM

(2)

E-mail: [email protected][1]

Source URL: http://www.uneca.org/stories/17-african-law-students-qualify-final-round-15th-wto-moot-court- competition

Links

[1] mailto:[email protected]

17 African Law students qualify for final round of 15th WTO Moot Court... http://www.uneca.org/print/13492

2 of 2 5/8/2017 11:44 AM

Références

Documents relatifs

[r]

This paper is interested in establishing the nature and idea of law and morals in traditional Yoruba society seen from the perspective of the Ogboni group.. What has the Ogboni

A traditional version with printed study books, textbooks and law digests and a digital version containing all the material in a digital version on a rental tablet

This means that teachers can make copies of short excerpts from a book or magazine, for example, for distribution to students in their class without having to buy a copy of the

ont été transfectées avec de e d’anticorps spécifiques en x profils de marquage de la formé (b). La triadine et la s déformées proviennent du.. La

The contributions to this edition of the Competition Law Review thereby implicitly ask whether competition policy can almost exclusively be aimed at economic ‘efficiency’ or whether

At the present time, supervisor training within child and family services happens on an ad hoc basis, depending upon individual needs and the resources available within the

The question of who is in charge of providing (and possibly proving) the relevant information for decision-making appears to be one of the key questions resulting in