• Aucun résultat trouvé

Defense semantics of argumentation: encoding reasons for accepting arguments

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Defense semantics of argumentation: encoding reasons for accepting arguments"

Copied!
16
0
0

Texte intégral

Références

Documents relatifs

In [8] the result is extended to the class of disjunctive programs. The P-stable semantics of a normal or disjunctive program P is defined by means of a fixed point operator in terms

We have seen that uniform equivalence is located in between ordinary and strong equivalence, in the sense that it considers all models, similar to strong equivalence, but only

In order to handle equivalences and specializations of p eq and p sub (see below for details and examples), we introduce p e , an equivalence relation over properties

First, we obtain a criterion similar to Theorem 1.1 for the Witt group of a quadratic field extension equipped with its nontrivial automorphism:..

We start by showing that under some reasonable conditions on the attack relation, an argumentation system built from a knowledge base 6 has a finite number of extensions even if its

Brownian motion in ~d has the following property for d > 4: The random set W intersects sets of dimension greater than d-4 with positive probability. and

Thus, he has a possible way of negating (C): A person can experience states of affairs or events that begin after that person's death, because such things exist

self-defense is a movie by christophe boutin first camera (right-hand pages): mélanie scarciglia second camera (left-hand pages): sébastien rouchon effigy realisation: marianne