Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
Internal Report (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building Research), 1959-02-01
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=e671d0ba-97ea-4bbb-9a86-2ead9e38d2f9 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=e671d0ba-97ea-4bbb-9a86-2ead9e38d2f9
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/20337964
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Moisture sorption measurements on plaster Jones, P. M.
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA D I V I S I O N OF BUILDING RESEARCH
MOISTURE SORPTION MEASUREMENTS ON PLASTER
bs
PeterM a Jones
Report No.167
of the D i v i s i o n of B u i l d i n g R e searah O t t a w a February1959
PREFACE
Since water i s t h e most important a g e n t commonly involved i n problems of dimensions 1 change and d e t e r i o r a t i o n i n b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s , i n f o r m a t i o n on t h e e q u i l i b r i u m moisture c o n t e n t s of m a t e r i a l s i s of decided i n t e r e s t i n b u i l d i n g s c i e n c e . The D i v i s i o n has c o n s t r u c t e d , a s r e p o r t e d e a r l i e r i n DBR I n t e r n a l Report
133,
a s o r p t i o n b a l a n c e f o r d e t e r m i n a t i o n of s o r p t i o n isotherms. The a d d i t i o n a l u s e of a s m a l l o p t i c a l s t r a i n gauge which c a n be r e a d t h r o u g h t h e g l a s s w a l l s of t h e a p p a r a t u s h a s p e r m i t t e d simultaneousmeasurement of l e n g t h ohange a t v a r i o u s e q u i l i b r i u m moisture c o n t e n t s . The anomalous behaviour of gypsum p l a s t e r i n some e a r l y experiments l e d t o t h e s t u d i e s whioh a r e now r e p o r t e d . These i n t u r n have drawn a t t e n t i o n t o t h e p o s s i b i l i t y t h a t
gypaum p l a s t e r may l o s e w a t e r of h y d r a t i o n under i n d o o r o l i m a t e o o n d i t i o n s of low r e l a t i v e humidity, and f u r t h e r s t u d i e s a r e now
i n
progress.Ottawa
February 1959
N.B. Hutcheon
MOISTURE SOR PTION MEASUREMENTS ON PLASTER
P e t e r M. J o n e s
The n a t u r e of t h e a d s o r p t i o n of w a t e r on p l a s t e r a s p r e v i o u s l y determined and r e p o r t e d
i n
DBR I n t e r n a l Report No.133
( l ) , was u n u s u a l and unexpected. The B.E.T. p l o t was n o t l i n e a r and, i n a d d i t i o n , t h e s u r f a c e a r e a c a l c u l a t e d from t h e t e s t r e s u l t s was u n u s u a l l y l a r g e . Both t h e i s o t h e r m and t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g dimensional change i n d i c a t e d t h a t l a r g e changes o c c u r r e d i n t h e narrow r a n g e of v a l u e s of p/po betweon 0 and 0.1, and a g a i n when p/po of0.8
was exoeeded. These r e s u l t s prompted s p e c u l a t i o n r e g a r d i n g p o s s i b l e mechanisms which would account f o r t h i s behaviour af p l a s t e r , a n d c o n s e q u e n t l y f u r t h e r work w a s undertaken.The s t u d y d e s c r i b e d h e r e was d e s i g n e d t o . c o n f i r m t h e p r e v i o u s r e s u l t s and t o r e v e a l t h e p o s s i b l e mechanism. Samples were p r e p a r e d under normal c o n d i t i o n s of h y d r a t i o n , a s w e l l a a under c o n d i t i o n s which, i t was thought, would produce c o a r s e c r y s t a l s .of low s u r f a c e a r e a .
Apparatus and Sample 0
The a p p a r a t u s used was t h e same a s t h a t p r e v i o u s l y used,
t h e d e s c r i p t i o n and manner of o p e r a t i o n of which have been
r e p o r t e d ( I ) . Samples were prepared a s d e s c r i b e d i n t h e f o l l o w i n g paragraphs. I t should be n c t e d t h a t t h e o r i g i n a l c o n s t i t u e n t s and manner of mixing were t h e same i n a l l c a s e s , t h e d i f f e r e n c e s b e i n g i n t h e c o n d i t i o n s of s e t t i n g and subsequent t r e a t m e n t .
( a ) Unf i r e d ' "Hot" Sample
T h i s sample was p r e p a r e d by a d d i n g 530 grams of p o t t e r y p l a s t e r t o
318
grams of d i s t i l l e d water. F i v e seconds a f t e r a d d i t i o n , t h e m i x t u r e was s t i r r e d f o r35
seconds, p l a c e d i n moulda, and allowed t o s e t a t9S0c.
The r e s u l t i n g subatanoe was t h e n removed and s t o r e d i n a d e s i c a a t o r a t 50 p e r o e n t r e l a t i v e humidity f o r 1 month.( b )
-
Unf i r e dold"
SampleT h i s sample was p r e p a r e d b y a d d i n g 530 grams of p o t t e r y p l a s t e r t o
318
grams o f d i s t i l l e d w a t e r . F i v e s e c o n d s a f t e r a d d i t i o n t h e m i x t u r e was s t i r r e d f o r35
seoonds. T h l s m i x t u r e was p l a c e d i n moulds and a l l o w e d t o s e t a t room t e m p e r a t u r e .It w a s t h e n removed and s t o r e d
i n
a d e s i c c a t o r a t 50 p e r c e n t r e l a t i v e h u m i d i t y f o r 1 month.( c ) and ( d ) F i r e d Samples
P o r t i o n s of t h e " h o t " and " c o l d v samples were f i r e d a t
850
t o 9 0 0 ' ~ f o r 16 h o u r s , a l l o w e d t o c o o l , and s t o r e di n
a d e s i c c a t o r o v e r c a l c i u m c h l o r i d e u n t i l used.R e s u l t s and D i s c u s s i o n
-
( a )
Unf i r e d SaE v a c u a t i o n of a d s o r b e d g a s e s f r o m t h e system r e q u i r e d
a
l o n g time. During t h i s e v a c u a t i o n t h e "hot" sample r a p i d l y l o s t 1 p e r c e n t of i t s w e i g h t , b u t t h e n remalnod u n a l t ' e r e d , w h i l e t h e " c o l d t t sample showed a c o n t i n u o u s l o s s o v e r a p e r i o d of t h r e e weeks u n t i l i t had l o s t a l m o s t 2 0 p e r c e n t of i t s weight. These r a t e s of l o s s a r e shown i n F i g . 1.
R e s u l t s o f t h e w a t e r vapour a d s o r p t i o n measurement a r e p l o t t e d i n Fig. 2 , B0E.T. c a l c u l a t i o n s were made on t h e s e
samples and p l o t s a r e shown i n F i s.
3
and4.
The s u r a c e a r e a s8
?i
c a l c u l a t e d from t h e s e p l o t s a r e 1
6.1
rn2/g and16.73
m /g f o r the"cold'' and "hotl1 s a m p l e s r e s p e c t i v e l y .
I n t h e c a s e of t h e " c o l d " sample, t h e a d s o r p t i o n i s o t h e r m shows two p o r t i o n s where a l a r g e i n c r e a s e i n w e i g h t s o c c u r s ,
between 0 and 0.1 v a l u e s of p/po and when p/po of
0.8
i s exceeded. The B0E.T. p l o t does n o t g i v e a s t r a i g h t l i n e , b u t n e v e r t h e l e s s on c a l c u l a t i n g t h e s u r f a c e a r e a of t h e sample a v e r y l a r g e v a l u e i s f o u n d ,166.1
m2/g. The s u r f a c e a r e a of c o n c r e t e h a s p r e v i o u s l y b e e n f o u n d t o be43
m2/g.
P l a s t e r i s t h o u g h t t o b e i n a c r y s t a l l i n e f o r m when s o l i d , whereas c o n c r e t e i s t h o u g h t to be a g e l , and i twould h a r d l y be e x p e c t e d t h a t a c r y s t a l l i n e s t r u c t u r e would have a l a r g e r s u r f a c e a r e a t h a n a g e l .
It i s t h u s p o s t u l a t e d t h a t t h e measured i n c r e a s e - i n w e i g h t i s n o t all p h y s i c a l a d s o r p t i o n , b u t p a r t c h e m i s o r p t i o n r e s u l t i n g i n h y d r a t i o n . T h i s t h o u g h t i s s u p p o r t e d by a c l o s e r
s t u d y of the r e s u l t s . Twenty p e r c e n t by w e i g h t o f w a t e r was removed on d e g a s s i n g which c o r r e s p o n d s t o t h e t h e o r e t i c a l w a t e r
of h y d r a t i o n of 2 1 p e r c e n t . T h i s d i f f e r e n c e i s p r o b a b l y due t o t h e f a c t t h a t t h e s a m p l e was n o t p u r e CaSO4. 2H20.
The l a r g e i n c r e a s e between 0 and 0.1 v a l u e s of p/po i s
6
por c e n t and appoarv t o c o r r e s p o n d w i t h a6.6
p e r c e n t i n c r e a s e i n weight when anhydrous CaS04 i s h y d r a t e d t o ~aS04.1/2 H20.The second l a r g e i n c r e a s e of 23 p e r c e n t when p/po v a l u e of 0.8 i s exceedod, a p p e a r s comparable w i t h complete h y d r a t i o n t o CaSO .2H 0 which p r o d u c e s 26 p e r c e n t i n c r e a s e i n weight.
4
2
Thus i t i s p o s t u l a t e d t h a t t h e i n i t i a l i n c r e a s e of
6
p e r c e n t d u r i n g a d s o r p t i o n c o r r e s p o n d s t o h y d r a t i o n from t h e anhydrous CaSO t o t h e hemihydrate CaS04.1/2 H20. P h y s i c a l4
a d s o r p t i o n a p p e a r s t o t a k e p l a c e on t h i s m a t e r i a l u n t i l t h e
second l a r g e i n c r e a s e o c c u r s . I t i s thought t h a t t h i s c o r r e s p o n d s t o h y d r a t i o n from t h e hemihydrate t o t h e d i h y d r a t e .
C a l c u l a t i o n s and B.E.T. p l o t s u s i n g t h e l i n e a r form of t h e e q u a t i o n were m d e on t h e p o s t u l a t e d a d s o r p t i o n p o r t i o n of t h e c u r v e , and a r e g i v e n i n F i The approximate v a l u e of t h e
s u r f a c e a r e a was found t o be 2%:b5i2/go which i s a more r e a l i s t i c f i g u r e when compared t o t h e v a l u e f o r c o n c r e t e .
The d i m e n s i o n a l change was v e r y l a r g e and was beyond t h e r a n g e of t h e e x t e n s o m e t e r . But i t a p p e a r s t h a t v a l u e s o b t a i n e d show t h e t e n d e n c i e s e x h i b i t e d i n t h e weight change ( F i g .
6 ) .
I n t h e c a s e of t h e " h o t w sample, s e p a r a t e e x p e r i m e n t a t i o n by f i r i n g shovred t h a t the o r i g i n a l sample c o n t a i n e d 2.54 p e r c e n t t o t a l w a t e r c o n t e n t and s o was n o t i n t h e form of t h e hemihydrate. During the d e g a s s i n g p e r i o d t h e sample l o s t 1 p e r c e n t by weight and r e - a d s o r b e d t h i s on a d s o r p t i o n , b u t i t showed no tendency t o - h y d r a t e a s d i d t h e "cold1' sample.
No d i m e n s i o n a l change was made on t h e " h o t " sample. F i r e d Samples
It was hoped t h a t t h e s e samples would have d i f f e r e n t s t r u c t u r e s and t h a t they would be s u i t a b l e f o r p u r e a d s o r p t i o n measurements w i t h o u t any h y d r a t i o n . The i s o t h e r m s a r e g i v e n
i n F i g ,
7
and t h e d i m e n s i o n a l change r e s u l t s i n Fig. 8. I t i s s e e n t h a t t h e a d s o r p t i o n i s v e r y s m a l l indeed. No B o E o T oc a l c u l a t i o n s were made and s o no s u r f a c e a r e a measurements were p o s s i b l e , The d i m e n s i o n a l changes a r e a l s o of a v e r y s m a l l o r d e r .
C o n c l u s i o n s
-
I t i s a p p a r e n t t h a t t h e a d s o r p t i o n c h a r a c t e r i s t i o s of p l a s t e r cannot be s t u d i e d i n t h i s a p p a r a t u s , beoause of t h e decomposition t h a t o c c u r s a t h i g h vacuum. I t i s p o s t u l a t e d t h a t d u r i n g vacuum d r y i n g and subsequent exposure t o i n c r e a s i n g huniidit i e s i n 1;he t e s t a p p a r a t u s
i t
d e h y d r a t e s and t h e n rehydra t e si n t h r e e s t a g e s :
( 1) h y d r a t i o n t o hemihydrate CaS04.1/2 H20
( 2 ) p h y s i o a l a d s o r p t i o n on t h e hemihydra t e
( 3 )
hydra t i o n t o t h e d i h y d r a t e CaS04.2H20.The " h o t " sample shows no t e n d e n c y t o h y d r a t e , which r a i s e e t h e f o l l o w i n g q u e s t i o n s :
(1) what i s t h e c o n a t i t u t i o n of t h i s ''hotW p l a s t e r ? ( 2 ) why does n o hydra t i o n t a k e p l a c e ?
The f i r i n g o f t h e samples d i d n o t produce samples on which t h e pure a d s o r p t i o n i s o t h e r m s c o u l d be measured b u t produced samples which had undergone p h y s i c a l changes r e s u l t i n g from e i t h e r f u s i n g of t h e samples, which gave low s u r f a c e a r e a o r some o t h e r a o t i o n which r e n d e r e d t h e samples i n e r t t o w a t e r a d s o r p t i o n .
Ref a r e n c e
1. Mossman, C.E. Moisture a d a o r p t i o n measurements. N a t i o n a l R e s e a r c h Counc 11, D i v i s i o n of B u i l d i n g Re s e a r c h , DBR I n t e r n a l R e p o r t
133.
Ottawa, October1957.
0 COLD SAMPLE HOT SAMPLE
FIGURE I
0
8 lo 12 14 16 18 2 0 -REMOVAL
OF
H,O
FROM PLASTER SAMPLE BY
EVACUATION AT
mm.
Hg
-
T\'
~ - ~ - Q - O - @ - ~ - O - O - O - O - ( ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ~I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2-
0 4 -\
-
-
0 6 --
-
\*
-
-
\
-
-
"\"
-
-
\
"\
-
-
--
O \"\
O \-
O-0,"I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 DAYS OF PUMPING AT rnm. HCJ.0 COLD SAMPLE
HOT SAMPLE
FIGURE 2
FIGURE
4
B.E.T.
PLOT ON
"COLD" PLASTER (ASSUMING NO
HYDRATION)
USING ADSORPTION
CURVE. CALCULATED
FIGURE 5
B.E.T.
PLOT
ON
"COLD" SAMPLE
(
ASSUMING
HYDRATION
OCCURS).
CALCULATED
SURFACE
AREA
=
28.42 m
/
-9-
0 FIRED COLD SAMPLE
@ FIRED HOT SAMPLE