0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
M K
Frequencycm1 30x30 smear 630K
60x60 smear 315K
A force-‐constant model of graphene for conduc4vity calcula4ons
Henrique Miranda
(1)and Ludger Wirtz
(1)(1)
Physics and Materials Science Research Unit, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Mo=va=on
[1] O. Dubay and G. Kresse, Phys. Rev. B 67, 035401 (2003).
[2] T. Sohier, M. Calandra, C.-‐H. Park, N. Bonini, N. Marzari, and F. Mauri, Phys. Rev. B 90, 125414 (2014).
[3] J. L. Mañes, Phys. Rev. B 76, 045430 (2007).
[4] R. A. Jishi, L. Venkataraman, M. S. Dresselhaus, and G. Dresselhaus, Chemical Physics LeXers 209, 77 (1993).
[5] L. Wirtz and A. Rubio, Solid State CommunicaZons 131, 141 (2004).
[6] Y. N. Gartstein, Physics LeXers A 327, 83 (2004).
[7] S. Piscanec, M. Lazzeri, F. Mauri, A. C. Ferrari, and J. Robertson, Phys. Rev. LeX. 93, 185503 (2004).
[8] S. Pisana, M. Lazzeri, C. Casiraghi, K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, A. C. Ferrari, and F. Mauri, Nat. Mater. 6, 198 (2007).
[8] J. Li, H. P. C. Miranda, Y. Niquet, C. Delerue, L. Genovese, I. Duchemin, and L. Wirtz (submiXed)
Graphene has some interes=ng proper=es:
• high charge-‐carrier mobility (limited by electron-‐phonon interacZon)
• InteresZng for high frequency applicaZons (control of mobility is important) Aim of the project:
• Create a 4 nearest-‐neighbor (4NN) force-‐constant model of graphene that reproduces the DFT calculated phonon frequencies and modes.
• The model will be used for calculaZng the phonon-‐limited electrical conducZvity of graphene and carbon nanotubes.[8]
• Incorporate long-‐range interacZons in the model.
Ab-‐ini4o phonon dispersion of graphene
Force constant model
The force constants are second derivatives of the total energy with respect to the positions of two atoms:
They depend on:
• Types of atoms interacting
• Relative position vector
Transformation from local to global coordinates:
Build the dynamical matrix:
Calculate the phonon frequencies:
References
Electron-‐Phonon coupling
Comparison of 4NN models
– The off-diagonal elements of the force constant matrix are VERY important!
• They can be modeled as angular springs between the carbon atoms [6].
• 4NN diagonal model enough to reproduce the dispersion but gives bad phonon eigenvectors
• 4NN model with 2 off-diagonal parameters: phonon eigenvectors and eigenvalues OK!
– Simple model with few parameters (14 parameters instead of 12 ).
– Strain dependent model by fitting to strained graphene.
– Local to global coordinates transformation is delicate with off-diagonal terms.
– The same analysis and model can be done for other materials (BN)
Conclusions
• Ground-‐state: LDA norm-‐conserving pseudopotenZal, 35 Ha plane-‐wave cut-‐off, 4.65 Bohr ladce constant (relaxed).
• Phonon dispersion: DFPT sampling of 30x30 q-‐points.
Cij = @2E
@xi@xj Global reference frame Cij0 = @2E
@x0i@x0j Local reference frame
C = R
TC
0R
Long-‐range force constants
D
ab(~q) = X
s
C
sabe
i~q.( ~ra r~s)✏l/ti1 = ✏l/ti3 = 0
✏ti/l1 = ✏ti/l3 = 0
✏l/ti2 = ✏ti/l2
✏l/ti4 = ✏ti/l4
C0n = 0 B@
ln ✏l/tin 0
✏ti/ln tin 0
0 0 ton
1 CA
Off diagonal terms:
ogen not included [4]
Phonon displacements
det |D
ab(~q) !(~q)
2| = 0
The canonical phonon modes are defined using two rules[2]:
• Eigenvector of a longitudinal (transverse) mode is parallel (perpendicular) to the phonon’s momentum
• Phase differences between atoms is for acousZc and for opZcal modes.
The DFT calculated phonon modes tend to the canonical ones in the long wavelength limit.
At finite momentum there is an acousZc/opZcal mixing linear with |q|[2-‐3].
Can we capture this dependence correctly in a 4NN model? Why is it important?
• Real space cut-‐off the force constants up to 4NN.
• Kohn anomalies are suppressed
• Out-‐of-‐plane mode frequencies become imaginary (unstable system)
• The 4NN model does not reproduce totally the phonon dispersion.
• Can we add an analyZcal correcZon?
e
i~q.( ~r1 r~2)e
i~q.( ~r1 r~2)• We generate the dynamical matrix using 4NN and compare to the ab-‐ini&o dynamical matrix and/or the eigenvalues using the quality funcZon and find the best fit using a simplex method:
• We calculate from the phonon eigenvectors calculated with the different models:
• Good agreement with reported value [2]
eaq, ˜LA = 1
p2eiq·(R+ra) q
|q|
eaq, ˜T A = 1
p2eiq·(R+ra) q ?
|q ?|
eaq, ˜LO = a 1
p2eiq·(R+ra) q
|q|
eaq, ˜T O = a 1
p2eiq·(R+ra) q ?
|q ?|
TA LA
ZA ZO
TO
LO • Kohn anomalies at Γ and K points that
connect the Fermi surface (non-‐analyZc phonon dispersion).
• We can’t describe the full dispersion with a finite set of force constants
(Fourier interpolaZon fails).
• The electronic temperature changes the slope of the phonon dispersion.
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
M K
Frequencycm1
ab-initio ref. [4]
Diagonal force-‐constant tensor
l ti
to
xj xi
Phonon dispersion of doped graphene
Phonon dispersion of compressed/stretched graphene
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
M K
Frequencycm1
ab-initio ref. [5]
Off-‐diagonal for 2NN
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
M K
Frequencycm1
ab-initio New fit
Off-‐diagonal for 2NN and 4NN
The electron-‐phonon coupling matrix for graphene has the form[2-‐3]:
Where and are related to the acousZc-‐opZcal mixing in the phonon modes:
Where and are calculated using the canonical phonon modes.
To get the correct electron-‐phonon coupling the model should reproduce the correct value of .
• Fit 4NN force constants to
strained and stretched graphene.
• When doping graphene we
change the Fermi energy and the Kohn anomaly is found now on a circle in the Brillouin zone
CalculaZons within the adiabaZc approximaZon
eq,LA =p
1 ↵2|q|2eq, ˜LA |q|[sin(3✓q)eq, ˜LO + cos(3✓q)eq, ˜T O] eq,T A =p
1 ↵2|q|2eq, ˜T A |q|[cos(3✓q)eq, ˜LO sin(3✓q)eq, ˜T O] eq,LO =p
1 ↵2|q|2eq, ˜LO |q|[sin(3✓q)eq, ˜LA + cos(3✓q)eq, ˜T A] eq,T O =p
1 ↵2|q|2eq, ˜T O |q|[cos(3✓q)eq, ˜LA sin(3✓q)eq, ˜T A]
Canonical modes Modes with Acous=c/Op=cal mixing
˜O
˜A
Acous=c phonons Op=cal phonons
A O
A
⇡ ˜
A˜
O O= ˜
On 1 2 3 4
ln 40.905 7.402 -1.643 -0.609
tin 16.685 -4.051 3.267 0.424
ton 9.616 -0.841 0.603 -0.501
✏l/tin 0.000 0.632 0.000 -1.092
✏ti/ln 0.000 -0.632 0.000 -1.092
[1]
Model Phonon
frequencies Phonon displacements
near Γ
Ref [4] ✗ ✗
Ref [5] ✓ ✗
New Fit ✓ ✓
Table 2. FiXed force constants
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Force(dyn/cm)
Distance (˚A) long.
trans. in-plane trans. out-of-plane
-0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
M K
Energy(ev)
ef
AcousZc-‐opZcal mixing
Table 1. Comparison of the different models
Ref. [4] Ref. [5] New Fit
Fermi energy
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
M K
Frequencycm1
ef +.0168
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
M K
Frequencycm1
nn 4
0 500 1000 1500 2000
M K
Frequencycm1
-5%
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
M K
Frequencycm1
5%
compressed stretched
Hqe-ph = i|q|
2↵(q)QLA Ae2i✓q(QLA + iQT A)
Ae 2i✓q(QLA iQT A) 2↵(q)QLA + i
0 Oei✓q(QLO + iQT O)
Oe i✓q(QLO iQT O) 0
Q⌫ = eq · eq,⌫
ProjecZon on the canonical modes
⇡ 0.10˚ A
= ↵eig X
q=Nq
X
n
h!0(~q)n !(~q)abn i2
+ ↵dyn X
q=Nq
X
ij
X
a,b
hD0(~q)abij D(~q)abij i2
-0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
ref [4] ref [5]
New fit
ab-in
itio LD A
neighbor