HAL Id: cea-02492538
https://hal-cea.archives-ouvertes.fr/cea-02492538
Submitted on 27 Feb 2020
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
New methods to estimate the internal pressure of xenon
in fission bubbles using SEM-EPMA-SIMS and EBSD in
irradiated fuels
C. Cagna, I. Zacharie-Aubrun, P. Bienvenu, B. Michel, L. Barrallier
To cite this version:
C. Cagna, I. Zacharie-Aubrun, P. Bienvenu, B. Michel, L. Barrallier. New methods to estimate the internal pressure of xenon in fission bubbles using SEM-EPMA-SIMS and EBSD in irradiated fuels. EMAS 2015 - 14th European Workshop on Modern Developments and Applications in Microbeam Analysis, May 2015, Portoroz, Slovenia. �cea-02492538�
EMAS2015 |
New methods to estimate the internal pressure of
xenon in fission bubbles using SEM-EPMA-SIMS
and EBSD in irradiated fuels
C. CAGNA, I. ZACHARIE-AUBRUN, P. BIENVENU, B. MICHEL – CEA Cadarache, DEC
CONTENTS
| PAGE 2
I.
CONTEXT
II.
ESTIMATING THE PRESSURE IN BUBBLES
Direct method : Measurement by SEM/EPMA/SIMS Indirect method :
• Strain measurement by EBSD/cross-correlation,
• Finite element modeling to calculate the pressure
II.
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
I- CONTEXT
I.
CONTEXT
II.
ESTIMATING THE PRESSURE IN BUBBLES
I- CONTEXT
PW Reactor
Fuel assembly
Rods : fuel + cladding
Fuel : UO2 pellets
Radial section of a pellet Fuel’s microstructure
I- CONTEXT
Nominal Irradiation
Core (~ 1000°C)
Periphery (≈ 500°C)
Irradiated 1 cycle
- In solution inside the fuel
- Intra- and/or intergranular bubbles
Localisation of fission gases
Power ramps
Accidental situation – RIA (Reactivity Insertion Accident) Coalescence of bubbles after a HBS in MOX ramp
Modeling is an essential tool that is now seeking to translate all phenomena and calculate all physical quantities (temperature, stress, swelling, release of fission gas…) that modify the behavior of PWR fuels.
Providing new experimental data, such as fission gas bubbles pressure, is a way to validate and improve the models’ predictions of the fuel behaviour during :
0,1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1 10 100 1000 10000
Pr
e
ssu
re
(MP
a)
Bubbles radius (nm)
Bubbles pressure versus radius at 300K
SIMS EDX
Equilibrium
21 AVRIL 2015
J.Noirot, NFIR report, 2012 J.Noirot, JNM 372, 2008,
K.Nogita, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 141, 481-486,1998 |
Buckingham
Van der Waals
| PAGE 6 EMAS | 5 May 2015
Experimental data from the literature
III- ESTIMATING THE PRESSURE IN BUBBLES
I.
CONTEXT
II.
ESTIMATING THE PRESSURE IN BUBBLES
Direct method : Measurement by SEM/EPMA/SIMS Indirect method :
• Strain measurement by EBSD/cross-correlation,
• Finite element modeling to calculate the pressure
21 AVRIL 2015 EMAS | 5 May 2015 | PAGE 8
III- ESTIMATING THE PRESSURE IN BUBBLES –
GLOBAL METHODOLOGY
SIMS EPMA
Measuring the amount of xenon in bubbles
Measuring the volume fraction of bubbles SEM Quantitative analysis Total inventory of fission gases
Morphology
Image analysis
SIMS crater Binary image SIMS depth profile Mean pressureQuantity of xenon inside the bubbles 2D -> 3D Volume fraction
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 0 500 1000 I( 1 3 2 X e ) (c /s ) Time in s Atomic Volume Equation of state 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0 ,1 0 ,3 0 ,5 0 ,7 0 ,9 1 ,1 1 ,3 1 ,5 1 ,7 1 ,9 2 ,1 2 ,3 2 ,5 2 ,7 2 ,9 3 ,1 3 ,3 3 ,5 3 ,7 3 ,9 Bubbles diameter % Volumic
① SEM
Identification and localization of one
bubble under the surface
② EPMA
Checking that the bubble is filled with
xenon – X Carto
③ SIMS
Sample abrasion
④ EPMA
Checking that the bubble has been opened– X Carto
⑤ SEM
Measurement of the bubble Bubble filled with gas
~1 µm Bubble filled with Xe Empty bubble Before abrasion After abrasion
III- ESTIMATING THE PRESSURE IN BUBBLES –
SINGLE BUBBLE METHODOLOGY
21 AVRIL 2015 EMAS | 5 May 2015 | PAGE 10
III- ESTIMATING THE PRESSURE IN BUBBLES –
SINGLE BUBBLE METHODOLOGY
SEM-BSE (20kV) SEM-SE (20kV) EPMA-Xe(30kV)
An area with isolated bubbles
just below the surface is identified by SEM and EPMA.
Opened bubbles are identified
by a second sweep by SEM and EPMA. SIMS abrasion 1 10 100 1000 10000 0 50 100 150 200 250 1 3 2 X e Signal (c p s/ s) Time (s) Depth profile by SIMS
III- ESTIMATING THE PRESSURE IN BUBBLES –
SINGLE BUBBLE METHODOLOGY
0,01 0,1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1 10 100 1000 10000 Pr es su re (MP a) Bubbles radius (nm)
Bubbles pressure versus their radius at 300K
Equilibrium
Buckingham/Van der Waals SIMS
EDX
This work
Results
Equation of state : Molar volume < 90 m-3.mol-1 Buckingham
Molar volume > 90 m-3.mol-1 Van der Waals
III- ESTIMATING THE PRESSURE IN BUBBLES
| PAGE 12
21 AVRIL 2015 EMAS | 5 May 2015
I.
CONTEXT
II.
ESTIMATING THE PRESSURE IN BUBBLES
Direct method : Measurement by SEM/EPMA/SIMS Indirect method :
• Strain measurement by EBSD/cross-correlation,
• Finite element modeling to calculate the pressure
The stress applied to a material will lead to a distortion of its crystal lattice and thus a movement of bands on the EBSD Kikuchi diagram.
Two diagrams are taken from a grain, one in a unstrained region (reference) and another in a strained region.
Strain precision estimated at ~2.10-4
III- ESTIMATING THE PRESSURE IN BUBBLES BY EBSD
ROI
Fourier transform +
Filters
Cross-correlation Function
Peaks – shift between 2 ROI with a precision lower than one
pixel. It is then possible to calculate at any point of the sample the elastic strain and rotation
| PAGE 14
Four point bending test on a silicon single crystal
III- ESTIMATING THE PRESSURE IN BUBBLES BY EBSD
21 AVRIL 2015 EMAS | 5 May 2015
Center point of the line = unstrained reference. EBSD patterns are compared to this reference. In order to validate the results, the four-point bending experiment was simulated by a FE model
assuming anisotropic elasticity of cubic materials (C11 = 396 Gpa, C12= 121 Gpa, C44 = 64 Gpa).
According to the calculations, the shear strain should be null over the area. It appears that some
points are over 2.10-4. Special care is required to avoid any projection parameters variations, with a
flat and parallel sample surface to the stage surface.
First step : calibration
EBSD Scan
x
y
z
-0,0025 -0,002 -0,0015 -0,001 -0,0005 0 0,0005 0,001 0,0015 0,002 0,0025 0 200 400 600 Norm a l S tra in Position (µm) E11 E33 E22 EXX EYY EZZ -0,001 -0,0008 -0,0006 -0,0004 -0,0002 0 0,0002 0,0004 0,0006 0,0008 0,001 0 200 400 600 S he a r S tra in Position (µm) E23 Ref: E12 Ref: E31 Ref: 20 kV Displacement : 260 µm1,0E-07 1,0E-06 1,0E-05 1,0E-04 1,0E-03 1,0E-02 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 S trai n
Distance from the bubble /Rb
Fuel 4
Fuel 3
Fuel 2
Fuel 1
III- ESTIMATING THE PRESSURE IN BUBBLES BY EBSD
From calibration to irradiated fuels
With a finite element model it is possible to estimate the strain reached around the bubbles in irradiated fuels for different microstructures
Bubble’s surface
Small bubbles
High strain close to the bubble
210 nm 25 nm Fuel ③ Volume fraction: 0,007 Pressure: 220 Mpa Fuel ④ Volume fraction: 0,007 Pressure: 7000 Mpa 2 nm 17 nm Large bubbles Fuel ① Volume fraction: 0,06 Pressure: 6 Mpa 1600 nm 400 nm Fuel ② Volumic fraction: 0,015 Pressure: 20 Mpa 1600 nm 250 nm
III- CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
21 AVRIL 2015 EMAS | 5 May 2015 | PAGE 16
I.
CONTEXT
II.
ESTIMATING THE PRESSURE IN BUBBLES
III- CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
EBSD and Cross-Correlation method
•
Finite-element model
• Application of the method on material models such as ceramics
implanted in xenon.
• Application on irradiated fuels thanks to a FIB-SEM in a hot lab.
SEM/EPMA/SIMS method
• This study will be continued with the aim of adjusting acquisition confitins and adapting the
SIMS beam to detect a smaller number of bubbles.
• Work is performed to improve the precision and accuracy of the results by working on the
measurement of the bubble diameter (FIB-SEM), peak intensity and the equation of state.
DEN DEC SA3C LEMCI Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives
Centre de Cadarache| 13108 Saint Paul Lez Durance T. +33 (0)4 42 25 53 10
celine.cagna@cea.fr
Etablissement public à caractère industriel et commercial | RCS Paris B 775 685 019
| PAGE 18
CEA | 27 JUIN 2013
Thank you for your attention
| PAGE 18
21 AVRIL 2015 EMAS | 5 May 2015