• Aucun résultat trouvé

1111: Linear Algebra I Dr. Vladimir Dotsenko (Vlad) Lecture 18

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "1111: Linear Algebra I Dr. Vladimir Dotsenko (Vlad) Lecture 18"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

1111: Linear Algebra I

Dr. Vladimir Dotsenko (Vlad) Lecture 18

Change of coordinates

LetV be a vector space of dimensionn, and lete1, . . . , en andf1, . . . , fn be two different bases ofV. Then we can compute coordinates of each vectorvwith respect to either of those bases, so that

v=x1e1+· · ·+xnen

and

v=y1f1+· · ·+ynfn.

Our goal now is to figure out how these are related. For that, we shall need the notion of a transition matrix.

Definition 1. Let us express the vectorsf1, . . . , fn as linear combinations ofe1, . . . , en: f1=a11e1+a21e2+· · ·+am1em,

f2=a12e1+a22e2+· · ·+am2em, . . .

fn=a1ne1+a2ne2+· · ·+amnem.

The matrix (aij) is called the transition matrix from the basise1, . . . , en to the basis f1, . . . , fn. Its k-th column is the column of coordinates of the vectorfk relative to the basise1, . . . , en.

Lemma 1. In the notation above, we have

 x1

x2

... xn

=

a11 a12 . . . a1n

a21 a22 . . . a2n

... . . .. ... an1 an2 . . . ann

 y1

y2

... yn

 .

In plain words, if we call e1, . . . , en the “old basis” and f1, . . . , fn the “new basis”, then this system tells us that the product of the transition matrix with the columns of new coordinates of a vector is equal to the column of old coordinates.

Proof. The proof is fairly straightforward: we take the formula v=y1f1+· · ·+ynfn,

and substitute instead offi’s their expressions in terms ofej’s:

f1=a11e1+a21e2+· · ·+am1em, f2=a12e1+a22e2+· · ·+am2em,

. . .

fn=a1ne1+a2ne2+· · ·+amnem.

1

(2)

What we get is

y1(a11e1+a21e2+· · ·+an1en)+y2(a12e1+a22e2+· · ·+an2en)+. . .+yn(a1ne1+a2ne2+· · ·+annen) =

= (a11y1+a12y2+· · ·+a1nyn)e1+· · ·+ (an1y1+an2y2+· · ·+annyn)en.

Since we know that coordinates are uniquely defined, we conclude that a11y1+a12y2+· · ·+a1nyn=x1,

. . .

an1y1+an2y2+· · ·+annyn =xn,

which is what we want to prove.

If we denote, for a vectorv, the column of coordinates ofvwith respect to the basise1, . . . , en byve, and also denote the transition matrix from the basise1, . . . , en to the basisf1, . . . , fnbyMe,f, then the previous result can be written as

ve=Me,fvf.

Lemma 2. We have

Me,fMf,g=Me,g and

Me,fMf,e=In

if dim(V) =n.

Proof. Applying the formula above twice, we have

ve=Me,fvf =Me,fMf,gvg.

But we also have

ve=Me,gvg. Therefore

Me,fMf,gvg=Me,gvg

for everyvg. From our previous classes we know that knowing Avfor all vectors v completely determines the matrixA, soMe,fMf,g=Me,gas required. Since manifestly we haveMe,e=In, we conclude by letting gk=ek, k=1, . . . , n, thatMe,fMf,e =In.

Linear maps and transformations

Definition 2. Suppose thatV and W are two vector spaces. A functionf: V →W is said to be a linear map, or alinear operator, if

• forv1, v2∈V, we havef(v1+v2) =f(v1) +f(v2),

• forc∈R,v∈V, we havef(c·v) =c·f(v).

A linear map from a vector spaceVto the same vector space is said to be a linear transformation ofV.

Example 1. As we know, every linear mapϕ: Rn →Rk is given by ak×n-matrixA, so thatϕ(x) =Ax.

2

(3)

Example 2. LetVbe the vector space of all polynomials in one variablex. Consider the functionX:V→V that maps every polynomialf(x)toxf(x). This is a linear transformation ofV:

x(f1(x) +f2(x)) =xf1(x) +xf2(x), x(cf(x)) =c(xf(x)).

LetPn be the vector space of all polynomials in one variablexof degree at mostn. Then the ruleXas above defines a linear map :Pn →Pn+1. (Note that the target of ϕ has to be different, since multiplying byxincreases degrees).

Example 3. LetVbe the vector space of all polynomials in one variablex. Consider the functionD:V→V that maps every polynomialf(x)tof0(x). This is a linear map:

(f1(x) +f2(x))0=f10(x) +f20(x), (cf(x))0=cf0(x).

The function D define both a linear map :Pn → Pn−1, and a linear transformation of Pn (since the degree of the derivative of a polynomial of degreeat most nisat most n−1).

3

Références

Documents relatifs

This shows that after many iterations, each vector is sent to (approximately) a vector with equal coordinates, so the distribution of porridge is closer and closer to equal. For 4,

In the end of module 1111, we discussed making a matrix of a linear transformation diagonal, using a basis of eigenvectors (when exists).. The main question that we shall address

These two threads together contain four vectors, so since our space is 4-dimensional, we have

From our proof, one sees that for computing the Jordan normal form and a Jordan basis of a linear trans- formation ϕ on a vector space V, one can use the following plan:.. • Find

Given 101 coins of various shapes and denominations, one knows that if you remove any one coin, the remaining 100 coins can be divided into two groups of 50 of equal total weight..

For a matrix A, the dimension of the solution space to the system of equations Ax = 0 is equal to the number of free unknowns, that is the number of columns of the reduced row

In some sense, this is a central result about linear maps (which also justifies the definition of matrix products).

In this module, we shall be using extensively notions and methods from the module 1111.. Please consult the notes for that module when you