• Aucun résultat trouvé

Assessment of professionalism in family medicine residents: Turning the mirror around

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Assessment of professionalism in family medicine residents: Turning the mirror around"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Vol 62: february • féVrier 2016

|

Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien

181

College

Collège | President’s Message

Assessment of professionalism in family medicine residents

Turning the mirror around

Jennifer L. Hall

MSc MD CCFP FCFP

A

ddressing professionalism within the medical field has been a priority over the past while. This evolved from events highlighted in the media but also from within our profession. At a fall 2015 meeting of the Canadian Medical Forum, which brings together lead- ers of national medical organizations to discuss issues of priority to physicians, their patients, and the health care system, professionalism was a topic of substantial dis- cussion. The Canadian Medical Association (CMA) dis- cussed their strategic initiative around professionalism.1 The CMA aims to define a progressive and values-based vision for medical professionalism through face-to-face and online engagement. The CMA noted that there was an overwhelming response to their e-panel on this topic, which will help inform their work. Many of the organi- zations believed that this was a high priority and were supportive. More broadly, a recent document from the Australian Medical Association highlights the challenges to medical professionalism, including the ever chang- ing modern health care environment, which has barriers such as bureaucracy, rising consumerism, and changing perceptions of the medical profession.2

These discussions led me to examine how we look at professionalism within our organization. I did not have to look far: I reviewed my worn copy of the evaluation objectives for daily use in assessing competence in profes- sionalism.3 This 2010 document describes the professional behaviour of family medicine residents working in our offices, hospitals, long-term care institutions, emergency departments, and patients’ homes. This document needs to be more broadly used. It is more than just an assess- ment tool for competency in this area. It describes how we value professionalism as family doctors, as practising family physicians were surveyed to describe this behaviour.

This document describes 12 themes of professionalism.3

• Day-to-day behaviour reassures one that the physi- cian is responsible, reliable, and trustworthy.

• The physician knows his or her limits of clinical com- petence and seeks help appropriately.

• The physician demonstrates a flexible, open-minded approach that is resourceful and deals with uncertainty.

• The physician evokes confidence without arrogance, and does so even when needing to obtain further information or assistance.

• The physician demonstrates a caring and compas- sionate manner.

• The physician demonstrates respect for patients in all ways, maintains appropriate boundaries, and is committed to patient well-being. This includes time management, availability, and a willingness to assess performance.

• The physician demonstrates respect for colleagues and team members.

• Day-to-day behaviour and discussion reassure one that the physician is ethical and honest.

• The physician practises evidence-based medicine skillfully. This implies not only critical appraisal and information-management capabilities, but incorporates appropriate learning from colleagues and patients.

• The physician displays a commitment to societal and community well-being.

• The physician displays a commitment to personal health and seeks balance between personal life and professional responsibilities.

• The physician demonstrates a mindful approach to practice by maintaining composure and equanim- ity, even in difficult situations, and by engaging in thoughtful dialogue about values and motives.

When I look at these themes and the observable behav- iour further described in the document,3 I reflect on how well they align with the 4 principles of family medicine and the expectations that patients have of us. This fits our societal obligation—our contract as public servants.

This theme has also come up as I have spoken with fam- ily medicine interest groups at medical schools. Students struggle in their career decisions, especially as they relate to personal expectations of family medicine. My message to this energetic, highly motivated group is that embody- ing these 12 themes of professionalism ensures that we meet patients’ needs by learning the right skills and adapt- ing them as their needs change and our interests develop.

Maybe I should print off a new copy of the themes of professionalism. I will continue to use it a lot. It is a good self-reflection tool—a mirror or lens to add to my own continuing professional development tool box.

references

1. Canadian Medical Association. CMA board of directors October 2015 meeting highlights.

Ottawa, ON: Canadian Medical Association; 2015.

2. Australian Medical Association. Medical professionalism 2010. Revised 2015. Canberra, Aust:

Australian Medical Association; 2015.

3. CFPC. Defining competence for the purposes of certification by the College of Family Physicians of Canada: the evaluation objectives in family medicine. Mississauga, ON: CFPC; 2010.

Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 182.

Références

Documents relatifs

Programs should use field notes (or equivalent) to gather qualitative comments on resident perfor- mance during daily clinical practice and should integrate them into their

Compared with IMGs who did not pass the MCCQE2, a larger proportion of IMGs who passed the examination were from the non-CSA–non-Western group, were female, were 30 years or

Based on a recent survey, a substantial number of family medicine residents in Canada would appreci- ate a podcast series addressing the 99 topics for CFPC Certifcation (R.A.O.. If

It is also not necessary, according to this principle, that the individual have insight or acceptance about the fact that his driving poses risk of harm—an aspect of the

Soon after I began as Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer, Lynn Dunikowski, Director of the Canadian Library of Family Medicine (CLFM), informed me that she planned

Of the 7 CanMEDS-FM roles, the role of scholar clearly identifies that family physicians “facilitate the education of their stu- dents, patients, colleagues, and others.” 15

1 Based largely on the work of the Educating Future Physicians of Ontario 2,3 and the Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists (CanMEDS) projects, 4,5 CanMEDS-FM is

Conclusion  By far most Canadian family medicine postgraduate training programs had learning objectives and designated faculty leads in ethics and professionalism, yet