A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
M. A SOREY
P. K. M ITTER
Cohomology of the Yang-Mills gauge orbit space and dimensional reduction
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 45, n
o1 (1986), p. 61-78
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1986__45_1_61_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1986, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
61
Cohomology of the Yang-Mills gauge orbit space and dimensional reduction
M. ASOREY
(1)
Departamento de Fisica Teorica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
P. K. MITTER
Universite de Paris VI, LPTHE (2), 4, place Jussieu,
Tour 16, 1 er etage, 75230 Paris Cedex 05, France
Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, ’
Vol. 45, n° 1, 1986, Physique , théorique ,
ABSTRACT. Let A be the gauge orbit space of pure
Yang-Mills theory
and
Z),
i =1, 2
be its first and secondcohomology
groups. Wegive
a differentialgeometric proof,
based on a dimensional reductionprocedure,
that certaincohomology
class onA,
obtainedby
a methoddue to
Atiyah
andSinger, give
the non-trivialgenerators
ofZ)
i =
1, 2
in cases where these groups are non-trivial. The dimensional reductionprocedure
is ageneralization
of the method used to obtain, the canonical formalism from the covariant one in thetemporal
gauge. The relation betweengenerating
forms ofH1(A, Z),
Chern-Simmons classes andglobal
gauge anomalies in odd dimensions is alsopointed
out in thelight
of this method.RESUME. Soit A
l’espace
des orbites dejauge
d’une theorie deYang-
Mills pure et
Z),
i =1, 2,
sonpremier
et son second groupe de coho-mologie.
On donne une demonstration degéométrie différentielle,
baseesur un
precede
de reductiondimensionnelle,
du fait que certaines classes(1) Partly supported by the CAICYT (Plan de Altas Energias).
(2) Laboratoire Associe au CNRS 280.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique - 0246-0211 Vol. 45/86/01/61/18/$ 3,80/(~) Gauthier-Villars
62 M. ASOREY AND P. K. MITTER
de
cohomologie
de~~1,
obtenues par une methode due aAtiyah
etSinger,
fournissent les
generateurs
non triviaux deZ),~
i =1, 2,
dans des casou ces groupes sont non triviaux. Le
procédé
de reduction dimensionnelle est unegeneralisation
de la methode utilisee pour obtenir Ie formalismecanonique
apartir
du formalisme covariant dans lajauge temporelle.
Onsignale aussi,
a la lumiere de cettemethode,
la relation entre les formesgeneratrices
deH1(A, Z),
les classes deChern-Simmons,
et les anomaliesde
jauge globales.
’1. INTRODUCTION
The
physical
relevance ofcohomological properties
of theYang-Mills
orbit space A has been
recently
stressed in two different contexts.First, Atiyah-Singer [4] (sec
also Stora[13 ])
havepointed
out the connectionbetween the non-abelian anomalies in even dimensions and the second
cohomology
groupH2(A, Z)
of A. On the other hand it has been shown that in the canonical Hamiltonianformalism,
the 8-vacuumphenomenon
can be
expressed
in terms of thegenerating
1-forms of the firstcohomology
group
H1(A, Z) [7] ] [J] ] [15 ].
In a similar way, thegenerating
2-forms ofH2(A, Z)
turn out to be very relevant for the canonical formalism ofYang-
Mills theories in 2 + 1 dimensions with a Chern-Simmons term
[2 [5] [15].
Let P be a smooth
principal SU(N)-bundle (N ~ 2)
on a compact smooth manifoldV, g0
the group ofpointed
gauge transformations and A the space of connections in P. Thecorresponding
orbit space is denoted In[4] ] Atiyah
andSinger
introduced theprincipal
bundle 7r :(P
xj~)/~ -~
V x A withSU(N)
as its structure group. Then the Chern classCr
of this bundlegives
an element ofH2r(V
xA,
TheKunneth formula and the
(known) cohomology
of V lead to elements ofH2r(~,~, ~),
...,[R).
In this paper we willshow, bydifferential geometric techniques,
for V =S2N- 2 (respectively
V =S2N-1)
that the
cocycles
inH2(A, [?) (respectively H1(A, [R))
constructedby
theabove
procedure
(r = N) are in fact generators of thosecohomology
groups.The
proof proceds
via a dimensional reductiontechnique
which gene- ralizes the standardapproach
to the canonical formalism in thetemporal
gauge
Ao
= 0. Thistechnique
establishes1)
a relation between thepoints
of the gauge orbit space when the initial base manifold is V x S 1 with closed curves in the orbit space when the initial base manifold is V
2)
arelation between closed
S2-surfaces
in the orbit spacecorresponding
to Vand
points
of the orbitspace corresponding
to V xS2.
The results are in agreement with those of[4] although
the method iscompletely
different.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
63 COHOMOLOGY OF THE YANG-MILLS GAUGE ORBIT SPACE
Our method should be
particularly palatable
tophysicists
with a back-ground
in differential geometry.We also
point
outby
this method the existence of a relation between thegenerating
1-forms ofH1(~~, 7),
theglobal
chiralanomaly
and theChern-Simmons terms in 2N - 1 dimensions.
The paper is
organized
as follows. In Section 2 we calculate the numberof connected components of the extended orbit space i. e. the number of
inequivalent principal
fibre bundles over V with gauge groupSU(N).
We also
point
out how thegenerating
functions ofZ)
can begiven
in terms of Chern numbers. Thecomputation
of thecohomology
groups
Z)
andH2(A, Z)
is carried out in Section 3 for some mani- folds V. Section 4 is devoted to theanalysis
of thegenerating
1-forms ofH1(A, Z) by
means of the dimensional reduction method for V =S2N-l
and S2 N - 2 x S 1. In Section 5 thegeneralization
of this method for two- dimensional surfaces ofA, provides
asimple proof
of non-exactness and the normalization of theexplicit expression
of thegenerating
2-formsof
Z)
for the case V =S2N- 2,
G =SU(N). Finally
theapplication
of the first
cohomology
groupH1(A, Z)
to thestudy
ofglobal
gauge anomalies in odd dimensionalspace-times
is considered in Section 6.Let us introduce some notation. We consider
only
four kinds of mani- folds V =Sn,
sn xS 1,
Sn xS2,
Sn x S 1 x S 1. Letdp
denote the space of connections defined in anyprincipal
fibre bundleP(V, SU(N)). ~p
thegroup of gauge transformations of P and
~
the normalsubgroup
of~p
which leaves fixed a
given point
of P. If we choose connections in the. dim V
Sobolev class k and gauge transformations in class k + 1 with k >
2
,then
dp
is an affiine Hilbert space, and~p
and~
Hilbert Lie groups. The orbit spacedefined
by
usual action of~p
onis a smooth
separable
paracompact Hilbert manifold[7] ] [9] ] [11 ].
_If we restrict ourselves to the space of irreducible connections
~P
and~p
is thequotient
of~p by
its centerZ(~p) ~ ZN,
then the orbit space _is also a smooth
separable
paracompact Hilbert[7] ] [9] ] [11 ]. Moreover,
are
principal
fibre bundles[7] ] [7] ] [9] ] [77].
64 M. ASOREY AND P. K. MITTER
2. THE EXTENDED ORBIT SPACE
For any
principal
bundleP(V, SU(N))
theorbit
space is aconnected manifold because is so and the is closed
[9 ].
Then, Z) =
Z. It is obvious that the orbit spaces ofequivalent principal
bundles arediffeomorphic.
Let[P] denote
the class ofprincipal
fibre bundles
equivalent
to P.The extend orbit space
is defined
by
thedisjoint
union of the orbit spaces of the differentequiva-
valence classes of
principal
fibre bundles on V with the same gauge groupSU(N).
It is believed that an
(extended)
orbit space is thephysical configuration
space in the Euclidean
approach
to ContinuumQuantum Yang-Mills theory.
In
general
is notconnected,
and the number of its connectedcomponents
is the cardinal of the setH 1 (V, SU(N))
of classes ofprincipal
fibre bundles on V with gauge group
SU(N).
Now, as is well known[72] ]
where
BSU(N)
is theclassifying
space of the Lie groupSU(N)
and[V, BSU(N) ] is
the set of classes ofhomotopy equivalent
maps of V intoBSU(N).
Since the total space of the universal bundle onBSU(N)
is con-tractible
7~t(SU(N)).
Thus.Let us consider some
particular
cases. If V = 1 xS 1, (2 . 3) implies
that
for N ~ 2. The
corresponding
classes ofprincipal
fibre bundles are clas-sified
by
the Chern-numberN
where n denotes the N-fo!d exterior
product.
Annales de Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique .
65 COHOMOLOGY OF THE YANG-MILLS GAUGE ORBIT SPACE
is the curvature of any connection A
of P,
and XN is the normalized invariantN-polynomial
of the Liealgebra
ofSU(N) [4 ].
In the same way. one getsfor N > 2. which
corresponds
to the Chern numbers andand the
SU(2)-principal
fibre bundles on S2 x S1 x S1 and S2 x S2 arecompletely
classifiedby C2(P).
Sincefor N > 2. the
corresponding
bundles are labeledby CB ( P). Finally.
and
The above results also hold for the extended orbit spaces associated with
They
are summarized inPROPOSITION 2.1. The
0-cohomology
groups of the extended orbit spaces on xSB
S2N- 2 XS2~ S2N- 2
with gauge groupSU(N) (N > 2
aregiven by
The
corresponding generating
functions aregiven by
thefollowing
Chern numbers
66 M. ASOREY AND P. K. MITTER
3. COHOMOLOGY OF THE ORBIT SPACE
The real
cohomology
groups~)
of any orbit spaceAp
can be obtainedby
means of Thom’s theorem[3 ].
The Poincare series ofHP
is definedby
Since
dp
iscontractible,
is aclassifying
space for~
andwhere
Map (V, BSU(N))
denotes the set ofpointed
maps whichpull-back
the universal bundle on B
SU(N)
to theprincipal
bundle P on V.Now,
over the rationals
[3 ]. Thus,
Mapo (V,
BSU(N)) ~ Mapo (V, K(Z, 4)
x ... xK(Z, 2N)) (3 . 4)
and
according
to Thom’s theoremIn
special
cases,using
the known realcohomology of Eilenberg-MacLane
spaces we obtain
PROPOSITION 3.1. For any
principal
bundleP(V, SU(N)),
onProof :
The Poincare series(3 . 6)-(3 . 8) imply
that = [R andIR)
= 0 for V =IR)
= 0 and~) _ ~8
forV =
S2N-2,
and[?) =
IR and for V = xSl.
Now the
cohomology
groupsZ)
with theinteger
coefficients differ from theinteger
submoduli of~) only by
the torsion.But,
in thisAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
67 COHOMOLOGY OF THE YANG-MILLS GAUGE ORBIT SPACE
case, since
Ap
is connected = is torsionless because is so.On the other hand the exact sequence of
homomorphisms
of abeliangauge group
induces the exact sequence of
cohomology
groupsNow, by
theproperties
ofcohomology
groups~)
= Hom~), U( 1 ))
= Hom(7~ (~p), U( 1 ))
and since is
torsionless, j1
issurjective
anda 1
is trivial.Thus, i2
isinjective,
whichimplies
that is also torsionless and coincides with the submoduli ofinteger
elements ofII
Throughout
we considercohomology
groups of the Cechcohomology theory. However,
since M is a paracompact(Hausdorff)
manifold all sheafcohomology
theories areisomorphic.
Inparticular,
isisomorphic
to thecorresponding
De Rhamcohomology
group.It is easy to show that
proposition
3.1 also holds for The difference between thecohomology
groups of and~~P
appearsonly
forhigher
orders. Since the results do not
depend
either on theprincipal
fibre bundleP(V, SU(N))
hereafter we shalldrop
thesub-script
P in the notation fordp
and~.
As remarked in
[4] ]
Chern-Weiltheory
for theprincipal
bundle(P
x xA, SU(N)) together
with the Kunneth formulagive,
inparticular,
elements in~)
andH2(A, [R).
Let us consider a
given
connection co in~)
and the induced connection 5 of(P
x xA, SU(N))
definedby
for x
j~)/~
xj~)/~
whereand T E are the
respective
components of any lift WE xj~)
of w..Then,
the Chern-Weiltheory
and Kunneth formula lead to forms Q1 and Q2 on definedby
68 M. ASOREY AND P. K. MITTER
for any
[A E ~,
i, r~ E where e is the curvature of OJih
are the horizontal lifts
of ~
and r with respect to (X).REMARK 3 . 2. The form 03A91 was
already
considered in[7] ]
for theanalysis
of ()-vacua in the canonical formalism ofYang-Mills
theories. Inthe same way Sz2 appears in the
study
of the canonical formalism of effectiveYang-Mills
theories in 3 dimensions with a Chern-Simmons term in theLagrangian [2 ].
We shall now show that 03A91 and 02 are
generators
of thecohomology
groups
H1(A, Z), Z)
when V =S2N-1
and V =S2N-2, respectively.
4. MAGNETIC 1-FORMS
We have shown in the
preceding
section that for V =S2N- 2
x S1 orS2N- 1 and
G = SU(N),
the firstcohomology
groupZ)=Z.
We shallshow that the
magnetic
form 01(3.11)
is in thegenerating
class of thiscohomology
group[1 ].
PROPOSITION 4.1. The
magnetic
form S21 is a closed 1-form ofProof
- Let Q1 = be thepull-back by
theprojection
map~ : j~ -~ A. It is sufficient to show that Q1 is closed. Once a connection
Ao
in ~ is
chosen,
~ ~ r(ad
P (8)A 1 (V)).
be any Hilbert basisofr(adP0A’(V)).Then
Since for any t E IR
we have
Thus,
the exterior differential of the 1-formQ1
isgiven by
Now,
since for any ai, i =1, ..., N,
LieSU(N)-valued
tensorialmi-forms
defined in
P(V, SU(N))
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique ’ theorique ’
69
COHOMOLOGY OF THE YANG-MILLS GAUGE ORBIT SPACE
and
Then,
which vanishes because of the Bianchi
identity dAF(A)
= 0 and the Stokestheorem. This means that
fi1
is closed. In the same way it can be shown that Q1 is horizontal with respect to any connection ofPROPOSITION 4.2. The
magnetic
form Q1 is not exact, and itbelongs
to the
generating cohomology
class ofH1(A, Z)
= Z.Proof.
2014 We have shown in Section 2 that theequivalence
classes ofprincipal
fibre bundles xSB SU(N))
are labeledby
the Chern num-bers In the same way it can be shown that any
principal
fibre bundleon S2N-1 with gauge group
SU(N)
is trivial. LetPt(S2N-1 x {t},SU(N)),
t E
[0,2yc ]
be theprincipal
fibre bundles obtainedby
the restriction of abundle P with = n to
x {~}).
For any t E[0,27r], Pt
isa trivial bundle. The orbit space of connections
x {0 }, SU(N))
is
diffeomorphic
to ~.Let B be a connection of P such that its restriction to
7~( {(1,0, ..., 0)}
x istrivial,
andbe the fibre bundle
isomorphism
establishedby
theparallel
transport with respect to Balong
the curvessuch that
(x, s),
0 ~ 5 ~ t. LetB(t)
denote the connection ofPo
obtainedby pull-back through L~
of the restriction of B toPt.
SinceL2n
is anautomorphism ofPo,
whichimplies
that[B(~)] is
a closed(differentiable)
curve in A. LetA(t)
be the horizontal lift of an with respectto any connection (D of
~o)
withA(O)
=B(O).
Since
A(t)
andB(t)
are two lifts of the same closed curve an of ~~ therealways
exists a(differentiable)
curveC(t)
in ~ such thatC(O)
=A(27r)
and70 M. ASOREY AND P. K. MITTER
C(2rc) = B(2~c)
which liescompletely
in the fibre over[A(0)].
Since 01 is horizontal and
C(t)
is a vertical vector we havefor any t ~ [0, 203C0] and
oAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique ’ theorique ’
COHOMOLOGY OF THE YANG-MILLS GAUGE ORBIT SPACE 71
This proves that Q1 is not exact. Moreover since
along
any closed curve[A(t)] constructed
in such a way is aninteger,
and for anyinteger n
there exists a curve[A(t)] closed
in such that = n,we can conclude that Q1 is in the
generating cohomology
classZ).
If V =
S2N - 2
xS 1,
theprincipal
fibre bundles over V xS 1
are classifiedby
the Chern numbers andCN-i(P)
and those over Vby
In such a case the
proof proceeds
in a similar wayby choosing
a bundleover V x S 1 whose Chern number
CN-1(P)
isequal
to that of the bundleover V where the connections of j~ are defined. The results for the orbit space ~~ are obtained in a similar way.
We have also shown :
COROLLARY 4. 3. The closed curve a1 :
[0,27r] -~
Acorresponding
to n =1 defined in the above
proof
is in thegenerating homology
class ofand in the first
homotopy
class of5. ULTRAMONOPOLE 2-FORMS
In Section 3 we have shown that for V =
S2N- 2
and G =SU(N), H2(~~, ~) _
Z. We shall show that theultramonopole
2-form Q2(3.12)
on the orbit space .
~~,
is in thegenerating
class ofZ).
PROPOSITION 5.1. - Q2 is a closed 2-form of N.
- It t is sufficient to show that the
pull-back
of 03A92
by
theprojection
map 7c: A ~ A is closed.Let {
La be a Hilbertbasis of A.
Then,
for any 03B11, a2, a3 EN,
because
Vol. 45, n° 1-1986.
72 M. ASOREY AND P. K. MITTER
Now,
because of the gauge invariance of theright
hand side of(3.12)
It is easy to show that
when the symmetry
properties
of XN and the Bianchiidentity
of co havebeen taken into account.
Now, by using (4.7)
and the Bianchiidentity dAF(A)
=0,
we obtainwhich vanishes because of the Stokes
theorem. II
PROPOSITION 5.2. The
ultramonopole
2-form Q2 is not exact and isa generator of the second
cohomology
groupH2(A, Z)
= Z.Proof.
2014 Let T :S2 ~
A be a differentiable map in thegenerating
classof the second
homotopy
group~cl(~°) _ n2N-1(SU(N)) =
~LLet a :
(0,2~ -~ S~ - {(0,0,1)}
be aparametrization
of theS2 sphere
without its north
pole,
definedby composition
of the1/z
coordinates(s, t)
of the open disc
1)2 = ~ x
E1} ~
~2 with the inverse of thestereographic
map. This map a can be extended to the natural mapLet A be a
given
connection in the fibre over[A] = (7(0,0,1).
We defineA(s, to)
as the horizontal lift withrespect
to the curveto)
of A suchthat
A(O, to)
= A(see Fig. 2).
Annales de Poincaré - Physique theorique
COHOMOLOGY OF THE YANG-MILLS GAUGE ORBIT SPACE 73
Let be the elements of ~° defined
by
The closed curve L in ~
belongs
to thegenerating
class of becauseof the exact sequence of
homotopy
groupsLet us consider a
principal
fibre bundleP 2N(S2N - 2
XS2~ SU(N))
such thatand let B be any connection of
P2N’
Recall that P is theprincipal
bundlewhere the connections of j~ are defined. Parallel transport with respect
to B
along
the curvesa(s, to)
induces afamily 03C6(s, t)
ofisomorphisms
of fibrebundles
Vol. 45, n° 1-1986.
74 M. ASOREY AND P. K. MITTER
where
x { ~}, SU(N))
is thefamily
ofprincipal
fibre bundles obtainedby
the restriction ofP 2N(S2N - 2
xBecause of
(5. 8),
P and the closed curvet)
of ~obelongs
to the
generating
class of too. Let us choose a connectionBo
inP2N
such that the
corresponding
mapst)
coincide with~(t).
The existenceof such a connection is obvious.
Let -~ be the
isomorphism
of fibre bundlesgiven by
for any M E
Then,
we define a new connectionB1
inP2N
such that for any vu ETuP2N
with =
(x, ~))
where
vu N - 2 and vu
are the componentsof vu
defined as follows.By
definition the connection
Bo
induces asplitting
ofTuP2N, vu
=vu
and
vu
=+ vu
alsosplits
because of theproduct
structure of thebase manifold S2N-2 x
S2.
Let vt be the t-component of in thesplitting
of inducedby
the coordinates(s, t)
when s, t 7~0,27r.
In the case s, t =
0, 27r,
vt ==7r~(~~).
vt denotes the real numbergiven by vt~t
= vt. It is easy toverify
thatB 1
as defined above is aglobal
continuousconnection in
Let
~:S~’~-{(0,...,(U)} -~
be a maximal cross-section of P. This section can be extended to a maximal cross-section
11 : (S2N- ~-{(0,...,0,l)})x(S~-{(0,OJ)})~P2NofP2Nby parallel
trans-port with respect to B
i along
the curvesa(s,
The definitionofiJ
isgiven by:
for any
(x, t))
E(S~-~ - {(0, ..., 0,1) })
x(S~ - {(0,0,1) }).
In thisgauge
B1,x
=r~ *A(s, t),
= 0 andB1,t
=cv(atA(s, t)) ~ r~ by
constructionof ~ and B1.
Since =
1,
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique theorique "
75 COHOMOLOGY OF THE YANG-MILLS GAUGE ORBIT SPACE
Now,
sinceand
which shows that Q2 is not exact and
belongs
to thegenerating
class ofH2(A, Z).
REMARK 5 . 3. The
pull-back
of the restriction of the connectionB 1
toSU(N)) through
the map~-1(s, t)
isby
definitionA(s, t).
In this way the S2-surtace 6 of ~ isnaturally
associated toBi.
Notice that~(s, to)
can beitself defined in terms of It is the map induced
by parallel
transport with respect to the connectionB 1 along
the curvesto). Hence,
this dimensional reduction method leads to acorrespondence
between maps of S2 into A and connections ofP2N.
Thiscorrespondence
can also bederived from the Narasimhan-Ramanan theorem
[8 ],
which shows thesurjective
character of the mapdefined
by pull-back
of the universalconnection Ao
of the universal bundleE(BSU(N), SU(N)),
i. e. Let denote the subset of the extended orbit space definedby
the orbits of connections of fibre bundlesP2N(S2
xV, SU(N))
whose Chern class isequal
toand
MapsP0(S2
xV, BSU(N))
the set ofpointed
maps S2 x V ~BSU(N)
such that for any a E S2 the map V2014~
BSU(N)
definedby
induces the bundle P
by pull-back
from E.Then,
if we define the correspon- denceby
for any
Kc
does coincide with thecorrespondence
obtained
by
means of the dimensional reductionmethod.
Vol. 45, n° 1-1986.
76 M. ASOREY AND P. K. MITTER
6. APPLICATION TO GAUGE ANOMALIES
We have
already
mentioned in the Introduction the relevance of themagnetic
andultramonopole
forms Q1 andrespectively,
for the Hamil-tonian formulation of the quantum
theory
ofYang-Mills
fields in 3 + 1dimensions with a 8-vacuum term in the
Lagrangian
and 2 + 1 dimensions with a Chern-Simmons one[7] ] [2] ] [5] ] [15 ].
On the other hand
Atiyah-Singer [4] and
Stora[7~] ]
have shown the existence of a relation between theultramonopole
formQ2
and the non-abelian gauge anomalies in We shall show the existence of a similar
relationship
between themagnetic
form Q1 and theglobal
anomalies in S2N - 1.Since ja~ is
contractible,
S21 is notonly
a closed 1-form but also an exact form. LetAo
be a fixed connection ofj~,
and defineAt
=Ao
+t(A - Ao)
for any A e -c~ and 0 ~ t ~ 1.
PROPOSITION 6.1.
2014 Any
real function Z defined on Averifying
that3Z = S21 is
equal
to the Chern-Simmons function .modulo a constant.
Moreover,
the restriction ofWAo
to the fibre[Ao] ]
of j~ is a non trivial element of
H°( [Ao L Z) =
Z.Proof.
The first statement is a consequence of the Poincare lemma.In
fact,
for any vector r of thetangent
spaceTA~
Thus, Z(A))
= 0 andWAo(A)
= + C because ~ isconnected. Since Q1 is horizontal with respect to any connection OJ of
j~(~~),
the restriction ofWAo(A)
to[A] ]
islocally
constant i. e.=
Q’(r)
= 0 for any r; = Since =0, WAo
vanishesin the connected
component
of[Ao],
which containsAo.
For any other connection A in the fibre[Ao],
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique ’ theorique ’
COHOMOLOGY OF THE YANG-MILLS GAUGE ORBIT SPACE 77
because
[At ]
is a closed curve of A andby Proposi-
tion
4 . 2.
Let E be the vector bundle associated to the fundamental
representation
of
SU(N),
S thespin
bundle over S2N-1 and0A : COO(S
QE) ~ COO(S
@E)
the
corresponding
Dirac operator.PROPOSITION 6 . 2
[6] ] [7~].2014The (-function
renormalized determinant of the Dirac operator isgiven by
where ø
is a gauge invariant function.For
completness
wegive
aproof :
Proof
2014 It isgeneralization
of the Wittenanalysis
for theZ2-anomaly
in four dimensions
[14 ].
In this caseproposition
3 .1implies
thatH2(A, Z)
= 0.Thus,
the non-abelian local gaugeanomaly
vanishes[4 ],
which
implies
that the restriction ofdet DA
to[A] is locally
constant.However,
it is notglobally
constant. Infact,
thespectral
flow of detalong
afamily
of connectionsAt
isgiven by
the index of the Dirac opera- torDp
over S2N-1 xS1,
Bbeing
the connection associated toAt
in theproof
ofproposition
4 . 2[6] ] [10 ].
Nowby
the index theoremTherefore,
the number ofeigenvalues
ofD+A0
whichchange
theirsign
when
At
goes fromAo
to A isWAo(A). Thus,
the(-function
renormalized determinantFor any other fibre
[A] ]
of j~ we choose a connectionA 1
E[A] ]
anddefine = - +
log
detThen,
the derivation of(6 . 3)
for any connection in
[A1] can
be obtained in the same way as(6 . 5) by substituing A 1
forAo. II
Finally
we remarkthat, by
means of the dimensional reduction methods used in theproofs Propositions 4.2, 5.2,
6.1 and6.2,
similar results canbe obtained for the first and second
cohomology
groups of the orbits spaces associated to differentspace-time
manifolds such asT2N-1, T2N - 2,
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank R. Stora for
interesting
conversations on anomalies and coho-mology.
P. K. M. thanks M. S. Narasimhan for ahelpful
conversation.Vol. 45, n° 1-1986.
78 M. ASOREY AND P. K. MITTER
[1] M. ASOREY, P. K. MITTER, CERN preprint TH 3424, 1982.
[2] M. ASOREY, P. K. MITTER, Phys. Lett., t. 153 B, 1985, p. 147.
[3] M. ATIYAH, R. BOTT, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (London), t. 308 A, 1982, p. 523.
[4] M. ATIYAH, I. M. SINGER, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., t. 81, 1984, p. 2597.
[5] R. JACKIW, in: E. Fradkin Festchrift, ed. A. Hilger, Bristol, 1985 (to be published)
and in Proceedings of the N. Bohr Centenial Symposium, North Holland (to be published), MIT preprint CTP 1254.
[6] J. LOTT, Phys. Lett., t. 145 B, 1984, p. 179.
[7] P. K. MITTER, C. M. VIALLET, Commun. Math. Phys., t. 79, 1981, p. 457.
[8] M. S. NARASIMHAN, S. RAMANAN, Amer. J. Math., t. 83, 1961, p. 563.
[9] M. S. NARASIMHAN, T. R. RAMADAS, Commun. Math. Phys., t. 67, 1979, p. 21.
[10] A. N. REDLICH, Phys. Rev. Lett., t. 52, 1984, p. 18.
[11] I. M. SINGER, Commun. Math. Phys., t. 60, 1978, p. 7.
[12] N. STEENROD, Topology of Fibre Bundles, Princeton, 1951.
[13] R. STORA, in: Progress in Gauge Field Theory, eds. G’t Hooft et al., Plenum, N. Y., 1984.
[14] E. WITTEN Phys. Lett., t. 117 B, 1982, p. 324.
[15] V. S. Wu, A. ZEE, University of Washington preprint 40048-38P 4, 1984.
( Manuscrit reçu le 26 novembre 1985)
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique ’ theorique ’