• Aucun résultat trouvé

Polar model of order-disorder

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Polar model of order-disorder"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: jpa-00236648

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00236648

Submitted on 1 Jan 1962

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Polar model of order-disorder

Ralph J. Harrison, Arthur Paskin

To cite this version:

Ralph J. Harrison, Arthur Paskin. Polar model of order-disorder. J. Phys. Radium, 1962, 23 (10), pp.613-615. �10.1051/jphysrad:019620023010061300�. �jpa-00236648�

(2)

613.

POLAR MODEL OF ORDER-DISORDER

By RALPH J. HARRISON and ARTHUR PASKIN,

Materials Research Laboratory, U. S. Army Materials Research Agency Watertown, Massachusetts.

Résumé. 2014 Paskin a montré que l’introduction des concepts les plus récents de l’effet d’écran dans les métaux applique aux alliages de type AB conduit à un modèle dipolaire semblable à celui de Mott. Les atomes A et B portent des charges d’écran opposées dues surtout à leur différence de valence.

L’énergie d’ordre évaluée à partir des paramètres d’écran théoriques pour le laiton 03B2 est en

accord raisonnable avec l’expérience, ce qui justifie la validite de ce modèle. On passera en revue les hypothèses de base et les conséquences de ce modèle en ce qui concerne les énergies d’ordre et

on décrira une extension de ce modèle au calcul de la contribution électronique au spectre des

vibrations élastiques de l’alliage.

Abstract. 2014 It has been pointed out [2] that the introduction of the more recent concepts of

electronic screening in metals applied to the AB alloys leads to a polar model resembling that

of Mott [1]. The A and B atoms have opposite charges mainly related to their differences in valence. The ordering energy estimated from the theoretical screening parameters for 03B2 brass

is in reasonable agreement with experiment, lending support to the physical validity of this model.

The basic assumptions and consequences of the model with respect to the ordering energy will be reviewed and in addition an extension of this model to the computation of the electronic contri- bution to the elastic spectrum of the alloy will be described.

LE JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE ET LE RADIUM TOME 23, OCTOBRE 1962,

An important step towards the understanding of

lhe origin of the ordering energy in binary alloys

was taken in 1937 by N. F. Mott [1] with the deve-

lopment of the " polar model ". Mott discussed this model with particular référence to the ordered beta brass (Cu Zn) alloy. The polar model may briefly be described as follows :

As a first approximation one considers the two

types of atoms as point charges in a " sea " of conduction electrons. The magnitudes of these point charges are taken to be the respective nuclear charges diminished by the average of the electronic

charge contained within the atomic polyhedra sur- rounding the respective ions. In this first approxi- mation the conduction electrons are considered to be distributed uniformly throughout the alloy, i.e.,

for Cu Zn there are assumed to be one and a half

conduction electrons per polyhedron. The point charges in this first approximation are then, (1/2)e

at the Zn site and - (1/2)e at the Cu site. If one

computes the elertrostatie energy of this ordered

point charge configuration relative to the disor-

dered case, one finds it to be an order of magnitude greater than the observed ordering energy. The

major cause of this large discrepancy is that the

conduction electrons, far from being uniform,

screen the ion charges quite strongly. Mott com- puted the magnitude of this effect by the use of a

linearized form of the Thomas-Fermi method. The conduction electron distribution thus obtained re-

presents the change in électron distribution from the case where all sites are occupied by fictitious

atoms having the average nuclear charge. The

Mott-Thomas-Fermi screening model led to the

result that the net charge within an atomic poly-

hedron is about 1/6 of the point ion charge of + (1/2)e. In its final approximation then, the polar model represents the ordering energy‘ by the

electrostatic energy of a point charge distribution of -f- .075 e located at the Zn sites and - .075 e

cloated at the Cu sites. After correcting this elec-

trostatic energy for the estimated contribution of terms associated with the ion-core repulsion, Mott

found that the result was in fairly good agreement

with experimental determinations of the ordering

energy (about 0.04: eV) in the beta brass (Cu Zn) alloy.

In recent years there have been further deve-

lopments in the theory of electronic çcreening in

metals that have led us to reexamine the problem

of the electronic structure of ordered alloys [2].

We have attempted to keep within the framework of the original Mott polar model. The screening

model we have used is one [3] that leads to an

asymptotic expression for the potential at large

distances from a screened point charge Ze of the

form

Kohn and Vosko [3] and Blandin and,Friedel [4]

have regarded the constants A and cp as empirical parameters to be determined with the aid of data on

resistivity of dilute alloys. The validity of the asymptotic form of the potential given by Eq. (1)

is somewhat more general than the free electron

model, since it includes the case of Bloch electrons

Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphysrad:019620023010061300

(3)

614

in a periodic potential under restrictions of sphe-

rical energy surfaces and isotropic scattering.

Langer and Vosko [5] derived a non-empirical

form for the free electron gas potential and charge density valid for closer distances. We have shown [6] that to within the nearest neighbor dis-

tance this charge density is closely approximated by

where the first term is the usual Thomas-Fermi term in the linearized form given by Mott, and in

the second term the constants A and p are given

definite values.

In Mott’s original calculation on the polar model

the value of the shielding parameter q (= 2kp oc)

was taken as a semi-empirical parameter adjusted

to the resistivity data, whereas in current semi-

empirical screening models it is the second term in

E . (2) which is adjusted.

e have estimated the degree of polarity by tintez grating Eq. (2) from the atomic radius, ra, to infi-

nity, finding the total charge outside ra and thence the charge inside ra screening the point charge at

the center. To estimate the amount of electronic

charge inside ra arising from screening of charges

outside ra, we take as first approximation the assumption that all the screening charges outside a

distance ra from a point charge divide themselves equally among nearest neighbor cells.

The result of the integration of Eq. (2) is to give a screening charge in beta Cu Zn equal to

0.24 Z, where Zi is the assumed ionic charge (= + 1/2e).

The Madelung energy, EM, computed as if these charges were located at the lattice points is equal

to 0.07 electron volts. The estimate of energy by

the Madelung method disregards any information

provide by the screening model regarding the dis-

distribution of charge within the unit cell. One

may if oné wishes, utilize this information by taking as the interaction energy of pairs of ions

where V is the potential at n of the screened charge

at m. This expression seemingly neglects the elec-

trostatic interaction of the electronic screening charge at m with the screening charge at n. Howe-

ver it is the correct expression, and results from consideration of electrostatic and kinetic energy terms as may be shown in several ways [7]. The

total interaction energy is then given by

where

The phase factor y has been introduced in view of the fact that Kohn and Vosko have found that

although the coefficient of the cosine term is well

apuroximately by the Langer and Vosko expres- sion (5), the phase factor is not.

Carrying out the summations for first neighbors only in the ordered Cu Zn lattice of parameters a :

Adding on the next neighteen neighbor shells gives

Thus the estimate of energy becomes

It may be pointed out that most of this comes

from the first shell alone, although there are fluc-

tuations in value even quite far out. The experi-

mental indications are that the ordering energy is about 0.04 electron volts per atom.

We have also been attempting to evaluate the contribution of the conduction electron part of the

interactions in beta brass to the vibration spec- trum. Our oscillation bas generally followed the procedure of Toya [8]. Values of the elastic cons- tants for the acoustic branch of the spectrum indi-

cate that the ion-core repulsions play a major role.

With regard to the optical branch, one similarly expects the core repulsion exchange forces to play

a major role. However there is some preliminary expérimental evidence [9] from neutron scattering

the frequency of the longitudinal optical mode is

such as to indicate tbat forces other than the nea- rest neighbor ion-core exchange must be involved.

The observed frequency for Cu Zn is 1.3 to 1.4 X 1013 sec-1. The frequency to be expected

in the case that short range ion-core forces are dominant can be shown to be

for beta brass. This figure would be slightly redu-

ced were a correction made for a possible electronic

contribution to C44. Another estimate, using the Born-Mayer constant for copper is 5 . 5 X 1012 sec-le An estimate of the electronic contribution alone on

the basis of the free électron screening model

would give less than 2 X 1012 sec-1. Since the squares of the contributions are additive, the elec-

tronic contribution is only a small fraction.

One may further estimate possible long-range

contributions to the optical frequencies for example by computing the frequencies corresponding to a completely ionic model of the lattice still arise.

One may use the sum rule [11] discussed by Brout

as a generalization of the Szigeti relation for lattice frequencies According to which the sum of squares

(4)

615

of longitudinal and transverse frequencies is related

to the compressibility modulus. Using this, and

even assuming zero frequency for transverse optical

modes in the long wave length limit the experi-

mental value for the frequency of the longitudinal optical mode is still somewhat too large. The experimental value is incorrect, or assumptions

involved in Brout’s sum rule must be violated.

One such assumption is that of nearest neighbor

forces alone for the ion core repulsion. Another is

the adiabatic assumption. In any case, whatever the mechanism leading to the observed high optical frequency, the polar character of the lattice in the

sense of Mott’s model is not in itself an explanation ;

insofar as long range electrostatic forces continue

to be significant, the unshielded point charges

seem more relevant than the uncompensated charges within each atomic polyhedron.

REFERENCES

[1] MOTT (N. F.), Proc. Phys. Soc., London, 1937, 49, 258.

[2] PASKIN (A.), Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc., Ser. II, 1962, 7,

216.

[3] KOHN (W.) et VOSKO (S. H.), Phys. Rev., 1960, 119,

912.

[4] BLANDIN (A.) and FRIEDEL (J.), J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 1960,17,170.

[5] LANGER (J. S.) and VOSKO (S. H.), J. Phys. Chem.

Solids, 1959, 12, 196.

[6] HARRISON (R. J.) and PASKIN (A.), J. Phys. Soc., Japan,1960,15,1902.

[7] e. g., SILVERMAN (B. D.) and WEISS (P. R.), Phys.

Rev., 1959, 114, 989. More directly it follows from

considerations paralleting those involved in the

Hellman-Feynman theorem.

[8] TOYA (T.), J. Res. Inst. for Catalysis, Hokkaido Uni-

versity, 1968; 6,161, 183 ; Progr. Theor. Phys., 1958, 20, 973, 94 ; also WOLL (E. J., Jr.) and KOHN (W.), Phys. Rev., 1962,126,1963.

[9] ANTAL (J.), Private communication experimental re-

sults quoted are only tentative at the present time.

[10] However, it has been pointed out to us by Friedel

that corrections for the Bloch character of the con-

duction electrons can be quite large.

[11] BROUT (R.), Phys. Rev., 1959, 113, 43.

Références

Documents relatifs

Thus, in the GDT of R1, the link between goal 13 (“go and give R2”) and goal 14 (“go to R2”) has to be modified: whereas the satisfaction of goal 13 is quite unchanged (its

This paper presents a novel technique for reduction of a process model based on the notion of in- dication, by which, the occurrence of an event in the model reveals the occurrence

EFFEX originates from this need and was built brick by brick within a few years, beginning by a flame propagation module (the core of the software), completed later by peripheral

Touzi, “Target Scattering Decomposition in Terms of Roll- Invariant Target Parameters,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol.. Huynen, Phenomenological Theory

From the physical point of view, a striking success of the noncommutative geometric approach is that the al- gebra, the Hilbert space and the Dirac operator of the Standard Model can

The present model, which is an extension of the one developed by Lennard- Jones and Devonshire, uses a twin lattice, along with the conjugate lattices, and hence allows for two

This paper presents a novel tech- nique for reduction of a process model based on the notion of indication, by which, the occurrence of an event in the model reveals the occurrence

Secondly, we have studied the influence of the fontanel and skull conductivities on the electrical potential values at the scalp for a realistic neonatal head model.. The RDM and