• Aucun résultat trouvé

Corrigendum to "Impact of CO2 and climate on the Last Glacial Maximum vegetation: results from the ORCHIDEE/IPSL models" published in Clim. Past, 7, 557–577, 2011

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Corrigendum to "Impact of CO2 and climate on the Last Glacial Maximum vegetation: results from the ORCHIDEE/IPSL models" published in Clim. Past, 7, 557–577, 2011"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02931813

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02931813

Submitted on 12 Apr 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License

Corrigendum to ”Impact of CO2 and climate on the Last Glacial Maximum vegetation: results from the ORCHIDEE/IPSL models” published in Clim. Past, 7,

557–577, 2011

M.-N. Woillez, M. Kageyama, G. Krinner, N. de Noblet-Ducoudré, N. Viovy, M. Mancip

To cite this version:

M.-N. Woillez, M. Kageyama, G. Krinner, N. de Noblet-Ducoudré, N. Viovy, et al.. Corrigendum

to ”Impact of CO2 and climate on the Last Glacial Maximum vegetation: results from the OR-

CHIDEE/IPSL models” published in Clim. Past, 7, 557–577, 2011. Climate of the Past, European

Geosciences Union (EGU), 2011, 7 (4), pp.1457-1457. �10.5194/cp-7-1457-2011�. �hal-02931813�

(2)

Clim. Past, 7, 1457, 2011 www.clim-past.net/7/1457/2011/

doi:10.5194/cp-7-1457-2011

© Author(s) 2011. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

Climate of the Past

Corrigendum to

“Impact of CO 2 and climate on the Last Glacial Maximum

vegetation: results from the ORCHIDEE/IPSL models” published in Clim. Past, 7, 557–577, 2011

M.-N. Woillez

1

, M. Kageyama

1

, G. Krinner

2

, N. de Noblet-Ducoudr´e

1

, N. Viovy

1

, and M. Mancip

1

1

LSCE/IPSL INSU, UMR1572, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, CE Saclay, l’Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France

2

LGGE, UMR5183, CNRS, 54 rue Moli`ere, 38402 St. Martin d’H`eres Cedex, France

-90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0

CTRL LGM

TrBR TrBE TempNE TempBSTempBE BoNSBoNE BoBS

%

Fig. 13. Percentage of change in the area of presence of the tree PFT (fraction exceeds 1 %) when the CO

2

is decreased from 310 to 185 ppm and the background climate is kept constant to CTRL present or LGM. Abbreviations: see Table 1.

In the manuscript “Impact of CO

2

and climate on the Last Glacial Maximum vegetation: results from the OR- CHIDEE/IPSL models” by M.-N. Woillez et al., Fig. 14 has been accidentally replaced by the same figure as Fig. 13 in the final published manuscript. The Sect. “4.2.4 Impact of LGM CO

2

for a modern background climate” on p. 571, sec- ond paragraph, should refer to Fig. 13. The Sect. “4.3 Impact of dynamics and competitivity” on p. 572, second paragraph, should refer to Fig. 14.

On p. 571, right column, Sect. 4.2.4 the sentence should read: For TrBE and TrBR, the decrease is less than 20 % with a glacial climate in background, and more than 30 % under a modern climate (Fig. 13). For TempNE the response is similar for both climates, but for BoNE the decrease is much

Correspondence to: M.-N. Woillez ([email protected])

CTRLP CTRLG LGMP LGMG

gC/m2/year

TrBE TempNE TempBS BoNE BoBS

TrBEP310 TrBEP185 TrBEG310 TrBEG185

TempNEP310 TempNEP185 TempNEG310 TempNEG185 TempBSP310 TempBSP185 TempBSG310 TempBSG185

BoNEP310 BoNEP185 BoNEG310 BoNEP185 BoBSP310 BoBSP185 BoBSG310 BoBSG185

Fig. 14. Global annual mean NPP for the static simulations with an imposed vegetation. Legend at the top: names of the PFTs (see Table 1). Legend to the right hand-side: climatic and CO

2

forcings (see Table 2). Legend at the bottom: names of the simulations (see Table 3).

stronger in LGM climatic conditions than in modern climate (−60 % vs. −40 %, respectively, see Fig. 13).

On p. 572, left column, Sect. 4.3 the sentence should read:

The results presented in Fig. 14 show that the decrease of the global mean NPP in response to the decrease in CO

2

is very similar under a modern climate or a LGM climate.

Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.

Références

Documents relatifs