• Aucun résultat trouvé

Family medicine residents: baseline measurements

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Family medicine residents: baseline measurements"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

e554

Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien

|

Vol 58: oCToBER • oCToBRE 2012

A

s the new Triple C family medicine (FM) curricu- lum is being implemented in Canadian medical schools, it is valuable to have a baseline measure- ment of several important variables that can later be used to gauge the effect of the new curriculum. This Fast Fact summarizes data received from FM resi- dents in the first half of their second year, collected in the 2004, 2007, and 2010 editions of the National Physician Survey (NPS).

The mean age of second-year FM residents contin- ued to decrease, from 31.5 years in 2004 to 31.0 years in 2007, and 30.2 years in 2010. In 2010, second-year FM residents were more likely to be women (69%), which was substantially more than the proportion of female residents in other specialties (43%). However, the proportion of male FM residents increased from 27% in 2007 to 31% in 2010, although it remained lower than the 2004 proportion of men (36%). While the general satisfaction with their residency train- ing remained largely positive, with 78% of second- year FM residents indicating that they were satisfied or very satisfied in 2010, their level of satisfaction decreased slightly from 2004 and 2007, when 81%

and 82%, respectively, indicated that they were sat- isfied or very satisfied with their residency programs (Table 1).

Their ratings of the balance achieved between the academic and clinical components of their training improved in 2010, with 66% of second-year FM resi- dents agreeing that such a balance was achieved, compared with 2004, when only 53% of the second- year residents agreed with this assessment (Table 2).

Most second-year FM residents believed them- selves to be adequately prepared to deal with com- monly encountered medical problems. However, in relation to being prepared to deal with less common life-threatening emergencies, in 2010, fewer residents reported having received the skills or knowledge to deal with these problems than in 2007 (Table 3). (Note that these questions were not asked in 2004.)

In 2010, most second-year FM residents (81%) planned to practise as family physicians on comple- tion of their residency, and 32% intended to further specialize in FM. These proportions remained fairly consistent since 2004 (Table 4).

The upcoming 2012 NPS will once again go out to all Canadian medical residents, giving us an opportu- nity to evaluate the effect of changes being introduced into postgraduate medical education.

The NPS is a collaborative project of the College of Family Physicians of Canada, the Canadian Medical Association, and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Additional results are available at www.nationalphysiciansurvey.ca. If you would like the opportunity to develop and write a future Fast Fact using the NPS results, please contact Artem Safarov, National Physician Survey Project Manager, at 800 387-6197, extension 242, or artem@cfpc.ca.

Web exclusive | Fast Facts

Family medicine residents: baseline measurements

Table 1. Overall satisfaction with residency program

SAtiSFActiOn level

YeAr OF SurveY

2004 2007 2010

Satisfied or very satisfied, % 81 82 78

Neutral, % 10 10 12

Dissatisfied or very dissatisfied, % 9 3 9

Table 2. Agreement with the statement of balance between academic and clinical components of residency

level OF Agreement

YeAr OF SurveY 2004 2007 2010

Agree or strongly agree, % 53 61 66

Neutral, % 19 18 17

Disagree or strongly disagree, % 23 15 12

Table 3. Does residency provide you with the skills or knowledge to deal with the following?

KnOwleDge Or SKill

YeAr OF SurveY

2007 2010

Skill to deal with range of common problems, %

86 86

Knowledge to deal with range of common

problems, % 90 89

Skill to deal with less common life- threatening emergencies, %

60 56

Knowledge to deal with less common life-

threatening emergencies, % 79 70

Table 4. Plans for future practice

Future PrActice

YeAr OF SurveY 2004 2007 2010

Practise as a family physician or general practitioner, %

81 80 81

Specialize in an area of family medicine, %

31 33 32

Références

Documents relatifs

At a fall 2015 meeting of the Canadian Medical Forum, which brings together lead- ers of national medical organizations to discuss issues of priority to physicians, their

Fortunately, FMRs highlight potential changes such as increasing access to family medicine mentors who practise palliative care, teaching pragmatic skills on how to

barriers to conducting high-quality research for the mandatory family medicine resident scholarly project (FMRSP) in the University of Ottawa’s Department of Family Medicine

Of the 7 CanMEDS-FM roles, the role of scholar clearly identifies that family physicians “facilitate the education of their stu- dents, patients, colleagues, and others.” 15

1 Based largely on the work of the Educating Future Physicians of Ontario 2,3 and the Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists (CanMEDS) projects, 4,5 CanMEDS-FM is

Conclusion En insistant sur des habiletés et comportements spécifiques, le CBAS permet aux résidents et aux moniteurs d’effectuer des évaluations formatrices et

Residents participating in an ambulatory rotation reported greater satisfaction with the length of the rotation and exposure to more patient cases that reflect a

•   How  many  doctors  are  needed  in  the  area?  What  is  the  average  age  of  family  doctors  in  your  area?  Are  many  doctors  planning  to  retire