HAL Id: jpa-00247295
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247295
Submitted on 1 Jan 1996
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
NMR in the 2D Organic Superconductors
P. Wzietek, H. Mayaffre, D. Jérome, S. Brazovskii
To cite this version:
P. Wzietek, H. Mayaffre, D. Jérome, S. Brazovskii. NMR in the 2D Organic Superconductors. Journal
de Physique I, EDP Sciences, 1996, 6 (12), pp.2011-2041. �10.1051/jp1:1996201�. �jpa-00247295�
J.
Phys.
I France 6(1996)
2011-2041 DECEMBER 1996, PAGE 2011NMR in the 2D Organic Superconductors
P. Wzietek
(*),
H.Mayaffre,
D. Jérome and S. Brazovskii(**)
Laboratoire de
Physique
des Solides(***),
Université Paris-Sud, 91405Orsay
Cedex, Francé(Received
20 June 1996, recel>.ed in final form 22August
1996,accepted
26August 1996)
PACS.74.70.Kn
Organic superconductors
PACS.74.25.-q
General properties: correlations betweenphysical properties
in normal andsuperconducting
statesPACS.74.60.Ge Flux
pinning,
flux creep, and flux-fine latticedynamics
Abstract. We review recent NMR studies of the
layered
organic superconductors of the(BEDT)2X family.
First the normal stateproperties
are discussed. The central issue is the importance of theinterplay
betweenantiferromagnetism
and superconductivity in these mate- riais demonstratedby
the observation of apseudogap developing prior
to thesuperconducting
transition. An extended
analysis
of theKnight
shift and the nuclear relaxation rate gives an evi- dence for strongantiferromagnetic
fluctuations enhancedby
Coulombrepulsion
and thenesting
of the Fermi surface. The NMR data show some
analogy
withHigh
Tc superconductors howeverthe
comparison
is notstraightforward
as there is no clear evidence forspin-charge decouphng.
The use of
high
pressure to tune theamplitude
of AF fluctuations enablesus to draw a
general phase diagram
of thefamily.
In the second part the NMR experiments in thesuperconducting
state are
presented.
Une of the fundamental questions addressed by theseexperiments
is thesymmetry of the order parameter related to the
painng
mechanism. The mostspectacular
NMRmeasurements are those performed in the lock-in state, which grue access to the density of su-
perconducting
excitations at low energy. These expenments suggest that thepairing
state may be unconventionalfeatunng
ananisotropic superconducting
gap,possibly
with nodes. Finally, the NMR contribution to theunderstanding
of the nature of the vortex state is discussed in thecontext of recent results on
~-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br
where the ~H relaxationwas used as a
probe
of the vortex
density
fluctuations.1. Introduction
Quasi
two-dimensional(Q2D)
organicsuperconductors
were issued as a result of a search fornew donor molecules
replacing
TMTSF in 1D organic salts in order to improvesuperconduct- ing properties
of these materials. This led to a new andcompletely
dilferentfamily
of organic conductors butparadoxically,
thegoal
has beenpartially
achieved since T~ has been raisedby
a factor of 10. Since
then,
the number ofquasi
two-dimensionalorganic superconductors
has grown veryrapidly
andactually
the BEDT-based materials are thelargest part
among about 50organic superconductors.
Thesecompounds,
inspite
of rather low criticaltemperatures
(*)
Author forcorrespondence (e-mail: wzietek@lps.u-psud,fr)
(**)
On Ieave from L.D. Landau Institute for TheoreticalPhysics,
Moscow, Russia (***)CNRS,
U-R-A- 2©
LesÉditions
de Physique 1996(m
10K)
are veryinteresting
as mortel materials forstudying
the mechanisms ofsuperconduc- tivity
in the 2Dsuperconductors.
Particular
place
in thisfamily
isoccupied by
the so called~-phases
which have been mostextensively
studied and appear to berepresentative
for aqmte large
Mass of materials. Es-pecially, they display
a lot ofproperties
similar to those observed in thehigh
temperaturesuperconductors (HTSC): high conductivity anisotropy
orinterplay
betweenmagnetism
andsuperconductivity.
The
general
survey of thephysical properties
of 2Dorganic
materials can be found in[1-4].
In this paper we concentrate rather on varions aspects related to the
application
of the NMR and the electronicproperties.
Themajority
of resultspresented
below are those obtained on~-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br
and which werepublished
in[5-8].
Thisrepresent~tive
member of the~-(ET)2X family
is one of the the best characterized up todate,
it is also the 2Dorganic superconductor
with thehighest
known T~(11.6 K)
ai ambient pressure [9].The various
topics
covered in this paper arepresented
in three sections. The Section 2 is devoted to variousapplications
of the NMR in the normalphase: spin density distribution,
structural
peculiarities
and metallicproperties.
Theemphasis
is put on the apparent non-metallic behaviours revealed
by
this and other studies and which seem to be common to most~-phase superconductors.
Forexample,
theresistivity
often exhibits a maximum around 90 K andquite generally
in thesuperconducting ~-phases
a maximum ofdR/dT
occurs near50 K and tends to vanish under pressure
[10-1?].
Also the ESRspin susceptibility [13]
shows ametallic behavior between 300 and 50 Ii but a dramatic
drop
below 50 Ii indicates animportant
suppression of thedensity
of states at the Fermi level.One of the
advantages
of the organiccompounds
is theirhigh sensitivity
tahydrostatic
pressure. The
application
of pressure is a valuable tool since it increases the bandwidth and therefore it is inprinciple possible
todirectly
measure how dilferentphysical quantities
scale with thedensity
of states at the Fermi level. Thisprinciple
has beenextensively employed
inthe context of
(TMTSF)2X
and(TMTTF)2X
salts where the pressure scale was shown to beto some extent
equivalent
to the relativestrength
of electron-electronrepulsion [14,15].
Thesituation is however more
complex
in 2D than in the 1D materials silice also thegeometry
of the Fermi surface issubject
tochange
under pressure. The feedback of thischange
on thedensity
of states is netalways
easy tapredict
and thisprovides
one of thequestions
we wouldlike to answer with the use of NMR. Here we
analyze
theKnight
shift(Ii)
andspin-lattice
relaxation time measurements carried out in a
large
interval oftemperature
and pressure. Weinterpret
these results in terms of electronic correlations and spindensity
wave fluctuations above thesuperconducting
transition.The
following
sections deal with the NMR in thesuperconducting
state.In
superconductors,
the NMR relaxation canprobe
varioustypes
of fluctuations: super-conducting excitations,
normal carriers in the vortex cores, and motion of the vortex fines.An
important
achievement of thepresented study
is that ail of these contributions could beproperly separated. First,
theexceptional advantage
ofK-(ET)2X superconductors
consists indisposing
two suitable NMR nuclei. On onehand,
trie spins of~H
nuclei located at trieperiph-
ery of the
large
BEDTmolecules,
have a much weaker interaction with electronicspins
than those of central carbons(~~C substituted)
which contribute to build the conduction hands. On the other hand, the ratio ofgyromagnetic
ratios favours the relaxation of~H by
thefluctuating magnetic
field of the vortex structure. Thus, we con welldistinguish
the contribution due tovortex motion from the others.
Furthermore,
the contributions due to normal electrons and su-perconducting
excitations in the~~C
relaxation could beseparated
in anelegant
way, using theproperties
of the lock-in state. This enabled us to measure theKnight
shift and the relaxationcomponents
dueonly
tosuperconducting excitations,
which is discussed in Section 3.N°12 NMR IN THE 2D ORGANIC SUPERCONDUCTORS 2013
In the last section we
present
recentexperimental
and theoretical studies of vortex stateby
the~H
NMR relaxation formagnetic
fieldsperpendicular
to theconducting planes.
Newexperimental
results for thetemperature
and fielddependencies
of the NMR relaxation are confronted withexisting
modelsdeveloped
to understand thephase diagram
of the mixed state ofstrongly anisotropic superconductors.
EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS. The measurements on
~-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br presented
herewere
performed
on arhombic-shaped single crystals, approximately
o-à x 1 x 1mm~.
Thesample
used for carbon NMR wasloo%~~C
enriched on both central carbon atoms of the ET molecule. Thequality
of thesample
has been testedby
an inductive measurement of thesuperconducting
transition. The criticaltemperature
is 11.6 K with a transition width less thon 1K.Also,
the NMRspectra aiialysis
versus the orientation of thesample
in the field shows that thesample
wastruly single crystal. Spin-lattice
relaxation times have been measuredapplying
a saturation comb and thesignal intensity
was measuredusing
aspin
echo for~~C
and free inductiondecay
for~H.
Measurements under pressure were
performed
in a small Cu-Be pressure oeil The pressurewas
applied using
anisopentane
mediumthrough
acapillary tubing. Doing
so, we were able toadjust
the pressureduring cooling
down to theisopentane
solidification. At the solidification of the pressuremedium, freezing
andmelting temperatures
could be detectedby watching
thebroadening
of theisopentane
NMR fine.2. Electronic
Properties
in Metallic Phase2.1. NMR SHIFT TENSORS.
~-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br crystallizes
in an orthorhombic struc-ture with 8 ET molecules per unit cell
(space symmetry Pnma)
[16] therefore 8 central~~C pairs
contribute to thespectrum.
Thespectrum
of each carbonpair split by dipolar coupling
is made up of 4 lines and thus we could
expect
ingeneral
to observe 32 lines in the spec-trum. This number is however reduced
by
half due to the inversionsymmetry
of the structurewhich makes the two molecules of each dimer
equivalent. Accordingly,
wegenerally
observe aspectrum
with 16 lines in ageneral
orientation.Figure
1 shows thespectra
obtained in threeparticular
orientations of thecrystal
withrespect
to the field. When the field isparallel
to thelayer
the reflectionsymmetry
reduces the number of linesby
half and when it isparallel
to one of the axes a, b, c, all molecules becomeequivalent (the
field is then invariantby
allsymmetry operations
ofPmna)
so that thespectrum
reduces to 4 lines. There is oneimportant practical implication
of these observations:as we ~vill see later the
great anisotropy
of theKnight
shift tensor olfers thepossibility
of anexcellent
alignment
of thecrystal
in the field which 1N-ill be ofgreat help
for measurements inthe
superconducting
state.In order to achieve an
unambiguous
lineassignment
twotypes
of 2D-NMR[17,18]
exper-iments were
performed
in several orientations: thedipolar couplings
were measuredtaking
J-resolved
spectra
and carbonpairs
were identified using COSYexperiments [8].
We have then determined the shift tensors of both carbon sites. For that we have assumed that theprincipal
axes
(X,
Y.Z)
are thesymmetry
axes of the ET molecule. X liesalong
the central C-Cbond,
Z is
perpendicular
to the molecularplane
and Ycompletes
theorthogonal
frame. Theorigin
of the shifts were based on the chemical shift in solid ET
[19].
Inprinciple
it is notcompletely
obvious that the chemical shift in the neutral ET is the same as in the metallic
compound.
There are however evidences that this
chqice
for theorigin
of theKnight
shift is correct within few ppm.First,
as will be shownlater,
the hnebroadening
observed below 200 K canprovide
an alternative determination of the origin of the
Knight
shift. Anotherindependent
method87 4
15 i4'~ ' ' ' ' ~
Il
~Il
~' ' ' 6 5 2' fl
~~'~~
~
i' 1'
12 ii io9
11
500 400 300 200 100 0 -100 500 400 300 200 100 0 -100 100 0 -100
frequency (ppm)
Fig.
1. ~~C spectra at 9.3 T for three particular orientation of the magnetic field:arbitraty (left),
m the
plane la, c) (middle)
and perpendicular to theplane (right).
~~~
C~ C
400
~
~
300
[
~ o OÎ
~~~ O ~(
o m m~ .
[
.
Q4 0
~ m
-ioo a a
200
0 30 60 90 0 30 60 90
6 (dwroq)
6(*@m)
Fig.
2.Fitting
of theKnight
shift tensors.was used
by Hennig
et ai. [20] whoperformed
the CP-MAS measurenients on theo-(ET)21~
below the
insulating
transition and found that the observed shifts of the central carbons are close to that of pure BEDT.Furthermore,
we will show that the pressuredependence
of theKnight
shift is consistent with thisassumption.
Using
theisotropic
chemical shift(m
ii1 ppm fromTMS) [19]
theeigenvalues
of the shifttensor for
~-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br
are obtainedby fitting
thesingle crystal
rotation pattemsas shown in
Figure
2. The fit grues ÎÉ~ e(Kxx,Kvv,Kzz)
#
(-20.20,550)
andÎt2 (-180, -110, 320)
for the two sitesCi
andC2.
It is important to note that the fit is excellent=for the site 1 in contrast with that of site 2. This could be due to the
assumption
made on theN°12 NMR IN THE 2D ORGANIC SUPERCONDUCTORS 2015
Çf)Hf[Î]
Fig.
3. Sitelabelhng
inside the BEDT aimer.principal
axes, since in~-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br
thesymmetry
of the ET molecule is brokenby
the dimerization so that the two tensors are
hkely
to haveslightly
dilferentprincipal
axes aswas also revealed
by
other studies[21].
Separating
the isotropic andanisotropic
parts of the shift tensor: K=
Ki~~
+Kam~u
we obtain for the two sites: 1[~[~ =190, K(~
=
10,
K(~~~~ =(-203, -163, 366)
and Kj~~~~ =(-190, -120, 310).
Atpresent
theorigin
of suchstrong
dilference in the isotropic shifts of the two sites cannot beexplained.
Ingeneral
weexpect
aslight
dilference in thespin density
due to the relative shift of the two molecules of the dimer as sho~vn inFigure
3. As wassuggested by
Kawamoto et ai.[22]
thelarge
dilference could be related to aslight mixing
of 2s orbital to HOMO causedby
the breakdown of theplanar
atomic coordination aroundCi
atom,although
this
hypothesis
was not confirmedby X-rays.
On the otherhand,
it is alsohkely
that theasymmetry
was overestimatedby neglecting
theanisotropy
of the chemical shift[23].
Thelabelling
of the sites inFigure
3 was chosenaccording
to theprinciple
that thespin density
should behigher
for the sites which are close one to another and havestronger overlap
of the atomic orbitals.Although
the lack ofspin density
calculations for thepresent compound
makesimpossible
to confirm thisassumption,
such rule was demonstrated for the TMTSF stacks in the(TMTSF)2X family [14, 24].
Desoto et ai
[21]
made similar studies butthey
have taken into account theanisotropy
of the ET chemical shift to extract theKnight
shift tensor.Also, they
attribute thehigher Kzz
rather to the outer carbon sites
(C2),
based on theangular study
of the hnepositions
and the linewidth. Their siteassignment
relies on the fact that theexperimentally
determinedprincipal
axes of the
Knight
shift tensor do not coincideexactly
with those of the ET molecule. Themisalignment
is attributed to theproximity
of the carbon atoms of the other molecule of thedimer and therefore is
expected
to bestronger
for the siteCi (see Fig. 3) However,
as the elfectis rather small (~J 6
deg)
it is not clear if theassignment
obtained in this way is more reliable(the experimentally
determined axes of the tensor areusually subject
to anexperimental
errorof the same order of
magnitude).
The
strongly anisotropic Knight
shift onCi
andC2
sites comes from the2pz
orbitals of the carbon and3pz
of the sulfur'atoms. Thestrong
andpositive Kzz
as well as weaker andnegative in-plane components
of K can bereadily
attributed todipole
field of the2pz
conduction electrons. The interaction with electronic
density
of theneighbouring
sulfur andcarbon atoms accounts for the deviation from the pure
dipolar
shift due to2pz
andproportional
to
j-1,-1,2).
The latter can be written as:~~~~~
~~~~~~A(z
With~~Z
"~~~ ~~~~
~~~
where
fci
is the spindensity
on the2pz
orbital ofCi,
ip is the electronicsusceptibility
perspin
and )~~ means the space averageweighted
with the2p=
electrondensity [25].
For anisolated carbon atom we have
[25]
l~
= 2 u-a-
= 1.35 x 10~~
cm~~
andA(~~
= loo
kG/~IB (2)
~
2p~
~~
In the same way it is
possible
to estimate thedipolar
fieldgenerated by
thespins
on theneighbouring
sulfur and carbon atoms:~K~$-12
"ÎC2XPÀÎÎ-12
~~~~~~~
~~~~~ l~ 2p~(C2)
~
~~~ ~~
~~
~~~
~KÎ)5j
=
fsxpA(~flj
withA(~)Ij
=h~~ l~
mh~~
~
(4)
~ 3p~(S)
~Ci-S
After
having
inserted the interatomic distances rci-C~ and rci-s 116] we obtain:Af)1(~
= 7.5kG/~IB
andAf)Ij
= 3.75
kG/~IB là)
Summing
up all contributions theanisotropic part
of the shift tensor of the siteCi
can then be written as:-1
0 0 2 0 0~
0 0
Îtan~~~=K(j(
o -i o+K((~(~
o -i o+2K((~j
o
fi
o(6)
° °
~~ °
°
~~
° °
~~
~J is the
angle (SÎS2).
We havesupposed
that thetwo sulfur atoms have the same spin
density (otherwise
the tensor is notdiagonal
within the chosenframe).
The numerical estimations requires the
knowledge
of x~,fc~, fc~, fsi
#fs~
etfs~
"fs~.
We take x~ = 5 x
10~~ emu/mole.dimere
Xp" 8.3 x
10~2~ emu/spin
from[26]. Using
trierelaxation rate
study presented
in trie next section we can assume thatfci
CÎ 1-àfC~.
Triespin density
on trie sulfur atoms is not known but it is reasonable to set [27]fsi
#
fs~
" 3
fci
and
fs~
#fs~
# 3
fC~.
The factor of 3 is somewhatbigger
than the oneresulting
from bandstructure
calculation,
but the elfect of Coulombrepulsion
is to reinforce thespin density
onthe
sulphur
atoms whose3pz
orbitals are more delocalized that the2pz
orbitals of the carbons.The
fci
is then obtainedby fitting
the theoreticalexpression
of ÎÉan~~~ to theexperimental
results. Withfci
# o.023 we obtain
Îtani~~(Ci)
"
(-193. -165, 360)
andÎtan~~~(C2)
#(-112, -118, 231)
The result for
Ci
lits well with theexperimental values,
on the other hand thediscrepancy
observed for
C2 probably
mean that in our determination of theexperimental
shift tensor we have overestimated theanisotropic
part of this site.The
isotropic part
of theKnight
shift con be due either to the elfect of the contact interaction with the electrons of ls and 2s orbitals of the atom if these are mixed to the conduction band.or to the core
polarization
of the same orbitalsby
the conduction electrons. From the Hückel calculations[27],
the mixing of the 2s states to the HOMO band is belowIi
but thehyperfine couphng
constant isstrong enough
toprovide
a nonnegligible
elfect: A~~ = 3500kG/pB
[25]giving ~ÙÎÎ~~~~~ "
ÎÎ~ XpÀ2s
" 7ù ppm. Às for the core
polarization,
it is to note that it wouldgive a contribution of the same order of
magnitude.
It is ingeneral quite
hard tocalculate,
but to have arough
estimate we can consider the elfect of theexchange
interaction between thes
orbitals and
2pz
for which the effectivehyperfine
field was estimated to[28] ,4[
~ m +30 kG/~IB.
N°12 NMR IN THE 2D ORGANIC SUPERCONDUCTORS 2017
The
resulting isotropic
contribution would then be~É(/~
=fciXpA[/
= 60 ppm. These estimations are rather crude butthey
confirm the existence of anisotroiic
shift of the order of hundred ppm.Another
~~C study
wasreported by
Kawamoto et ai.[22,26]
who worked on apowder sample
of~-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br. They adjusted
thepowder
linewidthtaking fci
#fC~
# o.03. Also,a similar estimation was obtained for
fl-(ET)213
from theanalysis
of~~C
MASspectra [23].
A
complementary
information on the spmdensity
distribution can be obtainedstudying
theanisotropy
of the nuclear relaxation rate1/Ti
[8].2.2. PROTON NMR AND STRUCTURAL TRANSITIONS. The
conformational ordering
hasa
strong impact
on the metallic andsuperconducting properties
of~-(ET)2X
salts. It is well known that in those(TMTSF)2X compounds
where the anion does not share the inversionsymmetry
of the TMTSFcrystal
structure, the anionordering plays
an essential rote in thestabilizing
of dilferentground
states[29].
In~-(ET)2X
theanalog
rote of theagent
of interaction between metallic andinsulating layers
isplayed by ethylene
groups at the end of the donor molecules. Due to thesp~ hybridization
of the carbon atoms of the(CH2)2
groups, these have two stableconfigurations
calledeciipsed
orstaggered, depending
on relative orientationof the outer C-C bonds
[30].
Athigh temperature
thesystem
is disorderedby
athermally
activated fast motion and at low temperature one of these
configuration
isadopted depending
on the anion and
compound
structure[16, 30]: staggered
for~-(ET)2Cu(NCS)2
andeclipsed
for
~-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br
and~-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl.
The characteristic energy of the conformational motion can be monitored
by ~H
NMR. The relaxation tinte of the protons of the(CH2)2
groups inducedby
the strongdipolar
field is dominant when the Larmorfrequency
iscomparable
with thefrequency
of thefluctuating dipolar
field.According
to the standard BPPtheory (Bloembergen-Purcell-Pound [31])
theresulting
relaxation rate is:Ù
°~ 1+ÎÎ(r)
~~~where r~ is the characteristic
frequency.
For athermally
activated process we have:jEa1
~ ~° ~~~
kT
where is
Ea
the activation energy.In
Figure
4 we haveplotted 1/Ti
us. T at dilferent fields. The data are very well fitted with the theoreticalexpression giving
C = 9.5 x108 s~~,
ro" 7 x
10~~~
s andEa
= 2650 K.
From the field
dependence
of thepeak
it is clear that the motion starts to freeze around 200 K.Such structural transition is indeed observed
by X-rays [16, 32]. However,
whileaccording
to theK-rays
the modulation inducedby
theethylene
groups is commensurable with thelattice,
theNMR seems to indicate that a kind of disorder is
present
in thesystem
at lowtemperatures.
Infact,
as wasalready reported
in dilferentexperinients [5,21],
the~~C
NMR linewidth starts to broaden below 150-180 K. On the other hand thisbroadening
is rather insensitive to pressure up to 4 kbarthough
thecompressibility
of theK-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br
ishigh enough
toexpect
ashift of the transition to
higher temperature.
Thisphenomenon
is therefore not wellunderstood
and requires further studies. A similar elfect ~v-as observed infl-(ET)213
at 200 K[19]
in whicha
phase
transition occurs with an incommensurate modulated structure. The authors attribute trie linebroadenmg
to an Anderson localizationmodifying locally
the electronicdensity
anddriven
by
the modulation of the electrostaticpotential
inducedby
dilferentconfigurations
ofethylene
groups.io
8 lT
~
6
"«
Î~
'~ ~ 3 T
o
100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Temperature
(K)Fig.
4. ~H relaxation rate in~-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br
due toethylene
group motion at 1 T, 3 T and 9 T. The electronic contribution to the relaxation obtained from the rescaled relaxation of ~~C has been subtracted. The sohd curves are fitted with the theoretical expression as explamed in the text.c d.
a b
180 K
160 K
130 K
100 K
800 600 400 200 0 200
frequency (ppm)
Fig.
5. ~~C spectra of~-(ET )2Cu[N(CN)2]Br
for themagnetic
fieldparallel
to the planes at diiferent temperatures.N°12 NMR IN THE 2D ORGANIC SUPERCONDUCTORS 2019
0.8
0.6
~(
~))~à
~
~
~~
é
)
0.4~)
~
~ 0.3 .
0.2
O
~~
~@3
Gl Q Q Q0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Temperature (K)
Fig.
6. Linewidth toKnight
shift ratio for different fines of the spectrumla,
b,d).
Although,
as we see from the results discussed above, theunderlying physics
of thephe-
nomenon is not
yet quite clear,
the NMRexperiments
showundoubtedly
that the line broad-ening
issimply
causedby
a distribution ofhyperfine
shifts in thesample.
This is well shown inFigure
5. The width varystrongly
among dilferent lines and it is found that the width ofeach line is
proportional
to itsKnight
shift(for exaniple
the line c inFig.
5 has zeroKnight
shift for the
given
field direction and thus remains narrow down to lowtemperatures).
This is
analyzed
morequantitatively
inFigure
6 where the ratiolinewidth/Iinight
shift isplotted
in function oftemperature. Challenging
dilferentreports by X-spectroscopists
aboutthe wave vector of the lattice
modulation,
theonly interpretation
ofFigure
6 we cangive
is that there is an incommensurable modulation of the electronic
density.
Theinvestigation
of the anisotropy ofTi
in thespectrum [21]
led to similar conclusions. It will be thereforeinteresting
in the future to look for such abroadening
in othercompounds
andespecially
in~-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl
andK-(ET)2Cu(CN) [N(CN)2]
where the structural transition is absent.2.3. ÀNTIFERROMAGNETIC FLUCTUATIONS SEEN BY
~~C
NMR. The NMRinvestigation
of the electronic
properties
in metallic state of the ETcompounds
involvesmainly
the~~C Knight
shift and relaxation nieasurements in function oftemperature
and pressure. As wasshown in
previous section,
NMRproperties
of this nudeus areonly
determinedby hyper-
fine interaction with
conducting
electrons therefore itsKnight
shift and relaxation reflects the evolution of the local static ordynamic susceptibility.
These studies address somekey
ques- tions in the field of 2D electronic structures such as thecompetition
betweenmagnetism
andsuperconductivity
or the role of Coulombrepulsion.
In
Figure
7 the shifts of 6 lines(labelled
a,b,
c,d,
e and f as inFig.
1 of Ref.[5])
of~~C
in~-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br
have beeiiplotted
versus pressure. The shifts exhibit linear decreasewith pressure up to 5
kbar,
all lines in thespectrum having
the same relativeslope
dIn(K) /dP.
This confirms that the evolution of the
Knight
shift under pressure follows the variation of thedensity
of states at the Fermi leveln(EF) (or
the transferintegrals)
since the chemical shift is pressureindependent.
The variation of the
Knight
shift is evaluated to be about -6%/kbar
in the pressure interval studied. It isnoteworthy
to compare this value with theanalogous
pressure coefficients in othera b
c d e
f
o
1 . o . o .
-~
j
12
É à
Î
C-
. .. *
4
00
Knight shift(ppm)
Fig.
7. Pressuredependence
of the ~~C fines shift at room temperature.organic
conductorshaving
similarcompressibility,
e.g. in theQID
conductor(TMTSF)2PF~6,
the variation of
n(EF)
was estimated to about2Yo/kbar [14]. Also,
the structuralstudy
of~-(ET)2Cu(NCS)2
under pressure led to evaluate the variation to the bandwidth to 150 K/kbar
or
again
m2%/kbar [33].
This estimation suggests first that
simple
free electronsusceptibility
cannot account for sucha variation of the
Knight
shift.Following
the ideasdeveloped
for 1D metals 1N.e aretempted
to think that the enhancement is the elfect of electronic correlations. In a most naivepicture
onecan estimate the
expected
enhancement ofK(p) through
the RPRapproximation, introducing
the on-site
repulsion
parameter U. This will renormalize the spinsusceptibility
xby
a Stonerfactor:
Ko
R(EF)
~ 1
Un(EF)
°~ 1UR(EF)
where Ko is the bare
susceptibility.
It follows that~~Î~~
~1/n(EF) ~~~~ÎÎ~~~
Taking
a Stoner factor of 3 toexplain
the result andn(EF)
# 0.9 e~
lev/ET
molecule[27]
1N-e obtain LT m 0.7 eV which is
comparable
to the bandwidth Wm 0.6 eV. Without
omitting
the rather crude character of this
calculation,
we remind that a more elaborateanalysis
of NMR relaxation data in TMTSF and TMTTF salts hasyielded
U values close to 1eV[14].
A comparisoii ismeaningful
here as the Coulombrepulsion strength
is a molecularproperty
andin both cases conduction bands
are build on the same sulfur orbitals.
The situation seems however more confused if
we go further into details of numerical estima- tions of the relaxation rate. In the NMR of correlated metals it is well known that one expects deviations from the
Korringa
relation due to collective elfects and theproblem
wasextensively
studied in the context of1D organics
[14,15].
Here we wereencouraged
to make this kind ofspeculations by
the observed lineardependence of1/Ti
usK2,
seeFigure
8. Thequantitative
measure can be given
by
the so-calledKorringa
ratio:~ ~ ~
~,~ ~N
~4~kB
1 1
j
N°12 NNIR IN THE 2D ORGANIC SUPERCONDUCTORS 2021
30
b_..
25
:~
f
£'
20
£'
~ Ô'
_~5 15 d f
a
'- .~ _.~
~ 10
~Î..~
c ____R.....""" ~~~~
/."
_.-.--.m '~
5 =;:' _______:...-"'5 kbar
0
0 50 100 150 200 250
K~ (10~
ppm~)
Fig. 8. Relaxation rate us.
K~ (at
room temperature, with pressure as theimplicit parameter)
which is
strictly equal
tounity
in the free electron model and moregenerally
is defined for thecomponent
of the relaxation rate due to uniform(q
=0)
fluctuations of thehyperfine
field[15].
For the current data of
K-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br
we haveTITK (
m1.2 x10~~
s K
at room
temperature,
where we have used K(
=
Iij~
+Kj~
+É)~
+K(~
+K(~
+K(~
for theTi
measuredHo along
the z axis[17,18].
Titisgives
lO m0,
29 ingood
accordance with the result of[21].
On the otherhand,
theusually expected
elfect of electron-electron correlationsis to mcrease the
experimental
value of lO[15,17]
and such enhancement was indeedreported
for many 1D metals
[14]. But,
as ingeneral only
the zero wave vectorcomponent of1/Ti
enters to the
Korringa relation,
thisprobably
meansthat,
unlike for 1Dsystems,
the uniformpart
of the relaxation is net dominant even athigh temperature.
From theshape
of the Fermi surface [27] we can indeedpredict
the existence of strong fluctuations at non-zero wave vectorresponsible
for the reduction of the uniformsusceptibility.
We shouldpoint
out here that the data inFigure
8 is veryremarkable,
it showsnamely
that theKorringa
ratio does not vary with pressure. If theantiferromagnetic
fluctuations dominate therelaxation,
this would mean that theiramplitude
scales as the bandwidth, and that thegeometry
of the Fermi surface(especially
the
nesting quality)
is not alfectedby
pressure up tom~
5 kbar.
The evolution of these
properties
intemperature
was the nextgoal
in ourinvestigation
of~-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br. Figure
9 shows thetemperature dependence
of theKnight
shift be-tween 10 and 300 Ii at lbar and 4 kbar. The error bars increase at low
temperature
because ofthe line
broadening
discussed before and also theoverlapping
of the hnes. The ambient pressure data coincides with that from ESRspin-susceptibility
measurements[13].
Between 300 and 50 K, theKnight
shift decreasesslowly 11 8% /100 K).
If we compare in~-(ET)2Cu(NCS)2
theisotherm [33] and the isobar
[34] expansion
coefficients we can conclude that 100 Kcorresponds
to 1-î kbar.
Hence,
the variation of the spinsusceptibility
inhigh temperature
region can be attributed to the lattice contraction.Below 50 Il we observe a
sharp drop
in the spinsusceptibility
which has beeniiiterpreted
interms of a
pseudo-gap
in thedensity
of states[13].
At 4 kbar thispseudo-gap disappears
andthe
compound
exhibits a more common metallic behavior inagreement
with the observations made on theresistivity
under pressure[10].
Spin-lattice
relaxation time measurements versus pressure and temperature arepresented
in
Figure
10. Atbar, 1/TIT
exhibits near 50 K aniniportant
enhancement, which con also1.2
~
... .
....
~. ... :~~
~'~ ~
O
~
°~
l£
~
O O O
g
~'0,6 .
ÎÎ
~
ÉÎ
0,4o.2
0
0
(K)
Fig.
9. Temperaturedependence
of trieKnight
shift(normahzed by
its room temperaturevalue)
at bar
(.)
and 4 kbar(o),
e.
0.4
~
'.
~~ .
~.
0.3
,
é
f ~~~
~ ~ .
_~
~£ à ~ ~
$
0.2 à.
~~
. o OÔÔ Ô°°~~~
~~ ~ ~
~
o.1
8° °ooo
O aDO°O 8
O
o°
o
Î
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Temperature (K)
Fig.
10.-1/TIT
us. temperature at dilferent pressures: 1 bar
(.),
I.S kbar(Zi),
3 kbar(o)
and4 kbar
(o).
be observed on protons
[35,36j. Clearly,
thislarge peak
in1/TIT
is in some way related to the decrease of thesusceptibility:
it occurs near 50 K and isprogressively spread
Dut underpressure. At
higher temperatures
thesusceptibility (corrected
for the thermalexpansion)
becomes constant and at the same time a
Kornnga-like behaviour
is restored for1/TIT.
N°12 NMR IN THE 2D ORGANIC SUPERCONDUCTORS 2023
-7.7
~
-7.8
-7.9
_
s
~ 3 p~ -s.1
.8.2
-8.3
'~'~r
x M z r
Fig,
il. Calculated band structure(a)
and Fermi surface(b)
after Canadell.The
temperature profiles of1/TIT
andKnight
shift show a ratherstriking similarity
with thosereported
inYBa2Cu306.63
for the~~Cu [37]
as well as some other HTSC materials[38].
This relaxation behaviour in HTSC has been often
explained by
the appearance of short rangeantiferromagnetic
correlations in theCu02 blanes leading
to apseudo-gap
or a decrease in thedensity
of states.Although
acomparison
with HTSC niay be instructive here we must be careful and remember that someconcepts
and scenarios invoked to understand the electronicproperties
of copper oxidesuperconductors,
do netapply
in theirorganic analogs. First,
the models based on the FermiLiquid (FL) approach emphasize
the rote of thepeculiar properties
of the Fermi surface ofcuprates. Accordingly,
the van Hovesingularity
at the Fermilevel, coupled
with the AF
nesting, produces
the charactenstic "double"divergences
in rqsponse functions.Several authors make use of this mechanism to
explain
the lineartemperiture dependence
of the
resistivity
and thehigh Tc's.
On thecontrary,
in ET-basedsuperconductors
neither doesn(EF) diverge
nor isp(T)
linear.Furthermore,
in the HTSC there arearguments
for thestrong couphng regime
and the model based on the"Luttinger hquid" theory.
Thisapproach postulates
thepossibility
ofspin-charge decoupling
in 2D electron system.Acrordingly,
thepeak
of1/TIT YBa2Cu306.63
wasinterpreted
as the appearance of a spin gap[38]
since it is trot followedby
theresistivity.
As far as the resultspresented
here are concemed, it would bemore dillicult to
accept
therequired postulate
because there is astrong
correlation between the relaxation rate and theresistivity
which has apeak
near 90K and one candistinguish
dilferent
regimes
in thep(T)
curves below and above 50K. Moreover this simultaneouspeak
ofresistivity
andTi
seems to be one of immanent features of the BEDT salts since it has beenobserved in another
compound
of thefamily [26].
Therefore thepossibility
of thespin-gap
scenario in the
~-(ET)2X
is net established.On the other hand there is a common
point
with cuprates worth toexploit
here, which is the influence of theshape
of the Fermi surface on themagnetic properties.
It is well known that the 1D AFnesting
of the Fermi surface in(TMTSF)2X compounds
netonly
gives ahuge
contribution to the relaxation time but can affect the
conductivity
and make thesystem
gointo an
insulating
state[29, 39].
In~-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2)Br
the calculated Fermi surface[27]
shows the existence of nested
parts
with twopossible
incommensurate wave vectors(Fig. Il).
Both nuclear relaxation and electron
scattering
are sensitive to theimaginary
part of the localsusceptibility x".
For the relaxation rate we have:j
~
L "~ij°~~'
(~)
~
where ~a~ is the Larmor
frequency.
The introduction of correlations within the RPAapproxi-
mation leads tomodify
the baresusceptibility
as follows[15j:
~"~ÎÎ~~ Il XÎ(~,
L~~))~
~~ÎÎ~~~
l~~
Nesting
of the Fermi surfaceoccurring
at a vectorQ
will thus enhancex"(Q>~J~)
as well as1/Ti
because of the maximum ofxi (q, ~a~)
atQ [40].
The RPA
description
is nolonger
valid in presence of astrong divergence.
The FL theories based on thenesting properties provide
ingeneral
a betterapproach through
thequasi-particle picture, introducing
the notion ofpseudo-gap
as a decrease of the effectivedensity
of states at Fermi level[41,42].
Suchpseudo-gap developing
at lowtemperatures
would affect the static anddynamic susceptibility explaining
thus both thedrop
of K andpeak
in1/TIT.
Charfi-Kaddour et ai.[42, 43]
have calculated the contribution to the relaxation rate at thenesting
vector in a 2Dinteracting
electron gas model.They
show the existence of a maximum of relaxation as a function oftemperature
whichdepends
on thenesting
and on thestrength
of the correlations.Also.
Kampf
et ai.[41]
have shown thatspin
fluctuations in a two-dimensional metal with a nested Fermi surface lead to apseudo
gap in the electronicspectrum. Although
these studieswere made in the context of copper oxide
superconductors,
the mainingredients
used in the cal- culation 1,e.imperfect nesting
and Coulombrepulsion,
do exist as well in theorganic systems
we
study
here. Charfi-Kaddour et ai.[42, 43j
in their model have defined the conditions for thispseudo
gap todevelop: good nesting, strong
correlations and lowtemperature.
The sameauthors have then calculated the electron
scattering
contribution due to the AF fluctuations.They
show the existence of a crossovertemperature
for theresistivity strongly
correlated to the maximumof1/TIT,
inqualitative
agreement with theexperiments (Fig. 10, [10]).
Themeasurements on
~-(ET)2X
meet theexpectations
of this theoretical model: thedisappearance
of the
spin
fluctuations under pressure is observed in thespin-lattice
relaxation rate measure- mentsparallel
to the reduction of thepseudo-gap
which manifests in the decrease of theKnight
shift(Fig. 7).
Above 4 kbar ail the
properties
become more usual for a metal. Thenesting
enhanced AF fluctuations arecertainly
moredependent
on pressure than the elfects comingonly
from the pressuredependence
of thebandwidth,
so that one would have to include the true Fermi surfaceshape
of ET salts in order toget
aquantitative
accourt of the observed elfects.Indeed,
whereasin the
previous analysis
of the pressuredependence
of theKnight
shift we found that it variesby
6$lo
/kbar,
trie relaxation is much more sensitive on pressure in the interval oftemperature
where the AF fluctuations are dominant. The elfect of pressure would then be to reduce thequality
of thenesting.
This reminds the situation in 1D systems hke(TMTSF)2PF6
where theapplication
of pressure results in reduction of the SDW transitiontemperature.
Such elfect was attributedto the increased
overlap
of ~ orbitals in the transverse direction whichdestroys
theperfect 1D-nesting
and inhibits thegrowth
of2kF spin fluctuations
at lowtemperature [29, 39, 44j.
In ouf case the reduction of the nested