• Aucun résultat trouvé

Status of Ascochyta rabiei of chickpea in the Mediterranean basin Porta-Puglia A. in

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Status of Ascochyta rabiei of chickpea in the Mediterranean basin Porta-Puglia A. in"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Saxena M.C. (ed.), Cubero J.I. (ed.), Wery J. (ed.).

Present status and future prospects of chickpea crop production and improvement in the Mediterranean countries

Zaragoza : CIHEAM

Options Méditerranéennes : Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 9 1990

pages 51-54

Article available on lin e / Article dispon ible en lign e à l’adresse :

--- http://om.ciheam.org/article.php?ID PD F=91605010

--- To cite th is article / Pou r citer cet article

--- Porta-Puglia A. Statu s of Ascoch yta rabiei of ch ickpea in th e Mediterran ean basin . In : Saxena M.C. (ed.), Cubero J.I. (ed.), Wery J. (ed.). Present status and future prospects of chickpea crop production and improvement in the Mediterranean countries. Zaragoza : CIHEAM, 1990. p. 51-54 (Options Méditerranéennes : Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 9)

---

http://www.ciheam.org/

http://om.ciheam.org/

(2)

Status of Ascochyta rabiei of chickpea in the

A. PORTA-PUGLIA

ISTITUTO SPERIMENTALE PER LA PATOLOGIA VEGETALE VIA BERTERO 22.

00156 ROMA, ITALY

- Ascochyta rabiei of of Cicer arietinum

losses, are on seeds

and A. rabiei

of and on the of and

the existence of physiologic specialization.

6, to which all the

to define a suitabk set of to the

on the and of chickpeas in the

On

of ascochyta blight.

- "Aschochyta rabiei du pois chiche dans le bassin méditerranéen". Lab. est l'un des plus importants pathogènes du pois chiche L.) dans la plus grande partie des zones méditerranéennes interessées par la culture, où ìl peut provoquer de très graves dégâts surtout en semis d'hiver. Le champignon peut survivre sur les graines et sur les résidus de culture. Sur ces derniers la forme païfaite peut apparaître si les conditions climatiques sont favorables. A.

montre un degré élevé de variabilité morphologique et pathologique. Des observations, conduites à partir de 1963, sur le comportement de plusieurs variétés au champ ou en conditions contrôlées, ont montré l'existence d'une spécialisation patholo- gique. Syrie, au Liban et en 6 races ont été identifiées. La race 6, capable d'attaquer toutes les variétés d@érentielles, semble être la plus fréquente. La coopération internationale est indispensable pour établir une sérìe de variétés différentielles communes et standardiser les techniques des essais. prévenir la diffusion de la maladie provoquée par A. des programmes de production de semence comprenant l'analyse sanitaire des graines sont à recommander.

The obtained in sowing

have shown that, at least in the low medium elevation chickpea (Cicer arie- tinum L.) can give yields because the plant

can make a use of soil to the

sowing (Saxena, 1984).

The of sowing is the of

epiphytotics of ascochyta blight

Singh, 1984). Thus, the shift to sowing dates implies the availability of to ascochyta blight. One of the to

is the good knowledge of the causal agent, in what its pathological specializa- tion.

The of this is to deal with the situation

in the define the knowledge

of ascochyta blight, and to the need field.

The causal agent

Ascochyta rabiei is the most

quently used name the causal agent of ascochyta

blight although do not (m une and

The debate is mostly based on the low of

fungus. The the existence of the

state of the fungus, rabiei

in will

impose a use of the name of in the

in with the of the

tional botanical code. The name of the is

still used by such an as

(3)

this

the the state of the

et al., 1963),

in et

al., (1987),

of

15 “C. The in

the epidemiology needs to be intensively studied as also

its to the pathologic

bility of the fungus

of the pathogen has been

the the

and the close

ce, Spain,

Tunisia and Some

in all the continents

A. rabiei in plant at the soil the top soil (a few

and on seeds. The the most efficient

way of et al.,

the

of ascochyta blight in

had not been cultivated The plots

also situated away any chickpea field, so

that the only possible

inoculum.

The disease

A. rabiei attacks all the of the host. infections, mostly contaminated seeds, can cause damping-off of the seedlings. The fungus causes spots on leaves leading less

ditions, the

on

lesions, often the

case the above the lesions wilt and of stem

on the pod

wall, infection contamination of seeds can

Seeds, also be

ing.

climatic conditions, picnidia on the lesions, often in

be

the is

intense.

(1984j, the best conditions

9 and 24 “C of

Such conditions can easily be met .of the cultivation cycle of chickpea

the The

in tively season.

The host-pathogen re1ationship:resist- ance and race specialization

no of A . rabiei affecting the genus Cicer.

cowpea (Vigna siaensis Endl.) and bean vul- garis L.). At the

in

ved on the above mentioned hosts and on pea

sativurn L.) in ino-

et al. (1981) tested 13 accessions of seven Cicer species. The

tions of the

the need studies.

Some accessions of wild chickpea species have been tes- ted both in the field

The

of C. reticdatum isolate of A.

rabiei communication).

Within the genus and within lines of C. arie- tinum, A. rabiei shows an extended of pathogenic

The specialization

1963, the CV C-12/34 lost its con-

the the knowledge on the

of A. rabiei (Aujla, 1964;

With the situation of the pathogen in the

the Chickpea

by in

of The data the

tions on lines and local in

et al., et al., 1985)

obtained on 50

show a high level of evidence of a et al., 1986 and

1987). Six have been

identified by inoculation on a set tial

ing at on isolates and Lebanon,

able to distinguish among six The two

of techniques,

the is not

-

52 -

(4)

easy to define which of the is due to the fungal isolates and which due to in the choice

of disease

The not

ing and lead to the conclusion that at least six of which

this to be the most

among the populations examined by both of

Control

of A. rubiei must begin with the use of healthy efficiently seeds. This

should be applied to all stages of plant includ-

ing exchange.

fungicides as effective

et al., 1973). The of (11%) and

maneb (36%) the inoculum

with thiaben- dazole as effective and without phytotoxic ing to a schedule at uneconomical.

studies needed on chemical to the

efficiency of active At this

point it is useful to that field con- a fungus with such a epidemic

must be designed taking into account the

The a situation

‘‘influx’’ moving into the plot) and “exodus”

out it) not in As

an effect of that situation, a can be to the level of disease on the adjacent plots (James, 1979).

the best way of managing the disease is to combine the choice of possessing a

of field with the use of healthy

seeds, obtained seed schemes includ-

ing seed health testing. A few applications of fun- gicides at development stages of chickpea should also be economically acceptable and should complete the

as and the

to a depth of 10 cm at least

can also to the of ascochyta blight, by the amount of inoculum.

The role of international cooperation

plays a in

knowledge of ascochyta blight

ing has a

collection and has supplied basic on the envi- condition in

of useful field have been

identified and have been as

a consequence of to chickpea

eventual use in

gene manipulation. All this has been achieved

active of and national

institutions in This meeting, held the aegis of the

Studies, the Commission of the

the is

the signed between and

institutions, with financial

the a

on combined to ascochyta blight and wilt.

The above mentioned also a

on the situation of A. rabiei

fact, identification is a typical case

in which only can achieve the

be done independently

in institutions, and

at the end, the choice of

an set of and the

of the techniques should be in

to allow of into

detail, in we feel

that be done to develop lines the

specific of use as is com-

mon to that all the plants in an available do not show homogenous to some isolates of

A . rubiei, the

genetic of the host, as the inoculations done with colonies of the fungus obtained single-

isolates conditions.

Should all the above conditions be fulfilled, a step could be the of obtained in dif-

with the same isolate, to be exchanged conditions. The ment in obtained by

the method and give to extensive the situation in time and space.

a to host-

pathogen is needed. should evolutia- plant pathology and biochemical aspects along with

extensive epidemiological a of

fact, knowledge of the genetical bases of

of chickpea to ascochyta blight is still Even if a less complex, should be expected in most host-pathogen (Ellingboe, 19&6), we do not have conclusive evidence in

A . rubiei is

(5)

Conclusions

The tasks to jointly by chickpea patho- logists and against ascochyta blight multi-

fold and heavy. the

to face them efficiently and economically, avoiding duplicate Two can be expected

these common On one hand, some

cal aspects of the could be elu-

cidated. On the hand, economic benefits can be

expected in the basin an

of yields in the in which the chickpea is still and the enhancement of the its

the of a

legume potentially useful in

References

AULA, S.S. (1964): Study on eleven isolates of 17: 83-87.

of 4"' ed.

F.

tion of chickpea lines to Ascochytu rubiei 12: 27-29.

in Genetic basis of of

U.S.A.

J.S. (1984): Evidence of in Ascochytu

r-ubiei of in

of Chickpeas (Saxena, and Singh, eds.). Nijhoff and Junk

J.S. and S. to

27: 643-645.

of Ascochytu

r-ubiei 7th of

(1986): Seed- 1.

of

of of chickpea in

in of Chickpeas (Saxena,

and Singh,

CASAS, A. (1987): of the

Ascochytu rubiei in

ings, 7th of the Union,

of

1st on

et al., eds.).

of Ascochytu rubiei. 444-457.

W.J.,

Effect fungicides on of Ascochytu rubiei in

57:

42-746.

N.N. and J.N. (1980): Ascochytu rubiei

synonymous with rubiei. 33: 119-120.

in Oxon,

di Ascochytu rubiei

A., F. and

of some isolates of Ascochytu rubiei.

12: 22- 23.

F. and Ascochyfu rubiei 50 in

L.E. F.J., eds.). Uni- of

S.

in Ascochytu rubiei 24: 265-266.

on

in of Chickpeas

Junk

in The Oxon, G.C., NENE, Y.L.

Ascochytu rubiei. 65:

586-587.

ing the development of of Ascochytu rubiei.

125 in S.

Ascochytu rubiei, pathology 27: 225-360.

WELTZEN, Epidemiological

aspects of in

Singh, Nijhoff and Junk

C.G.

la biologie, l'épidémiologie et du

167-192.

- 54 -

Références

Documents relatifs

- “La culture du pois chiche dans le bassin méditerranéen.” Le pois chiche, plante d’origine mediterranéenne, occupe une place importante dans l‘agriculture du

Present status and future prospects of chickpea crop production and improvement in the Mediterranean countries.. Zaragoza

Present status and future prospects of chickpea crop production and improvement in the Mediterranean countries.. Zaragoza

Present status and future prospects of chickpea crop production and improvement in the Mediterranean countries.. Zaragoza

Insect pests of chickpea in the Mediterranean area and possibilities for resistance..

Present status and future prospects of chickpea crop production and improvement in the Mediterranean countries.. Zaragoza

Present status and future prospects of chickpea crop production and improvement in the Mediterranean countries.. Zaragoza

Potencial yield (kg/ha) of winter chickpea as related to spring chickpea (year location). 3) utilization of that is lost simply.. by between