• Aucun résultat trouvé

Roughness calibration for the SMOS L-MEB model

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Roughness calibration for the SMOS L-MEB model"

Copied!
13
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02822344

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02822344

Submitted on 6 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Roughness calibration for the SMOS L-MEB model

Marc Crapeau, Jean-Pierre Wigneron, Yann H. Kerr, Jean-Christophe Calvet, Patricia de Rosnay, Kauzar Saleh Contell, Arnaud Mialon

To cite this version:

Marc Crapeau, Jean-Pierre Wigneron, Yann H. Kerr, Jean-Christophe Calvet, Patricia de Rosnay, et al.. Roughness calibration for the SMOS L-MEB model. 2. Workshop on Remote Sensing and Modeling of Surface Properties, Jun 2009, Toulouse, France. 1 p. + 12 pl. �hal-02822344�

(2)

Roughness calibraton for the SMOS L-MEB model

M. Crapeau, J.P. Wigneron, Y. Kerr,

J.C. Calvet, P. De Rosnay, K. Saleh, A. Mialon

2nd Workshop on Remote Sensing and Modeling of Surface Properties

Toulouse, 10 June 2009

(3)

Why roughness calibration ?

Principle : simultaneously retrieval of several surface parameters from multi-angular

radiometric data with a least-squares iterative method

Focused parameters:

Soil moisture (SM)

Vegetation optical thickness ( τ )

Surface roughness (H

R

)

(4)

The SMOREX experiment

Both radiometric and in-situ measurements

LEWIS: L-band dual pol. radiometer

Incidence angle from 20° to 60°

8 data sets every day

Ground installation:

Meteorology

Soil moisture and temperature profile

Biomass measurements, soil texture,...

2 surfaces: Bare soil and Fallow

6 years of data acquis ition

(5)

Using SM in-situ data to calibrate H

R

SM in-situ measurements as input parameter in L-MEB to invert H

R

(Saleh et al. 2007)

Allow '2-P' retrieval (τ , HR)

Study of HR dependency with SM

Calibration of HR over fallow

(6)

Using SM in-situ data to calibrate H

R

( τ ,H

R

) inversions with measured SM:

H

R

can be calibrated with a linear dependency on SM

2003-2004

HR = 1.3 – 1.13 SM

Saleh et al. 2007

(7)

Using SM in-situ data to calibrate H

R

( τ ,SM) inversions with calibrated H

R

:

Good correlation between retrieved and measured SM

H

R

= 1.3 – 1.13 SM

RMSE = 0.057 m

3

.m

-3

2005

(8)

Roughness calibration without SM in-situ data

Calibrate H

R

without on-field measurements

Solution: using of observations where SM is theorically known → Theorical SM values as L-MEB input param.

How to select dry and wet observations ?

Very wet soil

Very dry soil

(9)

Iterative scheme

for sub-sets selection

2P-2P retrieval iterative method

'2P' L-MEB retrieval (SM, τ )

HR=1

Selection of extremal moisture observations

on retrieved SM

“very dry” and

“saturated”

SM thresholds

'2P' L-MEB retrieval (HR, τ )

SM of selected data set to extremal value New HR relation

with SM

(10)

Roughness calibration

with 2P-2P iterative method

Convergence lead to an improvement of the SM retrieval

But no

convergence

for 2006...

(11)

Roughness calibration

with 2P-2P iterative method

(SM, τ ) retrievals with H

R

calibrated with 2P-2P iterative method

HR

= 1.33 – 1.2 SM RMSE = 0.058 m

3

.m

-3

2005

Fallow

(12)

Roughness calibration

with 2P-2P iterative method

2P-2P iterative method results for 2003 to 2007 SMOSREX data sets

Saleh et al. 07 calibration

Iterative methode

2003 0.043 0.057

2004 0.052 0.048

2005 0.055 0.058

2006 0.039 X

2007 0.070 0.058

2003-2004 0.044 0.053

2003-2007 0.055 0.052

RMSE of SM retrievals over SMOSREX fallow

(13)

Conclusion

Surface roughness can be calibrated without any soil moisture measurements by using theorical estimations for period of extremal of soil moisture

Results are almost as good as calibration done with SM on-field measurements

→ Effective calibration method for experiments extended in time (like SMOS)

Improvements on initial conditions, sub-sets selection

and convergence are in progress

Références

Documents relatifs

It uses a soil resistance driven by surface (0 − 5 cm) soil moisture, meteorological forcing and time (hour) of day, and has the capability to be calibrated using the

(1) CESBIO, TOULOUSE CEDEX 4, France (Yann.Kerr@cesbio.cnes.fr), (2) Vega technologies, Toulouse, France, (3) INRA-EPHYSE, Bordeaux France, (4) Array systems, Toronto, Canada, (5)

Arnaud Mialon, Al Bitar Ahmad, Lucie Berthon, Simone Bircher, François Cabot, Maria-José Escorihuela, Delphine Leroux, Olivier Merlin, Nathalie. Novello, Thierry Pellarin,

Surface emissivity can then be related to the moisture content in the first few centimeters of soil, and, after some surface roughness and temperature corrections, to the sea

Satellite Soil Moisture Validation and Application Workshop in Frascati, Italy, 1-3

Statistics for comparison of 0–5 cm volumetric moisture content (θ) estimates by means of Delta-T ThetaProbe and Decagon 5TE sensors at the Sodankylä “HA Open 1” (low organic

The SMOS LPRM soil moisture retrievals, using the optimized parameters, were then evaluated against the latest SMOS Level 3 (L3) soil moisture product and a set of in situ networks

Kerr, Arnaud Mialon, Al Bitar Ahmad, Delphine Leroux, Philippe Richaume, Claire Gruhier, Lucie Berthon, Nathalie Novello, Christoph.. Rüdiger, Simone Bircher,