Assessing the potential of microsatellite markers
to infer origin and movements of locust swarms:
the case studies of
L. migratoria
in Madagascar
and
C. terminifera
in Australia
Chapuis MP, Loiseau A, Popple JA, Michalakis Y, Lecoq M, Franc A, McCulloch L, Simpson S, Estoup AE, Sword G
Introduction
Locusta migratoria
in Madagascar1992-1996 1997 1998 Sugar Cane Outbreaks : 1006 individuals/swarm Remissions : 1-100 individuals/hectare
Introduction
-Chortoicetes terminifera
in AustraliaOutbreaks
Introduction
Preventative control strategy
Malagasy National Anti-Locust Center (CNA)
Australian Plague Locust Commission (APLC)
- monitoring locust populations (locust surveys and light trap information)
- forecasting (meteorological, habitat, and density data) - early controls (chemical and biological)
Introduction
Need for a better understanding of the spatial population
dynamics in the early outbreak stage
- limits of direct ecological approaches because of the great dispersal ability of locusts
- population genetics may be an useful alternative
WHAT IS THE POTENTIAL OF APPLICATION OF
POPULATION GENETICS TO THE MANAGEMENT
OF SWARMING LOCUSTS?
Introduction
The genetic approaches might lack resolution for low
genetic differentiation among populations
- Demographic effect = outbreaking populations experience demographic flushes
Æ large number of effective migrants
- Behavioural effect = outbreaking insects travel together in migratory bands of nymphs and fly large distances in swarms of adults
M&M - Sampling C. terminifera in Australia L. migratoria in Madagascar 2006-2007 > 50 populations 10 loci 2001-2004 12 populations 14 loci
Presence of null alleles
M&M - Microsatellite markersL. migratoria in Madagascar Æ
from 32 loci, 47% excluded by pre-testing from 14 remaining loci, 13% of null alleles
C. terminifera in Australia Æ
from 33 loci, 59% excluded by pre-testing from 10 remaining loci, 22% of null alleles
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 A B C D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 A B C D E
Null genotypes and heterozygote deficiencies 3’TTTCATCCTCCTAAATCGGA5’ 5’TGTAAACGACGGCCAGTGAT…(GT)n… AATGTAGGAGGATTTAGCCT3’ binding site 2 Repeat region binding site 1 primer
×
M&M - Microsatellite markers
Presence of null alleles
– HOW DO I ANALYSE DATA?
- Null alleles bias
- Efficiency of the method for correcting genotype datasets
INA
correction Æ 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Dempster et al. 1977Null allele frequency ˆ
r
Allocating a single new allele state common to all
genotyped populations Estimating null allele frequency ˆr
Adjusting allele and genotype frequencies based on ˆr
Traditionnaly used estimator of genetic variation among populations
Presence of null alleles M&M - Microsatellite markers
F
ST(Weir 1996)
-0.05 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45 0.01 0.1 1 10Number of migrants per
generation
Absence of null alleles
Null allele frequency > 0.20
Estimating
F
ST by excluding null allele stateENA
correction -0.05 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45 0.01 0.1 1 10 -0.05 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45 0.01 0.1 1 10INA
correction Æ FreeNA software Panmixia is assumed ! http://www.montpellier.inra.fr/URLB/M&M - Microsatellite markers Presence of null alleles
Delineating clusters of population samples:
BAPS (Corander
et al. 2003)
Number of migrants per generation
% correct
population
structures
0 20 40 60 80 100 1 2 3 4 5Absence of null alleles
Null alleles: r ≈ 0.20 0 20 40 60 80 100 1 2 3 4 5 INA correction 0 20 40 60 80 100 1 2 3 4 5
C. terminifera in Australia
* A single genetic cluster of populations
* Global FST{ENA} = 0.001 [-0.002 - 0.004] Results L. migratoria in Madagascar * Global FST{ENA} = 0.002 [0.000 - 0.004] * A single genetic cluster of populations
Comparative study in
L. migratoria
ResultsÆ
absence or low levels of genetic differentiation are partlyassociated with outbreaks
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
Madagascar China Western Europe
ns
P
= 0.0001Value per locus
Value for the 14 loci
Conclusions
Homogenizing effect of outbreaks at a wide scale
Æ Lack of resolution to detect migrants and infer their origin
Perspectives
Æ integrating other type of data, such as demographic, behavioural, or environmental data
Æ use of genetic linkage disequilibrium information (e.g. Bayesian methods of Gaggiotti et al. 2002, 2004)